Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Tests of BSM Higgs interactions by the combination (κV2−κ2V) in HHjj production at LHC

D. Domenech*, G. García-Mir†, and M. Herrero‡

  • *Contact author: daniel.domenech@uam.es
  • †Contact author: guillermo.garciamir@estudiante.uam.es
  • ‡Contact author: maria.herrero@uam.es

Phys. Rev. D 113, 015007 – Published 8 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/wtws-cj5h

Abstract

In this work, we study the potential of analyzing the particular combination of κ modifiers given by κV2−κ2V to disentangle beyond Standard Model Higgs signals in double Higgs production with two extra light jets at LHC. We use the Higgs effective field theory approach, HEFT, for the gauge invariant description of these two κV and κ2V parameters representing the BSM interactions of the Higgs particle with the electroweak gauge bosons, HVV and HHVV, respectively. We illustrate the bonus of studying this particular combination κV2−κ2V focusing in just one process, HHjj, instead of studying κV and κ2V separately using various processes. For the detailed analysis here, we focus on the particular final state H(→γγ)H(→bb¯)jj′, with two photons, two b-jets and two light jets, which we analyze fully including parton showering, fragmentation, hadronization and detector effects, in both signal and main background. We find that the sensitivity to κV2−κ2V could be notably improved at the HL-LHC by the proper cuts on the final state bb¯γγjj′ that select optimally the events with VBF-topology and HH-topology. In particular, we propose strategies based on a good isolation of γγ and b-jet pairs, and focus specially on specific variables like ηγγ and PγγT where the signal events distributions may efficiently discriminate between BSM signal versus SM background. We will show here how the high transversality of these two pairs in the signal (inherited from the high transversality of the H’s) is correlated with the nonvanishing value of this (κV2−κ2V) combination.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (42)

  1. J. R. Andersen et al. (LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group) (2013), 10.5170/CERN-2013-004.
  2. Report on the Physics at the HL-LHC,and Perspectives for the HE-LHC, edited by A. Dainese, M. Mangano, A. B. Meyer, A. Nisati, G. Salam, and M. A. Vesterinen, CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs Vol. 7 (CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 2019).
  3. (ATLAS, CMS Collaborations), CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 7, 422 (2019).
  4. M. Cepeda et al., CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 7, 221 (2019).
  5. M. Mlynarikova (ATLAS, CMS Collaborations), in 30th International Workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering and Related Subjects (2023), arXiv:2307.07772.
  6. ATLAS-CMS Collaborations, arXiv:2504.00672.
  7. I. Brivio and M. Trott, Phys. Rep. 793, 1 (2019).
  8. A. Dobado and D. Espriu, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 115, 103813 (2020).
  9. M. Herrero and R. A. Morales, Phys. Rev. D 102, 075040 (2020).
  10. M. J. Herrero and R. A. Morales, Phys. Rev. D 104, 075013 (2021).
  11. M. J. Herrero and R. A. Morales, Phys. Rev. D 106, 073008 (2022).
  12. D. Domenech, M. J. Herrero, R. A. Morales, and M. Ramos, Phys. Rev. D 106, 115027 (2022).
  13. D. Domenech, M. Herrero, R. A. Morales, and A. Salas-Bernárdez, Phys. Rev. D 112, 115022 (2025).
  14. F. Arco, D. Domenech, M. J. Herrero, and R. A. Morales, Phys. Rev. D 108, 095013 (2023).
  15. J. M. Dávila, D. Domenech, M. J. Herrero, and R. A. Morales, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 503 (2024).
  16. M. Gonzalez-Lopez, M. J. Herrero, and P. Martinez-Suarez, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 260 (2021).
  17. R. Contino, C. Grojean, M. Moretti, F. Piccinini, and R. Rattazzi, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2010) 089.
  18. J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H.-S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2014) 079.
  19. T. Sjöstrand, S. Ask, J. R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten, S. Mrenna, S. Prestel, C. O. Rasmussen, and P. Z. Skands, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191, 159 (2015).
  20. J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaître, A. Mertens, and M. Selvaggi (T. D. Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2014) 057.
  21. M. Selvaggi, Fcc-ee idea detector delphes card, https://github.com/delphes/delphes/blob/master/cards/delphes_card_IDEA.tcl.
  22. R. D. Ball, V. Bertone, S. Carrazza, L. Del Debbio, S. Forte, A. Guffanti, N. P. Hartland, and J. Rojo, Nucl. Phys. B877, 290 (2013).
  23. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Nature (London) 607, 52 (2022).
  24. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 101801 (2024).
  25. A. Tumasyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Nature (London) 607, 60 (2022).
  26. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 861, 139210 (2025).
  27. E. Arganda, C. Garcia-Garcia, and M. J. Herrero, Nucl. Phys. B945, 114687 (2019).
  28. J. M. Cornwall, D. N. Levin, and G. Tiktopoulos, Phys. Rev. D 10, 1145 (1974); 11, 972(E) (1975).
  29. C. E. Vayonakis, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 17, 383 (1976).
  30. B. W. Lee, C. Quigg, and H. B. Thacker, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1519 (1977).
  31. R. L. Delgado, A. Dobado, and F. J. Llanes-Estrada, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2014) 121.
  32. K. Doroba, J. Kalinowski, J. Kuczmarski, S. Pokorski, J. Rosiek, M. Szleper, and S. Tkaczyk, Phys. Rev. D 86, 036011 (2012).
  33. M. Szleper, arXiv:1412.8367.
  34. R. L. Delgado, A. Dobado, D. Espriu, C. Garcia-Garcia, M. J. Herrero, X. Marcano, and J. J. Sanz-Cillero, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2017) 098.
  35. D. Gonçalves, T. Han, F. Kling, T. Plehn, and M. Takeuchi, Phys. Rev. D 97, 113004 (2018).
  36. F. A. Dreyer and A. Karlberg, Phys. Rev. D 98, 114016 (2018).
  37. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2008) 063.
  38. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1896 (2012).
  39. CMS Collaboration, Report No. CMS-PAS-FTR-18-019, 2018.
  40. CMS Collaboration, Prospects for non-resonant Higgs boson pair production measurement in bbγγ final states in proton-proton collisions at s=14  TeV at the high-luminosity LHC, Technical Report, CERN, Geneva, 2022.
  41. S. Dawson, S. Dittmaier, and M. Spira, Phys. Rev. D 58, 115012 (1998).
  42. M. J. Dolan, C. Englert, N. Greiner, K. Nordstrom, and M. Spannowsky, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 387 (2015).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation