Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Neutrino oscillations as a probe of macrorealism

Kathrine Mørch Groth*, Johann Ioannou-Nikolaides, D. Jason Koskinen, and Markus Ahlers

  • *Contact author: kathrine.groth@nbi.ku.dk

Phys. Rev. D 112, 096029 – Published 25 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/y2v2-ttj9

Abstract

The correlations between successive measurements of a quantum system can violate a family of Leggett-Garg Inequalities (LGIs) that are analogous to the violation of Bell’s inequalities of measurements performed on spatially separated quantum systems. These LGIs follow from a macrorealistic point of view, imposing that a classical system is at all times in a definite state and that a measurement can, at least in principle, leave this state undisturbed. Violations of LGIs can be probed by neutrino flavor oscillations if the correlators of consecutive flavor measurements are approximately stationary. We discuss here several improvements of the methodology used in previous analyses based on accelerator and reactor neutrino data. We argue that the strong claims of LGI violations made in previous studies are based on an unsuitable modeling of macrorealistic systems in statistical hypothesis tests. We illustrate our improved methodology via the example of the MINOS muon-neutrino survival data, where we find revised statistical evidence for violations of LGIs at the (2–3)σ level, depending on macrorealistic background models.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (16)

  1. J. S. Bell, Phys. Phys. Fiz. 1, 195 (1964).
  2. A. J. Leggett and A. Garg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 857 (1985).
  3. A. J. Leggett, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14, R415 (2002).
  4. C. Emary, N. Lambert, and F. Nori, Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 016001 (2013).
  5. D. Gangopadhyay, D. Home, and A. S. Roy, Phys. Rev. A 88, 022115 (2013).
  6. D. Gangopadhyay and A. S. Roy, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 260 (2017).
  7. J. A. Formaggio, D. I. Kaiser, M. M. Murskyj, and T. E. Weiss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 050402 (2016).
  8. R. Z. Barrios and M. A. Acero, arXiv:2401.00240.
  9. Q. Fu and X. Chen, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 775 (2017).
  10. X.-Z. Wang and B.-Q. Ma, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 133 (2022).
  11. Xue K. Song, Y. Huang, J. Ling, and Man H. Yung, Phys. Rev. A 98, 050302 (2018)(R).
  12. J. Naikoo, A. K. Alok, S. Banerjee, and S. U. Sankar, Phys. Rev. D 99, 095001 (2019).
  13. S. Shafaq, T. Kushwaha, and P. Mehta, arXiv:2112.12726.
  14. N. G. van Kampen, Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry (Elsevier, New York, 2007).
  15. A. B. Sousa (MINOS, MINOS+ Collaborations), AIP Conf. Proc. 1666, 110004 (2015).
  16. I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz, and A. Zhou, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2020) 178.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation