Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Exact results in softly broken supersymmetric chiral gauge theories with flavor

Jacob M. Leedom1,*, Hitoshi Murayama2,3,4,†, Gup Singh2,3,‡, Bethany Suter2,3,§, and Jason Wong2,3,∥

  • *Contact author: leedom@fzu.cz
  • †Contact author: hitoshi@berkeley.edu
  • ‡Contact author: gupsingh@berkeley.edu
  • §Contact author: bethany_suter@berkeley.edu
  • ∥Contact author: jtwong71@berkeley.edu

Phys. Rev. D 112, 025001 – Published 2 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/wvb3-gybj

Abstract

We present exact results in softly broken supersymmetric SU(NC) chiral gauge theories with charged fermions in one antisymmetric, NF fundamental, and NC+NF−4 antifundamental representations. We achieve this by considering the supersymmetric version of these theories and utilizing anomaly mediated supersymmetry breaking at a scale m≪Λ to generate a vacuum. The connection to nonsupersymmetric theories is then conjectured in the limit m→∞. For odd NC, we determine the massless fermions and unbroken global symmetries in the infrared. For even NC, we find global symmetries are nonanomalous and no massless fermions. In all cases, the symmetry breaking patterns differ from what the tumbling hypothesis would suggest.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (19)

  1. H. Georgi, Nucl. Phys. B156, 126 (1979).
  2. S. Raby, S. Dimopoulos, and L. Susskind, Nucl. Phys. B169, 373 (1980).
  3. J. Goity, R. D. Peccei, and D. Zeppenfeld, Nucl. Phys. B262, 95 (1985).
  4. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Nucl. Phys. B557, 79 (1999).
  5. G. F. Giudice, M. A. Luty, H. Murayama, and R. Rattazzi, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (1998) 027.
  6. A. Pomarol and R. Rattazzi, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (1999) 013.
  7. E. Boyda, H. Murayama, and A. Pierce, Phys. Rev. D 65, 085028 (2002).
  8. C. Csáki, H. Murayama, and O. Telem, Phys. Rev. D 104, 065018 (2021).
  9. C. Csáki, H. Murayama, and O. Telem, Phys. Rev. D 105, 045007 (2022).
  10. D. Kondo, H. Murayama, and C. Sylber, arXiv:2209.09287.
  11. H. Murayama, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 251601 (2021).
  12. H. Murayama, B. Noether, and D. R. Varier, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2025) 152.
  13. C. Csáki, A. Gomes, H. Murayama, and O. Telem, Phys. Rev. D 104, 114018 (2021).
  14. C. Csáki, A. Gomes, H. Murayama, B. Noether, D. R. Varier, and O. Telem, Phys. Rev. D 107, 054015 (2023).
  15. A. Goh, H. Murayama, G. Singh, B. Suter, and J. Wong, arXiv:2505.07931.
  16. E. Poppitz and S. P. Trivedi, Phys. Lett. B 365, 125 (1996).
  17. P. Pouliot, Phys. Lett. B 367, 151 (1996).
  18. E. Witten, Phys. Lett. 117B, 324 (1982).
  19. D. Kondo, H. Murayama, and B. Noether, arXiv:2505.18138.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation