Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Soft-hard factorization of heavy-quark transport in QCD matter at finite chemical potential

Jiale Lou1,*, Wu Wang1,*, Jiazhen Peng1, Fei Sun1,2, Kejun Wu1,2, Wei Xie1,2, Zuman Zhang3,4, Shuang Li1,2,†, and Sa Wang1,2,‡

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • †Contact author: lish@ctgu.edu.cn
  • ‡Contact author: wangsa@ctgu.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 112, 116001 – Published 1 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/zsk6-xff2

Abstract

We calculate the collisional energy loss and momentum diffusion coefficients of heavy quarks traversing a hot and dense QCD medium at finite quark chemical potential, μ≠0. The analysis is performed within an extended soft-hard factorization model that consistently incorporates the μ-dependence of the Debye screening mass MD(μ) and of the fermionic thermal distribution functions. Both the energy loss and the diffusion coefficients are found to increase with μ, with the enhancement being most pronounced at low temperatures where the chemical potential effects dominate the medium response. To elucidate the origin of this dependence, we derive analytic high-energy approximations in which the leading μ-corrections appear as logarithmic terms: a soft logarithm ∼μ2ln(|t*|/MD2) from t-channel scattering off thermal gluonic excitations, and a hard logarithm ∼μ2ln(E1T/|t*|) from scattering off thermal quarks. In the complete result the dependence on the intermediate separation scale t* cancels, as required. We also confirm the expected mass hierarchy −dE/dz(charm)<−dE/dz(bottom) at fixed velocity. Our findings demonstrate that finite chemical potential plays a significant role in heavy-quark transport and must be included in theoretical descriptions of heavy-flavor dynamics in baryon-rich environments, such as those probed in the RHIC Beam Energy Scan, and at FAIR and NICA.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (53)

  1. M. Gyulassy and L. McLerran, Nucl. Phys. A750, 30 (2005).
  2. E. V. Shuryak, Nucl. Phys. A750, 64 (2005).
  3. STAR Collaboration, Nucl. Phys. A757, 102 (2005).
  4. A. D. Frawley, T. Ullrich, and R. Vogt, Phys. Rep. 462, 125 (2008).
  5. A. Bzdak, S. Esumi, V. Koch, J. Liao, M. Stephanov, and N. Xu, Phys. Rep. 853, 1 (2020).
  6. X. Dong, Y. Lee, and R. Rapp, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69, 417 (2019).
  7. Z. Tang, Z.-B. Tang, W. Zha, W.-M. Zha, Y. Zhang, and Y.-F. Zhang, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 31, 81 (2020).
  8. J. Chen et al., Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35, 214 (2024).
  9. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2022) 174.
  10. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 813 (2024).
  11. T. Ablyazimov et al. (CBM Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 60 (2017).
  12. V. Abgaryan et al. (MPD Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. A 58, 140 (2022).
  13. M. A. Stephanov, K. Rajagopal, and E. V. Shuryak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4816 (1998).
  14. Z. Fodor and S. D. Katz, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2004) 050.
  15. F. Prino and R. Rapp, J. Phys. G 43, 093002 (2016).
  16. B. Chen, L. Jiang, X.-H. Liu, Y. Liu, and J. Zhao, Phys. Rev. C 105, 054901 (2022).
  17. M. He, H. van Hees, and R. Rapp, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 130, 104020 (2023).
  18. G. D. Moore and D. Teaney, Phys. Rev. C 71, 064904 (2005).
  19. W. M. Alberico, A. Beraudo, A. De Pace, A. Molinari, M. Monteno, M. Nardi, and F. Prino, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1666 (2011).
  20. M. He, R. J. Fries, and R. Rapp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 112301 (2013).
  21. T. Song, H. Berrehrah, D. Cabrera, W. Cassing, and E. Bratkovskaya, Phys. Rev. C 93, 034906 (2016).
  22. S. Cao, G.-Y. Qin, and S. A. Bass, Phys. Rev. C 92, 024907 (2015).
  23. S. Cao et al., Phys. Rev. C 99, 054907 (2019).
  24. S. Z. Shi, J. F. Liao, and M. Gyulassy, Chin. Phys. C 43, 044101 (2018).
  25. S. Z. Shi, J. F. Liao, and M. Gyulassy, Chin. Phys. C 42, 104104 (2018).
  26. W. Ke, Y. Xu, and S. A. Bass, Phys. Rev. C 98, 064901 (2018).
  27. S. Li, C. W. Wang, X. B. Yuan, and S. Q. Feng, Phys. Rev. C 98, 014909 (2018).
  28. S. Li, C. Wang, R. Wan, and J. Liao, Phys. Rev. C 99, 054909 (2019).
  29. J. D. Bjorken, Report No. FERMILAB-Pub-82/59-THY, 1982, https://lss.fnal.gov/archive/1982/pub/Pub-82-059-T.pdf
  30. M. H. Thoma and M. Gyulassy, Nucl. Phys. B351, 491 (1991).
  31. E. Braaten and M. H. Thoma, Phys. Rev. D 44, 1298 (1991).
  32. H. Vija and M. H. Thoma, Phys. Lett. B 342, 212 (1995).
  33. H. Berrehrah, P. B. Gossiaux, J. Aichelin, W. Cassing, J. M. Torres-Rincon, and E. Bratkovskaya, Phys. Rev. C 90, 051901 (2014).
  34. M. Y. Jamal and B. Mohanty, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 130 (2021).
  35. S. Madni, A. Mukherjee, A. Bandyopadhyay, and N. Haque, Phys. Lett. B 838, 137714 (2023).
  36. J. Peng, K. Yu, S. Li, W. Xiong, F. Sun, and W. Xie, Phys. Rev. D 109, 096028 (2024).
  37. S. Li, F. Sun, W. Xie, and W. Xiong, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 536 (2021).
  38. E. Braaten and T. C. Yuan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2183, 66 (1991).
  39. E. Braaten and M. H. Thoma, Phys. Rev. D 44, R2625 (1991).
  40. J.-P. Blaizot and E. Iancu, Phys. Rep. 359, 355 (2002).
  41. P. Romatschke and M. Strickland, Phys. Rev. D 71, 125008 (2005).
  42. P. B. Gossiaux and J. Aichelin, Phys. Rev. C 78, 014904 (2008).
  43. S. Li and C. W. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 98, 034914 (2018).
  44. S. Li, W. Xiong, and R. Z. Wan, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1113 (2020).
  45. S. Li and J. Liao, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 671 (2020).
  46. H. A. Weldon, Phys. Rev. D 28, 2007 (1983).
  47. Z. Xu and C. Greiner, Phys. Rev. C 71, 064901 (2005).
  48. S. M. H. Wong, Phys. Rev. C 54, 2588 (1996).
  49. B. L. Combridge, Nucl. Phys. B151, 429 (1979).
  50. S. Peigné and A. Peshier, Phys. Rev. D 77, 014015 (2008).
  51. S. Peigné and A. Peshier, Phys. Rev. D 77, 114017 (2008).
  52. R. Bellwied, S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, J. Günther, S. D. Katz, C. Ratti, and K. K. Szabo, Phys. Lett. B 751, 559 (2015).
  53. S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, J. N. Guenther, R. Kara, S. D. Katz, P. Parotto, A. Pasztor, C. Ratti, and K. K. Szabo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 052001 (2020).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation