Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Path optimization method for the sign problem caused by the fermion determinant

Kazuki Hisayoshi1, Kouji Kashiwa1,*, Yusuke Namekawa2, and Hayato Takase

  • 1Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Faculty of Information Engineering, Fukuoka Institute of Technology, Fukuoka 811-0295, Japan
  • 2Education and Research Center for Artificial Intelligence and Data Innovation, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 730-0053, Japan

  • *Contact author: kashiwa@fit.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. D 111, 094503 – Published 6 May, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.094503

Abstract

The path optimization method with machine learning is applied to the one-dimensional massive lattice Thirring model, which has the sign problem caused by the fermion determinant. This study aims to investigate how the path optimization method works for the sign problem. We show that the path optimization method successfully reduces statistical errors and reproduces the analytic results. We also examine an approximation of the Jacobian calculation in the learning process and show that it gives consistent results with those without an approximation.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (61)

  1. P. de Forcrand, Proc. Sci. LAT2009 (2009) 010 [arXiv:1005.0539].
  2. A. Alexandru, G. Basar, P. F. Bedaque, and N. C. Warrington, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 015006 (2022).
  3. K. Nagata, 31, 1 (2020), https://www2.yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~soken.editorial/author.html?author=%E6%B0%B8%E7%94%B0%20%E6%A1%82%E5%A4%AA%E9%83%8E; Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 127, 103991 (2022).
  4. Y. Mori, K. Kashiwa, and A. Ohnishi, Phys. Rev. D 96, 111501 (2017).
  5. Y. Mori, K. Kashiwa, and A. Ohnishi, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2018, 023B04 (2018).
  6. A. Alexandru, P. F. Bedaque, H. Lamm, and S. Lawrence, Phys. Rev. D 97, 094510 (2018).
  7. E. Witten, AMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math. 50, 347 (2011), https://inspirehep.net/literature/1197789.
  8. M. Cristoforetti, F. Di Renzo, and L. Scorzato (Aurora Science Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 86, 074506 (2012).
  9. H. Fujii, D. Honda, M. Kato, Y. Kikukawa, S. Komatsu, and T. Sano, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2013) 147.
  10. S. Lawrence and Y. Yamauchi, Phys. Rev. D 110, 014508 (2024).
  11. K. Kashiwa, Y. Mori, and A. Ohnishi, Phys. Rev. D 99, 014033 (2019).
  12. F. Bursa and M. Kroyter, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2018) 054.
  13. K. Kashiwa, Y. Mori, and A. Ohnishi, Phys. Rev. D 99, 114005 (2019).
  14. Y. Mori, K. Kashiwa, and A. Ohnishi, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 113B01 (2019).
  15. K. Kashiwa and Y. Mori, Phys. Rev. D 102, 054519 (2020).
  16. Y. Namekawa, K. Kashiwa, A. Ohnishi, and H. Takase, Phys. Rev. D 105, 034502 (2022).
  17. Y. Namekawa, K. Kashiwa, H. Matsuda, A. Ohnishi, and H. Takase, Phys. Rev. D 107, 034509 (2023).
  18. M. Giordano, K. Kapas, S. D. Katz, A. Pasztor, and Z. Tulipant, Phys. Rev. D 106, 054512 (2022).
  19. M. Rodekamp, E. Berkowitz, C. Gäntgen, S. Krieg, T. Luu, and J. Ostmeyer, Phys. Rev. B 106, 125139 (2022).
  20. M. Rodekamp, E. Berkowitz, M. Dincă, C. Gäntgen, S. Krieg, and T. Luu, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2023 (2024) 031 [arXiv:2311.18312].
  21. G. Kanwar, A. Lovato, N. Rocco, and M. Wagman, Phys. Rev. C 109, 034317 (2024).
  22. Y. Lin, W. Detmold, G. Kanwar, P. E. Shanahan, and M. L. Wagman, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2023 (2024) 043 [arXiv:2309.00600].
  23. W. Detmold, G. Kanwar, M. L. Wagman, and N. C. Warrington, Phys. Rev. D 102, 014514 (2020).
  24. W. Detmold, G. Kanwar, H. Lamm, M. L. Wagman, and N. C. Warrington, Phys. Rev. D 103, 094517 (2021).
  25. P. F. Bedaque and H. Oh, Phys. Rev. D 109, 094519 (2024).
  26. W. E. Thirring, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 3, 91 (1958).
  27. H. Fujii, S. Kamata, and Y. Kikukawa, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2015) 078; 02 (2016) 36.
  28. H. Fujii, S. Kamata, and Y. Kikukawa, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2015) 125; 09 (2016) 172(E).
  29. A. Alexandru, G. Basar, and P. Bedaque, Phys. Rev. D 93, 014504 (2016).
  30. A. Alexandru, G. Basar, P. F. Bedaque, G. W. Ridgway, and N. C. Warrington, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2016) 053.
  31. M. Fukuma and N. Umeda, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2017, 073B01 (2017).
  32. F. Di Renzo and K. Zambello, Phys. Rev. D 105, 054501 (2022).
  33. A. Alexandru, P. F. Bedaque, H. Lamm, S. Lawrence, and N. C. Warrington, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 191602 (2018).
  34. S. Lawrence and Y. Yamauchi, Phys. Rev. D 107, 114505 (2023).
  35. M. A. Stephanov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4472 (1996).
  36. A. M. Halasz, A. D. Jackson, R. E. Shrock, M. A. Stephanov, and J. J. M. Verbaarschot, Phys. Rev. D 58, 096007 (1998).
  37. J. Bloch, J. Glesaaen, J. J. M. Verbaarschot, and S. Zafeiropoulos, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 015.
  38. M. Fukuma and N. Matsumoto, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2021, 023B08 (2021).
  39. M. Giordano, A. Pasztor, D. Pesznyak, and Z. Tulipant, Phys. Rev. D 108, 094507 (2023).
  40. A. Alexandru, P. F. Bedaque, H. Lamm, and S. Lawrence, Phys. Rev. D 96, 094505 (2017).
  41. J. M. Pawlowski and C. Zielinski, Phys. Rev. D 87, 094503 (2013).
  42. W. S. McCulloch and W. Pitts, Bull. Math. Biophys. 5, 115 (1943).
  43. D. O. Hebb, The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory (Psychology Press, New York, 2005).
  44. F. Rosenblatt, Psychol. Rev. 65, 386 (1958).
  45. G. E. Hinton and R. R. Salakhutdinov, Science 313, 504 (2006).
  46. A. Alexandru, G. Basar, P. F. Bedaque, G. W. Ridgway, and N. C. Warrington, Phys. Rev. D 93, 094514 (2016).
  47. A. Alexandru, G. Basar, P. F. Bedaque, and G. W. Ridgway, Phys. Rev. D 95, 114501 (2017).
  48. G. Cybenko, Math. Control Signals Syst. 2, 303 (1989).
  49. K. Hornik, Neural Netw. 4, 251 (1991).
  50. R. H. Swendsen and J.-S. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2607 (1986).
  51. C. J. Geyer, Computing science and statistics: Proceedings of 23rd Symposium on the Interface Interface Foundation (1991), p. 156.
  52. K. Hukushima and K. Nemoto, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, 1604 (1996).
  53. D. E. Rumelhart, G. E. Hinton, and R. J. Williams, Nature (London) 323, 533 (1986).
  54. S. Duane, A. D. Kennedy, B. J. Pendleton, and D. Roweth, Phys. Lett. B 195, 216 (1987).
  55. A. M. Ferrenberg and R. H. Swendsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2635 (1988).
  56. A. Paszke, S. Gross, F. Massa, A. Lerer, J. Bradbury, G. Chanan, T. Killeen, Z. Lin, N. Gimelshein, L. Antiga et al., Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2019), Vol. 32, https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2019/hash/bdbca288fee7f92f2bfa9f7012727740-Abstract.html.
  57. I. Loshchilov and F. Hutter, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (2019), arXiv:1711.05101.
  58. L. Bottou, Online Learning in Neural Networks (Cambridge University Press, 1998).
  59. M. Fukuma, N. Matsumoto, and Y. Namekawa, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2021, 123B02 (2021).
  60. M. Fukuma, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2024, 053B02 (2024).
  61. K. Splittorff and J. J. M. Verbaarschot, Phys. Rev. D 75, 116003 (2007).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation