- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Interpreting the diversity of afterglow emission from radio-detected tidal disruption events with instantaneous and delayed outflows

Yuri Sato1,*, Mukul Bhattacharya2,3, Jose Alonso Carpio4, Jewel Capili5,6, and Kohta Murase7,8

  • *Contact author: yuri@astr.tohoku.ac.jp(YS)
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 114, 103004 – Published 3 November, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/zn96-2c77

Abstract

Tidal disruption events (TDEs) occur when a star is gravitationally disrupted by the tidal field of a supermassive black hole during a close encounter. Radio emission has recently been detected in TDEs and is commonly attributed to synchrotron radiation from both wind and jetted outflows. However, several TDEs exhibit bright radio flares at late times, which cannot be easily explained if the wind is launched promptly after the stellar disruption. The radio light curves of TDEs with delayed radio flares are modeled using three scenarios: an instantaneous wind, a delayed wind, and a delayed relativistic jet. We show that the instantaneous wind model struggles to reproduce delayed radio flare events, indicating the necessity of an additional delayed outflow component. In contrast, the delayed wind model provides a consistent explanation for the observed radio phenomenology, successfully reproducing events both with and without delayed radio flares. For some delayed radio flare events (e.g., ASASSN-15oi and AT 2019dsg), both the delayed wind and delayed jet models can reproduce the observed radio light curves, making it challenging to distinguish between these scenarios based on radio data alone. To break this degeneracy, we present calculations of detailed multiwavelength spectra from radio to x-ray and very-high-energy gamma-ray bands, including both synchrotron and inverse-Compton processes. Within this framework, the delayed jet model produces x-ray and optical emission detectable at typical TDE distances, in contrast to wind-driven scenarios. Our results highlight how multiwavelength campaigns offer effective means to distinguish between possible outflow mechanisms. We apply our model to AT 2025aarm, which is one of the closest TDEs that has been observed, and show the importance of x-ray observations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (101)

  1. J. G. Hills, Possible power source of Seyfert galaxies and QSOs, Nature (London) 254, 295 (1975).
  2. M. J. Rees, Tidal disruption of stars by black holes of 10 to the 6th-10 to the 8th solar masses in nearby galaxies, Nature (London) 333, 523 (1988).
  3. C. R. Evans and C. S. Kochanek, The tidal disruption of a star by a massive black hole, Astrophys. J. Lett. 346, L13 (1989).
  4. A. Loeb and A. Ulmer, Optical appearance of the debris of a star disrupted by a massive black hole, Astrophys. J. 489, 573 (1997).
  5. L. E. Strubbe and E. Quataert, Optical flares from the tidal disruption of stars by massive black holes, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 400, 2070 (2009).
  6. G. Lodato and E. Rossi, Multiband lightcurves of tidal disruption events, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 410, 359 (2011).
  7. S. Komossa, Tidal disruption of stars by supermassive black holes: Status of observations, J. High Energy Astrophys. 7, 148 (2015).
  8. B. D. Metzger and N. C. Stone, A bright year for tidal disruptions, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 461, 948 (2016).
  9. N. Roth, D. Kasen, J. Guillochon, and E. Ramirez-Ruiz, The X-ray through optical fluxes and line strengths of tidal disruption events, Astrophys. J. 827, 3 (2016).
  10. J. Krolik, T. Piran, and T. Ryu, Follow the mass—a concordance picture of tidal disruption events, Astrophys. J. 988, 220 (2025).
  11. B. D. Metzger, Cooling envelope model for tidal disruption events, Astrophys. J. Lett. 937, L12 (2022).
  12. K. Murase, S. S. Kimura, B. T. Zhang, F. Oikonomou, and M. Petropoulou, High-energy neutrino and gamma-ray emission from tidal disruption events, Astrophys. J. 902, 108 (2020).
  13. A. Mummery, B. Metzger, S. van Velzen, and M. Guolo, Tidal disruption event calorimetry: Observational constraints on the physics of TDE optical flares, arXiv:2512.09143.
  14. K. D. Alexander, S. van Velzen, A. Horesh, and B. A. Zauderer, Radio properties of tidal disruption events, Space Sci. Rev. 216, 81 (2020).
  15. F. De Colle, J. Guillochon, J. Naiman, and E. Ramirez-Ruiz, The dynamics, appearance and demographics of relativistic jets triggered by tidal disruption of stars in quiescent supermassive black holes, Astrophys. J. 760, 103 (2012).
  16. S. van Velzen et al., Seventeen tidal disruption events from the first half of ZTF survey observations: Entering a new era of population studies, Astrophys. J. 908, 4 (2021).
  17. J. S. Bloom et al., A relativistic jetted outburst from a massive black hole fed by a tidally disrupted star, Science 333, 203 (2011).
  18. D. N. Burrows et al., Discovery of the onset of rapid accretion by a dormant massive black hole, Nature (London) 476, 421 (2011).
  19. S. B. Cenko et al., Swift J2058.4 + 0516: Discovery of a possible second relativistic tidal disruption flare, Astrophys. J. 753, 77 (2012).
  20. G. C. Brown, A. J. Levan, E. R. Stanway, N. R. Tanvir, S. B. Cenko, E. Berger, R. Chornock, and A. Cucchiaria, Swift J1112.2−8238: A candidate relativistic tidal disruption flare, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 452, 4297 (2015).
  21. I. Andreoni et al., A very luminous jet from the disruption of a star by a massive black hole, Nature (London) 612, 430 (2022); 613, E6 (2023).
  22. D. Giannios and B. D. Metzger, Radio transients from stellar tidal disruption by massive black holes, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 416, 2102 (2011).
  23. T. Piran, G. Svirski, J. Krolik, R. M. Cheng, and H. Shiokawa, ”Circularization” vs. Accretion—what powers tidal disruption events?, Astrophys. J. 806, 164 (2015).
  24. S. van Velzen et al., A radio jet from the optical and x-ray bright stellar tidal disruption flare ASASSN-14li, Science 351, 62 (2016).
  25. T. Matsumoto and T. Piran, Generalized equipartition method from an arbitrary viewing angle, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 522, 4565 (2023).
  26. P. Beniamini, T. Piran, and T. Matsumoto, Swift J1644+57 as an off-axis jet, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 524, 1386 (2023).
  27. K. D. Alexander, E. Berger, J. Guillochon, B. A. Zauderer, and P. K. G. Williams, Discovery of an outflow from radio observations of the tidal disruption event ASASSN-14li, Astrophys. J. Lett. 819, L25 (2016).
  28. T. Matsumoto, T. Piran, and J. H. Krolik, What powers the radio emission in TDE AT2019dsg: A long-lived jet or the disruption itself?, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 511, 5085 (2022).
  29. Y. Cendes, K. D. Alexander, E. Berger, T. Eftekhari, P. K. G. Williams, and R. Chornock, Radio observations of an ordinary outflow from the tidal disruption event AT2019dsg, Astrophys. J. 919, 127 (2021).
  30. K. Hayasaki and R. Yamazaki, Disk wind–driven expanding radio-emitting shell in tidal disruption events, Astrophys. J. 954, 5 (2023).
  31. A. Horesh, S. B. Cenko, and I. Arcavi, Delayed radio flares from a tidal disruption event, Nat. Astron. 5, 491 (2021).
  32. Y. Cendes et al., A mildly relativistic outflow launched two years after disruption in tidal disruption event AT2018hyz, Astrophys. J. 938, 28 (2022).
  33. Y. Cendes et al., Ubiquitous late radio emission from tidal disruption events, Astrophys. J. 971, 185 (2024).
  34. C. T. Christy et al., The peculiar radio evolution of the tidal disruption event ASASSN-19bt, Astrophys. J. 974, 18 (2024).
  35. A. Horesh, I. Sfaradi, R. Fender, D. A. Green, D. R. A. Williams, and J. S. Bright, Are delayed radio flares common in tidal disruption events? the case of the TDE iPTF 16fnl, Astrophys. J. Lett. 920, L5 (2021).
  36. A. J. Goodwin et al., A second radio flare from the tidal disruption event AT2020vwl: A delayed outflow ejection?, Astrophys. J. 981, 122 (2025).
  37. Z. Lin, Y. Wang, D.-F. Bu, J. Mao, and J. Liu, Delayed launch of ultrafast outflows in the tidal disruption event AT2020afhd, Astrophys. J. Lett. 989, L9 (2025).
  38. I. Sfaradi et al., The first radio-bright off-nuclear tidal disruption event AT 2024tvd reveals the fastest-evolving double-peaked radio emission, Astrophys. J. Lett. 992, L18 (2025).
  39. W. W. Golay et al., Radio emission from the infrared tidal disruption event WTP14adeqka: A directly resolved nonrelativistic outflow, Astrophys. J. 1007, 88 (2026).
  40. S. C. Wu, D. Tsuna, B. Mockler, and A. L. Piro, Delayed radio emission in tidal disruption events from collisions of outflows driven by disk instabilities, Astrophys. J. 998, 199 (2026).
  41. Z. G. Dai and T. Lu, Hydrodynamics of relativistic blast waves in a density-jump medium and their emission signature, Astrophys. J. Lett. 565, L87 (2002).
  42. E. Nakar and J. Granot, Smooth light curves from a bumpy ride: Relativistic blast wave encounters a density jump, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 380, 1744 (2007).
  43. J. Zhuang, R.-F. Shen, G. Mou, and W. Lu, Interaction of an outflow with surrounding gaseous clouds as the origin of late-time radio flares in tidal disruption events, Astrophys. J. 979, 109 (2025).
  44. T. Matsumoto and T. Piran, Late-time radio flares in tidal disruption events, Astrophys. J. 971, 49 (2024).
  45. O. Teboul and B. D. Metzger, A unified theory of jetted tidal disruption events: From promptly escaping relativistic to delayed transrelativistic jets, Astrophys. J. Lett. 957, L9 (2023).
  46. I. Sfaradi et al., An off-axis relativistic jet seen in the long lasting delayed radio flare of the TDE AT 2018hyz, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 527, 7672 (2024).
  47. Y. Sato, K. Murase, M. Bhattacharya, J. A. Carpio, M. Mukhopadhyay, and B. T. Zhang, Two-component off-axis jet model for radio flares of tidal disruption events, Phys. Rev. D 110, L061307 (2024).
  48. C. Yuan, B. T. Zhang, W. Winter, and K. Murase, Structured jet model for multiwavelength observations of the jetted tidal disruption event AT 2022 cmc, Astrophys. J. 974, 162 (2024).
  49. C. Yuan, W. Winter, B. T. Zhang, K. Murase, and B. Zhang, Revisiting X-ray afterglows of jetted tidal disruption events with the external reverse shock, Astrophys. J. 982, 196 (2025).
  50. The official website of CTAO, https://www.ctao.org.
  51. The official website of Chandra, https://chandra.harvard.edu.
  52. The official website of Rubin, https://www.lsst.org.
  53. The official website of ZTF, https://www.ztf.caltech.edu.
  54. The official website of ALMA, https://alma-telescope.jp/en/.
  55. The official website of SKAO, https://www.skao.int/en.
  56. The official website of VLA, https://public.nrao.edu/telescopes/vla/.
  57. The official website of MeerKAT, https://www.sarao.ac.za/science/meerkat/about-meerkat/.
  58. B. T. Zhang, K. Murase, P. Veres, and P. Mészáros, External inverse-Compton emission from low-luminosity gamma-ray bursts: Application to GRB 190829A, Astrophys. J. 920, 55 (2021).
  59. B. T. Zhang, K. Murase, K. Ioka, and B. Zhang, The origin of very-high-energy gamma-rays from GRB 221009A: Implications for reverse shock proton synchrotron emission, J. High Energy Astrophys. 45, 392 (2025).
  60. K. Murase, K. Toma, R. Yamazaki, and P. Mészáros, On the implications of late internal dissipation for shallow-decay afterglow emission and associated high-energy gamma-ray signals, Astrophys. J. 732, 77 (2011).
  61. K. Murase, Interacting supernovae as high-energy multimessenger transients, Phys. Rev. D 109, 103020 (2024).
  62. R. A. M. J. Wijers, M. J. Rees, and P. Meszaros, Shocked by GRB-970228: The afterglow of a cosmological fireball, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 288, L51 (1997).
  63. Z. G. Dai and T. Lu, The afterglow of GRB 990123 and a dense medium, Astrophys. J. Lett. 519, L155 (1999).
  64. Y. F. Huang and K. S. Cheng, Gamma-ray bursts: Optical afterglows in the deep Newtonian phase, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 341, 263 (2003).
  65. T. Piran, The physics of gamma-ray bursts, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 1143 (2004).
  66. B. Zhang, The Physics of Gamma-Ray Bursts (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2018).
  67. K. Leventis, H. J. van Eerten, Z. Meliani, and R. A. M. J. Wijers, Practical flux prescriptions for gamma-ray burst afterglows, from early to late times, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 427, 1329 (2012).
  68. L. Sironi and D. Giannios, A late-time flattening of light curves in gamma-ray burst afterglows, Astrophys. J. 778, 107 (2013).
  69. S. Minhajur Rahaman, J. Granot, and P. Beniamini, The deep Newtonian regime in late-time blast waves: Inevitable transition and distinct flux signatures, arXiv:2604.23567.
  70. A. Anumarlapudi et al., Radio afterglows from tidal disruption events: An unbiased sample from ASKAP RACS, Astrophys. J. 974, 241 (2024).
  71. A. Hajela et al., Eight years of light from ASASSN-15oi: Toward understanding the late-time evolution of TDEs, Astrophys. J. 983, 29 (2025).
  72. A. Horesh, I. Sfaradi, R. Fender, D. A. Green, D. R. A. Williams, and J. S. Bright, Are delayed radio flares common in tidal disruption events? the case of the TDE iPTF 16fnl, Astrophys. J. Lett. 920, L5 (2021).
  73. A. J. Goodwin et al., A radio-emitting outflow produced by the tidal disruption event AT2020vwl, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 522, 5084 (2023).
  74. J. M. Miller and B. Mockler, Archival swift observations of the host galaxy of the TDE AT2025aarm, Astron. Telegr. 17466, 1 (2025), https://www.astronomerstelegram.org/?read=17466.
  75. G. K. Jaisawal, H. Wichern, and P. Charalampopoulos, X-ray brightening of the tidal disruption event at 2025aarm, AstroNote, No. 2026-101 (2026), https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/x-ray-brightening-of-the-tidal-disruption-event-at-2025aarm/.
  76. D. Paneque, M. Teshima, M. Kherlakian, A. Simongini, H. Katagiri, F. Schiavone, S. Menon, S. Inoue, and V. B. Martins, Gamma-ray upper limits the on the rising phase of TDE 2025aarm from observations by the MAGIC and LST-1 telescopes, Transient Name Server AstroNote 328, 1 (2025), https://www.wis-tns.org/astronotes/astronote/2025-328.
  77. J. Guillochon and E. Ramirez-Ruiz, A dark year for tidal disruption events, Astrophys. J. 809, 166 (2015).
  78. K. Hayasaki, N. C. Stone, and A. Loeb, Circularization of tidally disrupted stars around spinning supermassive black holes, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 461, 3760 (2016).
  79. C. Bonnerot, E. M. Rossi, G. Lodato, and D. J. Price, Disc formation from tidal disruptions of stars on eccentric orbits by Schwarzschild black holes, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 455, 2253 (2016).
  80. T. Piran, A. Sadowski, and A. Tchekhovskoy, Jet and disc luminosities in tidal disruption events, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 453, 157 (2015).
  81. S. van Velzen et al., Seventeen tidal disruption events from the first half of ZTF survey observations: Entering a new era of population studies, Astrophys. J. 908, 4 (2021).
  82. K. Hayasaki and P. G. Jonker, On the origin of late-time X-ray flares in UV/optically selected tidal disruption events, Astrophys. J. 921, 20 (2021).
  83. K. D. Alexander et al., The multiwavelength context of delayed radio emission in tidal disruption events: Evidence for accretion-driven outflows, Astrophys. J. 1000, 139 (2026).
  84. L. Z. Kelley, A. Tchekhovskoy, and R. Narayan, Tidal disruption and magnetic flux capture: Powering a jet from a quiescent black hole, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 445, 3919 (2014).
  85. A. Tchekhovskoy, B. D. Metzger, D. Giannios, and L. Z. Kelley, Swift J1644+57 gone MAD: The case for dynamically-important magnetic flux threading the black hole in a jetted tidal disruption event, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 437, 2744 (2014).
  86. P. Mimica, D. Giannios, B. D. Metzger, and M. A. Aloy, The radio afterglow of swift J1644+57 reveals a powerful jet with fast core and slow sheath, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 450, 2824 (2015).
  87. A. J. Goodwin and A. Mummery, A universal critical accretion rate for black hole jet formation, arXiv:2602.14838.
  88. S. Gezari, Tidal disruption events, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 59, 21 (2021).
  89. M. MacLeod, J. Guillochon, and E. Ramirez-Ruiz, The tidal disruption of giant stars and their contribution to the flaring supermassive black hole population, Astrophys. J. 757, 134 (2012).
  90. C. Yuan, K. Murase, B. T. Zhang, S. S. Kimura, and P. Mészáros, Post-Merger jets from supermassive black hole coalescences as electromagnetic counterparts of gravitational wave emission, Astrophys. J. Lett. 911, L15 (2021).
  91. W. Lu and P. Kumar, External inverse-Compton emission from jetted tidal disruption events, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 458, 1071 (2016).
  92. H. Sun, B. Zhang, and Z. Li, Extragalactic high-energy transients: Event rate densities and luminosity functions, Astrophys. J. 812, 33 (2015).
  93. A. Generozov, N. C. Stone, and B. D. Metzger, Circumnuclear media of quiescent supermassive black holes, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 453, 775 (2015).
  94. A. Generozov, P. Mimica, B. D. Metzger, N. C. Stone, D. Giannios, and M. A. Aloy, The influence of circumnuclear environment on the radio emission from TDE jets, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 464, 2481 (2017).
  95. H. Bondi, On spherically symmetrical accretion, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 112, 195 (1952).
  96. E. Quataert, A dynamical model for hot gas in the galactic center, Astrophys. J. 613, 322 (2004).
  97. J. Cuadra, S. Nayakshin, and Q. D. Wang, The role of feedback in accretion on low luminosity AGN: Sgr A* case study, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 450, 277 (2015).
  98. S. M. Ressler, E. Quataert, and J. M. Stone, Hydrodynamic simulations of the inner accretion flow of sagittarius A* fuelled by stellar winds, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 478, 3544 (2018).
  99. M. Mukhopadhyay, M. Bhattacharya, and K. Murase, Multimessenger signatures of delayed choked jets in tidal disruption events, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 534, 1528 (2024).
  100. K. Murase, S. S. Kimura, and P. Meszaros, Hidden cores of active galactic nuclei as the origin of medium-energy neutrinos: Critical tests with the MeV gamma-ray connection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 011101 (2020).
  101. K. Hayasaki and R. Yamazaki, Neutrino emissions from tidal disruption remnants, Astrophys. J. 886, 114 (2019).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 114, 103004– Published 3 November, 2026
  • Received 5 January 2026
  • Revised 27 May 2026
  • Accepted 24 September 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation