Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Flavor and electroweak precision constraints on a simplified dark matter model with a light spin-0 mediator

Lipika Kolay* and Soumitra Nandi†

  • *Contact author: klipika@iitg.ac.in
  • †Contact author: soumitra.nandi@iitg.ac.in

Phys. Rev. D 114, 035025 – Published 18 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/yj31-gk7k

Abstract

This work investigates the allowed parameter spaces of a simplified dark matter (DM) model characterized by a spin-0 mediator with masses in the low to intermediate range (<10  GeV). We systematically divide the parameter space into various mass regions of the mediator and constrain the model parameters using a diverse set of observables, including flavor-changing charged and neutral current processes such as rare and semileptonic decays of pseudoscalar mesons (B and K), electroweak precision observables, alongside data from fixed-target experiments. Additionally, we explore the model’s capability to explain recent Belle II data on invisible B meson decays. Our study includes a detailed examination of DM properties and the constraints from big bang nucleosynthesis. We present bounds on model parameters through individual and simultaneous analyses of the available inputs and highlight their implications for understanding DM phenomenology. Furthermore, we obtain bounds on the couplings of the possible gauge-invariant dimension-5 operators, leading to the possible interactions between the spin-0 mediator and the SM gauge bosons and fermions. This study comprehensively investigates the constraints and theoretical implications associated with low-mass spin-0 mediator DM models.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (238)

  1. Y. Bai and J. Berger, Fermion portal dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2013) 171.
  2. D. Schmeier, Effective models for dark matter at the international linear collider, other thesis, University of Bonn, 2013.
  3. M. R. Buckley, D. Feld, and D. Goncalves, Scalar simplified models for dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 91, 015017 (2015).
  4. J. Abdallah et al., Simplified models for dark matter and missing energy searches at the LHC, arXiv:1409.2893.
  5. J. Abdallah et al., Simplified models for dark matter searches at the LHC, Phys. Dark Universe 9–10, 8 (2015).
  6. A. Berlin, S. Gori, T. Lin, and L.-T. Wang, Pseudoscalar portal dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 92, 015005 (2015).
  7. S. Baek, P. Ko, M. Park, W.-I. Park, and C. Yu, Beyond the dark matter effective field theory and a simplified model approach at colliders, Phys. Lett. B 756, 289 (2016).
  8. C. Englert, M. McCullough, and M. Spannowsky, S-channel dark matter simplified models and unitarity, Phys. Dark Universe 14, 48 (2016).
  9. A. Albert et al., Towards the next generation of simplified dark matter models, Phys. Dark Universe 16, 49 (2017).
  10. A. De Simone and T. Jacques, Simplified models vs effective field theory approaches in dark matter searches, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 367 (2016).
  11. G. Arcadi, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y. Mambrini, M. Pierre, S. Profumo, and F. S. Queiroz, The waning of the WIMP? A review of models, searches, and constraints, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 203 (2018).
  12. M. Bauer, M. Klassen, and V. Tenorth, Universal properties of pseudoscalar mediators in dark matter extensions of 2HDMs, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 107.
  13. G. Arcadi, M. Lindner, F. S. Queiroz, W. Rodejohann, and S. Vogl, Pseudoscalar mediators: A WIMP model at the neutrino floor, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2018) 042.
  14. D. Abercrombie et al., Dark matter benchmark models for early LHC Run-2 searches: Report of the ATLAS/CMS dark matter forum, Phys. Dark Universe 27, 100371 (2020).
  15. T. Abe et al., LHC Dark Matter Working Group: Next-generation spin-0 dark matter models, Phys. Dark Universe 27, 100351 (2020).
  16. C. Arina, Impact of cosmological and astrophysical constraints on dark matter simplified models, Front. Astron. Space Sci. 5, 30 (2018).
  17. G. Arcadi, A. Djouadi, and M. Raidal, Dark Matter through the Higgs portal, Phys. Rep. 842, 1 (2020).
  18. G. Arcadi, G. Busoni, T. Hugle, and V. T. Tenorth, Comparing 2HDM+ scalar and pseudoscalar simplified models at LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2020) 098.
  19. G. Arcadi, A. Djouadi, and M. Kado, The Higgs-portal for vector dark matter and the effective field theory approach: A reappraisal, Phys. Lett. B 805, 135427 (2020).
  20. P. Cea, Evidence of the true Higgs boson HT at the LHC Run 2, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 34, 1950137 (2019).
  21. F. Richard, Evidences for a pseudo scalar resonance at 400 GeV Possible interpretations (2020).
  22. A. M. Sirunyan et al., Search for a standard model-like Higgs boson in the mass range between 70 and 110 GeV in the diphoton final state in proton-proton collisions at s=8 and 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 793, 320 (2019).
  23. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Dark sector searches with the CMS experiment, Phys. Rept. 1115, 448 (2025).
  24. G. Aad et al., Search for a new pseudoscalar decaying into a pair of muons in events with a top-quark pair at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 108, 092007 (2023).
  25. J. Tao (ATLAS and CMS Collaborations), Extra Higgs boson searches at the LHC, in Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on the CKM Unitarity Triangle, https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.03571.
  26. L. Rygaard, J. Niedziela, R. Schäfer, S. Bruggisser, J. Alimena, S. Westhoff, and F. Blekman, Top secrets: Long-lived ALPs in top production, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2023) 138.
  27. G. Bhattacharyya and D. Das, Scalar sector of two-Higgs-doublet models: A minireview, Pramana 87, 40 (2016).
  28. M. Bauer, U. Haisch, and F. Kahlhoefer, Simplified dark matter models with two Higgs doublets: I. Pseudoscalar mediators, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2017) 138.
  29. G. Hiller, B physics signals of the lightest CP odd Higgs in the NMSSM at large tan beta, Phys. Rev. D 70, 034018 (2004).
  30. P. Draper, T. Liu, C. E. M. Wagner, L.-T. Wang, and H. Zhang, Dark Light Higgs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 121805 (2011).
  31. J. March-Russell, C. McCabe, and M. McCullough, Neutrino-flavoured sneutrino dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2010) 108.
  32. Y.-T. Chen, S. Matsumoto, T.-P. Tang, Y.-L. S. Tsai, and L. Wu, Light thermal dark matter beyond p-wave annihilation in minimal Higgs portal model, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 281.
  33. L. Lopez-Honorez, T. Schwetz, and J. Zupan, Higgs portal, fermionic dark matter, and a standard model like Higgs at 125 GeV, Phys. Lett. B 716, 179 (2012).
  34. S. Baek, P. Ko, and W.-I. Park, Invisible Higgs decay width vs dark matter direct detection cross section in Higgs portal dark matter models, Phys. Rev. D 90, 055014 (2014).
  35. S. Baek, P. Ko, and J. Li, Minimal renormalizable simplified dark matter model with a pseudoscalar mediator, Phys. Rev. D 95, 075011 (2017).
  36. F. Ferrer, L. M. Krauss, and S. Profumo, Indirect detection of light neutralino dark matter in the NMSSM, Phys. Rev. D 74, 115007 (2006).
  37. D. Goncalves, P. A. N. Machado, and J. M. No, Simplified models for dark matter face their consistent completions, Phys. Rev. D 95, 055027 (2017).
  38. M. J. Dolan, F. Kahlhoefer, C. McCabe, and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, A taste of dark matter: Flavour constraints on pseudoscalar mediators, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2015) 171; 07 (2015) 103(E).
  39. G. Krnjaic, Probing light thermal dark-matter with a Higgs portal mediator, Phys. Rev. D 94, 073009 (2016).
  40. S. Matsumoto, Y.-L. S. Tsai, and P.-Y. Tseng, Light fermionic WIMP dark matter with light scalar mediator, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2019) 050.
  41. C. Arina, E. Del Nobile, and P. Panci, Dark matter with pseudoscalar-mediated interactions explains the DAMA signal and the Galactic Center excess, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 011301 (2015).
  42. E. Del Nobile, G. B. Gelmini, A. Georgescu, and J.-H. Huh, Reevaluation of spin-dependent WIMP-proton interactions as an explanation of the DAMA data, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2015) 046.
  43. K.-C. Yang, Fermionic dark matter through a light pseudoscalar portal: Hints from the DAMA results, Phys. Rev. D 94, 035028 (2016).
  44. F. Ertas and F. Kahlhoefer, Loop-induced direct detection signatures from CP-violating scalar mediators, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2019). 052.
  45. F. Kahlhoefer, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, and S. Wild, Dark matter self-interactions from a general spin-0 mediator, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2017) 003.
  46. P. Agrawal, S. Blanchet, Z. Chacko, and C. Kilic, Flavored dark matter, and its implications for direct detection and colliders, Phys. Rev. D 86, 055002 (2012).
  47. B. Batell, J. Pradler, and M. Spannowsky, Dark matter from minimal flavor violation, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2011) 038.
  48. A. Kumar and S. Tulin, Top-flavored dark matter and the forward-backward asymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 87, 095006 (2013).
  49. S. Kanemura, S. Matsumoto, T. Nabeshima, and N. Okada, Can WIMP dark matter overcome the nightmare scenario?, Phys. Rev. D 82, 055026 (2010).
  50. A. Rajaraman and J. Smolinsky, Self-interacting dark matter with a neutrinophilic scalar mediator, Acta Phys. Pol. B 51, 1827 (2020).
  51. I. Adachi et al., Evidence for B+K→+νν− decays, Phys. Rev. D 109, 112006 (2024).
  52. W. G. Parrott, C. Bouchard, and C. T. H. Davies, Standard model predictions for B→Kℓ+ℓ−, B→Kℓ1−ℓ2+ and B→Kνν− using form factors from Nf=2+1+1 lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 107, 014511, 2023; 107, 119903(E) (2023).
  53. S. Adler et al., Measurement of the K+−>pi+nu nu branching ratio, Phys. Rev. D 77, 052003 (2008).
  54. P. del Amo Sanchez et al., Search for the rare decay B→Kνν¯, Phys. Rev. D 82, 112002 (2010).
  55. J. Grygier et al., Search for B→hνν¯ decays with semileptonic tagging at Belle, Phys. Rev. D 96, 091101 (2017); 97, 099902(E) (2018).
  56. J. K. Ahn et al., Study of the KL→π0νν¯ Decay at the J-PARC KOTO experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 121801 (2021).
  57. J. P. Lees et al., Search for B→K(*)νν¯ and invisible quarkonium decays, Phys. Rev. D 87, 112005 (2013).
  58. A. Berlin, D. Hooper, and S. D. McDermott, Simplified dark matter models for the Galactic Center gamma-ray excess, Phys. Rev. D 89, 115022 (2014).
  59. E. Izaguirre, G. Krnjaic, and B. Shuve, The Galactic Center excess from the bottom up, Phys. Rev. D 90, 055002 (2014).
  60. S. Ipek, D. McKeen, and A. E. Nelson, A renormalizable model for the galactic center gamma ray excess from dark matter annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 90, 055021 (2014).
  61. R. Bernabei et al., The dark matter: DAMA/LIBRA and its perspectives, in 16th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Astrophysics and Relativistic Field Theories (2021).
  62. T. Daylan, D. P. Finkbeiner, D. Hooper, T. Linden, S. K. N. Portillo, N. L. Rodd, and T. R. Slatyer, The characterization of the gamma-ray signal from the central Milky Way: A case for annihilating dark matter, Phys. Dark Universe 12, 1 (2016).
  63. U. Haisch and E. Re, Simplified dark matter top-quark interactions at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2015) 078.
  64. L. Kolay and S. Nandi, Exploring constraints on simplified dark matter model through flavour and electroweak observables, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 008.
  65. R. L.Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  66. B. Batell, A. Freitas, A. Ismail, and D. Mckeen, Flavor-specific scalar mediators, Phys. Rev. D 98, 055026 (2018).
  67. U. Haisch, P. Pani, and G. Polesello, Determining the CP nature of spin-0 mediators in associated production of dark matter and tt¯ pairs, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2017) 131.
  68. T.-K. Chen, C.-W. Chiang, and K. Yagyu, CP violation in a model with Higgs triplets, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2023) 069; 07 (2023) 169(E).
  69. D. Azevedo, R. Capucha, A. Onofre, and R. Santos, CP-violation, asymmetries and interferences in tt¯ϕ, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 246.
  70. G. Aad et al., Test of CP invariance in vector-boson fusion production of the Higgs boson in the H→ττ channel in proton–proton collisions at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B 805, 135426 (2020).
  71. X. Chen and Y. Wu, Search for CP violation effects in the h→ττ decay with e+e− colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 697 (2017).
  72. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), First search for light dark matter in the neutrino fog with XENONnT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 111802 (2025).
  73. J. Aalbers et al., Search for new physics in low-energy electron recoils from the first LZ exposure, Phys. Rev. D 108, 072006 (2023).
  74. D. Huang et al., Search for dark-matter–nucleon interactions with a dark mediator in PandaX-4T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 191002 (2023).
  75. M. Crisler, R. Essig, J. Estrada, G. Fernandez, J. Tiffenberg, M. Sofoharo, T. Volansky, and T.-T. Yu, SENSEI: First direct-detection constraints on sub-GeV dark matter from a surface run, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 061803 (2018).
  76. I. Arnquist et al., First constraints from DAMIC-M on Sub-GeV dark-matter particles interacting with electrons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 171003 (2023).
  77. M. Diamond, G. Giroux, Z. Hong, and G. Savvidis, Low energy dark matter searches, Can. J. Phys. 103, 717 (2025).
  78. S. Okawa and Y. Omura, Light mass window of lepton portal dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 231.
  79. I. Adachi et al., Search for lepton-flavor-violating τ decays to a lepton and an invisible boson at Belle II, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 181803 (2023).
  80. I. Adachi et al., Search for a long-lived spin-0 mediator in b→s transitions at the Belle II experiment, Phys. Rev. D 108, L111104 (2023).
  81. I. Adachi et al. (The Belle II Collaboration), Search for a dark Higgs boson produced in association with inelastic dark matter at the Belle II experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 131801 (2025).
  82. I. Adachi et al., Search for a τ+τ− resonance in e+e−→μ+μ−τ+τ− events with the Belle II experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 121802 (2023).
  83. M. Ablikim et al., Search for sub-GeV invisible particles in inclusive decays of J/ψ to ϕ, arXiv:2506.10316.
  84. M. Ablikim et al., Search for a muonphilic scalar X0 or vector X1 via J/ψ→μ+μ−+invisible decays at BESIII, Phys. Rev. D 109, L031102 (2024).
  85. D. Banerjee et al., Search for Axionlike and Scalar Particles with the NA64 Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 081801 (2020).
  86. Y. M. Andreev et al., Search for pseudoscalar bosons decaying into e+e− pairs in the NA64 experiment at the CERN SPS, Phys. Rev. D 104, L111102 (2021).
  87. Y. M. Andreev et al., Shedding light on dark sectors with high-energy muons at the NA64 experiment at the CERN SPS, Phys. Rev. D 110, 112015 (2024).
  88. L. Marsicano, M. Battaglieri, A. Celentano, R. De Vita, and Y.-M. Zhong, Probing leptophilic dark sectors at electron beam-dump facilities, Phys. Rev. D 98, 115022 (2018).
  89. S. Gninenko, Addendum to the NA64 proposal: Search for the A′→invisible and X→e+e− decays in 2021, CERN Report No. CERN-SPSC-2018-004, SPSC-P-348-ADD-2, 2018, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2300189.
  90. C.-Y. Chen, M. Pospelov, and Y.-M. Zhong, Muon beam experiments to probe the dark sector, Phys. Rev. D 95, 115005 (2017).
  91. A. Blondel et al., Searches for long-lived particles at the future FCC-ee, Front. Phys. 10, 967881 (2022).
  92. J. Alimena et al., Searching for long-lived particles beyond the Standard Model at the Large Hadron Collider, J. Phys. G 47, 090501 (2020).
  93. R. Aaij et al., Test of lepton universality using B+→K+ℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 151601 (2014).
  94. R. Aaij et al., Differential branching fractions and isospin asymmetries of B→K(*)μ+μ− decays, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2014) 133.
  95. R. Aaij et al., Angular analysis of the B0→K*0μ+μ− decay using 3  fb−1 of integrated luminosity, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2016) 104.
  96. R. Aaij et al., Angular Analysis of the B+→K*+μ+μ− Decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 161802 (2021).
  97. S. Wehle et al., Lepton-flavor-dependent angular analysis of B→K*ℓ+ℓ−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 111801 (2017).
  98. A. Bharucha, D. M. Straub, and R. Zwicky, B→Vℓ+ℓ− in the standard model from light-cone sum rules, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 098.
  99. A. Biswas, S. Nandi, S. K. Patra, and I. Ray, New physics in b→sℓℓ decays with complex Wilson coefficients, Nucl. Phys. B969, 115479 (2021).
  100. W. Altmannshofer, P. Ball, A. Bharucha, A. J. Buras, D. M. Straub, and M. Wick, Symmetries and Asymmetries of B→K*μ+μ− Decays in the standard model and beyond, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2009) 019.
  101. S. Banerjee et al. (Heavy Flavor Averaging Group (HFLAV), Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ-lepton properties as of 2023, Phys. Rev. D 113, 012008 (2026).
  102. Y. S. Amhis et al., Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ-lepton properties as of 2021, Phys. Rev. D 107, 052008 (2023).
  103. S. Navas et al., Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  104. L. Di Luzio, M. Kirk, A. Lenz, and T. Rauh, ΔMs theory precision confronts flavour anomalies, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2019) 009.
  105. R. L. Workman et al., Review of particle physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  106. R. Aaij et al., Test of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays (2021).
  107. R. Aaij et al., Constraints on the KS0→μ+μ− Branching Fraction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 231801 (2020).
  108. M. Beneke, C. Bobeth, and R. Szafron, Power-enhanced leading-logarithmic QED corrections to Bq→μ+μ−, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 232; 11 (2022) 99.
  109. T. Aaltonen et al., Measurements of the angular distributions in the decays B→K(*)μ+μ− at CDF, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 081807 (2012).
  110. R. Aaij et al., Measurement of the CP asymmetry in B+→K+μ+μ− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 151801 (2013).
  111. A. M. Sirunyan et al., Measurement of angular parameters from the decay B0→K*0μ+μ− in proton-proton collisions at s=8  TeV, Phys. Lett. B 781, 517 (2018).
  112. R. Aaij et al., Test of lepton universality in b→sℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 051803 (2023).
  113. S. Bhattacharya, A. Biswas, S. Nandi, and S. K. Patra, Exhaustive model selection in b→sℓℓ decays: Pitting cross-validation against the Akaike information criterion, Phys. Rev. D 101, 055025 (2020).
  114. A. J. Buras, Theoretical review of B physics, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 368, 1 (1995).
  115. D. Becirevic, N. Kosnik, F. Mescia, and E. Schneider, Complementarity of the constraints on new physics from Bs→μ+μ− and from B→Kl+l− decays, Phys. Rev. D 86, 034034 (2012).
  116. F. Bergsma et al., Search for axion like particle production in 400-GeV proton—copper interactions, Phys. Lett. 157B, 458 (1985).
  117. J. Blumlein et al., Limits on neutral light scalar and pseudoscalar particles in a proton beam dump experiment, Z. Phys. C 51, 341 (1991).
  118. M. E. Duffy et al., Neutrino production by 400-GeV/c protons in a beam-dump experiment, Phys. Rev. D 38, 2032 (1988).
  119. J. D. Clarke, R. Foot, and R. R. Volkas, Phenomenology of a very light scalar (100  MeV<mh<10  GeV) mixing with the SM Higgs, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2014) 123.
  120. F. Bezrukov and D. Gorbunov, Light inflaton Hunter’s guide, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2010) 010.
  121. D. Bečirević, G. Piazza, and O. Sumensari, Revisiting B→K(*)νν¯ decays in the Standard Model and beyond, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 252 (2023).
  122. D. M. Straub, flavio: A Python package for flavour and precision phenomenology in the standard model and beyond (2018).
  123. A. J. Buras, J. Harz, and M. A. Mojahed, Disentangling new physics in K→πν¯ν and B→K(K*)ν¯ν observables (2024).
  124. E. Cortina Gil et al., Measurement of the very rare K+→π+νν¯ decay, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 093.
  125. J. K. Ahm et al., Search for the KL→π0νν¯ decay at the J-PARC KOTO experiment (2024).
  126. W. Altmannshofer, A. Crivellin, H. Haigh, G. Inguglia, and J. M. Camalich, Light new physics in B→K(*)νν−?, Phys. Rev. D 109, 075008 (2024).
  127. L. Calibbi, T. Li, L. Mukherjee, and M. A. Schmidt, Is dark matter the origin of the B→Kνν¯ excess at Belle II?, Phys. Rev. D 112, 075020 (2025).
  128. A. Berezhnoy, W. Lucha, and D. Melikhov, Analysis of qrec2-distribution for B→KMX and B→K*MX decays in a scalar-mediator dark-matter scenario, Phys. Rev. D 111, 075035 (2025).
  129. M. Abdughani and Y. Reyimuaji, Constraining light dark matter and mediator with B+→K+νν− data, Phys. Rev. D 110, 055013 (2024).
  130. X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, and G. Valencia, Revisiting models that enhance B+→K+νν− in light of the new Belle II measurement, Phys. Rev. D 109, 075019 (2024).
  131. A. Berezhnoy and D. Melikhov, B→K*MX vs B→KMX as a probe of a scalar-mediator dark matter scenario, Europhys. Lett. 145, 14001 (2024).
  132. A. Datta, D. Marfatia, and L. Mukherjee, B→Kνν−, MiniBooNE and muon g-2 anomalies from a dark sector, Phys. Rev. D 109, L031701 (2024).
  133. H. Davoudiasl and M. Schnubel, Bringing the Peccei-Quinn mechanism down to Earth, Phys. Rev. D 110, 075014 (2024).
  134. P. D. Bolton, S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik, and M. Novoa-Brunet, Signatures of light new particles in B→K(*) Emiss, Phys. Rev. D 110, 055001 (2024); 111, 039903(E) (2025).
  135. D. McKeen, J. N. Ng, and D. Tuckler, Higgs portal interpretation of the Belle II B+→K+νν measurement, Phys. Rev. D 109, 075006 (2024).
  136. X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, J. Tandean, and G. Valencia, B→K+invisible, dark matter, and CP violation in hyperon decays, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 078.
  137. C. Bourrely, I. Caprini, and L. Lellouch, Model-independent description of B−>pi l nu decays and a determination of −V(ub)−, Phys. Rev. D 79, 013008 (2009); 82, 099902(E) (2010).
  138. W. G. Parrott, C. Bouchard, and C. T. H. Davies, B→K and D→K form factors from fully relativistic lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 107, 014510 (2023).
  139. R. R. Horgan, Z. Liu, S. Meinel, and M. Wingate, Lattice QCD calculation of form factors describing the rare decays B→K*ℓ+ℓ− and Bs→ϕℓ+ℓ−, Phys. Rev. D 89, 094501 (2014).
  140. A. Biswas, S. Nandi, S. K. Patra, and I. Ray, A closer look at the extraction of −Vub− from B→πℓν, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 082.
  141. N. Carrasco, P. Lami, V. Lubicz, L. Riggio, S. Simula, and C. Tarantino, K→π semileptonic form factors with Nf=2+1+1 twisted mass fermions, Phys. Rev. D 93, 114512 (2016).
  142. J. K. Ahn et al., Search for the KL→π0νν¯ and KL→π0X0 decays at the J-PARC KOTO experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 021802 (2019).
  143. R. Ammar et al., Search for the familon via B+−−> pi+− X0, B+−−> K+− X0, and B0−> K0(S)X0 decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 271801 (2001).
  144. G. Aad et al., Combination of the W boson polarization measurements in top quark decays using ATLAS and CMS data at s=8  TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2020) 051.
  145. A. M. Sirunyan et al., Measurement of CKM matrix elements in single top quark t-channel production in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, Phys. Lett. B 808, 135609 (2020).
  146. M. Aaboud et al., Measurement of the W boson polarisation in tt¯ events from pp collisions at s=8  TeV in the lepton+jets channel with ATLAS, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 264 (2017); 79, 19(E) (2019).
  147. V. Khachatryan et al., Measurement of the W boson helicity fractions in the decays of top quark pairs to lepton +jets final states produced in pp collisions at s=8  TeV, Phys. Lett. B 762, 512 (2016).
  148. A. Biswas, L. Mukherjee, S. Nandi, and S. K. Patra, Constraining new physics with possible dark matter signatures from a global CKM fit, Phys. Rev. D 107, 055041 (2023).
  149. R. Aaij et al., Measurement of the W boson mass, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2022) 036.
  150. ATLAS Collaboration, Improved W boson mass measurement using 7 TeV proton-proton collisions with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS Conference Note No. ATLAS-CONF-2023-004, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (2023), https://cds.cern.ch/record/2853290.
  151. V. M. Abazov et al., Measurement of the W boson mass with the D0 detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 151804 (2012).
  152. T. Aaltonen et al., High-precision measurement of the W boson mass with the CDF II detector, Science 376, 170 (2022).
  153. CMS Collaboration, Measurement of the W boson mass in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, CMS Physics Analysis Summary No. CMS-PAS-SMP-23-002, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (2024), https://cds.cern.ch/record/ 2910372.
  154. S. Schael et al. (ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, Group, SLD Heavy Flavour Group), Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance, Phys. Rept. 427, 257 (2006).
  155. P. L. Anthony et al. (SLAC E158 collaboration), Precision measurement of the weak mixing angle in Moller scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 081601 (2005).
  156. J. Bernabeu, D. Comelli, A. Pich, and A. Santamaria, Hard m(t) corrections as a probe of the symmetry breaking sector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2902 (1997).
  157. J. Papavassiliou and A. Santamaria, Extra dimensions at the one loop level: Z−> b anti-b and B anti-B mixing, Phys. Rev. D 63, 016002 (2001).
  158. A. Freitas, Higher-order electroweak corrections to the partial widths and branching ratios of the Z boson, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2014) 070.
  159. B. Abi et al., Measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 0.46 ppm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 141801 (2021).
  160. D. P. Aguillard et al. (Muon g−2 Collaboration), Measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 127 ppb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 101802 (2025).
  161. R. Aliberti et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the standard model: An update, Phys. Rept. 1143, 1 (2025).
  162. L. Morel, Z. Yao, P. Cladé, and S. Guellati-Khélifa, Determination of the fine-structure constant with an accuracy of 81 parts per trillion, Nature (London) 588, 61 (2020).
  163. D. Hanneke, S. Fogwell, and G. Gabrielse, New measurement of the electron magnetic moment and the fine structure constant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 120801 (2008).
  164. R. H. Parker, C. Yu, W. Zhong, B. Estey, and H. Müller, Measurement of the fine-structure constant as a test of the standard model, Science 360, 191 (2018).
  165. M. Lindner, M. Platscher, and F. S. Queiroz, A call for new physics: The muon anomalous magnetic moment and lepton flavor violation, Phys. Rep. 731, 1 (2018).
  166. S. Eidelman and M. Passera, Theory of the tau lepton anomalous magnetic moment, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 22, 159 (2007).
  167. G. Aad et al., Observation of the γγ→ττ process in Pb+Pb collisions and constraints on the τ-Lepton anomalous magnetic moment with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 151802 (2023).
  168. W. Bernreuther, R. Bonciani, T. Gehrmann, R. Heinesch, T. Leineweber, P. Mastrolia, and E. Remiddi, QCD corrections to static heavy quark form-factors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 261802 (2005).
  169. S. M. Etesami, S. Khatibi, and M. Mohammadi Najafabadi, Measuring anomalous WW γ and t t¯γ couplings using top+ γ production at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 533 (2016).
  170. Y. Ema, T. Gao, and M. Pospelov, Standard model prediction for paramagnetic electric dipole moments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 231801 (2022).
  171. T. S. Roussy et al., An improved bound on the electron’s electric dipole moment, Science 381, adg4084 (2023).
  172. Y. Yamaguchi and N. Yamanaka, Large long-distance contributions to the electric dipole moments of charged leptons in the standard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 241802 (2020).
  173. G. W. Bennett et al., An improved limit on the muon electric dipole moment, Phys. Rev. D 80, 052008 (2009).
  174. K. Inami et al., An improved search for the electric dipole moment of the τ lepton, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2022) 110.
  175. A. Soni and R. M. Xu, Electric dipole moment of the top quark on CP nonconserving Higgs boson exchange, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 33 (1992).
  176. V. Cirigliano, W. Dekens, J. de Vries, and E. Mereghetti, Is there room for CP violation in the top-Higgs sector?, Phys. Rev. D 94, 016002 (2016).
  177. S. Dar, The neutron EDM in the SM: A review, Report No. IC-00-115, 2000.
  178. C. Abel et al., Measurement of the permanent electric dipole moment of the neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 081803 (2020).
  179. A. I. Hernández-Juárez, A. Moyotl, and G. Tavares-Velasco, New estimate of the chromomagnetic dipole moment of quarks in the standard model, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 262 (2021).
  180. J. I. Aranda, T. Cisneros-Pérez, J. Montaño, B. Quezadas-Vivian, F. Ramírez-Zavaleta, and E. S. Tututi, Revisiting the top quark chromomagnetic dipole moment in the SM, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 164 (2021).
  181. A. M. Sirunyan et al., Measurement of the top quark forward-backward production asymmetry and the anomalous chromoelectric and chromomagnetic moments in pp collisions at s=13  TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2020) 146.
  182. A. Tumasyan et al., Search for CP violation using tt¯ events in the lepton+jets channel in pp collisions at s=13  TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2023) 081.
  183. A. Tumasyan et al., Search for CP violating top quark couplings in pp collisions at s=13  TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 023.
  184. K. Fuyuto and M. Ramsey-Musolf, Top down electroweak dipole operators, Phys. Lett. B 781, 492 (2018).
  185. W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, H. H. Patel, S. Profumo, and D. Tuckler, Electric dipole moments in a leptoquark scenario for the B-physics anomalies, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2020) 069.
  186. J. Engel, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, and U. van Kolck, Electric dipole moments of nucleons, nuclei, and atoms: The standard model and beyond, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 71, 21 (2013).
  187. T. Bhattacharya, V. Cirigliano, R. Gupta, H.-W. Lin, and B. Yoon, Neutron electric dipole moment and tensor charges from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 212002 (2015).
  188. T. Bhattacharya, V. Cirigliano, S. Cohen, R. Gupta, H.-W. Lin, and B. Yoon, Axial, scalar and tensor charges of the nucleon from 2+1+1-flavor lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 94, 054508 (2016).
  189. J. Brod and D. Skodras, Electric dipole moment constraints on CP-violating light-quark Yukawas, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2019) 233.
  190. G. Steigman, Neutrinos, big bang nucleosynthesis, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2012, 268321 (2012).
  191. M. Kaplinghat, S. Tulin, and H.-B. Yu, Direct detection portals for self-interacting dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 89, 035009 (2014).
  192. E. W. Kolb, The Early Universe (Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, 2019), Vol. 69.
  193. V. Rubakov, Introduction to cosmology, Proc. Sci. RTN2005 (2005) 003.
  194. B. D. Fields, P. Molaro, and S. Sarkar, Big bang nucleosynthesis, in Review of particle physics Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  195. G.-Y. Huang and W. Rodejohann, Solving the Hubble tension without spoiling big bang nucleosynthesis, Phys. Rev. D 103, 123007 (2021).
  196. N. Aghanim et al., Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
  197. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), WIMP dark matter search using a 3.1  tonne×year exposure of the XENONnT experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 221003 (2025).
  198. E. Aprile et al., First dark matter search with nuclear recoils from the XENONnT experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041003 (2023).
  199. J. Aalbers et al., Dark matter search results from 4.2 Tonne-years of exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 011802 (2025).
  200. J. Aalbers et al., First dark matter search results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041002 (2023).
  201. Z. Bo et al., Dark matter search results from 1.54  Tonne·year exposure of PandaX-4T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 011805 (2025).
  202. D. Huang et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Search for dark-matter–nucleon interactions with a dark mediator in PandaX-4T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 191002 (2023).
  203. P. Agnes et al., Search for low-mass dark matter WIMPs with 12 ton-day exposure of DarkSide-50, Phys. Rev. D 107, 063001 (2023).
  204. P. Adari et al., First direct-detection results on sub-GeV dark matter using the SENSEI detector at SNOLAB, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 011804 (2025).
  205. M. F. Albakry et al., Search for low-mass dark matter via bremsstrahlung radiation and the Migdal effect in SuperCDMS, Phys. Rev. D 107, 112013 (2023).
  206. D. S. Akerib et al., Results of a search for sub-GeV dark matter using 2013 LUX data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 131301 (2019).
  207. R. Essig, J. Mardon, and T. Volansky, Direct detection of sub-GeV dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 85, 076007 (2012).
  208. R. Essig, T. Volansky, and T.-T. Yu, New constraints and prospects for sub-GeV dark matter scattering off electrons in xenon, Phys. Rev. D 96, 043017 (2017).
  209. E. Aprile et al., Low-mass dark matter search using ionization signals in XENON100, Phys. Rev. D 94, 092001 (2016); 95, 059901(E) (2017).
  210. A. H. Abdelhameed et al., First results from the CRESST-III low-mass dark matter program, Phys. Rev. D 100, 102002 (2019).
  211. P. Agnes et al., Search for dark matter particle interactions with electron final states with DarkSide-50, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 101002 (2023).
  212. J. Liao, Y. Gao, Z. Liang, Z. Ouyang, Z. Peng, L. Zhang, F. Zhang, L. Zhang, J. Zheng, and J. Zhou, Introduction to a low-mass dark matter project, ALETHEIA: A Liquid hElium Time projection cHambEr In dArk matter, arXiv:2203.07901.
  213. C. E. Aalseth et al., DarkSide-20k: A 20 tonne two-phase LAr TPC for direct dark matter detection at LNGS, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133, 131 (2018).
  214. T. Åkesson et al., Light dark matter eXperiment (LDMX), arXiv:1808.05219.
  215. C. Cheng et al., Search for light dark matter-electron scatterings in the PandaX-II experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 211803 (2021).
  216. I. M. Bloch et al., SENSEI at SNOLAB: Single-electron event rate and implications for dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 161002 (2025).
  217. B. A. Cervantes-Vergara et al., Skipper-CCD sensors for the Oscura experiment: Requirements and preliminary tests, J. Instrum. 18, P08016 (2023).
  218. M. Ackermann et al., Searching for dark matter annihilation from milky way dwarf spheroidal galaxies with six years of fermi large area telescope data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 231301 (2015).
  219. E. Charles et al., Sensitivity projections for dark matter searches with the Fermi Large Area Telescope, Phys. Rep. 636, 1 (2016).
  220. H. Abdallah et al., Search for dark matter annihilations towards the inner Galactic halo from 10 years of observations with H.E.S.S, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 111301 (2016).
  221. H. Silverwood, C. Weniger, P. Scott, and G. Bertone, A realistic assessment of the CTA sensitivity to dark matter annihilation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2015) 055.
  222. S. Bhattacharya, L. Kolay, and D. Pradhan, Multiparticle scalar dark matter with ZN symmetry, arXiv:2410.16275.
  223. S. K. Patra, OptEx, Version 1.0.0 (2019), https://github.com/effExTeam/ OptEx-1.0.0.
  224. M. Aaboud et al., Angular analysis of Bd0→K*μ+μ− decays in pp collisions at s=8  TeV with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 047.
  225. R. Aaij et al., Branching fraction measurements of the rare Bs0→ϕμ+μ− and Bs0→f2′(1525)μ+μ−- decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 151801 (2021).
  226. L. Xayavong and N. Smirnova, Radial overlap correction to superallowed 0+→0+ nuclear β decays using the shell model with Hartree-Fock radial wave functions, Phys. Rev. C 105, 044308 (2022).
  227. R. L. Workman et al., Review of particle physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  228. W. Qian et al., Recent CKMfitter updates on global fits of the CKM matrix, Proc. Sci. CKM2021 (2021) 074..
  229. A. Biswas, S. Nandi, and I. Ray, Extractions of −Vub−/−Vcb− from a combined study of the exclusive b→u(c)ℓ−ν¯ℓ decays, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 024.
  230. S. Jaiswal, S. Nandi, and S. K. Patra, Extraction of |Vcb| from B→D(*)ℓνℓ and the Standard Model predictions of R(D(*)), J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2017) 060.
  231. R. Aaij et al., Determination of the quark coupling strength |Vub| using baryonic decays, Nat. Phys. 11, 743 (2015).
  232. R. Aaij et al., Precise determination of the Bs0–B¯s0 oscillation frequency, Nat. Phys. 18, 1 (2022).
  233. Y. S. Amhis et al., Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ-lepton properties as of 2018, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 226 (2021).
  234. R. Aaij et al., Analysis of neutral b-meson decays into two muons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 041801 (2022).
  235. G. Aad et al., A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the discovery, Nature (London) 607, 52 (2022); 612, E24 (2022).
  236. M. J. Baker et al., The coannihilation codex, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2015) 120.
  237. J. Edsjo and P. Gondolo, Neutralino relic density including coannihilations, Phys. Rev. D 56, 1879 (1997).
  238. J. Kopp, V. Niro, T. Schwetz, and J. Zupan, DAMA/LIBRA and leptonically interacting dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 80, 083502 (2009).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation