Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Constraining antibaryonic dark matter through correlated nucleon decay signatures

Mathew Thomas Arun1,* and Anuja Bandu Khadse2

  • *Contact author: mathewthomas@iisertvm.ac.in

Phys. Rev. D 112, 075021 – Published 10 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/ydjh-mqzv

Abstract

Baryon number violation in the visible sector induced by antibaryonic dark matter provides a viable mechanism for low-scale baryogenesis. Two of the most sensitive probes of this scenario are neutron decay processes, such as n→ν¯+invisible and n→π0+invisible. In this work, we discuss the possible spontaneous breaking of baryon symmetry in the dark sector and the generation of di-nucleon decay processes, such as nn→ν¯ν¯ and nn→π0π0 at one loop, arising from the operators responsible for induced nucleon decays. While the induced nucleon decay rates in this model depend on the dark matter density, di-nucleon decay processes do not, providing a complementary probe of the new physics. We thus use nucleon and di-nucleon decay bounds to constrain the local density and mass of the antibaryonic dark matter.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (40)

  1. N. Aghanim et al., Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A5 (2020).
  2. M. Migliaccio, Cosmic microwave background cosmology with Planck, Nuovo Cimento C 41, 132 (2019).
  3. Elena Aprile, Ke Abe, F. Agostini, S. Ahmed Maouloud, L. Althueser, B. Andrieu, E. Angelino, J. R. Angevaare, V. C. Antochi, D. Antón Martin et al., First dark matter search with nuclear recoils from the XENONnT experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041003 (2023).
  4. J. Aalbers, D. S. Akerib, A. K. Al Musalhi, F. Alder, S. K. Alsum, C. S. Amarasinghe, A. Ames, T. J. Anderson, N. Angelides, H. M. Araújo et al., Background determination for the LUX-ZEPLIN dark matter experiment, Phys. Rev. D 108, 012010 (2023).
  5. T. Araki et al., Search for the invisible decay of neutrons with KamLAND, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 101802 (2006).
  6. K. Abe et al., Search for nucleon decay via n→ν¯π0 and p→ν¯π+ in super-kamiokande, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 121802 (2014).
  7. K. Abe, Y. Hayato, T. Iida, K. Ishihara, J. Kameda, Y. Koshio, A. Minamino, C. Mitsuda, M. Miura, S. Moriyama et al., Search for n- n oscillation in super-kamiokande, Phys. Rev. D 91, 072006 (2015).
  8. K. Abe, Y. Haga, Y. Hayato, M. Ikeda, K. Iyogi, J. Kameda, Y. Kishimoto, M. Miura, S. Moriyama, M. Nakahata et al., Search for proton decay via p→e+π0 and p→μ+π0 in 0.31 megaton years exposure of the super-kamiokande water Cherenkov detector, Phys. Rev. D 95, 012004 (2017).
  9. Yasuo Takeuchi et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Recent results and future prospects of super-kamiokande, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 952, 161634 (2020).
  10. Angel Abusleme et al., JUNO sensitivity to invisible decay modes of neutrons, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 5 (2025).
  11. Janeth Valverde et al., A decade of multi-wavelength observations of the TeV blazar 1ES 1215+303: Extreme shift of the synchrotron peak frequency and long-term optical-gamma-ray flux increase, Astrophys. J. 891, 170 (2020).
  12. David E. Morrissey and Michael J. Ramsey-Musolf, Electroweak baryogenesis, New J. Phys. 14, 125003 (2012).
  13. David E. Kaplan, Markus A. Luty, and Kathryn M. Zurek, Asymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 79, 115016 (2009).
  14. N. Haba and S. Matsumoto, Baryogenesis from dark sector, Prog. Theor. Phys. 125, 1311 (2011).
  15. Hooman Davoudiasl, David E. Morrissey, Kris Sigurdson, and Sean Tulin, Hylogenesis: A unified origin for baryonic visible matter and antibaryonic dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 211304 (2010).
  16. Hooman Davoudiasl, David E. Morrissey, Kris Sigurdson, and Sean Tulin, Baryon destruction by asymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 84, 096008 (2011).
  17. Kalliopi Petraki and Raymond R. Volkas, Review of asymmetric dark matter, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28, 1330028 (2013).
  18. Junwu Huang and Yue Zhao, Dark matter induced nucleon decay: Model and signatures, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2014) 077.
  19. Mathew Thomas Arun, Baryon number violation from confining new physics, Phys. Rev. D 107, 055021 (2023).
  20. A. Akshay and Mathew Thomas Arun, Assisted baryon number violation in 4k+2 dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 109, 095039 (2024).
  21. Sacha Davidson, Enrico Nardi, and Yosef Nir, Leptogenesis, Phys. Rep. 466, 105 (2008).
  22. Yuval Grossman, Wee Hao Ng, and Shamayita Ray, Revisiting the bounds on hydrogen-antihydrogen oscillations from diffuse γ-ray surveys, Phys. Rev. D 98, 035020 (2018).
  23. Pavel Fileviez Perez and Mark B. Wise, Baryon and lepton number as local gauge symmetries, Phys. Rev. D 82, 011901 (2010); 82, 079901(E) (2010).
  24. Pavel Fileviez Perez, Lepton and baryon numbers as local gauge symmetries, Phys. Rev. D 110, 035018 (2024).
  25. Michael B. Green and John H. Schwarz, Anomaly cancellation in supersymmetric D=10 gauge theory and superstring theory, Phys. Lett. 149B, 117 (1984).
  26. Pascal Anastasopoulos, M. Bianchi, E. Dudas, and E. Kiritsis, Anomalies, anomalous U(1)’s and generalized Chern-Simons terms, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2006) 057.
  27. Claudio Coriano, Nikos Irges, and Simone Morelli, Stuckelberg axions and the effective action of anomalous Abelian models. 1. A Unitarity analysis of the Higgs-axion mixing, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2007) 008.
  28. Mark Claudson, Mark B. Wise, and Lawrence J. Hall, Chiral Lagrangian for deep mine physics, Nucl. Phys. B195, 297 (1982).
  29. K. Abe et al., Neutron-antineutron oscillation search using a 0.37 megaton-years exposure of super-kamiokande, Phys. Rev. D 103, 012008 (2021).
  30. J. Gustafson et al., Search for dinucleon decay into pions at Super-Kamiokande, Phys. Rev. D 91, 072009 (2015).
  31. S. Sussman et al., Dinucleon and nucleon decay to two-body final states with no hadrons in super-kamiokande, arXiv:1811.12430.
  32. K. Abe et al., Hyper-Kamiokande Design Report, arXiv:1805.04163.
  33. Babak Abi et al., Deep underground neutrino experiment (DUNE), far detector technical design report, volume i introduction to DUNE, J. Instrum. 15, T08008 (2020).
  34. Valentina Santoro, The HighNESS project and future free neutron oscillations searches at the ESS, Proc. Sci., EPS-HEP2021 (2022) 711.
  35. Jeremy Sakstein and Mark Trodden, Baryogenesis via dark matter-induced symmetry breaking in the early universe, Phys. Lett. B 774, 183 (2017).
  36. Marcela Carena, Mariano Quirós, and Yue Zhang, Electroweak baryogenesis from dark-sector CP violation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 201802 (2019).
  37. Marcela Carena, Mariano Quirós, and Yue Zhang, Dark CP violation and gauged lepton or baryon number for electroweak baryogenesis, Phys. Rev. D 101, 055014 (2020).
  38. Lisa Biermann, Margarete Mühlleitner, and Jonas Müller, Electroweak phase transition in a dark sector with CP violation, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 439 (2023).
  39. Pedro Bittar, Gustavo Burdman, and Gabriel M. Salla, Spontaneous breaking of baryon number, baryogenesis and the bajoron, Phys. Rev. D 112, 055039 (2025).
  40. Andrea Addazi, Baryon violating first order phase transitions and gravitational waves, Phys. Lett. B 859, 139104 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation