Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Hadron-quark hybrid model, modular transformation, and Roberge-Weiss transition

Hiroaki Kouno1,*, Riki Oshima1,†, Motoi Tachibana1,2,‡, and Kouji Kashiwa3,§

  • *Contact author: kounoh@cc.saga-u.ac.jp
  • †Contact author: 24804001@edu.cc.saga-u.ac.jp
  • ‡Contact author: motoi@cc.saga-u.ac.jp
  • §Contact author: kashiwa@fit.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. D 111, 014026 – Published 27 January, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.014026

Abstract

In the framework of modular transformations, we reformulate the recently proposed hadron-quark hybrid model when the imaginary baryonic chemical potential is introduced. In this case, the number density of the hybrid model is obtained by the modular transformation of the complex number densities of the baryons (antibaryons) and the quarks (antiquarks). We can regard these number densities as the basis in the complex plane. As a result, we can consider the torus, which is characterized by the basis. Since the complex structure of the torus is invariant under the modular transformation, we can extract the topological property of the hadron-quark system using the untransformed baryon (antibaryon) and the quark (antiquark) number densities. We apply this model to analyze the Roberge-Weiss transition. It is shown that the torus vanishes at the baryonic chemical potential where the Roberge-Weiss transition appears because the number density of baryons (antibaryons) is not linearly independent of the number density of quarks (antiquarks). When the temperature T is lower than the Roberge-Weiss transition temperature TRW, the torus shrinks smoothly to the one-dimensional object at the Roberge-Weiss transition point, but the discontinuity does not appear. On the other hand, the discontinuity of the geometrical object appears when T>TRW. We also calculate the modulus of the torus and transform it into the fundamental region. The transformed moduli are symmetric below TRW, but the symmetry is broken above TRW.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (30)

  1. K. Fukushima and T. Hatsuda, Rep. Prog. Phys. 74, 014001 (2011).
  2. P. de Forcrand, Proc. Sci. LAT2009 (2009) 010 [arXiv:1005.0539].
  3. K. Nagata, Soryusironkenkyu 31, 1 (2020); Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 127, 103991 (2022).
  4. P. de Forcrand and O. Philipsen, Nucl. Phys. B642, 290 (2002).
  5. M. D’Elia and M.-P. Lombardo, Phys. Rev. D 67, 014505 (2003).
  6. M. D’Elia and M.-P. Lombardo, Phys. Rev. D 70, 074509 (2004).
  7. H.-S. Chen and X.-Q. Luo, Phys. Rev. D 72, 034504 (2005).
  8. M. D’Elia and F. Sanfilippo, Phys. Rev. D 80, 111501 (2009).
  9. Y. Sakai, K. Kashiwa, H. Kouno, M. Matsuzaki, and M. Yahiro, Phys. Rev. D 79, 096001 (2009).
  10. A. Roberge and N. Weiss, Nucl. Phys. B275, 734 (1986).
  11. C. Bonati, M. D’Elia, M. Mariti, M. Mesiti, F. Negro, and F. Sanfilippo, Phys. Rev. D 93, 074504 (2016).
  12. F. Cuteri, J. Goswami, F. Karsch, A. Lahiri, M. Neumann, O. Philipsen, C. Schmidt, and A. Sciarra, Phys. Rev. D 106, 014510 (2022).
  13. C. Bonati, E. Calore, M. D’Elia, M. Mesiti, F. Negro, F. Sanfilippo, S. F. Schifano, G. Silvi, and R. Tripiccione, Phys. Rev. D 99, 014502 (2019).
  14. Y. Sakai, K. Kashiwa, H. Kouno, and M. Yahiro, Phys. Rev. D 77, 051901 (2008).
  15. H. Kouno, Y. Sakai, K. Kashiwa, and M. Yahiro, J. Phys. G 36, 115010 (2009).
  16. H. Kouno and K. Kashiwa, Phys. Rev. D 109, 054007 (2024).
  17. A. Dumitru and R. D. Pisarski, Phys. Rev. D 66, 096003 (2002).
  18. K. Fukushima, Phys. Lett. B 591, 277 (2004).
  19. C. Ratti, M. A. Thaler, and W. Weise, Phys. Rev. D 73, 014019 (2006).
  20. S. K. Ghosh, T. K. Mukherjee, M. G. Mustafa, and R. Ray, Phys. Rev. D 73, 114007 (2006).
  21. E. Megias, E. Ruiz Arriola, and L. L. Salcedo, Phys. Rev. D 74, 065005 (2006).
  22. S. Rößner, C. Ratti, and W. Weise, Phys. Rev. D 75, 034007 (2007).
  23. K. Kashiwa, H. Kouno, M. Matsuzaki, and M. Yahiro, Phys. Lett. B 662, 26 (2008).
  24. Y. Sakai, T. Sasaki, H. Kouno, and M. Yahiro, Phys. Rev. D 82, 076003 (2010).
  25. K. Kashiwa, Symmetry 11, 562 (2019).
  26. S. Kikuchi, T. Kobayashi, M. Tanimoto, and H. Uchida, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 113B07 (2022).
  27. R. Oshima, H. Kouno, and K. Kashiwa, arXiv:2311.14306.
  28. T. Hirakida, K. Kashiwa, J. Sugano, J. Takahashi, H. Kouno, and M. Yahiro, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35, 2050049 (2020).
  29. K. Kashiwa, T. Hirakida, and H. Kouno, Symmetry 14, 1783 (2022).
  30. M. Nakahara, Geometry, Topology and Physics (Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol and Philadelphia, 2003).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation