- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Light thermal dark matter models in the light of DAMIC-M 2025 constraints

Debasish Borah1,*, Satyabrata Mahapatra2,†, Narendra Sahu3,‡, and Vicky Singh Thounaojam3,§

  • *Contact author: dborah@iitg.ac.in
  • †Contact author: satyabrata@iitgoa.ac.in
  • ‡Contact author: nsahu@phy.iith.ac.in
  • §Contact author: ph22resch01004@iith.ac.in
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 113, 015026 – Published 20 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/zv1q-3j7c

Abstract

We study the viability of light thermal dark matter (DM) in the sub-GeV mass range in view of the stringent new DAMIC-M limits on DM-electron scattering. Considering a Dirac fermion singlet DM charged under a new Abelian gauge symmetry U(1), we outline two possibilities: (i) family nonuniversal U(1) gauge coupling with resonantly enhanced DM annihilation into Standard Model (SM) fermions, and (ii) family universal dark U(1) gauge symmetry where relic density is set by DM annihilation into light gauge bosons. As an illustrative example of the first class of models, we consider a gauged Lμ−Lτ extension of the SM having interesting detection prospects at several experiments. While both of these classes of models lead to the observed DM relic and consistency with DAMIC-M together with other experimental limits, the second class of models also lead to strong DM self-interactions, potentially solving the small-scale structure issues of cold dark matter. While a vast part of the parameter space in both the models is already ruled out, the current allowed region of parameter space can be further probed at ongoing or future experiments, keeping the models testable.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (100)

  1. XENON Collaboration, WIMP dark matter search using a 3.1  tonne×year exposure of the XENONnT experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 221003 (2025).
  2. LZ Collaboration, Dark matter search results from 4.2  tonne−years of exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 011802 (2025).
  3. PandaX Collaboration, Dark matter search results from 1.54 tonne year exposure of PandaX-4T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 011805 (2025).
  4. S. Balan et al., Resonant or asymmetric: The status of sub-GeV dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2025) 053.
  5. A. Cheek, P. Figueroa, G. Herrera, and I. M. Shoemaker, Sub-GeV dark matter under pressure from direct detection, arXiv:2507.15956.
  6. G. Krnjaic, Testing thermal-relic dark matter with a dark photon mediator, arXiv:2505.04626.
  7. B. Dutta, S. Ghosh, and J. Kumar, A sub-GeV dark matter model, Phys. Rev. D 100, 075028 (2019).
  8. R. Essig, T. Volansky, and T.-T. Yu, New constraints and prospects for sub-GeV dark matter scattering off electrons in xenon, Phys. Rev. D 96, 043017 (2017).
  9. K. Bondarenko, A. Boyarsky, T. Bringmann, M. Hufnagel, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, and A. Sokolenko, Direct detection and complementary constraints for sub-GeV dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 118.
  10. A. Adhikary, D. Borah, S. Mahapatra, I. Saha, N. Sahu, and V. S. Thounaojam, New realisation of light thermal dark matter with enhanced detection prospects, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2024) 043.
  11. D. Borah, P. Das, S. Mahapatra, and N. Sahu, Light thermal dark matter via type-I seesaw portal, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2025) 023.
  12. G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rep. 405, 279 (2005).
  13. G. Arcadi, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y. Mambrini, M. Pierre, S. Profumo, and F. S. Queiroz, The waning of the WIMP? A review of models, searches, and constraints, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 203 (2018).
  14. G. Arcadi, D. Cabo-Almeida, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y. Mambrini, J. P. Neto, M. Pierre, S. Profumo, and F. S. Queiroz, The waning of the WIMP: Endgame?, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 152 (2025).
  15. XENON Collaboration, Light dark matter search with ionization signals in XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 251801 (2019).
  16. CRESST Collaboration, First results from the CRESST-III low-mass dark matter program, Phys. Rev. D 100, 102002 (2019).
  17. XENON Collaboration, Search for light dark matter in low-energy ionization signals from XENONnT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 161004 (2025).
  18. PandaX-II Collaboration, Search for light dark matter-electron scatterings in the PandaX-II experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 211803 (2021).
  19. PandaX Collaboration, Search for light dark matter with ionization signals in the PandaX-4T experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 261001 (2023).
  20. SENSEI Collaboration, SENSEI: Direct-detection results on sub-GeV dark matter from a new skipper-CCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 171802 (2020).
  21. SuperCDMS Collaboration, Light dark matter constraints from SuperCDMS HVeV detectors operated underground with an anticoincidence event selection, Phys. Rev. D 111, 012006 (2025).
  22. DAMIC-M Collaboration, Probing benchmark models of hidden-sector dark matter with DAMIC-M, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 071002 (2025).
  23. R. Foot, New physics from electric charge quantization?, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 06, 527 (1991).
  24. X. He, G. C. Joshi, H. Lew, and R. Volkas, NEW Z-prime PHENOMENOLOGY, Phys. Rev. D 43, 22 (1991).
  25. X.-G. He, G. C. Joshi, H. Lew, and R. R. Volkas, Simplest Z-prime model, Phys. Rev. D 44, 2118 (1991).
  26. M. Bauer, P. Foldenauer, and J. Jaeckel, Hunting all the hidden photons, J. High Energy Phys. 18 (2020) 094.
  27. N. Bernal, J. P. Neto, J. Silva-Malpartida, and F. S. Queiroz, Enabling thermal dark matter within the Vanilla Lμ−Lτ model, Phys. Rev. D 112, 075042 (2025).
  28. S. Baek, N. G. Deshpande, X. G. He, and P. Ko, Muon anomalous g−2 and gauged Lμ−Lτ models, Phys. Rev. D 64, 055006 (2001).
  29. E. Ma, D. Roy, and S. Roy, Gauged Lμ−Lτ with large muon anomalous magnetic moment and the bimaximal mixing of neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B 525, 101 (2002).
  30. R. Aliberti et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the standard model: An update, Phys. Rep. 1143, 1 (2025).
  31. D.  P. Aguillard, T. Albahri, D. Allspach, J. Annala, K. Badgley, S. Baeßler, I. Bailey, L. Bailey, E. Barlas-Yucel (Muon g−2 Collaboration), Measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 127 ppb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 101802 (2025).
  32. A. Kamada, K. Kaneta, K. Yanagi, and H.-B. Yu, Self-interacting dark matter and muon g−2 in a gauged U(1)Lμ−Lτ model, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2018) 117.
  33. D. N. Spergel and P. J. Steinhardt, Observational evidence for self-interacting cold dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3760 (2000).
  34. S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu, Dark matter self-interactions and small scale structure, Phys. Rep. 730, 1 (2018).
  35. J. S. Bullock and M. Boylan-Kolchin, Small-scale challenges to the ΛCDM paradigm, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 55, 343 (2017).
  36. M. R. Buckley and P. J. Fox, Dark matter self-interactions and light force carriers, Phys. Rev. D 81, 083522 (2010).
  37. J. L. Feng, M. Kaplinghat, and H.-B. Yu, Halo shape and relic density exclusions of sommerfeld-enhanced dark matter explanations of cosmic ray excesses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 151301 (2010).
  38. J. L. Feng, M. Kaplinghat, H. Tu, and H.-B. Yu, Hidden charged dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2009) 004.
  39. A. Loeb and N. Weiner, Cores in dwarf galaxies from dark matter with a Yukawa potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 171302 (2011).
  40. T. Bringmann, F. Kahlhoefer, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, and P. Walia, Strong constraints on self-interacting dark matter with light mediators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 141802 (2017).
  41. M. Kaplinghat, S. Tulin, and H.-B. Yu, Direct detection portals for self-interacting dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 89, 035009 (2014).
  42. S. Tulin, H.-B. Yu, and K. M. Zurek, Beyond collisionless dark matter: Particle physics dynamics for dark matter halo structure, Phys. Rev. D 87, 115007 (2013).
  43. A. Kamada and H.-B. Yu, Coherent propagation of PeV neutrinos and the dip in the neutrino spectrum at IceCube, Phys. Rev. D 92, 113004 (2015).
  44. K. R. Lynch, Extended electroweak interactions and the muon g−2, Phys. Rev. D 65, 053006 (2002).
  45. M. Lindner, M. Platscher, and F. S. Queiroz, A call for new physics: The muon anomalous magnetic moment and lepton flavor violation, Phys. Rep. 731, 1 (2018).
  46. B. W. Lee and S. Weinberg, Cosmological lower bound on heavy neutrino masses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 165 (1977).
  47. E. W. Kolb and K. A. Olive, The Lee-Weinberg bound revisited, Phys. Rev. D 33, 1202 (1986).
  48. M. Pospelov, A. Ritz, and M. B. Voloshin, Secluded WIMP dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 662, 53 (2008).
  49. R. T. D’Agnolo and J. T. Ruderman, Light dark matter from forbidden channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 061301 (2015).
  50. A. Berlin and N. Blinov, Thermal dark matter below an MeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 021801 (2018).
  51. R. T. D’Agnolo, D. Liu, J. T. Ruderman, and P.-J. Wang, Forbidden dark matter annihilations into standard model particles, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 103.
  52. J. Herms, S. Jana, Vishnu P. K., and S. Saad, Minimal realization of light thermal dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 091803 (2022).
  53. C. Jaramillo, Reviving keV sterile neutrino dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2022) 093.
  54. R. Essig, M. Fernandez-Serra, J. Mardon, A. Soto, T. Volansky, and T.-T. Yu, Direct detection of sub-GeV dark matter with semiconductor targets, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2016) 046.
  55. DarkSide Collaboration, Search for dark matter particle interactions with electron final states with DarkSide-50, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 101002 (2023).
  56. T. R. Slatyer, Indirect detection of dark matter, in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Anticipating the Next Discoveries in Particle Physics (2018), pp. 297–353, arXiv:1710.05137.
  57. K. E. O’Donnell and T. R. Slatyer, Constraints on dark matter with future MeV gamma-ray telescopes, Phys. Rev. D 111, 083037 (2025).
  58. M. Cirelli, N. Fornengo, B. J. Kavanagh, and E. Pinetti, Integral x-ray constraints on sub-GeV Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 103, 063022 (2021).
  59. S. Balaji, D. Cleaver, P. De la Torre Luque, and M. Michailidis, Dark matter in x-rays: Revised XMM-Newton limits and new constraints from eROSITA, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2025) 053.
  60. D. Wadekar and Z. Wang, Strong constraints on decay and annihilation of dark matter from heating of gas-rich dwarf galaxies, Phys. Rev. D 106, 075007 (2022).
  61. A. K. Saha, Searching for dark matter with MeVCube, Phys. Rev. D 111, 123041 (2025).
  62. M. Cirelli, N. Fornengo, J. Koechler, E. Pinetti, and B. M. Roach, Putting all the X in one basket: Updated x-ray constraints on sub-GeV dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2023) 026.
  63. P. De la Torre Luque, S. Balaji, and J. Silk, New 511 keV line data provide strongest sub-GeV dark matter constraints, Astrophys. J. Lett. 973, L6 (2024).
  64. D. la Torre Luque, Pedro, S. Balaji, M. Fairbairn, F. Sala, and J. Silk, 511 keV galactic photons from a dark matter spike, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2025) 034.
  65. W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, M. Pospelov, and I. Yavin, Neutrino trident production: A powerful probe of new physics with neutrino beams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 091801 (2014).
  66. NA64 Collaboration, First results in the search for dark sectors at NA64 with the CERN SPS high energy muon beam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 211803 (2024).
  67. P. Foldenauer and J. Hoefken Zink, How to rule out (g−2)μ in U(1)Lμ−Lτ with white dwarf cooling, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 096.
  68. S. Gninenko and D. Gorbunov, Refining constraints from Borexino measurements on a light Z′-boson coupled to Lμ−Lτ current, Phys. Lett. B 823, 136739 (2021).
  69. COHERENT Collaboration, Observation of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering, Science 357, 1123 (2017).
  70. COHERENT Collaboration, First measurement of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering on argon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 012002 (2021).
  71. BABAR Collaboration, Search for a muonic dark force at BABAR, Phys. Rev. D 94, 011102 (2016).
  72. T. R. Slatyer, Indirect dark matter signatures in the cosmic dark ages: I. Generalizing the bound on s-wave dark matter annihilation from Planck results, Phys. Rev. D 93, 023527 (2016).
  73. S. Gninenko, N. Krasnikov, and V. Matveev, Muon g−2 and searches for a new leptophobic sub-GeV dark boson in a missing-energy experiment at CERN, Phys. Rev. D 91, 095015 (2015).
  74. D. Borah, S. Mahapatra, N. Sahu, and V. S. Thounaojam, Self-interacting dark matter with observable ΔNeff, Phys. Rev. D 112, 035037 (2025).
  75. E. C. G. Stueckelberg, Interaction energy in electrodynamics and in the field theory of nuclear forces, Helv. Phys. Acta 11, 225 (1938).
  76. M. Kaplinghat, S. Tulin, and H.-B. Yu, Dark matter halos as particle colliders: Unified solution to small-scale structure puzzles from dwarfs to clusters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 041302 (2016).
  77. L. G. van den Aarssen, T. Bringmann, and C. Pfrommer, Is dark matter with long-range interactions a solution to all small-scale problems of ΛCDM cosmology?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 231301 (2012).
  78. D. Borah, S. Mahapatra, and N. Sahu, New realization of light thermal self-interacting dark matter and detection prospects, Phys. Rev. D 108, L091702 (2023).
  79. D. Borah, S. Mahapatra, N. Sahu, and V. S. Thounaojam, Self-interacting dark matter and the GRB221009A event, Phys. Rev. D 108, 083038 (2023).
  80. S. Mahapatra, S. K. Sahoo, N. Sahu, and V. S. Thounaojam, Self-interacting dark matter and Dirac neutrinos via lepton quarticity, Phys. Rev. D 109, 055036 (2024).
  81. D. Borah, S. Mahapatra, P. K. Paul, N. Sahu, and P. Shukla, Asymmetric self-interacting dark matter with a canonical seesaw model, Phys. Rev. D 110, 035033 (2024).
  82. J. D. Bjorken, R. Essig, P. Schuster, and N. Toro, New fixed-target experiments to search for dark gauge forces, Phys. Rev. D 80, 075018 (2009).
  83. S. Andreas, C. Niebuhr, and A. Ringwald, New limits on hidden photons from past electron beam dumps, Phys. Rev. D 86, 095019 (2012).
  84. A. Bross, M. Crisler, S. Pordes, J. Volk, S. Errede, and J. Wrbanek, Search for short-lived particles produced in an electron beam dump, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2942 (1991).
  85. SHiP Collaboration, A facility to search for hidden particles (SHiP) at the CERN SPS, arXiv:1504.04956.
  86. J. H. Chang, R. Essig, and S. D. McDermott, Revisiting supernova 1987A constraints on dark photons, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2017) 107.
  87. K. N. Abazajian et al. (CMB-S4 Collaboration), CMB-S4 Science Book, 1st ed. (2016), 10.2172/1352047.
  88. M. S. Madhavacheril, N. Sehgal, and T. R. Slatyer, Current dark matter annihilation constraints from CMB and low-redshift data, Phys. Rev. D 89, 103508 (2014).
  89. Planck Collaboration, Planck 2018 results: VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020).
  90. G. Elor, N. L. Rodd, T. R. Slatyer, and W. Xue, Model-independent indirect detection constraints on hidden sector dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2016) 024.
  91. S. Profumo, F. S. Queiroz, J. Silk, and C. Siqueira, Searching for secluded dark matter with H.E.S.S., Fermi-LAT, and Planck, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2018) 010.
  92. G. Mangano, G. Miele, S. Pastor, T. Pinto, O. Pisanti, and P. D. Serpico, Relic neutrino decoupling including flavor oscillations, Nucl. Phys. B729, 221 (2005).
  93. E. Grohs, G. M. Fuller, C. T. Kishimoto, M. W. Paris, and A. Vlasenko, Neutrino energy transport in weak decoupling and big bang nucleosynthesis, Phys. Rev. D 93, 083522 (2016).
  94. P. F. de Salas and S. Pastor, Relic neutrino decoupling with flavour oscillations revisited, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2016) 051.
  95. C. Boehm, M. J. Dolan, and C. McCabe, A lower bound on the mass of cold thermal dark matter from Planck, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2013) 041.
  96. 2018 Planck Explanatory Supplement, https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planck-legacy-archive/index.php/Main_Page.
  97. C. Giovanetti, M. Lisanti, H. Liu, and J. T. Ruderman, Joint cosmic microwave background and big bang nucleosynthesis constraints on light dark sectors with dark radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 021302 (2022).
  98. DESI Collaboration, Constraints on neutrino physics from DESI DR2 BAO and DR1 full shape, Phys. Rev. D 112, 083513 (2025).
  99. S. Tulin, H.-B. Yu, and K. M. Zurek, Resonant dark forces and small scale structure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 111301 (2013).
  100. S. A. Khrapak, A. V. Ivlev, G. E. Morfill, and S. K. Zhdanov, Scattering in the attractive Yukawa potential in the limit of strong interacion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 225002 (2003).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 113, 015026– Published 20 January, 2026
  • Received 21 October 2025
  • Accepted 24 December 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation