Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Searching for the N-naturalness tower of neutrinos

Sofia Lonardi1,*, Manuel Ettengruber2,†, and Philipp Eller3,‡

  • *Contact author: sofia.lonardi@physik.uni-freiburg.de
  • †Contact author: manuel-meinrad.ettengruber@ipht.fr
  • ‡Contact author: philipp.eller@tum.de

Phys. Rev. D 114, 075022 – Published 14 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/yhpw-px34

Abstract

We present the first experimental search for the N-naturalness tower of neutrinos using a global analysis of publicly available neutrino data. As a potential solution to the hierarchy problem, the N-naturalness model employs a varying Higgs mass parameter among N dark sectors and encodes the required fine-tuning of the placement of the sectors in a parameter r. We report exclusion limits on the parameter space (r, N), for normal and inverted ordering and in case the neutrino is Majorana or Dirac. In the case of a Majorana neutrino, we can rule out N≤104 sectors with r≥0.1. This is particularly exciting as it shows that a gauge and gravitational unification around MGUT, which is a benchmark scenario of the N-naturalness framework with N=104 without fine-tuning, is ruled out by neutrino experiments.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (55)

  1. S. Weinberg, Baryon and lepton nonconserving processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1566 (1979).
  2. P. Minkowski, μ→eγ at a rate of one out of 109 muon decays?, Phys. Lett. 67B, 421 (1977).
  3. M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, Complex spinors and unified theories, Conf. Proc. C 790927, 315 (1979).
  4. T. Yanagida, Horizontal symmetry and masses of neutrinos, Prog. Theor. Phys. 64, 1103 (1980).
  5. R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Neutrino mass and spontaneous parity nonconservation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 912 (1980).
  6. R. N. Mohapatra, Seesaw mechanism and its implications, in SEESAW 25 (World Scientific, Singapore, 2004), 12, pp. 29–44.
  7. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and G. R. Dvali, The hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter, Phys. Lett. B 429, 263 (1998).
  8. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. R. Dvali, and J. March-Russell, Neutrino masses from large extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 65, 024032 (2001).
  9. G. R. Dvali and A. Y. Smirnov, Probing large extra dimensions with neutrinos, Nucl. Phys. B563, 63 (1999).
  10. G. Dvali and M. Redi, Phenomenology of 1032 dark sectors, Phys. Rev. D 80, 055001 (2009).
  11. M. Ettengruber, Neutrino physics in TeV scale gravity theories, Phys. Rev. D 106, 055028 (2022).
  12. N. Arkani-Hamed, T. Cohen, R. T. D’Agnolo, A. Hook, H. D. Kim, and D. Pinner, Solving the hierarchy problem at reheating with a large number of degrees of freedom, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 251801 (2016).
  13. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and G. R. Dvali, Phenomenology, astrophysics and cosmology of theories with submillimeter dimensions and TeV scale quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 59, 086004 (1999).
  14. G. Dvali, I. Sawicki, and A. Vikman, Dark matter via many copies of the standard model, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2009) 009.
  15. A. Friedlander, K. J. Mack, S. Schon, N. Song, and A. C. Vincent, Primordial black hole dark matter in the context of extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 105, 103508 (2022).
  16. L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis, and D. Lust, Dark dimension, the swampland, and the dark matter fraction composed of primordial black holes, Phys. Rev. D 106, 086001 (2022).
  17. E. Gonzalo, M. Montero, G. Obied, and C. Vafa, Dark dimension gravitons as dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2023) 109.
  18. L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis, and D. Lust, The dark universe: Primordial black hole ⇋ dark graviton gas connection, Phys. Lett. B 840, 137844 (2023).
  19. M. Ettengruber and F. Kuhnel, Micro black hole dark matter, arXiv:2506.14871.
  20. M. Montero, C. Vafa, and I. Valenzuela, The dark dimension and the swampland, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2023) 022.
  21. P. A. N. Machado, H. Nunokawa, and R. Zukanovich Funchal, Testing for large extra dimensions with neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. D 84, 013003 (2011).
  22. V. S. Basto-Gonzalez, A. Esmaili, and O. L. G. Peres, Kinematical test of large extra dimension in beta decay experiments, Phys. Lett. B 718, 1020 (2013).
  23. I. Girardi and D. Meloni, Constraining new physics scenarios in neutrino oscillations from daya bay data, Phys. Rev. D 90, 073011 (2014).
  24. P. Eller, M. Ettengruber, and A. Zander, Neutrino data analysis of extra-dimensional theories with massive bulk fields, Phys. Rev. D 112, 055009 (2025).
  25. T. G. Elaçmaz, I. Martinez-Soler, and Y. F. Perez-Gonzalez, Updated constraints on large extra dimensions from reactor antineutrino experiments, Phys. Rev. D 114, 055014 (2026).
  26. A.-Y. Bai, A. Chatrabhuti, Y.-Y. Huang, H. Isono, and J. Tang, Dark dimension Right-handed neutrinos confronted with Long-Baseline oscillation experiments, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2026) 196.
  27. M. Ettengruber, A. Zander, and P. Eller, Testing the number of neutrino species with a global fit of neutrino data, Phys. Rev. D 109, 095016 (2024).
  28. M. Ettengruber, Neutrino masses and phenomenology in N-naturalness, Phys. Rev. D 112, 055015 (2025).
  29. Z.-L. Han, B. Zhu, L. Bian, and R. Ding, Consistent origin of neutrino mass and freeze-in dark matter in large N theories, arXiv:1812.00637.
  30. S. Bansal, S. Ghosh, M. Low, and Y. Tsai, A cosmological case study of a tower of warm dark matter states: N naturalness, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2025) 012.
  31. B. Batell, A. Ghalsasi, W. Huang, and M. Low, i-ncidental N-naturalness, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2026) 127.
  32. G. Dvali, Black holes and large N species solution to the hierarchy problem, Fortschr. Phys. 58, 528 (2010).
  33. G. Dvali and M. Redi, Black hole bound on the number of species and quantum gravity at LHC, Phys. Rev. D 77, 045027 (2008).
  34. P. Eller et al., newtrinos.jl: A julia package for global analysis of neutrino data, J. Open Source Softw. 11, 9644 (2026).
  35. T. Kozynets, P. Eller, A. Zander, M. Ettengruber, and D. J. Koskinen, Constraints on non-unitary neutrino mixing in light of atmospheric and reactor neutrino data, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2025) 130.
  36. P. Eller, Atmospheric neutrino oscillations: The full picture, Phys. Rev. D 114, 053005 (2026).
  37. D. Wang, O. Mena, E. D. Valentino, and S. Gariazzo, Updating neutrino mass constraints with background measurements, Phys. Rev. D 110, 103536 (2024).
  38. KATRIN Collaboration, First direct neutrino-mass measurement with sub-eV sensitivity, Nat. Phys. 18, 160 (2022).
  39. Daya Bay Collaboration, The detector system of the daya bay reactor neutrino experiment, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 811, 133 (2016).
  40. Daya Bay Collaboration, A side-by-side comparison of daya bay antineutrino detectors, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 685, 78 (2012).
  41. Daya Bay Collaboration, Precision measurement of reactor antineutrino oscillation at kilometer-scale baselines by daya bay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 161802 (2023).
  42. JUNO Collaboration, Potential to identify neutrino mass ordering with reactor antineutrinos at JUNO*, Chin. Phys. C 49, 033104 (2025).
  43. JUNO Collaboration, Sub-percent precision measurement of neutrino oscillation parameters with JUNO*, Chin. Phys. C 46, 123001 (2022).
  44. The JUNO Collaboration, Measurement of reactor neutrino oscillation with the first JUNO data, Nature (London) 654, 343 (2026).
  45. GERDA Collaboration, Final results of GERDA on the search for neutrinoless double-beta decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 252502 (2020).
  46. G. Saleh, First results from LEGEND-200 on the search for neutrinoless double beta decay, Nuovo Cimento C 49, 5 (2026).
  47. I. Esteban, M. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J. P. Pinheiro, and T. Schwetz, Nufit-6.0: Updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 216.
  48. F. Capozzi, W. Giarè, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, A. Melchiorri, and A. Palazzo, Neutrino masses and mixing: Entering the era of subpercent precision, Phys. Rev. D 111, 093006 (2025).
  49. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group Collaboration), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  50. LEGEND Collaboration, First results on the search for lepton number violating neutrinoless double-β decay with the LEGEND-200 experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 022701 (2026).
  51. J. Engel and J. Menéndez, Status and future of nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double-beta decay: A review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 046301 (2017).
  52. M. Ettengruber, M. Agostini, A. Caldwell, P. Eller, and O. Schulz, Discovering neutrinoless double-beta decay in the era of precision neutrino cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 106, 073004 (2022).
  53. F. Pompa, T. Schwetz, and J.-Y. Zhu, Impact of nuclear matrix element calculations for current and future neutrinoless double beta decay searches, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2023) 104.
  54. P. D. Bolton, F. F. Deppisch, M. Rai, and Z. Zhang, Probing the nature of heavy neutral leptons in direct searches and neutrinoless double beta decay, Nucl. Phys. B1010, 116785 (2025).
  55. https://github.com/philippeller/Newtrinos.jl

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation