Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Studies of CPT symmetry in positronium decays with the 192 plastic strip J-PET detector

N. Chug1,2,*, S. D. Bass1,3, E. Y. Beyene1,2, C. Curceanu4, E. Czerwiński1,2, M. Das1,2, K. V. Eliyan1,2, M. Gorgol5, J. Hajduga6 et al. (J-PET Collaboration)

J. Hajduga6, S. Jalali1,2, B. Jasińska5, K. Kacprzak1,2, T. Kaplanoglu1,2, Ł. Kapłon1,2, K. Kasperska1,2, A. Khreptak1,2, A. Kierys7, G. Korcyl1,2, T. Kozik1,2, K. Kubat1,2, D. Kumar1,2, A. Kunimmal Venadan1,2, E. Lisowski8, F. Lisowski8, J. Mędrala-Sowa1,2, S. Moyo1,2, W. Mryka1,2, S. Niedźwiecki1,2, P. Pandey1,2, S. Parzych1,2, E. Pérez del Rio1,2, A. Porcelli1,9, B. Rachwał6, M. Rädler1,2, A. Sienkiewicz7, S. Sharma1,2, M. Skurzok1,2, E. Ł. Stępień1,2, T. Szumlak6, P. Tanty1,2, K. Tayefi Ardebili1,2, S. Tiwari1,2, and P. Moskal1,2,† (J-PET Collaboration)

  • 1Faculty of Physics, Astronomy and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
  • 2Centre for Theranostics, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
  • 3Kitzbühel Centre for Physics, Kitzbühel, Austria
  • 4INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy
  • 5Institute of Physics, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Lublin, Poland
  • 6AGH University of Cracow, Poland
  • 7Institute of Chemical Sciences, Faculty of Chemistry, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Lublin, Poland
  • 8Cracow University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Kraków, Poland
  • 9Centro de Investigación, Tecnología, Educación y Vinculación Astronómica, Universidad de Antofagasta, Avenida Angamos 601, Antofagasta 1240000, Chile

  • *Contact author: neha.chug@uj.edu.pl
  • †Contact author: p.moskal@uj.edu.pl

Phys. Rev. D 113, 032003 – Published 4 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/wy7r-xgl9

Abstract

A direct test of the CPT symmetry is performed for the electromagnetic decays of ortho-positronium using the Jagiellonian positron emission tomograph (J-PET). We present the precise measurement of the CPT-sensitive angular correlation entailing the positronium spin and the momenta of its annihilation photons, surpassing previous studies utilizing the same detection system. Positrons originating from a Na22 source are emitted from the detector’s center and subsequently form positronium atoms within the spherical chamber covered with porous material. Reconstruction of annihilation locations using the 192-strip J-PET detector makes it possible to determine the positronium emission direction, which defines the quantization axis along which positronium is polarized, without the application of external magnetic fields. The measurements were performed in total for 356 days resulting in an identification of 47.8×106 events with ortho-positronium decays into three photons. The results are consistent with the exactness of CPT symmetry with measured asymmetry amplitude −0.00029±0.00022 (stat.) and with statistical error four times smaller than the previous best measurement.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (47)

  1. J. D. Bjorken and S. D. Drell, Relativistic Quantum Fields (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965).
  2. R. P. Feynman, in Elementary Particles and the Laws of Physics The 1986 Dirac Memorial Lectures (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1999).
  3. D. Babusci et al. (KLOE-2 Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 845, 138164 (2023).
  4. G. Barenboim, C. A. Ternes, and M. Tórtola, Phys. Lett. B 780, 631 (2018).
  5. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241601 (2016).
  6. L. Nowak et al. (ASACUSA Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 858, 139012 (2024).
  7. M. Borchert et al., Nature (London) 601, 53 (2022).
  8. C. Baker et al., Nat. Phys. 21, 201 (2025).
  9. T. Aoyama, T. Kinoshita, and M. Nio, Phys. Rev. D 97, 036001 (2018).
  10. X. Fan, T. G. Myers, B. A. D. Sukra, and G. Gabrielse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 071801 (2023).
  11. R. S. Van Dyck, P. B. Schwinberg, and H. G. Dehmelt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 26 (1987).
  12. V. A. Kostelecky and N. Russell, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 11 (2011).
  13. L. Baudis et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1137 (2024).
  14. J. Bjorken, arXiv:hep-th/0111196.
  15. S. D. Bass, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 382, 20230092 (2023).
  16. R. Lehnert, Symmetry 8, 114 (2016).
  17. S. D. Bass, S. Mariazzi, P. Moskal, and E. Stepien, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 021002 (2023).
  18. S. D. Bass, Acta Phys. Pol. B 50, 1319 (2019).
  19. G. S. Adkins, D. B. Cassidy, and J. Pérez-Ríos, Phys. Rep. 975, 1 (2022).
  20. W. Bernreuther, U. Löw, J. Ma, and O. Nachtmann, Z Phys. C 41, 143 (1988).
  21. B. K. Arbic, S. Hatamian, M. Skalsey, J. Van House, and W. Zheng, Phys. Rev. A 37, 3189 (1988).
  22. P. A. Vetter and S. J. Freedman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 263401 (2003).
  23. P. Moskal et al., Nat. Commun. 12, 5658 (2021).
  24. P. Moskal et al., Nat. Commun. 15, 78 (2024).
  25. P. Moskal et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 764, 317 (2014).
  26. S. Niedźwiecki et al., Acta Phys. Pol. B 48, 1567 (2017).
  27. P. Moskal et al., Sci. Adv. 7, eabh4394 (2021).
  28. P. Moskal et al., Sci. Adv. 11, eads3046 (2025).
  29. G. Korcyl et al., IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 37, 2526 (2018).
  30. M. Pałka et al., J. Instrum. 12, P08001 (2017).
  31. M. Pałka et al., Bio-Algorithms Med-Syst. 10, 41 (2014), https://bamsjournal.com/article/541554/en.
  32. S. Sharma et al., EJNMMI Phys. 7, 1 (2020).
  33. M. Gorgol et al., B. Jasińska, M. Kosior, E. Stępień, and P. Moskal, Acta Phys. Pol. B 51, 293 (2020).
  34. B. Jasińska et al., Acta Phys. Pol. B 47, 453 (2016).
  35. A. Gajos et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 819, 54 (2016).
  36. N. Chug, Testing CPT symmetry in ortho-positronium decays at the precision of 10−4 with J-PET, Ph.D. thesis, Jagiellonian University, Poland, 2025, available at https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/.
  37. M. Skalsey, T. Girard, and A. Rich, Phys. Rev. C 32, 1014 (1985).
  38. P. Moskal et al., Acta Phys. Pol. B 47, 509 (2016).
  39. J. Y. J. Yang, M. C. M. Chiba, R. H. R. Hamatsu, T. H. T. Hirose, M. I. M. Irako, and T. K. T. Kumita, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 36, 3764 (1997).
  40. F. T. Ardebili and P. Moskal, Bio-Algorithms Med-Syst. 20, 1 (2024).
  41. F. Tayefi Ardebili, S. Niedźwiecki, and P. Moskal, Bio-Algorithms Med-Syst. 19, 132 (2023), https://bamsjournal.com/article/541973/en.
  42. P. Moskal et al., Sci. Adv. 10, eadp2840 (2024).
  43. M. Das et al., Bio-Algorithms Med-Syst. 20, 101 (2024).
  44. P. Moskal and E. Stępień, PET Clinics 15, 439 (2020).
  45. P. Moskal et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 66, 175015 (2021).
  46. P. Moskal, E. Stępień, and A. Khreptak, Bio-Algorithms Med-Systems 20, 55 (2024).
  47. D. Colladay and V. A. Kostelecky, Phys. Rev. D 55, 6760 (1997).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation