Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Neutrino and gamma-ray emissions from NGC 1068

Carlos Blanco1,2,*, Dan Hooper3,4,5,†, Tim Linden6,‡, and Elena Pinetti3,5,§

  • *Contact author: carlosblanco2718@princeton.edu
  • †Contact author: dhooper@fnal.gov
  • ‡Contact author: linden@fysik.su.se
  • §Contact author: epinetti@fnal.gov

Phys. Rev. D 112, 123016 – Published 5 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/wnjh-7nwp

Abstract

IceCube has recently reported the detection of ∼1–10  TeV neutrinos from the nearby active galaxy, NGC 1068. The lack of TeV-scale emission from this source suggests that these neutrinos are generated in the dense corona that surrounds NGC 1068’s supermassive black hole. In this paper, we present a physical model for this source, including the processes of pair production, pion production, synchrotron, and inverse Compton scattering. We have also performed a new analysis of Fermi-LAT data from the direction of NGC 1068, finding that the gamma-ray emission from this source is very soft but bright at energies below ∼1  GeV. Our model can predict a gamma-ray spectrum that is consistent with Fermi-LAT observations when the magnetic field within the corona of this active galactic nucleus (AGN) is quite high, namely B≳6  kG. To explain the observed neutrino emission, this source must accelerate protons with a total power that is comparable to its intrinsic x-ray luminosity. In this context, we consider two additional nearby active galaxies, NGC 4151 and NGC 3079, which have been identified as promising targets for IceCube.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (60)

  1. R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Science 378, 538 (2022).
  2. M. G. Aartsen et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 051103 (2020).
  3. S. Abdollahi et al. (Fermi-LAT Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 247, 33 (2020).
  4. M. Ajello et al. (Fermi-LAT Collaboration), Astrophys. J. 892, 105 (2020).
  5. V. A. Acciari et al. (MAGIC Collaboration), Astrophys. J. 883, 135 (2019).
  6. K. Murase, Astrophys. J. Lett. 941, L17 (2022).
  7. M. G. Aartsen et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 121104 (2020).
  8. M. G. Aartsen et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Nature (London) 591, 220 (2021); 592, E11 (2021).
  9. M. G. Aartsen et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 021103 (2013).
  10. IceCube Collaboration, Science 342, 1242856 (2013).
  11. M. G. Aartsen et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 101101 (2014).
  12. D. Hooper, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2016) 002.
  13. K. Murase, D. Guetta, and M. Ahlers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 071101 (2016).
  14. G. Giacinti, M. Kachelrieß, O. Kalashev, A. Neronov, and D. V. Semikoz, Phys. Rev. D 92, 083016 (2015).
  15. K. Murase, M. Ahlers, and B. C. Lacki, Phys. Rev. D 88, 121301 (2013).
  16. R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Astrophys. J. 954, 75 (2023).
  17. M. G. Aartsen et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Astrophys. J. 835, 151 (2017).
  18. M. G. Aartsen et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 051102 (2019).
  19. M. G. Aartsen et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Astrophys. J. 824, 115 (2016).
  20. D. Smith, D. Hooper, and A. Vieregg, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2021) 031.
  21. M. G. Aartsen et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Astrophys. J. 835, 45 (2017).
  22. D. Hooper, T. Linden, and A. Vieregg, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2019) 012.
  23. B. Khiali and E. M. de Gouveia Dal Pino, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 455, 838 (2016).
  24. F. W. Stecker, Phys. Rev. D 88, 047301 (2013).
  25. S. S. Kimura, K. Murase, and K. Toma, Astrophys. J. 806, 159 (2015).
  26. O. Kalashev, D. Semikoz, and I. Tkachev, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 120, 541 (2015).
  27. K. Murase, Active galactic nuclei as high-energy neutrino sources, in Neutrino Astronomy: Current Status, Future Prospects, edited by T. Gaisser and A. Karle (World Scientific, Singapore, 2017), pp. 15–31.
  28. K. Murase, S. S. Kimura, and P. Meszaros, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 011101 (2020).
  29. A. Marinucci et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 456, L94 (2016).
  30. F. E. Bauer et al., Astrophys. J. 812, 116 (2015).
  31. R. Caputo et al. (AMEGO Collaboration), arXiv:1907.07558.
  32. A. De Angelis et al. (e-ASTROGAM Collaboration), Exp. Astron. 44, 25 (2017).
  33. C. D. Dermer, J. A. Miller, and H. Li, Astrophys. J. 456, 106 (1996).
  34. C. D. Dermer, K. Murase, and Y. Inoue, J. High Energy Astrophys. 3–4, 29 (2014).
  35. K. Murase, K. Asano, T. Terasawa, and P. Meszaros, Astrophys. J. 746, 164 (2012).
  36. L. Stawarz and V. Petrosian, Astrophys. J. 681, 1725 (2008).
  37. G. Musulmanbekov, Phys. At. Nucl. 67, 90 (2004).
  38. T. Kamae, N. Karlsson, T. Mizuno, T. Abe, and T. Koi, Astrophys. J. 647, 692 (2006); 662, 779(E) (2007).
  39. J. Becker Tjus, B. Eichmann, F. Halzen, A. Kheirandish, and S. M. Saba, Phys. Rev. D 89, 123005 (2014).
  40. K. Mannheim and R. Schlickeiser, Astron. Astrophys. 286, 983 (1994).
  41. T. Linden, Phys. Rev. D 96, 083001 (2017).
  42. M. Ajello, M. Di Mauro, V. S. Paliya, and S. Garrappa, Astrophys. J. 894, 88 (2020).
  43. C. Blanco and T. Linden, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2023) 003.
  44. G. Breit and J. A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 46, 1087 (1934).
  45. R. J. Gould and G. P. Schreder, Phys. Rev. 155, 1404 (1967).
  46. F. A. Aharonian, A. M. Atoian, and A. M. Nagapetian, Astrofiz. 19, 323 (1983).
  47. K. Fang, J. S. Gallagher, and F. Halzen, Astrophys. J. 933, 190 (2022).
  48. F. A. Aharonian and A. M. Atoyan, Astrophys. Space Sci. 79, 321 (1981).
  49. N. Fornengo, R. A. Lineros, M. Regis, and M. Taoso, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2012) 005.
  50. C. Ricci, B. Trakhtenbrot, M. J. Koss, Y. Ueda, I. Del Vecchio, E. Treister, K. Schawinski, S. Paltani, K. Oh, I. Lamperti et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 233, 17 (2017).
  51. M. Wood, R. Caputo, E. Charles, M. Di Mauro, J. Magill, and J. S. Perkins (Fermi-LAT Collaboration), Proc. Sci. ICRC2017 (2018) 824 [arXiv:1707.09551].
  52. E. Peretti, G. Peron, F. Tombesi, A. Lamastra, M. Ahlers, and F. G. Saturni, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2025) 013.
  53. A. Neronov, D. Savchenko, and D. V. Semikoz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 101002 (2024).
  54. M. Ackermann, M. Ajello, A. Allafort, L. Baldini, J. Ballet, G. Barbiellini, D. Bastieri, K. Bechtol, R. Bellazzini, B. Berenji et al., Astrophys. J. 747, 104 (2012).
  55. F. Panessa, L. Bassani, M. Cappi, M. Dadina, X. Barcons, F. J. Carrera, L. Ho, and K. Iwasawa, Astron. Astrophys. 455, 173 (2006).
  56. G. C. Perola and L. Piro, Astron. Astrophys. 281, 7 (1994).
  57. M. C. Bentz and S. Katz, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 127, 67 (2015).
  58. W. Yuan, M. M. Fausnaugh, S. L. Hoffmann, L. M. Macri, B. M. Peterson, A. G. Riess, M. C. Bentz, J. S. Brown, E. Dalla Bontà, R. I. Davies et al., Astrophys. J. 902, 26 (2020).
  59. A. Masini, Obscured and compton-thick AGN in NuSTAR hard X-ray surveys (2018), 10.6092/unibo/amsdottorato/8361.
  60. R. Mbarek, A. Philippov, A. Chernoglazov, A. Levinson, and R. Mushotzky, Phys. Rev. D 109, L101306 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation