Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Once-in-a-lifetime encounter models for neutrino media. II. Quasisteady states and miscidynamic flavor evolution

Anson Kost1, Lucas Johns2, and Huaiyu Duan1

Phys. Rev. D 112, 103004 – Published 5 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/x1bx-p3cm

Abstract

We extended the once-in-a-lifetime encounter (OILE) model to stochastic interactions among neutrinos. As in the original OILE model, the new model reproduces the mean-field behavior of a dense neutrino gas for time t≲(μγ)−1, where μ measures the strength of the mean-field neutrino self-interaction potential and is proportional to the neutrino density, and the dimensionless “impact parameter” γ is a measure of the change in the flavor quantum state of a neutrino during interaction with another neutrino when the wave packets of the two neutrinos overlap. As in the mean-field case, the OILE model with random neutrino velocities experiences kinetic flavor decoherence as the flavor quantum states of the neutrinos diverge from each other. Unlike the mean-field case, however, the OILE model has a “collision term” due to the quantum entanglement among neutrinos. For γ≪1, this incoherent effect can drive the neutrinos into a quasisteady state that is similar to the collective precession mode in a homogeneous and isotropic neutrino gas in the mean-field approximation. Subsequently, the collision term drives the neutrino gas adiabatically through different quasisteady states and eventually to flavor equilibration. This process is an example of miscidynamic flavor evolution, with the mixing equilibria being the quasisteady precession states.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

See Also

Once-in-a-lifetime encounter models for neutrino media: From coherent oscillations to flavor equilibration

Anson Kost, Lucas Johns, and Huaiyu Duan
Phys. Rev. D 109, 103037 (2024)

Article Text

References (39)

  1. L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. D 17, 2369 (1978).
  2. S. P. Mikheyev and A. Y. Smirnov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 42, 913 (1985).
  3. G. M. Fuller, R. W. Mayle, J. R. Wilson, and D. N. Schramm, Astrophys. J. 322, 795 (1987).
  4. D. Nötzold and G. Raffelt, Nucl. Phys. B307, 924 (1988).
  5. J. T. Pantaleone, Phys. Lett. B 287, 128 (1992).
  6. H. Duan, G. M. Fuller, and Y.-Z. Qian, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60, 569 (2010).
  7. S. Chakraborty, R. Hansen, I. Izaguirre, and G. Raffelt, Nucl. Phys. B908, 366 (2016).
  8. I. Tamborra and S. Shalgar, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 71, 165 (2021).
  9. M. C. Volpe, Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 025004 (2024).
  10. L. Johns, S. Richers, and M.-R. Wu, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 75, 399 (2025).
  11. G. Sigl and G. Raffelt, Nucl. Phys. B406, 423 (1993).
  12. D. N. Blaschke and V. Cirigliano, Phys. Rev. D 94, 033009 (2016).
  13. J. Froustey, C. Pitrou, and M. C. Volpe, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2020) 015.
  14. N. F. Bell, A. A. Rawlinson, and R. F. Sawyer, Phys. Lett. B 573, 86 (2003).
  15. A. Friedland and C. Lunardini, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2003) 043.
  16. M. J. Cervia, A. V. Patwardhan, A. B. Balantekin, S. N. Coppersmith, and C. W. Johnson, Phys. Rev. D 100, 083001 (2019).
  17. A. V. Patwardhan, M. J. Cervia, and A. B. Balantekin, Phys. Rev. D 104, 123035 (2021).
  18. A. Roggero, Phys. Rev. D 104, 103016 (2021).
  19. J. D. Martin, A. Roggero, H. Duan, J. Carlson, and V. Cirigliano, Phys. Rev. D 105, 083020 (2022).
  20. M. Illa and M. J. Savage, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 221003 (2023).
  21. J. D. Martin, A. Roggero, H. Duan, and J. Carlson, arXiv:2301.07049.
  22. J. D. Martin, D. Neill, A. Roggero, H. Duan, and J. Carlson, Phys. Rev. D 108, 123010 (2023).
  23. A. V. Patwardhan, M. J. Cervia, E. Rrapaj, P. Siwach, and A. B. Balantekin, Many-body collective neutrino oscillations: Recent developments, in Handbook of Nuclear Physics, edited by I. Tanihata, H. Toki, and T. Kajino (Springer, Singapore, 2023), pp. 1–16.
  24. L. Johns, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 39, 2450122 (2024).
  25. S. Shalgar and I. Tamborra, Phys. Rev. D 107, 123004 (2023).
  26. V. Cirigliano, S. Sen, and Y. Yamauchi, Phys. Rev. D 110, 123028 (2024).
  27. A. Kost, L. Johns, and H. Duan, Phys. Rev. D 109, 103037 (2024).
  28. A. Friedland and C. Lunardini, Phys. Rev. D 68, 013007 (2003).
  29. H. Duan, G. M. Fuller, J. Carlson, and Y.-Z. Qian, Phys. Rev. D 74, 105014 (2006).
  30. H. Duan, G. M. Fuller, J. Carlson, and Y.-Z. Qian, Phys. Rev. D 75, 125005 (2007).
  31. G. G. Raffelt and A. Y. Smirnov, Phys. Rev. D 76, 081301 (2007); 77, 029903(E) (2008).
  32. G. G. Raffelt and A. Y. Smirnov, Phys. Rev. D 76, 125008 (2007).
  33. L. Johns, Phys. Rev. D 112, 063032 (2025).
  34. L. Johns, Phys. Rev. D 112, 043024 (2025).
  35. L. Johns and A. Kost, arXiv:2506.03271.
  36. J. Kersten and A. Y. Smirnov, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 339 (2016).
  37. S. Hannestad, G. G. Raffelt, G. Sigl, and Y. Y. Y. Wong, Phys. Rev. D 74, 105010 (2006); 76, 029901(E) (2007).
  38. H. Duan, G. M. Fuller, and Y.-Z. Qian, Phys. Rev. D 74, 123004 (2006).
  39. G. G. Raffelt and G. Sigl, Phys. Rev. D 75, 083002 (2007).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation