Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Stochastic baryon charge transport in relativistic hydrodynamics

Nicolas Borghini, Baochi Fu*, and Sören Schlichting

  • *Contact author: bfu@physik.uni-bielefeld.de

Phys. Rev. D 111, 116019 – Published 23 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/y3f4-3by4

Abstract

We utilize stochastic hydrodynamics to study correlations and fluctuations of baryon charge in high-energy heavy-ion collisions. The baryon charge fluctuations are important observables to probe the quantum chromodynamics (QCD) phase diagram, yet a dynamical description with stochastic hydrodynamics remains challenging due to numerical instabilities and high computational demands. In this work, we employ a linearized approach, allowing us to separately simulate the background energy-momentum evolution of a charge-neutral fluid and the stochastic baryon transport processes, thereby largely reducing computational cost while maintaining sufficient accuracy. We implement this linearized stochastic charge evolution in the 3+1D viscous hydrodynamic code music, and compare numerical results to (semi-)analytical solutions for stochastic charge transport in Bjorken flow. We find that it nicely describes the two-point correlation of 1+1D analytical solutions for various equations of state and transport coefficients. In particular, the hydrodynamic calculations demonstrate how different rapidity separations probe charge fluctuations originating at different times of the evolution. We also investigate the net baryon correlations after the Cooper-Frye freeze out, which show good consistency with the analytical calculations and indicate that these fluctuation-induced correlations are sensitive to the baryon diffusion coefficient.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (63)

  1. Y. Aoki, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and K. K. Szabo, Nature (London) 443, 675 (2006).
  2. H.-T. Ding, F. Karsch, and S. Mukherjee, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 24, 1530007 (2015).
  3. M. A. Stephanov, K. Rajagopal, and E. V. Shuryak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4816 (1998).
  4. A. Pandav, D. Mallick, and B. Mohanty, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 125, 103960 (2022).
  5. K. Fukushima and T. Hatsuda, Rep. Prog. Phys. 74, 014001 (2011).
  6. X. Luo and N. Xu, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 28, 112 (2017).
  7. A. Bzdak, S. Esumi, V. Koch, J. Liao, M. Stephanov, and N. Xu, Phys. Rep. 853, 1 (2020).
  8. D. Almaalol et al., arXiv:2209.05009.
  9. S. Ruan et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 892, 53 (2018).
  10. M. Asakawa and M. Kitazawa, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 90, 299 (2016).
  11. P. Braun-Munzinger, A. Rustamov, and J. Stachel, Nucl. Phys. A960, 114 (2017).
  12. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 807, 135564 (2020).
  13. S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, C. Ratti, and K. Szabo, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2012) 138.
  14. A. Bazavov et al. (HotQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 86, 034509 (2012).
  15. A. Bazavov et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 072001 (2014).
  16. M. A. Stephanov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 052301 (2011).
  17. F. Karsch and K. Redlich, Phys. Lett. B 695, 136 (2011).
  18. S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, C. Ratti, and K. K. Szabo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 052301 (2014).
  19. M. Albright, J. Kapusta, and C. Young, Phys. Rev. C 92, 044904 (2015).
  20. W.-j. Fu, J. M. Pawlowski, F. Rennecke, and B.-J. Schaefer, Phys. Rev. D 94, 116020 (2016).
  21. Y. Lu, F. Gao, X. Luo, L. Chang, and Y.-x. Liu, arXiv:2211.03401.
  22. G. A. Almasi, B. Friman, and K. Redlich, Phys. Rev. D 96, 014027 (2017).
  23. V. Vovchenko, L. Jiang, M. I. Gorenstein, and H. Stoecker, Phys. Rev. C 98, 024910 (2018).
  24. R. Bellwied, S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, J. N. Guenther, J. Noronha-Hostler, P. Parotto, A. Pasztor, C. Ratti, and J. M. Stafford, Phys. Rev. D 101, 034506 (2020).
  25. M. Sakaida, M. Asakawa, H. Fujii, and M. Kitazawa, Phys. Rev. C 95, 064905 (2017).
  26. M. Nahrgang, M. Bluhm, T. Schaefer, and S. A. Bass, Phys. Rev. D 99, 116015 (2019).
  27. D. Oliinychenko and V. Koch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 182302 (2019).
  28. D. Oliinychenko, S. Shi, and V. Koch, Phys. Rev. C 102, 034904 (2020).
  29. G. Pihan, M. Bluhm, M. Kitazawa, T. Sami, and M. Nahrgang, Phys. Rev. C 107, 014908 (2023).
  30. M. Bluhm et al., Nucl. Phys. A1003, 122016 (2020).
  31. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 5. Statistical Physics, Part 2 (Elsevier, New York, 2013).
  32. J. I. Kapusta, B. Muller, and M. Stephanov, Phys. Rev. C 85, 054906 (2012).
  33. J. I. Kapusta and C. Plumberg, Phys. Rev. C 97, 014906 (2018); 102, 019901(E) (2020).
  34. M. Singh, C. Shen, S. McDonald, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Nucl. Phys. A982, 319 (2019).
  35. S. Tang, S. Wu, and H. Song, Phys. Rev. C 108, 034901 (2023).
  36. M. Nahrgang and M. Bluhm, Phys. Rev. D 102, 094017 (2020).
  37. X. An, G. Basar, M. Stephanov, and H.-U. Yee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 072301 (2021).
  38. C. Chattopadhyay, J. Ott, T. Schaefer, and V. V. Skokov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 032301 (2024).
  39. K. Kuroki, A. Sakai, K. Murase, and T. Hirano, Phys. Lett. B 842, 137958 (2023).
  40. G. Basar, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 143, 104175 (2025).
  41. S. Wu, C. Shen, and H. Song, Chin. Phys. Lett. 38, 081201 (2021).
  42. C. Young, J. I. Kapusta, C. Gale, S. Jeon, and B. Schenke, Phys. Rev. C 91, 044901 (2015).
  43. G. S. Denicol, C. Gale, S. Jeon, A. Monnai, B. Schenke, and C. Shen, Phys. Rev. C 98, 034916 (2018).
  44. K. Murase and T. Hirano, arXiv:1304.3243.
  45. K. Murase, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 411, 167969 (2019).
  46. J. Hammelmann, J. M. Torres-Rincon, J.-B. Rose, M. Greif, and H. Elfner, Phys. Rev. D 99, 076015 (2019).
  47. A. De, C. Shen, and J. I. Kapusta, Phys. Rev. C 106, 054903 (2022).
  48. P. Romatschke and U. Romatschke, Relativistic Fluid Dynamics In and Out of Equilibrium, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2019).
  49. B. Schenke, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Phys. Rev. C 82, 014903 (2010).
  50. J.-F. Paquet, C. Shen, G. S. Denicol, M. Luzum, B. Schenke, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Phys. Rev. C 93, 044906 (2016).
  51. K. Murase, Causal hydrodynamic fluctuations and their effects on high-energy nuclear collisions, Ph.D. thesis, Tokyo Univeristy, 2015.
  52. J. Bhambure, R. Singh, and D. Teaney, Phys. Rev. D 111, 034026 (2025).
  53. C. Chattopadhyay, J. Ott, T. Schaefer, and V. V. Skokov, arXiv:2411.15994.
  54. A. Kurganov and E. Tadmor, J. Comput. Phys. 160, 241 (2000).
  55. A. Monnai, B. Schenke, and C. Shen, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 36, 2130007 (2021).
  56. J. I. Kapusta and J. M. Torres-Rincon, Phys. Rev. C 86, 054911 (2012).
  57. M. Pradeep, K. Rajagopal, M. Stephanov, and Y. Yin, Phys. Rev. D 106, 036017 (2022).
  58. A. S. Aasen, S. Floerchinger, G. Giacalone, and D. Guenduez, Phys. Rev. C 108, 014904 (2023).
  59. F. Cooper and G. Frye, Phys. Rev. D 10, 186 (1974).
  60. B. Ling, T. Springer, and M. Stephanov, Phys. Rev. C 89, 064901 (2014).
  61. S. Pratt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 212301 (2012).
  62. A. De, C. Plumberg, and J. I. Kapusta, Phys. Rev. C 102, 024905 (2020).
  63. https://arxiv.org/src/2502.11202v1/anc

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation