Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Three-body final state interactions in B+→DD¯K+ decays

Xin-Yue Hu1,2,3,*, Jiahao He2,4,*, Pengyu Niu1,3,†, Qian Wang1,3,5,6,‡, and Yupeng Yan7,§

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • †Contact author: niupy@m.scnu.edu.cn
  • ‡Contact author: qianwang@m.scnu.edu.cn
  • §Contact author: yupeng@sut.ac.th

Phys. Rev. D 113, 054003 – Published 2 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/whyt-cx47

Abstract

This paper presents a detailed analysis of the three-body final state interactions in the B+→DD¯K+ process, whose phase space is sufficient small. To precisely extract the resonance parameters, for instance the χc0/2(3930) in the DD¯ invariant mass distributions, in this process, one has to take into account final state interaction, especially the three-body final state interaction. We employ the dispersive Khuri-Treiman formalism, combined with a parametrization of the DD¯ interaction based on heavy quark spin symmetry. By performing a simultaneous fit to the experimental data from LHCb, BABAR, and Belle collaborations, the scheme with three-body interaction successfully describes the invariant mass distributions of the three two-body subsystems. We precisely extract the pole structures of χc0(3930) and ψ(3770) as 3.913−0.016i GeV and 3.761−0.006i GeV in B+ decay. By performing the pole trajectory analysis on a uniformized complex plane, we find that both of them stem from the input bare state.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (63)

  1. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Dalitz-plot analysis of the decays B±→K±π∓π±, Phys. Rev. D 72, 072003 (2005).
  2. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Dalitz plot analysis of the decay B±→K±K±K∓, Phys. Rev. D 74, 032003 (2006).
  3. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Dalitz plot analysis of B±→π±π±π∓ decays, Phys. Rev. D 79, 072006 (2009).
  4. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Dalitz plot analysis of B−→D+π−π−, Phys. Rev. D 79, 112004 (2009).
  5. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Dalitz plot analysis of B0→D¯0π+π− decays, Phys. Rev. D 92, 032002 (2015).
  6. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of J/ψϕ structures consistent with exotic states from amplitude analysis of B+→J/ψϕK+ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 022003 (2017).
  7. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Amplitude analysis of B+→J/ψϕK+ decays, Phys. Rev. D 95, 012002 (2017).
  8. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), A model-independent study of resonant structure in B+→D+D−K+ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 242001 (2020).
  9. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Amplitude analysis of the B+→D+D−K+ decay, Phys. Rev. D 102, 112003 (2020).
  10. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of new resonances decaying to J/ψK+ and J/ψϕ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 082001 (2021).
  11. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of a resonant structure near the Ds+Ds− threshold in the B+→Ds+Ds−K+ decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 071901 (2023).
  12. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of new charmonium or charmoniumlike states in B+→D*±D∓K+ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 131902 (2024).
  13. E. Braaten and M. Kusunoki, Exclusive production of the X(3872) in B meson decay, Phys. Rev. D 71, 074005 (2005).
  14. L. R. Dai, J.-J. Xie, and E. Oset, B0→D0D¯0K0, B+→D0D¯0K+, and the scalar DD¯ bound state, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 121 (2016).
  15. X. Li and M. B. Voloshin, X(3915) as a DsD¯s bound state, Phys. Rev. D 91, 114014 (2015).
  16. M.-Y. Duan, E. Wang, and D.-Y. Chen, Searching for the open flavor tetraquark Tcs¯0(2900)++ in the process B+→K+D+D−, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 681 (2024).
  17. Z.-M. Ding, Q. Huang, and J. He, Roles of D¯*K* and D*D¯ molecular states in decay B+→D*+D−K+, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1133 (2025).
  18. N. N. Khuri and S. B. Treiman, Pion-Pion scattering and K±→3π decay, Phys. Rev. 119, 1115 (1960).
  19. I. J. R. Aitchison and R. J. A. Golding, Relativistic three-pion dynamics in the ω channel, J. Phys. G 4, 43 (1978).
  20. S. Holz, M. Hoferichter, B.-L. Hoid, and B. Kubis, Precision evaluation of the η- and η′-pole contributions to hadronic light-by-light scattering in the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 171902 (2025).
  21. T. Aoyama et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the standard model, Phys. Rep. 887, 1 (2020).
  22. M. Hoferichter, B.-L. Hoid, B. Kubis, S. Leupold, and S. P. Schneider, Pion-pole contribution to hadronic light-by-light scattering in the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 112002 (2018).
  23. J. Gasser and A. Rusetsky, Solving integral equations in η→3π, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 906 (2018).
  24. V. Bernard, S. Descotes-Genon, M. Knecht, and B. Moussallam, A dispersive study of final-state interactions in K→πππ amplitudes, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 744 (2024).
  25. D. S. M. Alves and S. Gonzàlez-Solís, Final state rescattering effects in axio-hadronic η and η′ decays, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 264.
  26. M. Albaladejo et al. (JPAC Collaboration), Khuri-Treiman analysis of J/ψ→π+π−π0, Phys. Rev. D 108, 014035 (2023).
  27. E. Kou, T. Moskalets, and B. Moussallam, Isospin symmetry and analyticity in D→K¯ππ decays, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 177.
  28. G. D’Ambrosio, M. Knecht, and S. Neshatpour, Determination of the structure of the K→πππ amplitudes from recent data, Phys. Lett. B 835, 137594 (2022).
  29. X. Zhang, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, and J.-J. Xie, Remarks on non-perturbative three–body dynamics and its application to the KKK¯ system, Eur. Phys. J. A 58, 20 (2022).
  30. F. Niecknig and B. Kubis, Consistent Dalitz plot analysis of Cabibbo-favored D+→K¯ππ+ decays, Phys. Lett. B 780, 471 (2018).
  31. G. Colangelo, J. Gasser, and H. Leutwyler, ππ scattering, Nucl. Phys. B603, 125 (2001).
  32. R. Kaminski, J. R. Pelaez, and F. J. Yndurain, Pion-pion scattering amplitude. III. Improving the analysis with forward dispersion relations and Roy equations, Phys. Rev. D 77, 054015 (2008).
  33. P. Buettiker, S. Descotes-Genon, and B. Moussallam, A new analysis of πK scattering from Roy and Steiner type equations, Eur. Phys. J. C 33, 409 (2004).
  34. F. Niecknig and B. Kubis, Dispersion-theoretical analysis of the D+→K−π+π+ Dalitz plot, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2015) 142.
  35. A. Pilloni, C. Fernandez-Ramirez, A. Jackura, V. Mathieu, M. Mikhasenko, J. Nys, and A. P. Szczepaniak (JPAC Collaboration), Amplitude analysis and the nature of the Zc(3900), Phys. Lett. B 772, 200 (2017).
  36. E. Wang, H.-S. Li, W.-H. Liang, and E. Oset, Analysis of the γγ→DD¯ reaction and the DD¯ bound state, Phys. Rev. D 103, 054008 (2021).
  37. Q. Deng, R.-H. Ni, Q. Li, and X.-H. Zhong, Charmonia in an unquenched quark model, Phys. Rev. D 110, 056034 (2024).
  38. Z.-M. Ding, Q. Huang, and J. He, X0(2900) and χc0(3930) in process B+→D+D−K+, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 822 (2024).
  39. Y. Chen, H. Chen, C. Meng, H.-R. Qi, and H.-Q. Zheng, On the nature of X(3960), Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 381 (2023).
  40. P.-P. Shi, F. Huang, and W.-L. Wang, Hidden charm tetraquark states in a diquark model, Phys. Rev. D 103, 094038 (2021).
  41. M.-X. Duan, S.-Q. Luo, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Possibility of charmoniumlike state X(3915) as χc0(2P) state, Phys. Rev. D 101, 054029 (2020).
  42. T. Ji, X.-K. Dong, M. Albaladejo, M.-L. Du, F.-K. Guo, J. Nieves, and B.-S. Zou, Understanding the 0++ and 2++ charmonium(-like) states near 3.9 GeV, Sci. Bull. 68, 688 (2023).
  43. S. Prelovsek, S. Collins, D. Mohler, M. Padmanath, and S. Piemonte, Charmonium-like resonances with JPC=0++, 2++ in coupled DD¯, DsD¯s scattering on the lattice, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 035.
  44. Q. Xin, Z.-G. Wang, and X.-S. Yang, Analysis of the X(3960) and related tetraquark molecular states via the QCD sum rules, AAPPS Bull. 32, 37 (2022).
  45. X. Liu, H. Huang, J. Ping, D. Chen, and X. Zhu, The explanation of some exotic states in the csc¯s¯ tetraquark system, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 950 (2021).
  46. H. Mutuk, Molecular interpretation of X(3960) as Ds+Ds− state, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 1142 (2022).
  47. P.-P. Shi, M. Albaladejo, M.-L. Du, F.-K. Guo, and J. Nieves, P-wave charmonium contribution to hidden-charm states from a reanalysis of lattice QCD data, Phys. Rev. D 111, 074043 (2025).
  48. S. Elhatisari, T. A. Lähde, D. Lee, U.-G. Meißner, and T. Vonk, Alpha-alpha scattering in the Multiverse, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2022) 001.
  49. T. Ji, X.-K. Dong, M. Albaladejo, M.-L. Du, F.-K. Guo, and J. Nieves, Establishing the heavy quark spin and light flavor molecular multiplets of the X(3872), Zc(3900), and X(3960), Phys. Rev. D 106, 094002 (2022).
  50. F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, G. Li, U.-G. Meißner, and Q. Zhao, Effect of charmed meson loops on charmonium transitions, Phys. Rev. D 83, 034013 (2011).
  51. J. P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration, Dalitz plot analyses of B0→D−D0K+ and B+→D¯0D0K+ decays, Phys. Rev. D 91, 052002 (2015).
  52. J. Brodzicka et al. (Belle Collaboration), Observation of a new DsJ meson in B+→D¯0D0K+ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 092001 (2008).
  53. V. Baru, X.-K. Dong, M.-L. Du, A. Filin, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, J. Nieves, and Q. Wang, Effective range expansion for narrow near-threshold resonances, Phys. Lett. B 833, 137290 (2022).
  54. P.-Y. Niu, Z.-Y. Zhang, Y.-Y. Li, Q. Wang, and Q. Zhao, Pole structures of the X(1840) or X(1835) and the X(1880), Phys. Rev. D 110, 094020 (2024).
  55. I. Matuschek, V. Baru, F.-K. Guo, and C. Hanhart, On the nature of near-threshold bound and virtual states, Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 101 (2021).
  56. Y. Li, F.-K. Guo, J.-Y. Pang, and J.-J. Wu, Generalization of Weinberg’s compositeness relations, Phys. Rev. D 105, L071502 (2022).
  57. K. Abe et al. (Belle Collaboration), Observation of a near-threshold ωJ/ψ mass enhancement in exclusive B→KωJ/ψ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 182002 (2005).
  58. K. Chilikin et al. (Belle Collaboration), Observation of an alternative χc0(2P) candidate in e+e−→J/ψDD¯, Phys. Rev. D 95, 112003 (2017).
  59. S. Uehara et al. (Belle Collaboration), Observation of a charmonium-like enhancement in the γγ→ωJ/ψ process, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 092001 (2010).
  60. J. P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration, Study of X(3915)→J/ψω in two-photon collisions, Phys. Rev. D 86, 072002 (2012).
  61. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Study of e+e−→γωJ/ψ and observation of X(3872)→ωJ/ψ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 232002 (2019).
  62. V. V. Anashin et al., Measurement of ψ(3770) parameters, Phys. Lett. B 711, 292 (2012).
  63. W. A. Yamada, O. Morimatsu, and T. Sato, Analytic map of three-channel S matrix: Generalized uniformization and Mittag-Leffler expansion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 192001 (2022).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation