- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Dark acoustic oscillations as an early-Universe explanation of the DESI anomaly

Mathias Garny1,*, Florian Niedermann2,†, and Martin S. Sloth3,‡

  • *Contact author: mathias.garny@tum.de
  • †Contact author: florian.niedermann@su.se
  • ‡Contact author: sloth@sdu.dk
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 114, 043523 – Published 14 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/y31p-9g5k

Abstract

DESI DR2 data have been widely interpreted as evidence for late-time evolving dark energy (DE) with an apparent phantom crossing. Here we investigate an alternative explanation, based on early-Universe physics. If dark acoustic oscillations (DAOs) are close in scale to baryon acoustic oscillations (BAOs), they can bias the extraction of the BAO scale from the peak in the galaxy correlation function. This leads to an apparent shift in the inferred distance if the superposition of BAO and DAO features is misinterpreted as being due to BAOs only. Taking this shift into account, we find that a DAO with percent-level amplitude can reconcile DESI DR2 with Planck 2018 as well as Pantheon+supernovae data, with fit improvement at a similar level compared to evolving DE. Notably, a DAO feature with the required properties has been predicted in a previously proposed scenario that resolves the Hubble tension via a prerecombination decoupling of dark matter and dark radiation. The presence of a DAO feature close to the BAO peak can be scrutinized with future full-shape galaxy clustering data from DESI and Euclid.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (67)

  1. M. Abdul Karim et al. (DESI Collaboration), DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints, Phys. Rev. D 112, 083515 (2025).
  2. Z. Bayat and M. P. Hertzberg, Examining quintessence models with DESI data, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2025) 065.
  3. J. Khoury, M.-X. Lin, and M. Trodden, Apparent w <−1 and a lower S8 from dark axion and dark baryons interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 181001 (2025).
  4. R. Kou and A. Lewis, Unified dark fluid with null sound speed as an alternative to phantom dark energy, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2026) 014.
  5. R. Chen, J. M. Cline, V. Muralidharan, and B. Salewicz, Quintessential dark energy crossing the phantom divide, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2026) 044.
  6. R. Liu, Y. Zhu, W. Hu, and V. Miranda, Phantom mirage from axion dark energy, Phys. Rev. D 113, 083506 (2026).
  7. J.-Q. Wang, R.-G. Cai, Z.-K. Guo, and S.-J. Wang, Resolving the Planck-DESI tension by non-minimally coupled quintessence, Phys. Rev. D 113, 083534 (2026).
  8. R. R. Caldwell and E. V. Linder, Null impact of the null energy condition in current cosmology, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2026) 008.
  9. S. Sánchez López, A. Karam, and D. K. Hazra, Non-minimally coupled quintessence in light of DESI, arXiv:2510.14941.
  10. A. Bedroya, G. Obied, C. Vafa, and D. H. Wu, Evolving dark sector and the dark dimension scenario, arXiv:2507.03090.
  11. S. Casertano et al. (H0DN Collaboration), The local distance network: A community consensus report on the measurement of the Hubble constant at 1% precision, Astron. Astrophys. 708, A166 (2026).
  12. E. G. M. Ferreira, E. McDonough, L. Balkenhol, R. Kallosh, L. Knox, and A. Linde, The BAO-CMB tension and implications for inflation, Phys. Rev. D 113, 043524 (2026).
  13. J. L. Bernal, L. Verde, and A. G. Riess, The trouble with H0, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2016) 019.
  14. L. Knox and M. Millea, Hubble constant hunter’s guide, Phys. Rev. D 101, 043533 (2020).
  15. F. Niedermann and M. S. Sloth, Hot new early dark energy, Phys. Rev. D 105, 063509 (2022).
  16. F. Niedermann and M. S. Sloth, Hot new early dark energy: Towards a unified dark sector of neutrinos, dark energy and dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 835, 137555 (2022).
  17. J. S. Cruz, F. Niedermann, and M. S. Sloth, NANOGrav meets hot new early dark energy and the origin of neutrino mass, Phys. Lett. B 846, 138202 (2023).
  18. M. Garny, F. Niedermann, H. Rubira, and M. S. Sloth, Hot new early dark energy bridging cosmic gaps: Supercooled phase transition reconciles stepped dark radiation solutions to the Hubble tension with BBN, Phys. Rev. D 110, 023531 (2024).
  19. M. Garny, F. Niedermann, H. Rubira, and M. S. Sloth, Hot new early dark energy: Dark radiation matter decoupling, arXiv:2508.03795.
  20. V. Poulin, T. L. Smith, T. Karwal, and M. Kamionkowski, Early dark energy can resolve the Hubble tension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 221301 (2019).
  21. F. Niedermann and M. S. Sloth, New early dark energy, Phys. Rev. D 103, L041303 (2021).
  22. F. Niedermann and M. S. Sloth, Resolving the Hubble tension with new early dark energy, Phys. Rev. D 102, 063527 (2020).
  23. J. S. Cruz, F. Niedermann, and M. S. Sloth, Cold new early dark energy pulls the trigger on the H0 and S8 tensions: A simultaneous solution to both tensions without new ingredients, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2023) 033.
  24. N. Schöneberg and L. Vacher, The mass effect—variations of the electron mass and their impact on cosmology, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2024) 004.
  25. V. Poulin, T. L. Smith, R. Calderón, and T. Simon, Implications of the cosmic calibration tension beyond H0 and the synergy between early- and late-time new physics, Phys. Rev. D 111, 083552 (2025).
  26. K. S. Jeong and F. Takahashi, Self-interacting dark radiation, Phys. Lett. B 725, 134 (2013).
  27. M. A. Buen-Abad, G. Marques-Tavares, and M. Schmaltz, Non-Abelian dark matter and dark radiation, Phys. Rev. D 92, 023531 (2015).
  28. M. A. Buen-Abad, M. Schmaltz, J. Lesgourgues, and T. Brinckmann, Interacting dark sector and precision cosmology, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2017) 008.
  29. M. Archidiacono, S. Gariazzo, C. Giunti, S. Hannestad, and T. Tram, Sterile neutrino self-interactions: H0 tension and short-baseline anomalies, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2020) 029.
  30. N. Blinov and G. Marques-Tavares, Interacting radiation after Planck and its implications for the Hubble tension, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2020) 029.
  31. D. Aloni, A. Berlin, M. Joseph, M. Schmaltz, and N. Weiner, A step in understanding the Hubble tension, Phys. Rev. D 105, 123516 (2022).
  32. N. Schöneberg and G. Franco Abellán, A step in the right direction? Analyzing the Wess Zumino Dark Radiation solution to the Hubble tension, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2022) 001.
  33. D. E. Kaplan, G. Z. Krnjaic, K. R. Rehermann, and C. M. Wells, Atomic dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2009) 021.
  34. F.-Y. Cyr-Racine and K. Sigurdson, Cosmology of atomic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 87, 103515 (2013).
  35. F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, F. Ge, and L. Knox, Symmetry of cosmological observables, a mirror world dark sector, and the Hubble constant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 201301 (2022).
  36. N. Blinov, G. Krnjaic, and S. W. Li, Toward a realistic model of dark atoms to resolve the Hubble tension, Phys. Rev. D 105, 095005 (2022).
  37. S. Bansal, J. Barron, D. Curtin, and Y. Tsai, Precision cosmological constraints on atomic dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2022) 095.
  38. M. A. Buen-Abad, Z. Chacko, I. Flood, C. Kilic, G. Marques-Tavares, and T. Youn, Atomic dark matter, interacting dark radiation, and the Hubble tension, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 084.
  39. M. A. Buen-Abad, Z. Chacko, I. Flood, C. Kilic, G. Marques-Tavares, and T. Youn, Dark matter-dark radiation interactions and the Hubble tension, arXiv:2511.16554.
  40. S. Bansal, J. H. Kim, C. Kolda, M. Low, and Y. Tsai, Mirror twin Higgs cosmology: Constraints and a possible resolution to the H0 and S8 tensions, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 050.
  41. F. Beutler, M. Biagetti, D. Green, A. Slosar, and B. Wallisch, Primordial features from linear to nonlinear scales, Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 033209 (2019).
  42. S.-F. Chen and M. Zaldarriaga, It’s all ok: Curvature in light of BAO from DESI DR2, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2025) 014.
  43. N. Sailer, G. S. Farren, S. Ferraro, and M. White, Dispuτable: The high cost of a low optical depth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 081002 (2026).
  44. U. Andrade et al. (DESI Collaboration), Validation of the DESI DR2 measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations from galaxies and quasars, Phys. Rev. D 112, 083512 (2025).
  45. S.-F. Chen et al., Baryon acoustic oscillation theory and modelling systematics for the DESI 2024 results, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 534, 544 (2024).
  46. D. J. Eisenstein, H.-j. Seo, and M. J. White, On the robustness of the acoustic scale in the low-redshift clustering of matter, Astrophys. J. 664, 660 (2007).
  47. H.-J. Seo and D. J. Eisenstein, Improved forecasts for the baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological distance scale, Astrophys. J. 665, 14 (2007).
  48. T. Matsubara, Resumming cosmological perturbations via the Lagrangian picture: One-loop results in real space and in redshift space, Phys. Rev. D 77, 063530 (2008).
  49. T. Matsubara, Nonlinear perturbation theory with halo bias and redshift-space distortions via the Lagrangian picture, Phys. Rev. D 78, 083519 (2008); 78, 109901(E) (2008).
  50. J. Carlson, B. Reid, and M. White, Convolution Lagrangian perturbation theory for biased tracers, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 429, 1674 (2013).
  51. L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga, The IR-resummed effective field theory of large scale structures, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2014) 013.
  52. T. Baldauf, M. Mirbabayi, M. Simonović, and M. Zaldarriaga, Equivalence principle and the baryon acoustic peak, Phys. Rev. D 92, 043514 (2015).
  53. H.-J. Seo, F. Beutler, A. J. Ross, and S. Saito, Modeling the reconstructed BAO in Fourier space, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 460, 2453 (2016).
  54. Z. Vlah, U. Seljak, M. Y. Chu, and Y. Feng, Perturbation theory, effective field theory, and oscillations in the power spectrum, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2015) 057.
  55. D. Blas, M. Garny, M. M. Ivanov, and S. Sibiryakov, Time-sliced perturbation theory II: Baryon acoustic oscillations and infrared resummation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2016) 028.
  56. M. M. Ivanov and S. Sibiryakov, Infrared resummation for biased tracers in redshift space, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2018) 053.
  57. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
  58. M. Tegmark, Measuring cosmological parameters with galaxy surveys, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3806 (1997).
  59. J. L. Bernal, N. Bellomo, A. Raccanelli, and L. Verde, Beware of commonly used approximations. Part II. estimating systematic biases in the best-fit parameters, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2020) 017.
  60. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 results. VIII. Gravitational lensing, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A8 (2020).
  61. D. Brout et al., The Pantheon+Analysis: Cosmological constraints, Astrophys. J. 938, 110 (2022).
  62. J. Torrado and A. Lewis, Cobaya: Code for Bayesian analysis of hierarchical physical models, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2020) 057.
  63. D. Blas, J. Lesgourgues, and T. Tram, The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) II: Approximation schemes, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2011) 034.
  64. E. B. Holm, A. Nygaard, J. Dakin, S. Hannestad, and T. Tram, PROSPECT: A profile likelihood code for frequentist cosmological parameter inference, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 535, 3686 (2024).
  65. M. Garny, F. Niedermann, and M. S. Sloth, Dark acoustic oscillations and the Hubble tension, arXiv:2602.23895.
  66. A. G. Riess et al., A comprehensive measurement of the local value of the Hubble constant with 1  km s−1 Mpc−1 uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team, Astrophys. J. Lett. 934, L7 (2022).
  67. https://github.com/NEDE-Cosmo/DAO_bias_DESI_DR2.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 114, 043523– Published 14 August, 2026
  • Received 15 January 2026
  • Accepted 16 July 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by Bibsam.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation