Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Feasibility study of true muonium observation with the Belle II existing dataset

Ruben Gargiulo*

Elisa Di Meco

Stefano Palmisano

  • *Contact author: ruben.gargiulo@uniroma1.it

Phys. Rev. D 111, 112002 – Published 9 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/wbpp-sch4

Abstract

True muonium (μ+μ−) is one of the cleanest bound states, being composed only of leptons, along with true tauonium and positronium. Unlike the latter, true muonium and true tauonium have not been observed so far. This article shows that the spin-0 state of true muonium (para-TM), decaying into two photons, can be observed at a discovery level of significance in the dataset already collected by the Belle-II experiment at the ϒ(4S) peak, with certain assumptions on systematic uncertainties. Para-TM is produced via photon-photon fusion, and its observation is based on the detection of the photon pair resulting from its decay, on top of the continuum background due predominantly to light-by-light scattering. Trigger, acceptance and isolation cuts, along with calorimeter resolution and reconstruction efficiency, are taken into account during the Monte Carlo simulation of both signal and background. In order to separate signal and background, a machine learning method, based on extremely randomized trees, is trained on simulated events. Finally, the expected statistical significance of TM observation is evaluated, taking into account systematic uncertainties in a parametric fashion.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (28)

  1. G. Adkins, D. Cassidy, and J. Pérez-Ríos, Precision spectroscopy of positronium: Testing bound-state QED theory and the search for physics beyond the standard model, Phys. Rep. 975, 1 (2022).
  2. P. J. Fox, S. Jindariani, and V. Shiltsev, DIMUS: Super-compact dimuonium spectroscopy collider at Fermilab, J. Instrum. 18, T08007 (2023).
  3. R. Gargiulo, E. D. Meco, D. Paesani, S. Palmisano, E. Diociaiuti, and I. Sarra, True muonium resonant production at e+e− colliders with standard crossing angle, J. Phys. G 51, 045004 (2024).
  4. A. V. Bogomyagkov, V. P. Druzhinin, E. B. Levichev, A. I. Mil’shtein, and S. V. Sinyatkin, Concept of an electron-positron collider for production and study of the (μ+μ−) bound state, Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 15, 740 (2018).
  5. R. Gargiulo, S. Palmisano, and E. Di Meco, Feasibility study of true muonium discovery with the CERN-SPS H4 positron beam, Phys. Rev. D 110, 092015 (2024).
  6. E. Holvik and H. A. Olsen, Creation of relativistic fermionium in collisions of electrons with atoms, Phys. Rev. D 35, 2124 (1987).
  7. K. Sakimoto, Theoretical study of true-muonium μ+ μ− formation in muon collision processes μ−+μ+e− and μ++ pμ−, Eur. Phys. J. D 69, 276 (2015).
  8. S. J. Brodsky and R. F. Lebed, Production of the smallest QED atom: True muonium (μ+μ−), Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 213401 (2009).
  9. X. C. Vidal, P. Ilten, J. Plews, B. Shuve, and Y. Soreq, Discovering true muonium at LHCb, Phys. Rev. D 100, 053003 (2019).
  10. I. F. Ginzburg, U. D. Jentschura, S. G. Karshenboim, F. Krauss, V. G. Serbo, and G. Soff, Production of bound μ+μ− systems in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 58, 3565 (1998).
  11. B.-I. Collaboration, The Belle II physics book, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 123C01 (2019).
  12. K. I. Beloborodov, T. A. Kharlamova, and V. I. Telnov, Problems of studying γγ→γγ scattering at e+e− and γγ colliders, arXiv:2301.07089.
  13. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, and T. Stelzer, madgraph5: Going beyond, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2011) 128.
  14. L. A. Harland-Lang, M. Tasevsky, V. A. Khoze, and M. G. Ryskin, A new approach to modelling elastic and inelastic photon-initiated production at the LHC: superchic 4, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 925 (2020).
  15. P. Geurts, D. Ernst, and L. Wehenkel, Extremely randomized trees, Mach. Learn. 63, 3 (2006).
  16. V. Budnev, I. Ginzburg, G. Meledin, and V. Serbo, The two-photon particle production mechanism. Physical problems. Applications. Equivalent photon approximation, Phys. Rep. 15, 181 (1975).
  17. D. d’Enterria and H.-S. Shao, Prospects for ditauonium discovery at colliders, Phys. Lett. B 842, 137960 (2023).
  18. B. A. Kniehl, G. Kramer, and M. Spira, Large-pT photoproduction of D*± mesons in ep collisions, Z. Phys. C Part. Fields 76, 689 (1997).
  19. C. Flore, J.-P. Lansberg, H.-S. Shao, and Y. Yedelkina, Large-PT inclusive photoproduction of J/ψ in electron-proton collisions at HERA and the EIC, Phys. Lett. B 811, 135926 (2020).
  20. L. Harland-Lang and M. Tasevsky, New calculation of semiexclusive axionlike particle production at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 107, 033001 (2023).
  21. D. Y. Bardin, L. V. Kalinovskaya, and E. D. Uglov, Standard model light-by-light scattering in SANC: Analytic and numeric evaluation, Phys. At. Nucl. 73, 1878 (2010).
  22. I. Adachi, T. Browder, P. Križan, S. Tanaka, and Y. Ushiroda, Detectors for extreme luminosity: Belle II, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 907, 46 (2018).
  23. F. Wemmer et al., Photon reconstruction in the Belle II calorimeter using graph neural networks, Comput. Software Big Sci. 7, 13 (2023).
  24. F. Acanfora, R. Franceschini, A. Mastroddi, and D. Redigolo, Fusing photons into diphoton resonances at Belle II and beyond, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 099.
  25. Y. Iwasaki, B. Cheon, E. Won, X. Gao, L. Macchiarulo, K. Nishimura, and G. Varner, Level 1 trigger system for the Belle II experiment, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 58, 1807 (2011).
  26. F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay, scikit-learn: Machine learning in python, arXiv:1201.0490.
  27. M. J. Dolan, T. Ferber, C. Hearty, F. Kahlhoefer, and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, Revised constraints and Belle II sensitivity for visible and invisible axion-like particles, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2017) 094.
  28. R. Gargiulo et al., raeubaen/PRD-TM-Belle2-Data GitHub repository, https://github.com/raeubaen/prd-tm-belle2-data/blob/main/README.md.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation