- Open Access
Emergent Lorentzian dispersion relations from a Euclidean scalar-tensor theory
Phys. Rev. D 112, 024066 – Published 28 July, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/zylg-s8lf
Abstract
Can one be fooled into thinking that space and time are fundamentally described by a Lorentzian manifold? In this article, we describe a scenario in which a theory constructed on a (Euclidean signature) Riemannian manifold can lead to degrees of freedom with Lorentzian dispersion relations, due to a nontrivial configuration of a scalar field. In particular, we perform a perturbative analysis of a renormalizable shift-symmetric scalar-tensor theory and find that it can, in principle, admit a massless tensor degree of freedom with a Lorentzian dispersion relation. While the remaining degrees of freedom in the gravity sector will, in general, satisfy Euclidean dispersion relations, we argue that they can be brought under control by elliptic equations with an appropriate choice of boundary conditions.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (23)
- E. Anderson, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 524, 757 (2012); C. J. Isham, NATO Sci. Ser. C 409, 157 (1993), arXiv:gr-qc/9210011.
- S. Mukohyama and J.-P. Uzan, Phys. Rev. D 87, 065020 (2013).
- M. Ishak, Living Rev. Relativity 22, 1 (2019).
- J. D. Bekenstein, Phys. Rev. D 48, 3641 (1993).
- A. White, S. Weinfurtner, and M. Visser, Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 045007 (2010).
- S. Mukohyama, Phys. Rev. D 87, 085030 (2013).
- K. Muneyuki and N. Ohta, Phys. Lett. B 725, 495 (2013).
- K. S. Stelle, Phys. Rev. D 16, 953 (1977).
- J. C. Feng, S. Mukohyama, and S. Carloni, Phys. Rev. D 109, 024040 (2024).
- S. Hossenfelder and L. Smolin, Phys. Rev. D 81, 064009 (2010); S. W. Hawking, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 05, 453 (1990); S. W. Hawking and R. Laflamme, Phys. Lett. B 209, 39 (1988); S. W. Hawking, Phys. Rev. D 37, 904 (1988).
- S. Chadha and H. B. Nielsen, Nucl. Phys. B217, 125 (1983).
- R. Wald, General Relativity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984); S. Hawking and G. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1973).
- K. Aoki and S. Mukohyama, Phys. Rev. D 100, 064061 (2019).
- S. Mukohyama, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2014) 011.
- W. Barker, C. Marzo, and C. Rigouzzo, arXiv:2406.09500.
- L. Buoninfante, arXiv:1610.08744.
- Y.-C. Lin, M. P. Hobson, and A. N. Lasenby, Phys. Rev. D 99, 064001 (2019); Y.-C. Lin, Ghost and tachyon free gauge theories of gravity: A systematic approach, Ph.D. thesis, Apollo—University of Cambridge Repository, 2020.
- A. Aurilia and H. Umezawa, Phys. Rev. 182, 1682 (1969).
- S. Mukohyama, Phys. Rev. D 98, 104053 (2018).
- C. Deffayet, A. Held, S. Mukohyama, and A. Vikman, arXiv:2504.11437; J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2023) 031; C. Deffayet, S. Mukohyama, and A. Vikman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 041301 (2022).
- A. Hell, D. Lust, and G. Zoupanos, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2023) 168; J. Maldacena, arXiv:1105.5632.
- R. P. Woodard, Scholarpedia 10, 32243 (2015); Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138, 1067 (2023); M. Ostrogradsky, Mem. Acad. St. Petersbourg 6, 385 (1850).
- J. Kehayias, S. Mukohyama, and J.-P. Uzan, Phys. Rev. D 89, 105017 (2014).