Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Quantization of deformed reducible gauge theories

A. A. Averianov1,3,*, A. O. Barvinsky2,4,†, I. L. Buchbinder3,5,‡, V. A. Krykhtin6,§, and D. V. Nesterov2,∥

  • *Contact author: averianov.aa@phystech.edu
  • †Contact author: barvin@lpi.ru
  • ‡Contact author: buchbinder@theor.jinr.ru
  • §Contact author: krykhin@tpu.ru
  • ∥Contact author: nesterov@lpi.ru

Phys. Rev. D 114, 065018 – Published 17 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/yxrz-7985

Abstract

We consider a general reducible gauge theory deformed by mass or/and interaction terms violating gauge invariance. It is shown that in the Abelian case, by using the Stueckelberg-type procedure, this theory with broken gauge symmetry can be converted into exactly gauge-invariant theory which under a suitable choice of gauge conditions can be treated within the formalism of minimal wave operators manageable by the covariant Schwinger-DeWitt technique. We carry out quantization of such a theory in general terms when the initial generators of gauge transformations are of the first and second stages of reducibility and derive its partition function in terms of the functional integral with all corresponding ghost fields. This method is applied to quantization of massive fermionic totally antisymmetric tensor field models in anti–de Sitter space. One-loop quantum effective action for these models is derived in the form of the functional determinants of special Dirac-type differential operators in various dimensions.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (69)

  1. M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz, and E. Witten, Superstring Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1987), Vol. 1-2.
  2. J. Polchinski, String Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1998), Vol. 1-2.
  3. C. V. Johnson, D-Branes (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2003), p. 548.
  4. T. Ortin, Gravity and Strings (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2004).
  5. K. Becker, M. Becker, and J. H. Schwarz, String Theory and M-Theory: A Modern Introduction (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2007).
  6. D. Z. Freedman and A. Van Proeyen, Supergravity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2012).
  7. R. Blumenhagen, D. Luest, and S. Theisen, Basic Concepts of String Theory (Springer, New York, 2013).
  8. Y. Tanii, Introduction to Supergravity (Springer, New York, 2014).
  9. S. E. Hjelmeland and U. Lindstrom, Duality for nonspecialist, arXiv:hep-th/9705122.
  10. S. M. Kuzenko and K. Turner, Effective actions for dual massive (super) p-forms, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 040.
  11. A. Hell, On the duality of massive Kalb-Ramond and Proca fields, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2022) 056.
  12. A. Hell and I. Obata, On the Kalb-Ramond field with nonminimal coupling to gravity, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2026) 082.
  13. A. O. Barvinsky, A. E. Kalugin, and W. Wachowski, Schwinger-DeWitt expansion for the heat kernel of non-minimal operators in causal theories, Phys. Rev. D 112, 076032 (2025).
  14. H. Ruegg and M. Ruiz-Altaba, The Stueckelberg field, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19, 3265 (2004).
  15. I. L. Buchbinder, G. de Berredo-Peixoto, and I. L. Shapiro, Quantum effects in softly broken gauge theories in curved spacetimes, Phys. Lett. B 649, 454 (2007).
  16. I. L. Buchbinder, E. N. Kirillova, and N. G. Pletnev, Quantum equivalence of massive antisymmetric tensor field models in curved space, Phys. Rev. D 78, 084024 (2008).
  17. I. L. Buchbinder, P. R. B. R. do Vale, G. Y. Oyadomari, and I. L. Shapiro, Renormalization of massive vector field theory coupled to scalar in curved space-time, Phys. Rev. D, 110, 125015 (2024).
  18. I. L. Buchbinder, V. A. Krykhtin, and L. L. Ryskina, Lagrangian formulation of massive fermionic totally antisymmetric tensor field theory in AdS(d) space, Nucl. Phys. B819, 453 (2009).
  19. Yu. M. Zinoviev, Note on antisymmetric spin-tensors, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2009) 035.
  20. A. Campoleoni, D. Francia, J. Mourad, and A. Sagnotti, Unconstrained higher spins of mixed symmetry. II. Fermi fields, Nucl. Phys. B828, 405 (2010),
  21. C. M. Hull, Strongly coupled gravity and duality, Nucl. Phys. B583, 237 (2000).
  22. C. M. Hull, Symmetries and compactifications of (4,0) conformal gravity, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2000) 007.
  23. C. M. Hull, Duality in gravity and higher spin gauge fields, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2001) 027.
  24. P. West, E(11) and M theory, Classical Quantum Gravity 18, 443 (2001).
  25. L. Borsten, D=6,N=(2,0) and N=(4,0) theories, Phys. Rev. D 97, 066014 (2018).
  26. M. Henneaux, V. Lekeu, and A. Leonard, The action of the (free) (4,0)-theory, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2018) 114; 05 (2018) 105(E).
  27. M. Henneaux, V. Lekeu, J. Matulich, and S. Prohazka, The action the (free) N=(3,1) theory in six spacetime dimensions, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2018) 057.
  28. R. Minasian, C. Strickland-Constable, and Y. Zhang, On symmetries and dynamics of exotic supermultiplets, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 174.
  29. Y. Bertrand, S. Hohenegger, O. Holm, and H. Samtleben, Toward exotic 6D supergravities, Phys. Rev. D 103, 046002 (2021).
  30. M. Gunaydin, Unified non-metric (1,0) tensor-Einstein supergravity theories and (4,0) supergravity in six dimensions, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 081.
  31. V. I. Ogievetsky and I. V. Polubarinov, The notoph and its possible interactions, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 4, 156 (1967); https://inspirehep.net/literature/51411; V. I. Ogievetsky and I. V. Polubarinovreprinted in Supersymmetries and Quantum Symmetries, edited by J. Wess and E. A. Ivanov (Springer, New York, 1999), pp. 391–396.
  32. M. Kalb and P. Ramond, Classical direct interstring action, Phys. Rev. D 9, 2273 (1974).
  33. E. Cremmer and J. Scherk, Spontaneous dynamical breaking of gauge symmetry in dual models, Nucl. Phys. B72, 117 (1974).
  34. F. Gliozzi, J. Scherk, and D. Olive, Supersymmetry, supergravity theories and the dual spinor model, Nucl. Phys. B122, 253 (1977).
  35. E. A. Ivanov, Gauge fields, nonlinear realizations, supersymmetry, Phys. Part. Nucl. 47, 508 (2016).
  36. N. Kummer, On the theory of particles of spin 1, Helv. Phys. Acta, 33, 829 (1960).
  37. S. M. Kuzenko and E. S. N. Raptakis, Covariant quantization of tensor multiplet models, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 182.
  38. A. S. Schwarz, The partition function of degenerate quadratic functionals and Ray-Singer invariants, Lett. Math. Phys. 2, 247 (1978).
  39. A. S. Schwarz, The partition function of a degenerate functional, Commun. Math. Phys. 67, 1 (1979).
  40. W. Siegel, Hidden ghosts, Phys. Lett. 93B, 170 (1980).
  41. E. Sezgin and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Renormalizability properties of antisymmetric tensor field coupled to gravity, Phys. Rev. D 22, 179 (1980).
  42. H. Hata, T. Kugo, and N. Ohta, Skew-symmetric tensor gauge field theory dynamically realized in the QCD U(1) channel, Nucl. Phys. B178, 527 (1981).
  43. Y. N. Obukhov, The geometrical approach to antisymmetric tensor field theory, Phys. Lett. 109B, 195 (1982).
  44. D. Z. Freedman and P. K. Townsend, Antisymmetric tensor gauge theories and nonlinear sigma models, Nucl. Phys. B177, 282 (1981).
  45. J. Thierry-Mieg and L. Baulieu, Covariant quantization of nonabelian antisymmetric tensor gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B228, 259 (1983).
  46. E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin, Quantum equivalence of dual field theories, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 162, 31 (1985).
  47. S. P. de Alwis, M. T. Grisaru, and L. Mazincescu, Unitarity in antisymmetric tensor gauge theories, Phys. Lett. B 190, 122 (1987).
  48. A. A. Slavnov and S. A. Frolov, Quantization of non-Abelian antisymmetric tensor field, Theor. Math. Phys. 75, 470 (1988).
  49. I. L. Buchbinder and S. M. Kuzenko, Quantum equivalence of the Freedman-Townsend model and the principal chiral σ-model, (1987), arXiv:2405.16782.
  50. S. P. de Alwis, M. T. Grisaru, and L. Mazincescu, Quantization and unitary in antisymmetric tensor gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B303, 57 (1988).
  51. C. Batlle and J. Gomis, Lagrangian and Hamiltonian BRST structures of the antisymmetric tensor gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D 38 (1988) 1169.
  52. N. K. Nielsen, Quantum equivalence of four-dimensional nonlinear sigma-model and antisymmetric tensor model, Nucl. Phys. B332, 391 (1990).
  53. J. Gomis, J. Paris, and S. Samuel, Antibracket, antifields and gauge theory quantization, Phys. Rep. 259, 1 (1995).
  54. W. Siegel, Gauge spinor superfield as scalar multiplet, Phys. Lett. 85B, 333 (1979).
  55. S. J. Gates, Super p-form gauge superfields, Nucl. Phys. B184, 381 (1981).
  56. M. T. Grisaru, N. K. Nielsen, W. Siegel, and D. Zanon, Energy-momentum tensors, supercurrents, (super)traces and quantum equivalence, Nucl. Phys. B247, 157 (1984).
  57. I. L. Buchbinder and S. M. Kuzenko, Quantization of the classically equivalent theories in the superspace of simple supergravity and quantum equivalence, Nucl. Phys. B308, 162 (1988).
  58. I. L. Buchbinder and S. M. Kuzenko, Ideas and Methods of Supersymmetry and Supergravity or a Walk Through Superspace (IOP Publishing, London, 1998).
  59. K. Furuta, T. Inami, H. Nakajima, and M. Nitta, Supersymmetric extension of non-Abelian scalar-tensor duality, Prog. Theor. Phys. 106, 851 (2001).
  60. E. S. Fradkin and G. A. Vilkovisky, Quantization of relativistic systems with constraints, Phys. Lett. 55B, 224 (1975).
  61. I. A. Batalin and E. S. Fradkin, Relativistic S-matrix of dynamical systems with boson and fermion constraints, Phys. Lett. 69B, 309 (1977).
  62. M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, Quantization of Gauge Systems (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1992).
  63. I. A. Batalin and G. A. Vilkovisky, Gauge algebra and quantization, Phys. Lett. 102B, 27 (1981).
  64. I. A. Batalin and G. A. Vilkovisky, Quantization of gauge theories with linearly dependent generators, Phys. Rev. D 28, 2567 (1983); I. Batalin and G. Vilkovisky30, 508(E) (1984).
  65. A. O. Barvinsky, I. L. Buchbinder, V. A. Krykhtin, and D. V. Nesterov, Adjustment of Faddeev-Popov quantization to reducible gauge theories: Antisymmetric tensor fermion in AdSd space, Phys. Rev. D 112, 065021 (2025).
  66. A. O. Barvinsky, I. L. Buchbinder, V. A. Krykhtin, and D. V. Nesterov, Covariant quantization of totally antisymmetric tensor-spinor field in AdSd, Phys. Rev. D 113, 045022 (2026).
  67. V. Lekeu and Y. Zhang, On the quantization and anomalies of antisymmetric tensor-spinors, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2021) 078.
  68. L. D. Faddeev and V. N. Popov, Feynman diagrams for the Yang-Mills field, Phys. Lett. 25B, 29 (1967).
  69. I. L. Buchbinder, V. A. Krykhtin, and L. L. Ryskina, BRST approach to Lagrangian formulation of bosonic totally antisymmeric tensor fields in curved space, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 24, 401 (2009).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation