Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Structure of the Ω−(2012) with Hamiltonian effective field theory

Fang-Chao Han1,2,3, Zhan-Wei Liu1,2,3,*, Derek B. Leinweber4,†, and Anthony W. Thomas4,‡

  • 1School of Physical Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • 2Research Center for Hadron and CSR Physics, Lanzhou University and Institute of Modern Physics of CAS, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • 3Lanzhou Center for Theoretical Physics, MoE Frontiers Science Center for Rare Isotopes, Key Laboratory of Quantum Theory and Applications of MoE, Key Laboratory of Theoretical Physics of Gansu Province, Gansu Provincial Research Center for Basic Disciplines of Quantum Physics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • 4CSSM, Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia

  • *Contact author: liuzhanwei@lzu.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: derek.leinweber@adelaide.edu.au
  • ‡Contact author: anthony.thomas@adelaide.edu.au

Phys. Rev. D 112, L051503 – Published 29 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/xdbd-v5hb

Abstract

We investigate the internal structure of the Ω(2012)− by analyzing lattice QCD simulation and experimental data within Hamiltonian effective field theory, considering both JP=1/2− and 3/2− assignments. The couplings to the dominant decay channel ΞK¯ and the near-threshold channel Ξ(1530)K¯ are determined through the quark-pair-creation model. By studying the lattice QCD spectra in these two spin-parity scenarios, we extract the masses and widths of the resonances. We notice that the JP=3/2− resonance is consistent with the observed Ω(2012)− while the recently reported Ω(2109)− may be a JP=1/2− Ω.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (84)

  1. J. Yelton et al. (Belle Collaboration), Observation of an excited Ω− baryon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 052003 (2018).
  2. S. Jia et al. (Belle Collaboration), Search for Ω(2012)→KΞ(1530)→KπΞ at Belle, Phys. Rev. D 100, 032006 (2019).
  3. S. Jia et al. (Belle Collaboration), Observation of Ω(2012)−→Ξ(1530)K− and measurement of the effective couplings of Ω(2012)− to Ξ(1530)K− and ΞK−, Phys. Lett. B 860, 139224 (2025).
  4. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Evidence for two excited Ω-hyperons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 131903 (2025).
  5. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Observation of the Ω(2012) baryon at the LHC, arXiv:2502.18063.
  6. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  7. V. Crede and J. Yelton, 70 years of hyperon spectroscopy: A review of strange Ξ, Ω baryons, and the spectrum of charmed and bottom baryons, Rep. Prog. Phys. 87, 106301 (2024).
  8. T. Hyodo and M. Niiyama, QCD and the strange baryon spectrum, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 120, 103868 (2021).
  9. C. S. An, B. C. Metsch, and B. S. Zou, Mixing of the low-lying three- and five-quark Ω states with negative parity, Phys. Rev. C 87, 065207 (2013).
  10. C. S. An and B. S. Zou, Low-lying Ω states with negative parity in an extended quark model with Nambu-Jona-Lasinio interaction, Phys. Rev. C 89, 055209 (2014).
  11. S. Capstick and N. Isgur, Baryons in a relativized quark model with chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 34, 2809 (1986).
  12. K.-T. Chao, N. Isgur, and G. Karl, Strangeness −2 and −3 baryons in a quark model with chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 23, 155 (1981).
  13. R. N. Faustov and V. O. Galkin, Strange baryon spectroscopy in the relativistic quark model, Phys. Rev. D 92, 054005 (2015).
  14. C. S. Kalman, P wave baryons in a consistent quark model with hyperfine interactions, Phys. Rev. D 26, 2326 (1982).
  15. J. Liu, R. D. McKeown, and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Global analysis of nucleon strange form factors at low Q**2, Phys. Rev. C 76, 025202 (2007).
  16. U. Loring, B. C. Metsch, and H. R. Petry, The light baryon spectrum in a relativistic quark model with instanton induced quark forces: The strange baryon spectrum, Eur. Phys. J. A 10, 447 (2001).
  17. M. Pervin and W. Roberts, Strangeness −2 and −3 baryons in a constituent quark model, Phys. Rev. C 77, 025202 (2008).
  18. Y. Oh, Xi and Omega baryons in the Skyrme model, Phys. Rev. D 75, 074002 (2007).
  19. G. P. Engel, C. B. Lang, D. Mohler, and A. Schäfer (BGR Collaboration), QCD with two light dynamical chirally improved quarks: Baryons, Phys. Rev. D 87, 074504 (2013).
  20. R. G. Edwards, N. Mathur, D. G. Richards, and S. J. Wallace (Hadron Spectrum Collaboration), Flavor structure of the excited baryon spectra from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 87, 054506 (2013).
  21. L.-Y. Xiao and X.-H. Zhong, Possible interpretation of the newly observed Ω(2012) state, Phys. Rev. D 98, 034004 (2018).
  22. T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi, Y. Sarac, and H. Sundu, Interpretation of the newly discovered Ω(2012), Phys. Rev. D 98, 014031 (2018).
  23. T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi, Y. Sarac, and H. Sundu, Nature of the Ω(2012) through its strong decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 894 (2018).
  24. Z.-Y. Wang, L.-C. Gui, Q.-F. Lü, L.-Y. Xiao, and X.-H. Zhong, Newly observed Ω(2012) state and strong decays of the low-lying Ω excitations, Phys. Rev. D 98, 114023 (2018).
  25. M. V. Polyakov, H.-D. Son, B.-D. Sun, and A. Tandogan, Ω(2012) through the looking glass of flavour SU (3), Phys. Lett. B 792, 315 (2019).
  26. M.-S. Liu, K.-L. Wang, Q.-F. Lü, and X.-H. Zhong, Ω baryon spectrum and their decays in a constituent quark model, Phys. Rev. D 101, 016002 (2020).
  27. X. Liu, H. Huang, J. Ping, and D. Chen, Investigating Ω(2012) as a molecular state, Phys. Rev. C 103, 025202 (2021).
  28. A. J. Arifi, D. Suenaga, A. Hosaka, and Y. Oh, Strong decays of multistrangeness baryon resonances in the quark model, Phys. Rev. D 105, 094006 (2022).
  29. H.-H. Zhong, R.-H. Ni, M.-Y. Chen, X.-H. Zhong, and J.-J. Xie, Further study of within a chiral quark model*, Chin. Phys. C 47, 063104 (2023).
  30. K.-L. Wang, Q.-F. Lü, J.-J. Xie, and X.-H. Zhong, Toward discovering the excited Ω baryons through nonleptonic weak decays of Ωc, Phys. Rev. D 107, 034015 (2023).
  31. N. Su, H.-X. Chen, P. Gubler, and A. Hosaka, Investigation on the Ω(2012) from QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 110, 034007 (2024).
  32. T. M. Aliev, S. Bilmis, and M. Savci, Analysis of strong decays of SU(3) partners of Ω(2012) baryon, Chin. Phys. C 48, 083101 (2024).
  33. Q.-F. Lü, H. Nagahiro, and A. Hosaka, Understanding the nature of Ω(2012) in a coupled-channel approach, Phys. Rev. D 107, 014025 (2023).
  34. J. Oudichhya, K. Gandhi, and A. K. Rai, Quantum number assignments of light strange baryons in Regge phenomenology, Nucl. Phys. A1035, 122658 (2023).
  35. C. Menapara and A. K. Rai, Spectra of Ω Baryon, in Proceedings of the 65th DAE BRNS Symposium on nuclear physics (2022).
  36. S.-Q. Luo and X. Liu, Identifying triple-strangeness Ω hyperons in light of recent experimental results, Phys. Rev. D 112, 014047 (2025).
  37. M. P. Valderrama, Ω(2012) as a hadronic molecule, Phys. Rev. D 98, 054009 (2018).
  38. Y.-H. Lin and B.-S. Zou, Hadronic molecular assignment for the newly observed Ω* state, Phys. Rev. D 98, 056013 (2018).
  39. R. Pavao and E. Oset, Coupled channels dynamics in the generation of the Ω(2012) resonance, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 857 (2018).
  40. Y. Huang, M.-Z. Liu, J.-X. Lu, J.-J. Xie, and L.-S. Geng, Strong decay modes K¯Ξ and K¯Ξπ of the Ω(2012) in the K¯Ξ(1530) and ηΩ molecular scenario, Phys. Rev. D 98, 076012 (2018).
  41. T. Gutsche and V. E. Lyubovitskij, Strong decays of the hadronic molecule Ω*(2012), J. Phys. G 48, 025001 (2020).
  42. J.-X. Lu, C.-H. Zeng, E. Wang, J.-J. Xie, and L.-S. Geng, Revisiting the Ω(2012) as a hadronic molecule and its strong decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 361 (2020).
  43. Y. Lin, Y.-H. Lin, F. Wang, B. Zou, and B.-S. Zou, Reanalysis of the newly observed Ω* state in a hadronic molecule model, Phys. Rev. D 102, 074025 (2020).
  44. N. Ikeno, G. Toledo, and E. Oset, Molecular picture for the Ω(2012) revisited, Phys. Rev. D 101, 094016 (2020).
  45. N. Ikeno, W.-H. Liang, G. Toledo, and E. Oset, Interpretation of the Ωc→π+Ω(2012)→π+(K−Ξ) relative to Ωc→π+K−Ξ from the Ω(2012) molecular perspective, Phys. Rev. D 106, 034022 (2022).
  46. N. Ikeno, G. Toledo, W.-H. Liang, and E. Oset, Consistency of the molecular picture of Ω(2012) with the latest Belle results, Few Body Syst. 64, 55 (2023).
  47. J.-J. Xie and L.-S. Geng, The Ω(2012) as a hadronic molecule, Chin. Phys. Lett. 41, 081402 (2024).
  48. J. Song, W.-H. Liang, C.-W. Xiao, J. M. Dias, and E. Oset, Testing the molecular nature of the Ω(2012) with the ψ(3770)→Ω¯K¯Ξ and ψ(3770)→Ω¯K¯Ξ*(1530)(Ω¯K¯πΞ) reactions, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1311 (2024).
  49. X. Hu and J. Ping, Analysis of Ω(2012) as a molecule in the chiral quark model, Phys. Rev. D 106, 054028 (2022).
  50. C.-H. Zeng, J.-X. Lu, E. Wang, J.-J. Xie, and L.-S. Geng, Theoretical study of the Ω(2012) state in the Ωc0→π+Ω(2012)−→π+(K¯Ξ)− and π+(K¯Ξπ)− decays, Phys. Rev. D 102, 076009 (2020).
  51. R. J. Hudspith, M. F. M. Lutz, and D. Mohler, Precise Omega baryons from lattice QCD, arXiv:2404.02769.
  52. L. Hockley, W. Kamleh, D. Leinweber, and A. Thomas, Exploring the Ω− spectrum in lattice QCD, J. Phys. G 52, 065103 (2025).
  53. J. M. M. Hall, A. C. P. Hsu, D. B. Leinweber, A. W. Thomas, and R. D. Young, Finite-volume matrix Hamiltonian model for a Δ→Nπ system, Phys. Rev. D 87, 094510 (2013).
  54. J. M. M. Hall, W. Kamleh, D. B. Leinweber, B. J. Menadue, B. J. Owen, A. W. Thomas, and R. D. Young, On the structure of the Lambda 1405, Proc. Sci., LATTICE2014 (2014) 094 [arXiv:1411.3781].
  55. J. M. M. Hall, W. Kamleh, D. B. Leinweber, B. J. Menadue, B. J. Owen, A. W. Thomas, and R. D. Young, Lattice QCD evidence that the Λ(1405) resonance is an antikaon-nucleon molecule, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 132002 (2015).
  56. Z.-W. Liu, W. Kamleh, D. B. Leinweber, F. M. Stokes, A. W. Thomas, and J.-J. Wu, Hamiltonian effective field theory study of the N*(1535) resonance in lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 082004 (2016).
  57. Z.-W. Liu, W. Kamleh, D. B. Leinweber, F. M. Stokes, A. W. Thomas, and J.-J. Wu, Hamiltonian effective field theory study of the N*(1440) resonance in lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 95, 034034 (2017).
  58. Z.-W. Liu, J. M. M. Hall, D. B. Leinweber, A. W. Thomas, and J.-J. Wu, Structure of the Λ(1405) from Hamiltonian effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 95, 014506 (2017).
  59. J.-J. Liu, Z.-W. Liu, K. Chen, D. Guo, D. B. Leinweber, X. Liu, and A. W. Thomas, Structure of the Λ(1670) resonance, Phys. Rev. D 109, 054025 (2024).
  60. J.-j. Wu, D. B. Leinweber, Z.-w. Liu, and A. W. Thomas, Structure of the roper resonance from Lattice QCD constraints, Phys. Rev. D 97, 094509 (2018).
  61. C. D. Abell, D. B. Leinweber, A. W. Thomas, and J.-J. Wu, Regularization in nonperturbative extensions of effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 106, 034506 (2022).
  62. C. D. Abell, D. B. Leinweber, A. W. Thomas, and J.-J. Wu, Effects of multiple single-particle basis states in scattering systems, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 459, 169531 (2023).
  63. D. B. Leinweber, C. D. Abell, L. C. Hockley, W. Kamleh, Z.-W. Liu, F. M. Stokes, A. W. Thomas, and J.-J. Wu, Understanding the nature of baryon resonances, Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis. 47C, 146 (2024).
  64. C. D. Abell, D. B. Leinweber, Z.-W. Liu, A. W. Thomas, and J.-J. Wu, Low-lying odd-parity nucleon resonances as quark-model-like states, Phys. Rev. D 108, 094519 (2023).
  65. Y. Zhuge, Z.-W. Liu, D. B. Leinweber, and A. W. Thomas, Pion photoproduction of nucleon excited states with Hamiltonian effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 110, 094015 (2024).
  66. L. Hockley, C. Abell, D. Leinweber, and A. Thomas, Understanding the nature of the Δ(1600) resonance, Phys. Rev. D 111, 076027 (2025).
  67. Z. Yang, G.-J. Wang, J.-J. Wu, M. Oka, and S.-L. Zhu, Novel coupled channel framework connecting the quark model and Lattice QCD for the near-threshold Ds states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 112001 (2022).
  68. Z. Yang, G.-J. Wang, J.-J. Wu, M. Oka, and S.-L. Zhu, The investigations of the P-wave Bs states combining quark model and lattice QCD in the coupled channel framework, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2023) 058.
  69. L. Micu, Decay rates of meson resonances in a quark model, Nucl. Phys. B10, 521 (1969).
  70. R. D. Carlitz and M. Kislinger, Regge amplitude arising from su(6)w vertices, Phys. Rev. D 2, 336 (1970).
  71. A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pene, and J. C. Raynal, Naive quark pair creation model and baryon decays, Phys. Rev. D 9, 1415 (1974).
  72. A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pene, and J. C. Raynal, Resonant partial wave amplitudes in pi + n−> pi+pi + n according to the naive quark pair creation model, Phys. Rev. D 11, 1272 (1975).
  73. A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pene, and J. C. Raynal, Why is Ψ (4.414) so narrow?, Phys. Lett. B 72, 57 (1977).
  74. A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pene, and J. C. Raynal, Strong decays of Ψdblac (4.028) as a radial excitation of charmonium, Phys. Lett. B 71, 397 (1977).
  75. A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pene, and J. C. Raynal, Naive quark pair creation model of strong interaction vertices, Phys. Rev. D 8, 2223 (1973).
  76. D. Morel and S. Capstick, Baryon meson loop effects on the spectrum of nonstrange baryons, arXiv:nucl-th/0204014.
  77. P. G. Ortega, J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez, Molecular components in P-wave charmed-strange mesons, Phys. Rev. D 94, 074037 (2016).
  78. B. J. Menadue, W. Kamleh, D. B. Leinweber, and M. S. Mahbub, Isolating the Λ(1405) in Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 112001 (2012).
  79. S. Aoki et al. (PACS-CS Collaboration), 2+1 flavor Lattice QCD toward the physical point, Phys. Rev. D 79, 034503 (2009).
  80. R. Sommer, A new way to set the energy scale in lattice gauge theories and its applications to the static force and αs in SU(2) Yang-Mills theory, Nucl. Phys. B411, 839 (1994).
  81. S. Godfrey and K. Moats, Properties of excited charm and charm-strange mesons, Phys. Rev. D 93, 034035 (2016).
  82. S. Godfrey and K. Moats, Bottomonium mesons and strategies for their observation, Phys. Rev. D 92, 054034 (2015).
  83. L.-Y. Xiao, Q.-F. Lü, and S.-L. Zhu, Strong decays of the 1P and 2D doubly charmed states, Phys. Rev. D 97, 074005 (2018).
  84. Y.-H. Zhou, W.-J. Wang, L.-Y. Xiao, and X.-H. Zhong, Strong decays of the low-lying 1P- and 1D-wave Σc baryons, Phys. Rev. D 108, 014019 (2023).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation