Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

New regularization scheme for the wave function of the Universe in the Lorentzian path integral

Masaki Yamada*

  • *Contact author: m.yamada@tohoku.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. D 113, 063547 – Published 18 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/z59k-v3l8

Abstract

The Lorentzian path integral for the wave function of the Universe is only conditionally convergent and thus requires a well-defined prescription. The Picard-Lefschetz approach ensures convergence through contour deformation, but it has been argued that this leads to unsuppressed perturbations due to relevant saddle points residing in the region Im N>0. As an alternative, we propose a simple regulator for the lapse integral in minisuperspace. Specifically, we impose the vanishing initial size of the Universe via a delta function, represented as a narrow Gaussian of width σ, and take the limit σ→0 only after performing the functional integrations. This regulator has a clear physical interpretation: it corresponds to a vanishingly small quantum uncertainty in the initial size of the Universe. For any fixed σ>0, the lapse integral is absolutely convergent along (or slightly below) the real axis, and no excursion into the region Im N>0 is required. We further argue that the initial wave function for scalar and tensor perturbations should be incorporated in the Lorentzian path integral formalism, and we show that these perturbations are then appropriately suppressed. A purely Lorentzian path integral thus yields the tunneling wave function with suppressed perturbations. We also demonstrate that the Hartle-Hawking wave function can be reproduced by choosing a contour for the lapse integral extending from −∞ to +∞ that passes below the singularity near the origin.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (40)

  1. A. Vilenkin, The birth of inflationary universes, Phys. Rev. D 27, 2848 (1983).
  2. A. Vilenkin, Quantum creation of universes, Phys. Rev. D 30, 509 (1984).
  3. J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking, Wave function of the universe, Phys. Rev. D 28, 2960 (1983).
  4. A. D. Linde, Quantum creation of the inflationary universe, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 39, 401 (1984).
  5. V. A. Rubakov, Quantum mechanics in the tunneling universe, Phys. Lett. 148B, 280 (1984).
  6. Y. B. Zeldovich and A. A. Starobinsky, Quantum creation of a universe in a nontrivial topology, Sov. Astron. Lett. 10, 135 (1984).
  7. B. S. DeWitt, Quantum theory of gravity. 1. The canonical theory, Phys. Rev. 160, 1113 (1967).
  8. A. Vilenkin, Boundary conditions in quantum cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 33, 3560 (1986).
  9. A. Vilenkin, Quantum cosmology and the initial state of the universe, Phys. Rev. D 37, 888 (1988).
  10. J. Louko, Propagation amplitude in homogeneous quantum cosmology, Classical Quantum Gravity 4, 581 (1987).
  11. J. J. Halliwell and J. Louko, Steepest descent contours in the path integral approach to quantum cosmology. 1. The de Sitter minisuperspace model, Phys. Rev. D 39, 2206 (1989).
  12. J. J. Halliwell and J. B. Hartle, Integration contours for the no boundary wave function of the universe, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1815 (1990).
  13. J. D. Brown and E. A. Martinez, Lorentzian path integral for minisuperspace cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 42, 1931 (1990).
  14. A. Vilenkin, Approaches to quantum cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 50, 2581 (1994).
  15. J. Feldbrugge, J.-L. Lehners, and N. Turok, Lorentzian quantum cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 95, 103508 (2017).
  16. G. W. Gibbons, S. W. Hawking, and M. J. Perry, Path integrals and the indefiniteness of the gravitational action, Nucl. Phys. B138, 141 (1978).
  17. M. Honda, H. Matsui, K. Okabayashi, and T. Terada, Resurgence in Lorentzian quantum cosmology: No-boundary saddles and resummation of quantum gravity corrections around tunneling saddle points, Phys. Rev. D 110, 083508 (2024).
  18. C.-Y. Chou and J. Nishimura, Monte Carlo studies of quantum cosmology by the generalized Lefschetz thimble method, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2025) 142.
  19. J. Feldbrugge, J.-L. Lehners, and N. Turok, No smooth beginning for spacetime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 171301 (2017).
  20. J. Diaz Dorronsoro, J. J. Halliwell, J. B. Hartle, T. Hertog, and O. Janssen, Real no-boundary wave function in Lorentzian quantum cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 96, 043505 (2017).
  21. J. Diaz Dorronsoro, J. J. Halliwell, J. B. Hartle, T. Hertog, O. Janssen, and Y. Vreys, Damped perturbations in the no-boundary state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 081302 (2018).
  22. O. Janssen, J. J. Halliwell, and T. Hertog, No-boundary proposal in biaxial Bianchi IX minisuperspace, Phys. Rev. D 99, 123531 (2019).
  23. J. Feldbrugge, J.-L. Lehners, and N. Turok, No rescue for the no boundary proposal: Pointers to the future of quantum cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 97, 023509 (2018).
  24. J. Feldbrugge, J.-L. Lehners, and N. Turok, Inconsistencies of the new no-boundary proposal, Universe 4, 100 (2018).
  25. A. Vilenkin and M. Yamada, Tunneling wave function of the universe, Phys. Rev. D 98, 066003 (2018).
  26. A. Vilenkin and M. Yamada, Tunneling wave function of the universe II: The backreaction problem, Phys. Rev. D 99, 066010 (2019).
  27. S.-J. Wang, M. Yamada, and A. Vilenkin, Constraints on non-minimal coupling from quantum cosmology, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2019) 025.
  28. A. Di Tucci and J.-L. Lehners, No-boundary proposal as a path integral with Robin boundary conditions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 201302 (2019).
  29. A. Di Tucci, J.-L. Lehners, and L. Sberna, No-boundary prescriptions in Lorentzian quantum cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 100, 123543 (2019).
  30. M. Ailiga, S. Mallik, and G. Narain, Lorentzian Robin universe, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2024) 124.
  31. M. Ailiga, S. Mallik, and G. Narain, Lorentzian Robin universe of Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 57, 29 (2025).
  32. M. Ailiga, S. Mallik, and G. Narain, Boundary choices and one-loop complex gravitational path integral, Phys. Rev. D 111, 123538 (2025).
  33. M. Bojowald and S. Brahma, Loops rescue the no-boundary proposal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 201301 (2018).
  34. M. Bojowald and S. Brahma, Loop quantum gravity, signature change, and the no-boundary proposal, Phys. Rev. D 102, 106023 (2020).
  35. J.-L. Lehners, Wave function of simple universes analytically continued from negative to positive potentials, Phys. Rev. D 104, 063527 (2021).
  36. H. Matsui, S. Mukohyama, and A. Naruko, No smooth spacetime in Lorentzian quantum cosmology and trans-Planckian physics, Phys. Rev. D 107, 043511 (2023).
  37. J. J. Halliwell, J. B. Hartle, and T. Hertog, What is the no-boundary wave function of the universe?, Phys. Rev. D 99, 043526 (2019).
  38. B. Banihashemi and T. Jacobson, On the lapse contour in the gravitational path integral, Phys. Rev. D 111, 066014 (2025).
  39. G. V. Dunne, Functional determinants in quantum field theory, J. Phys. A 41, 304006 (2008).
  40. J. Maldacena, Comments on the no boundary wavefunction and slow roll inflation, arXiv:2403.10510.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation