Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Kaon decay constraints on vector bosons coupled to nonconserved currents

Matheus Hostert1,*, Maxim Pospelov2,3,†, and Adrian Thompson4,‡

  • *Contact author: matheus-hostert@uiowa.edu
  • †Contact author: pospelov@umn.edu
  • ‡Contact author: a.thompson@northwestern.edu

Phys. Rev. D 113, 115003 – Published 2 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/wvhd-8mtc

Abstract

We study rare three- and four-body kaon decays as a probe of light vector and axial-vector bosons coupled to nonconserved currents. We find that searches for KL→π0π0(X→e+e−) decays constrain the couplings of light X bosons to light quarks to be as small as O(10−5). The charged-pion modes K+→π+π0(X→e+e−) and KL→π+π−(X→e+e−) provide weaker limits, but constrain complementary combinations of couplings to the u, d, and s quarks at the level of O(10−4). Finally, we also find that double emission of X in K→πXX decays can provide yet additional constraints on the parameter space of light X bosons due to a double (mK/mX)2 enhancement to the rate. For a 17 MeV boson, these limits add to the known tension between spin-1 bosons coupled to vector and axial-vector currents interpretations of the results of the ATOMKI experiment with meson decay data. Finally, we also comment on negative pion capture on hydrogen and deuterium as a source of light particles and discuss the prospects for testing the 17 MeV boson hypothesis.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (70)

  1. P. Agrawal et al., Feebly-interacting particles: FIPs 2020 workshop report, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 1015 (2021).
  2. C. Antel et al., Feebly-interacting particles: FIPs 2022 workshop report, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 1122 (2023).
  3. E. Goudzovski et al., New physics searches at kaon and hyperon factories, Rep. Prog. Phys. 86, 016201 (2023).
  4. J. Aebischer et al., Kaon physics: A cornerstone for future discoveries, J. Phys. G 52, 100501 (2025).
  5. B. Holdom, Two U(1)’s and epsilon charge shifts, Phys. Lett. 166B, 196 (1986).
  6. J. Preskill, Gauge anomalies in an effective field theory, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 210, 323 (1991).
  7. J. A. Dror, R. Lasenby, and M. Pospelov, New constraints on light vectors coupled to anomalous currents, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 141803 (2017).
  8. J. A. Dror, R. Lasenby, and M. Pospelov, Dark forces coupled to nonconserved currents, Phys. Rev. D 96, 075036 (2017).
  9. E. D’Hoker and E. Farhi, Decoupling a fermion whose mass is generated by a Yukawa coupling: The general case, Nucl. Phys. B248, 59 (1984).
  10. E. D’Hoker and E. Farhi, Decoupling a fermion in the standard electroweak theory, Nucl. Phys. B248, 77 (1984).
  11. P. Fayet, U-boson production in e+e− annihilations, psi and Upsilon decays, and light dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 75, 115017 (2007).
  12. M. Pospelov, Secluded U(1) below the weak scale, Phys. Rev. D 80, 095002 (2009).
  13. A. J. Krasznahorkay et al., New results on the Be8 anomaly, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1056, 012028 (2018).
  14. A. J. Krasznahorkay et al., New evidence supporting the existence of the hypothetic X17 particle,
  15. A. J. Krasznahorkay, M. Csatlós, L. Csige, J. Gulyás, A. Krasznahorkay, B. M. Nyakó, I. Rajta, J. Timár, I. Vajda, and N. J. Sas, New anomaly observed in He4 supports the existence of the hypothetical X17 particle, Phys. Rev. C 104, 044003 (2021).
  16. A. J. Krasznahorkay et al., New anomaly observed in C12 supports the existence and the vector character of the hypothetical X17 boson, Phys. Rev. C 106, L061601 (2022).
  17. J. L. Feng, B. Fornal, I. Galon, S. Gardner, J. Smolinsky, T. M. P. Tait, and P. Tanedo, Protophobic fifth-force interpretation of the observed anomaly in Be8 nuclear transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 071803 (2016).
  18. J. L. Feng, B. Fornal, I. Galon, S. Gardner, J. Smolinsky, T. M. P. Tait, and P. Tanedo, Particle physics models for the 17 MeV anomaly in beryllium nuclear decays, Phys. Rev. D 95, 035017 (2017).
  19. J. L. Feng, T. M. P. Tait, and C. B. Verhaaren, Dynamical evidence for a fifth force explanation of the ATOMKI nuclear anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 102, 036016 (2020).
  20. D. S. M. Alves and N. Weiner, A viable QCD axion in the MeV mass range, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 092.
  21. D. S. M. Alves, Signals of the QCD axion with mass of 17  MeV/c2: Nuclear transitions and light meson decays, Phys. Rev. D 103, 055018 (2021).
  22. D. S. M. Alves and S. Gonzàlez-Solís, Final state rescattering effects in axio-hadronic η and η’ decays, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 264.
  23. D. Barducci and C. Toni, An updated view on the ATOMKI nuclear anomalies, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2023) 154; 07 (2023) 168(E).
  24. D. Banerjee et al. (NA64 Collaboration), Search for a hypothetical 16.7 MeV gauge boson and dark photons in the NA64 experiment at CERN, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 231802 (2018).
  25. D. Banerjee et al. (NA64 Collaboration), Improved limits on a hypothetical X(16.7) boson and a dark photon decaying into e+e− pairs, Phys. Rev. D 101, 071101 (2020).
  26. Y. M. Andreev et al. (NA64 Collaboration), Search for pseudoscalar bosons decaying into e+e− pairs in the NA64 experiment at the CERN SPS, Phys. Rev. D 104, L111102 (2021).
  27. J. R. Batley et al. (NA48/2 Collaboration), Search for the dark photon in π0 decays, Phys. Lett. B 746, 178 (2015).
  28. M. Hostert and M. Pospelov, Pion decay constraints on exotic 17 MeV vector bosons, Phys. Rev. D 108, 055011 (2023).
  29. C. J. G. Mommers and M. Vanderhaeghen, Constraining the axial-vector X17 interpretation with C12 data, Phys. Lett. B 858, 139031 (2024).
  30. M. Hostert and M. Pospelov, Novel multilepton signatures of dark sectors in light meson decays, Phys. Rev. D 105, 015017 (2022).
  31. E. Cortina Gil et al. (NA62 Collaboration), Search for K+ decays into the π+e+e−e+e− final state, Phys. Lett. B 846, 138193 (2023).
  32. V. Cirigliano, G. Ecker, H. Neufeld, A. Pich, and J. Portoles, Kaon decays in the standard model, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 399 (2012).
  33. J. R. Batley et al. (NA48/1 Collaboration), Observation of the rare decay KS→π0e+e−, Phys. Lett. B 576, 43 (2003).
  34. A. Lai et al. (NA48 Collaboration), Search for the decay KS→π0e+e−, Phys. Lett. B 514, 253 (2001).
  35. A. Alavi-Harati et al. (KTeV Collaboration), Search for the decay KL→π0e+e−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 397 (2001).
  36. A. Alavi-Harati et al. (KTeV Collaboration), Search for the rare decay KL→π0e+e−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 021805 (2004).
  37. J. R. Batley et al. (NA48/2 Collaboration), Precise measurement of the K±→π±e+e− decay, Phys. Lett. B 677, 246 (2009).
  38. R. Appel et al. (E865 Collaboration), A new measurement of the properties of the rare decay K+→π+e+e−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4482 (1999).
  39. T. Yamazaki et al., Search for a neutral boson in a two-body decay of K+→π+X0, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1089 (1984).
  40. N. J. Baker et al., Search for shortlived neutral particles emitted in K+ decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2832 (1987).
  41. G. D’Ambrosio, G. Ecker, G. Isidori, and J. Portoles, The decays K→πl+l− beyond leading order in the chiral expansion, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (1998) 004.
  42. P. Heiliger and L. M. Sehgal, Decays KL,S→π0π0γ and KL,S→π0π0e+e− as probes of chiral dynamics, Phys. Lett. B 307, 182 (1993).
  43. A. Alavi-Harati et al. (KTeV Collaboration), Search for the KL→π0π0e+e− decay in the KTeV experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 211801 (2002).
  44. J. R. Batley et al. (NA48/2 Collaboration), First observation and study of the K±→π±π0e+e− decay, Phys. Lett. B 788, 552 (2019).
  45. J. F. Donoghue, E. Golowich, and B. R. Holstein, Dynamics of the Weak Interactions, 1st ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1992).
  46. A. Lai et al. (NA48 Collaboration), Investigation of KL,S→π+π−e+e− decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 30, 33 (2003).
  47. S. Adler et al. (E787 Collaboration), Search for the decay K+→π+π0 neutrino anti-neutrino, Phys. Rev. D 63, 032004 (2001).
  48. R. Ogata et al. (E391a Collaboration), Study of the KL0→π0π0νν¯ decay, Phys. Rev. D 84, 052009 (2011).
  49. M. Fabbrichesi, E. Gabrielli, and B. Mele, Hunting down massless dark photons in kaon physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 031801 (2017).
  50. J.-Y. Su and J. Tandean, Kaon decays shedding light on massless dark photons, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 824 (2020).
  51. G. Ecker, A. Pich, and E. de Rafael, Radiative kaon decays and CP violation in chiral perturbation theory, Nucl. Phys. B303, 665 (1988).
  52. G. Ecker, A. Pich, and E. de Rafael, K0→π0γγ decays in chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Lett. B 189, 363 (1987).
  53. L. Cappiello and G. D’Ambrosio, KL→π0γγ decay in the chiral effective Lagrangian, Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis. 99A, 155 (1988).
  54. J. R. Batley et al. (NA48/2 Collaboration), First observation and measurement of the decay K±→π±e+e−γ, Phys. Lett. B 659, 493 (2008).
  55. X. Li (KOTO Collaboration), First search for KL0→π0e+e−e+e− decay mode, Proc. Sci., ICHEP2024 (2025) 285.
  56. C. Alexandrou, S. Bacchio, M. Constantinou, J. Finkenrath, K. Hadjiyiannakou, K. Jansen, G. Koutsou, and A. Vaquero Aviles-Casco, Nucleon axial, tensor, and scalar charges and σ-terms in lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 102, 054517 (2020).
  57. S. Egli et al. (SINDRUM Collaboration), Measurement of the decay π+→e+νee+e− and search for a light Higgs boson, Phys. Lett. B 222, 533 (1989).
  58. A. Anastasi et al., Limit on the production of a low-mass vector boson in e+e−→Uγ, U→e+e− with the KLOE experiment, Phys. Lett. B 750, 633 (2015).
  59. P. B. Denton and J. Gehrlein, Neutrino constraints and the ATOMKI X17 anomaly, Phys. Rev. D 108, 015009 (2023).
  60. F. Bossi et al. (PADME Collaboration), Search for a new 17 MeV resonance via e+e− annihilation with the PADME experiment, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2025) 007.
  61. D. Barducci and C. Toni, An updated view on the ATOMKI nuclear anomalies, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2023) 154; 07 (2023) 168(E).
  62. X. Zhang and G. A. Miller, Can nuclear physics explain the anomaly observed in the internal pair production in the Beryllium-8 nucleus?, Phys. Lett. B 773, 159 (2017).
  63. C.-Y. Chen, D. McKeen, and M. Pospelov, New physics via pion capture and simple nuclear reactions, Phys. Rev. D 100, 095008 (2019).
  64. P. K. Kloepppel, Interactions of stopping negative pions with deuterium, Nuovo Cimento (1955–1965) 34, 1 (1964). Translated by the Editorial Office.
  65. A. M. Baldini et al. (MEG II Collaboration), The design of the MEG II experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 380 (2018).
  66. C. S. Wood, S. C. Bennett, D. Cho, B. P. Masterson, J. L. Roberts, C. E. Tanner, and C. E. Wieman, Measurement of parity nonconservation and an anapole moment in cesium, Science 275, 1759 (1997).
  67. T. T. Anh et al., Checking the Be8 anomaly with a two-arm electron positron pair spectrometer, Universe 10, 168 (2024).
  68. K. Afanaciev et al. (MEG II Collaboration), Search for the X17 particle in Li7(p,e+e−)8Be processes with the MEG II detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 763 (2025).
  69. M. H. Fieg, T. Mäkelä, T. M. P. Tait, and M. Toman, The X17 with chiral couplings, arXiv:2602.11263.
  70. A. Thompson, athompson-git/KaonPhysics (Zenodo, 2026), 10.5281/zenodo.20058561.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation