Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Roberge-Weiss periodicity and singularity in a hadron resonance gas model with excluded volume effects

Riki Oshima1,*, Hiroaki Kouno1,†, and Kouji Kashiwa2,‡

  • *Contact author: 24804001@edu.cc.saga-u.ac.jp
  • †Contact author: kounoh@cc.saga-u.ac.jp
  • ‡Contact author: kashiwa@fit.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. D 111, 014023 – Published 22 January, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.014023

Abstract

Quantum chromodynamics (QCD) with pure imaginary baryon number chemical potential μ=iθT, where T is temperature and θ is a real number, has the Roberge-Weiss periodicity. We study the θ-dependence of the baryon number density and the pressure in the hadron resonance gas model with excluded volume effects of baryons. It is shown that the baryon number density and the pressure are smooth periodic functions of θ at low or high temperature. However, they have singular behavior at θ=(2k+1)π where k is an integer, when T∼211  MeV. This temperature is consistent with the Roberge-Weiss transition temperature TRW obtained by lattice QCD simulations. This singularity can be explained by the dual excluded volume effects in which the roles of pointlike and nonpointlike particles are exchanged each other in the ordinary excluded volume effects. It is also indicated that the excluded volume effect is visible just below TRW and is directly detectable by the lattice QCD simulation at finite θ. We compare the results with the one obtained by the Polyakov-loop extended Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (34)

  1. K. Fukushima and T. Hatsuda, Rep. Prog. Phys. 74, 014001 (2011).
  2. P. de Forcrand, Proc. Sci. LAT2009 (2009) 010 [arXiv:1005.0539].
  3. K. Nagata, Soryusironkenkyu 31, 1 (2020), https://www2.yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~soken.editorial/author.html?author=%E6%B0%B8%E7%94%B0%20%E6%A1%82%E5%A4%AA%E9%83%8E; Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 127, 103991 (2022).
  4. P. de Forcrand and O. Philipsen, Nucl. Phys. B642, 290 (2002).
  5. M. D’Elia and M.-P. Lombardo, Phys. Rev. D 67, 014505 (2003).
  6. M. D’Elia and M.-P. Lombardo, Phys. Rev. D 70, 074509 (2004).
  7. H.-S. Chen and X.-Q. Luo, Phys. Rev. D 72, 034504 (2005).
  8. M. D’Elia and F. Sanfilippo, Phys. Rev. D 80, 111501 (2009).
  9. Y. Sakai, K. Kashiwa, H. Kouno, M. Matsuzaki, and M. Yahiro, Phys. Rev. D 79, 096001 (2009).
  10. J. Cleymans, R. V. Gavai, and E. Suhonen, Phys. Rep. 130, 217 (1986).
  11. J. Cleymans, K. Redlich, H. Satz, and E. Suhonen, Z. Phys. C 33, 151 (1986).
  12. H. Kouno and F. Takagi, Z. Phys. C 42, 209 (1989).
  13. D. H. Rischke, M. I. Gorenstein, H. Stoecker, and W. Greiner, Z. Phys. C 51, 485 (1991).
  14. A. Miyahara, M. Ishii, H. Kouno, and M. Yahiro, Phys. Rev. D 101, 076011 (2020).
  15. K. S. Jeong, L. McLerran, and S. Sen, Phys. Rev. C 101, 035201 (2020).
  16. Y. Fujimoto, K. Fukushima, Y. Hidaka, A. Hiraguchi, and K. Iida, Phys. Lett. B 835, 137524 (2022).
  17. A. Roberge and N. Weiss, Nucl. Phys. B275, 734 (1986).
  18. C. Bonati, M. D’Elia, M. Mariti, M. Mesiti, F. Negro, and F. Sanfilippo, Phys. Rev. D 93, 074504 (2016).
  19. F. Cuteri, J. Goswami, F. Karsch, A. Lahiri, M. Neumann, O. Philipsen, C. Schmidt, and A. Sciarra, Phys. Rev. D 106, 014510 (2022).
  20. C. Bonati, E. Calore, M. D’Elia, M. Mesiti, F. Negro, F. Sanfilippo, S. F. Schifano, G. Silvi, and R. Tripiccione, Phys. Rev. D 99, 014502 (2019).
  21. K. Taradiy, A. Motornenko, V. Vovchenko, M. I. Gorenstein, and H. Stoecker, Phys. Rev. C 100, 065202 (2019).
  22. O. Savchuk, V. Vovchenko, R. V. Poberezhnyuk, M. I. Gorenstein, and H. Stoecker, Phys. Rev. C 101, 035205 (2020).
  23. K. Fukushima, Phys. Lett. B 591, 277 (2004).
  24. C. Ratti, M. A. Thaler, and W. Weise, Phys. Rev. D 73, 014019 (2006).
  25. S. K. Ghosh, T. K. Mukherjee, M. G. Mustafa, and R. Ray, Phys. Rev. D 73, 114007 (2006).
  26. E. Megias, E. Ruiz Arriola, and L. L. Salcedo, Phys. Rev. D 74, 065005 (2006).
  27. S. Rößner, C. Ratti, and W. Weise, Phys. Rev. D 75, 034007 (2007).
  28. Y. Sakai, T. Sasaki, H. Kouno, and M. Yahiro, Phys. Rev. D 82, 076003 (2010).
  29. K. Kashiwa, Symmetry 11, 562 (2019).
  30. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  31. V. Vovchenko, A. Pasztor, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and H. Stoecker, Phys. Lett. B 775, 71 (2017).
  32. H. Kouno and K. Kashiwa, Phys. Rev. D 109, 054007 (2024).
  33. P. Rehberg, S. P. Klevansky, and J. Hufner, Phys. Rev. C 53, 410 (1996).
  34. A. Miyahara, M. Ishii, H. Kouno, and M. Yahiro, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 32, 1750205 (2017).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation