Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Reflections on Noether’s second theorem and the energy-momentum tensor

Adam Freese*

  • *Contact author: afreese@jlab.org

Phys. Rev. D 113, 016011 – Published 9 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/wmz3-lrbz

Abstract

Through symmetry of the action under global spacetime translations, Noether’s first theorem infamously entails an energy-momentum tensor (EMT) that is neither symmetric nor gauge-invariant. In a prior work [Phys. Rev. D 106, 125012 (2022)], I had obtained a symmetric and gauge-invariant EMT by using Noether’s second theorem instead, with local spacetime translations as the symmetry group. However, the derivation therein was flawed, containing a faulty assumption about the transformation rule for spinor fields. In this work, I revisit the derivation of the previous work, both correcting the faulty step and simplifying the derivation for broader accessibility. The end result is an EMT for quantum chromodynamics that is gauge-invariant, but not symmetric.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

See Also

Article Text

References (90)

  1. Xiang-Dong Ji, Breakup of hadron masses and energy—momentum tensor of QCD, Phys. Rev. D 52, 271 (1995).
  2. Cédric Lorcé, On the hadron mass decomposition, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 120 (2018).
  3. Andreas Metz, Barbara Pasquini, and Simone Rodini, Revisiting the proton mass decomposition, Phys. Rev. D 102, 114042 (2020).
  4. Xiangdong Ji, Proton mass decomposition: Naturalness and interpretations, Front. Phys. (Beijing) 16, 64601 (2021).
  5. Cédric Lorcé, Andreas Metz, Barbara Pasquini, and Simone Rodini, Energy-momentum tensor in QCD: Nucleon mass decomposition and mechanical equilibrium, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2021) 121.
  6. R. L. Jaffe and Aneesh Manohar, The g1 problem: Fact and fantasy on the spin of the proton, Nucl. Phys. B337, 509 (1990).
  7. Xiang-Dong Ji, Gauge-invariant decomposition of nucleon spin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 610 (1997).
  8. E. Leader and C. Lorcé, The angular momentum controversy: What’s it all about and does it matter?, Phys. Rep. 541, 163 (2014).
  9. M. V. Polyakov, Generalized parton distributions and strong forces inside nucleons and nuclei, Phys. Lett. B 555, 57 (2003).
  10. Maxim V. Polyakov and Peter Schweitzer, Forces inside hadrons: Pressure, surface tension, mechanical radius, and all that, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33, 1830025 (2018).
  11. Cédric Lorcé, Hervé Moutarde, and Arkadiusz P. Trawiński, Revisiting the mechanical properties of the nucleon, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 89 (2019).
  12. Xiangdong Ji and Yizhuang Liu, Momentum-current gravitational multipoles of hadrons, Phys. Rev. D 106, 034028 (2022).
  13. Xiangdong Ji, Jinghong Yang, and Yizhuang Liu, Gravitational tensor-monopole moment of the hydrogen atom to order O(α), Phys. Rev. D 110, 114045 (2024).
  14. Xiangdong Ji and Chen Yang, Momentum flow and forces on quarks in the nucleon, arXiv:2503.01991.
  15. V. D. Burkert, L. Elouadrhiri, F. X. Girod, C. Lorcé, P. Schweitzer, and P. E. Shanahan, Colloquium: Gravitational form factors of the proton, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 041002 (2023).
  16. Adam Freese, Quantum stresses in the hydrogen atom, Phys. Rev. D 111, 034047 (2025).
  17. Cédric Lorcé and Peter Schweitzer, Pressure inside hadrons: Criticism, conjectures, and all that, Acta Phys. Pol. B 56, 3–A17 (2025).
  18. V. D. Burkert, L. Elouadrhiri, and F. X. Girod, The pressure distribution inside the proton, Nature (London) 557, 396 (2018).
  19. Krešimir Kumerički, Measurability of pressure inside the proton, Nature (London) 570, E1 (2019).
  20. V. D. Burkert, L. Elouadrhiri, and F. X. Girod, Determination of shear forces inside the proton, arXiv:2104.02031.
  21. B. Duran et al., Determining the gluonic gravitational form factors of the proton, Nature (London) 615, 813 (2023).
  22. Yuxun Guo, Feng Yuan, and Wenbin Zhao, Bayesian inferring nucleon’s gravitation form factors via near-threshold J/ψ photoproduction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 111902 (2025).
  23. Yoshitaka Hatta, Henry T. Klest, Kornelija Passek-K., and Jakob Schoenleber, Deeply virtual ϕ-meson production near threshold, arXiv:2501.12343.
  24. P. E. Shanahan and W. Detmold, Gluon gravitational form factors of the nucleon and the pion from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 99, 014511 (2019).
  25. P. E. Shanahan and W. Detmold, Pressure distribution and shear forces inside the proton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 072003 (2019).
  26. Dimitra A. Pefkou, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Gluon gravitational structure of hadrons of different spin, Phys. Rev. D 105, 054509 (2022).
  27. Daniel C. Hackett, Dimitra A. Pefkou, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Gravitational form factors of the proton from Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 251904 (2024).
  28. Dimitra Anastasia Pefkou, Gravitational form factors of hadrons from lattice QCD, Ph.D. thesis, MIT, 2023.
  29. Daniel C. Hackett, Patrick R. Oare, Dimitra A. Pefkou, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Gravitational form factors of the pion from Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 108, 114504 (2023).
  30. F. J. Belinfante, On the spin angular momentum of mesons, Physica (Utrecht) 6, 887 (1939).
  31. Cédric Lorcé, Asmita Mukherjee, Ravi Singh, and Ho-Yeon Won, Mapping the transverse spin sum rule in position space, Phys. Lett. B 868, 139792 (2025).
  32. Ho-Yeon Won and Cédric Lorcé, Relativistic energy-momentum tensor distributions in a polarized nucleon, Phys. Rev. D 111, 094021 (2025).
  33. Adam Freese and Gerald A. Miller, Synchronization effects on rest frame energy and momentum densities in the proton, Phys. Rev. D 108, 094026 (2023).
  34. Adam Freese, Mechanical form factors and densities of nonrelativistic fermions, Phys. Rev. D 112, 034037 (2025).
  35. Adam Freese, Noether’s theorems and the energy-momentum tensor in quantum gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 106, 125012 (2022).
  36. Boris Pavlovich Kosyakov, Introduction to the Classical Theory of Particles and Fields (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2007).
  37. Emmy Noether, Invariant variation problems, Gott. Nachr. 1918, 235 (1918).
  38. Steven Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1972).
  39. Sean M. Carroll, Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2019).
  40. Andrew J. S. Hamilton, General relativity, black holes, and cosmology (unpublished).
  41. R. F. Bilyalov, Conservation laws for spinor fields on a Riemannian space-time manifold, Theor. Math. Phys. 90, 252 (1992).
  42. R. F. Bilyalov, Symmetric energy-momentum tensor of spinor fields, Theor. Math. Phys. 108, 1093 (1996).
  43. Ricardo E. Gamboa Saravi, The electromagnetic energy momentum tensor, J. Phys. A 35, 9199 (2002).
  44. Ricardo E. Gamboa Saravi, On the energy momentum tensor, J. Phys. A 37, 9573 (2004).
  45. Hong-bao Zhang, Note on the energy-momentum tensor for general mixed tensor-spinor fields, Commun. Theor. Phys. 44, 1007 (2005).
  46. Adam D. Helfer, Spinor lie derivatives and fermion stress–energies, Proc. R. Soc. A 472, 20150757 (2016).
  47. Taeyeon Kim and Piljin Yi, Lie, Noether, Kosmann, and Diffeomorphism anomalies redux, arXiv:2412.03667.
  48. Yvette Kosmann, Dérivées de lie des spineurs. Applications, C. R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. Ser. A 262, 394 (1966).
  49. H. Weyl, Electron and gravitation. 1. (in German), Z. Phys. 56, 330 (1929).
  50. E. Cartan and A. Mercier, The Theory of Spinors, Dover Books on Mathematics (Dover Publications, New York, 1981).
  51. Katherine Brading and Harvey R. Brown, Noether’s theorems and gauge symmetries, arXiv:hep-th/0009058.
  52. R. Brout and F. Englert, Gravitational ward identity and the principle of equivalence, Phys. Rev. 141, 1231 (1966).
  53. Adam Freese and Ian C Cloët, Gravitational form factors of light mesons, Phys. Rev. C 100, 015201 (2019); 105, 059901(E) (2022).
  54. Suraj N. Gupta, Theory of longitudinal photons in quantum electrodynamics, Proc. Phys. Soc. London Sect. A 63, 681 (1950).
  55. K. Bleuler, A new method of treatment of the longitudinal and scalar photons, Helv. Phys. Acta 23, 567 (1950), https://inspirehep.net/literature/9186.
  56. Alexandru Proca, Sur la theorie ondulatoire des electrons positifs et negatifs, J. Phys. Radium 7, 347 (1936).
  57. E. C. G. Stueckelberg, Interaction energy in electrodynamics and in the field theory of nuclear forces, Helv. Phys. Acta 11, 225 (1938).
  58. Taichiro Kugo and Izumi Ojima, Local covariant operator formalism of nonabelian gauge theories and quark confinement problem, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 66, 1 (1979).
  59. L. D. Faddeev and V. N. Popov, Feynman diagrams for the Yang-Mills field, Phys. Lett. 25B, 29 (1967).
  60. C. Becchi, A. Rouet, and R. Stora, Renormalization of the Abelian Higgs-Kibble model, Commun. Math. Phys. 42, 127 (1975).
  61. C. Becchi, A. Rouet, and R. Stora, Renormalization of gauge theories, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 98, 287 (1976).
  62. I. V. Tyutin, Gauge invariance in field theory and statistical physics in operator formalism, arXiv:0812.0580.
  63. John C. Collins, Renormalization, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Vol. 26 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1986).
  64. Damianos Iosifidis, Manthos Karydas, Anastasios Petkou, and Konstantinos Siampos, On the geometric origin of the energy-momentum tensor improvement terms, Phys. Rev. D 112, 025007 (2025).
  65. F. W. Hehl, P. Von Der Heyde, G. D. Kerlick, and J. M. Nester, General relativity with spin and torsion: Foundations and prospects, Rev. Mod. Phys. 48, 393 (1976).
  66. R. T. Hammond, Torsion gravity, Rep. Prog. Phys. 65, 599 (2002).
  67. I. L. Shapiro, Physical aspects of the space-time torsion, Phys. Rep. 357, 113 (2002).
  68. Élie Cartan, Sur une généralisation de la notion de courbure de riemann et les espaces à torsion, C.R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. 174, 593 (1922), https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1572824499794149760.
  69. T. W. B. Kibble, Lorentz invariance and the gravitational field, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 2, 212 (1961).
  70. D. W. Sciama, The physical structure of general relativity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 36, 463 (1964).
  71. Cédric Jockel and Leon Menger, Effect of torsion on neutron star structure in Einstein-Cartan gravity, Phys. Rev. D 110, 104022 (2024).
  72. Nils Andersson and Kostas D. Kokkotas, Towards gravitational wave asteroseismology, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 299, 1059 (1998).
  73. Omar Benhar, Valeria Ferrari, and Leonardo Gualtieri, Gravitational wave asteroseismology revisited, Phys. Rev. D 70, 124015 (2004).
  74. L. K. Tsui and Pui-Tang Leung, Probing the interior of neutron stars with gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 151101 (2005).
  75. Hajime Sotani, Ken’ichiro Nakazato, Kei Iida, and Kazuhiro Oyamatsu, Probing the equation of state of nuclear matter via neutron star asteroseismology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 201101 (2012).
  76. Steven Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields. Vol. 1: Foundations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2005).
  77. F. W. Hehl and Y. N. Obukhov, Foundations of Classical Electrodynamics: Charge, Flux, and Metric, Progress in Mathematical Physics (Birkhäuser, Boston, 2003).
  78. Cedric Lorce, Geometrical approach to the proton spin decomposition, Phys. Rev. D 87, 034031 (2013).
  79. Friedrich W. Hehl, On energy-momentum and spin/helicity of quark and gluon fields, in Proceedings of the 15th Workshop on High Energy Spin Physics (2014).
  80. D. Bohm, Quantum Theory, Dover Books in Science and Mathematics (Dover Publications, New York, 1989).
  81. C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, and F. Laloë, Quantum Mechanics, Volume 1: Basic Concepts, Tools, and Applications (Wiley, New York, 2019).
  82. Jun John Sakurai and Jim Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Physics, Quantum Information and Quantum Computation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2020).
  83. S. Bates and A. Weinstein, Lectures on the Geometry of Quantization, Berkeley Mathematics Lecture Notes (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1997).
  84. S. R. Bongers, Geometric quantization of symplectic and Poisson manifolds, Master’s thesis, 2014.
  85. Lajos Pukánszky, The plancherel formula for the universal covering group of sl(r,2), Math. Ann. 156, 96 (1964).
  86. Alexei Kitaev, Notes on SL˜(2,R) representations, arXiv:1711.08169.
  87. Martin Weissman, What is... a metaplectic group?, Not. Am. Math. Soc. 70, 1 (2023).
  88. André Weil et al., Sur certains groupes d’opérateurs unitaires, Acta Math. 111, 14 (1964).
  89. V. I. Ogievetsky and I. V. Polubarinov, Spinors in gravitation theory, Sov. Phys. JETP 21, 1093 (1965), https://inspirehep.net/literature/48883.
  90. J. Brian Pitts, The nontriviality of trivial general covariance: How electrons restrict ’Time’ coordinates, spinors (Almost) fit into tensor calculus, and 7/16 of a tetrad is surplus structure, Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. B 43, 1 (2012).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation