Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Quantum entanglement autodistillation in baryon pair decays

Hai-Long Feng, Hao Tang, Wu-zhong Guo*, and Qin Qin†

  • *Contact author: wuzhong@hust.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: qqin@hust.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 112, 036020 – Published 28 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/yb7n-bdyc

Abstract

We study the spin-entangled mixed state of a spin-1/2 baryon–antibaryon pair produced in the process e+e−→J/ψ,ψ′→BB¯. We show that the spin entanglement of the system can increase following the decays B→b+M and B¯→b¯+M¯, where b,b¯ are spin-1/2 baryons and M,M¯ are spin-0 mesons. This phenomenon, known as entanglement autodistillation, manifests as a probabilistic amplification of entanglement during the decay process. We analyze the underlying mechanism and show that this phenomenon depends only on the initial state of the BB¯ system and the decay parameter αD, but not on the decay parameter ϕD. This effect only arises when parity is violated in the decay, when αD≠0.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (51)

  1. R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009).
  2. W. Rosenfeld, D. Burchardt, R. Garthoff, K. Redeker, N. Ortegel, M. Rau, and H. Weinfurter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 010402 (2017).
  3. S. Wu, C. Qian, Q. Wang, and X.-R. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 110, 054012 (2024).
  4. J. Li and C.-F. Qiao, Phys. Rev. D 74, 076003 (2006).
  5. K. Ehatäht, M. Fabbrichesi, L. Marzola, and C. Veelken, Phys. Rev. D 109, 032005 (2024).
  6. M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli, and L. Marzola, Phys. Rev. D 110, 053008 (2024).
  7. Y. Guo, X. Liu, F. Yuan, and H. X. Zhu, Research 2025, 0552 (2025).
  8. M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli, and L. Marzola, Phys. Rev. D 109, L031104 (2024).
  9. K. Chen, Y. Geng, Y. Jin, Z. Yan, and R. Zhu, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 580 (2024).
  10. Y. Geng, M. Cao, and R. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 109, L071301 (2024).
  11. A. Bernal, P. Caban, and J. Rembieliński, Sci. Rep. 15, 23410 (2025).
  12. K. Chen, Z.-P. Xing, and R. Zhu, Nucl. Phys. A 1063, 123199 (2025).
  13. Y. Zhang, B.-H. Zhou, Q.-B. Liu, S. Li, S.-C. Hsu, T. Han, M. Low, and T. A. Wu, arXiv:2504.01496.
  14. Y. Afik et al., arXiv:2504.00086.
  15. T. Han, M. Low, and Y. Su, arXiv:2501.04801.
  16. T. Han, M. Low, N. McGinnis, and S. Su, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2025) 081.
  17. Q. Bi, Q.-H. Cao, K. Cheng, and H. Zhang, Proc. Sci., ICHEP2024 (2025) 342.
  18. Q. Bi, Q.-H. Cao, K. Cheng, and H. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 109, 036022 (2024).
  19. D. Bai and Z. Ren, arXiv:2404.09116.
  20. D. Bai, Phys. Rev. C 109, 034001 (2024).
  21. D. Bai, Phys. Lett. B 845, 138162 (2023).
  22. D. Bai and Z. Ren, Phys. Rev. C 106, 064005 (2022).
  23. Y. Du, X.-G. He, C.-W. Liu, and J.-P. Ma, arXiv:2409.15418.
  24. K. Cheng and B. Yan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 011902 (2025).
  25. R. A. Morales, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138, 1157 (2023).
  26. R. A. Morales, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 581 (2024).
  27. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Nature (London) 633, 542 (2024).
  28. S. J. Parke and Y. Shadmi, Phys. Lett. B 387, 199 (1996).
  29. W. Bernreuther, A. Brandenburg, Z. G. Si, and P. Uwer, Nucl. Phys. B 690, 81 (2004).
  30. M. Baumgart and B. Tweedie, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2013) 117.
  31. G. Mahlon and S. J. Parke, Phys. Rev. D 81, 074024 (2010).
  32. J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra and J. A. Casas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 111801 (2024).
  33. J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, Phys. Rev. D 109, 096027 (2024).
  34. J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, Phys. Lett. B 848, 138409 (2024).
  35. J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, Phys. Rev. D 108, 076025 (2023).
  36. C. H. Bennett, S. Popescu, D. Rohrlich, J. A. Smolin, and A. V. Thapliyal, Phys. Rev. A 63, 012307 (2000).
  37. F. Verstraete, J. Dehaene, and B. DeMoor, Phys. Rev. A 64, 010101 (2001).
  38. F. Mintert, C. Viviescas, and A. Buchleitner, Basic concepts of entangled states, in Entanglement and Decoherence: Foundations and Modern Trends, edited by A. Buchleitner, C. Viviescas, and M. Tiersch (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009), pp. 61–86.
  39. G. Vidal and R. F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032314 (2002).
  40. W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998).
  41. F. Tabakin and R. A. Eisenstein, Phys. Rev. C 31, 1857 (1985).
  42. E. Perotti, G. Fäldt, A. Kupsc, S. Leupold, and J. J. Song, Phys. Rev. D 99, 056008 (2019).
  43. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Nature (London) 606, 64 (2022).
  44. T. D. Lee and C.-N. Yang, Phys. Rev. 108, 1645 (1957).
  45. V. Batozskaya (BESIII Collaboration), Proc. Sci., QNP2024 (2025) 072.
  46. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  47. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 106, L091101 (2022).
  48. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 108, L031106 (2023).
  49. M. Jacob and G. C. Wick, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 7, 404 (1959).
  50. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2012).
  51. E. D. Commins and P. H. Bucksbaum, Weak Interactions of Leptons and Quarks (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, USA, 1983).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation