Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Normal mode analysis within relativistic massive transport

Xin Lin1, Qiu-Ze Sun2, Xin-Hui Wu1, and Jin Hu1,*

  • *Contact author: hu-j23@fzu.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 113, 076010 – Published 10 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/zj9g-2k12

Abstract

In this paper, we address the normal mode analysis of the linearized Boltzmann equation for massive particles in the relaxation time approximation. We find that the sound channel and the heat channel are coupled in the massive case, which contrasts with their decoupling in the massless relaxation time approximation. In the limit of zero mass, our results smoothly reduce to the known case where the two channels decouple. By utilizing the argument principle in complex analysis, we determine the existence condition for collective modes and find the onset transition behavior of collective modes previously observed in massless systems. We numerically determine the critical wave number κc for the existence of each mode under various values of the scaled mass. Within the range of scaled masses considered, the critical wave numbers for the heat and shear channels increase with increasing scaled mass, while that of the sound channel exhibits a nonmonotonic dependence on the scaled mass. In addition, we analytically derive the dispersion relations for these collective modes in the long-wavelength limit. Notably, kinetic theory also incorporates collisionless damping effects known as Landau damping. We find that the branch cut structure responsible for Landau damping differs from the massless case: Whereas the massless system features only two branch points, the massive system exhibits an infinite number of such points forming a continuous branch cut.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (59)

  1. P. Romatschke and U. Romatschke, Relativistic Fluid Dynamics In and Out of Equilibrium, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2019).
  2. E. McDonough, Phys. Lett. B 809, 135755 (2020).
  3. Y. Hama, T. Kodama, and O. Socolowski, Jr., Braz. J. Phys. 35, 24 (2005).
  4. P. Huovinen and P. V. Ruuskanen, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 56, 163 (2006).
  5. S. Jeon and U. Heinz, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 24, 1530010 (2015).
  6. J. E. Bernhard, J. S. Moreland, and S. A. Bass, Nat. Phys. 15, 1113 (2019).
  7. J. Auvinen, K. J. Eskola, P. Huovinen, H. Niemi, R. Paatelainen, and P. Petreczky, Phys. Rev. C 102, 044911 (2020).
  8. G. Nijs, W. van der Schee, U. Gürsoy, and R. Snellings, Phys. Rev. C 103, 054909 (2021).
  9. D. Everett et al. (JETSCAPE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 103, 054904 (2021).
  10. J. E. Parkkila, A. Onnerstad, and D. J. Kim, Phys. Rev. C 104, 054904 (2021).
  11. A. Czajka, S. Hauksson, C. Shen, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Phys. Rev. C 97, 044914 (2018).
  12. V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 765, 193 (2017).
  13. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 428 (2017).
  14. M. P. Heller, R. A. Janik, and P. Witaszczyk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 201602 (2012).
  15. L. Landau and E. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics, 2nd ed. (Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 1987).
  16. M. P. Heller and M. Spalinski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 072501 (2015).
  17. M. Strickland, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2018) 128.
  18. G. S. Denicol and J. Noronha, Nucl. Phys. A1005, 121748 (2021).
  19. A. Behtash, C. N. Cruz-Camacho, and M. Martinez, Phys. Rev. D 97, 044041 (2018).
  20. P. Romatschke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 012301 (2018).
  21. C. Chattopadhyay and U. W. Heinz, Phys. Lett. B 801, 135158 (2020).
  22. A. Kurkela, W. van der Schee, U. A. Wiedemann, and B. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 102301 (2020).
  23. S. Chen and S. Shi, Phys. Rev. C 111, L021902 (2025).
  24. P. Romatschke, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 352 (2016).
  25. A. Kurkela and U. A. Wiedemann, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 776 (2019).
  26. M. Bajec, S. Grozdanov, and A. Soloviev, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 065.
  27. R. Brants, Phys. Rev. D 110, 116027 (2024).
  28. S. A. Hartnoll and S. P. Kumar, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2005) 036.
  29. P. K. Kovtun and A. O. Starinets, Phys. Rev. D 72, 086009 (2005).
  30. S. Grozdanov, N. Kaplis, and A. O. Starinets, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2016) 151.
  31. R. M. Strain, Commun. Math. Phys. 300, 529 (2010).
  32. L. Gavassino, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L042043 (2024).
  33. G. D. Moore, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2018) 084.
  34. S. Ochsenfeld and S. Schlichting, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2023) 186.
  35. J. Hu, SciPost Phys. 20, 020 (2026).
  36. R. Liboff, Kinetic Theory (Springer, New York, 2003).
  37. M. Dudyński, J. Stat. Phys. 153, 1084 (2013).
  38. S. R. De Groot, W. A. Van Leeuwen, and C. G. Van Weert, Relativistic Kinetic Theory. Principles and Applications (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980).
  39. J. Hu and S. Shi, Phys. Rev. D 106, 014007 (2022).
  40. D. Bazow, G. S. Denicol, U. Heinz, M. Martinez, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 022301 (2016).
  41. J. Hu, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 066.
  42. G. S. Rocha, I. Danhoni, K. Ingles, G. S. Denicol, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D 110, 076003 (2024).
  43. J. L. Anderson and H. R. Witting, Physica (Utrecht) 74, 466 (1974).
  44. G. S. Rocha, G. S. Denicol, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 042301 (2021).
  45. J. Hu, Phys. Rev. D 105, 096021 (2022).
  46. J. Hu and Z. Xu, Phys. Rev. D 107, 016010 (2023).
  47. J. Hu, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 281 (2025).
  48. A. Katz, A. Kurkela, and A. Soloviev, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2019) 017.
  49. A. Hataei, R. Heydari, and F. Taghinavaz, arXiv:2504.14591.
  50. M. Bajec and A. Soloviev, Phys. Rev. D 112, 065002 (2025).
  51. F. Olver, D. Lozier, R. Boisvert, and C. Clark, The NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2010).
  52. C. Cercignani and G. M. Kremer, The Relativistic Boltzmann Equation: Theory and Applications (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2002).
  53. M. P. Heller, A. Serantes, M. Spaliński, V. Svensson, and B. Withers, SciPost Phys. 10, 123 (2021).
  54. B. Withers, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2018) 059.
  55. S. Grozdanov, P. K. Kovtun, A. O. Starinets, and P. Tadić, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 251601 (2019).
  56. J. Dawson, Phys. Fluids 4, 869 (1961).
  57. M. Blake, R. A. Davison, S. Grozdanov, and H. Liu, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 035.
  58. S. Grozdanov, K. Schalm, and V. Scopelliti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 231601 (2018).
  59. N. Abbasi and D. H. Rischke, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2025) 241.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation