Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Model-independent unbinned analysis of B→K*(→K+π−)μ+μ−: Zeroes, bounds, Wilson coefficients, and symmetries

Bernat Capdevila

Joaquim Matias

Martín Novoa-Brunet

Mitesh Patel and Mark Smith

  • Instituto de Física Corpuscular, Universitat de Valéncia—Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Parc Científic, E-46980 Paterna, Valencia, Spain

Phys. Rev. D 112, 016007 – Published 7 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/vwjb-ddsq

Abstract

We present a model-independent method to study the four-body decay B→K*(→K+π−)μ+μ−, based on extracting continuous observables with a moments approach. The method allows the observables to be determined unbinned in both the dilepton and K+π− invariant masses on which the decay dynamics depend. This will allow the method to shed new light on how the observables depend on the P- and S-wave contributions to the K+π− system. This approach contrasts with the state-of-the-art analyses, which bin in dilepton and K+π− mass or use a model for the dependence of the underlying decay amplitudes on these masses. The method does not require making a statistical fit and so avoids problems of biases and poor uncertainty estimation when dealing with small samples or a large number of fit parameters. We provide the Standard Model predictions for the unbinned optimized observables, derive new geometrical bounds on their values, and study the robustness of these bounds in the presence of a scalar new physics contribution. We explore the zero-crossing points of P2 and P4,5′ observables as a function of a new physics contribution to the dominant vector Wilson coefficient, C9NP. We also discuss the conditions that can be used to test the theoretical model of the amplitudes needed for an experimental amplitude analysis. Finally, as an illustration, we show how the proposed method might be used to extract the zero-crossing points, make a comparison with the bounds and test a nontrivial relation between the observable values.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (68)

  1. S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias, M. Ramon, and J. Virto, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2013) 048.
  2. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2014) 133.
  3. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 151801 (2021).
  4. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 111802 (2023).
  5. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 108, 012018 (2023); 109, 119902(E) (2024).
  6. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 011802 (2020).
  7. S. Wehle et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 111801 (2017).
  8. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 864, 139406 (2025).
  9. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 047.
  10. S. Descotes-Genon, T. Hurth, J. Matias, and J. Virto, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2013) 137.
  11. B. Capdevila, A. Crivellin, S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias, and J. Virto, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2018) 093.
  12. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 131801 (2024).
  13. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 026.
  14. N. Gubernari, D. van Dyk, and J. Virto, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 088.
  15. N. Gubernari, M. Reboud, D. van Dyk, and J. Virto, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 133.
  16. C. Cornella, G. Isidori, M. König, S. Liechti, P. Owen, and N. Serra, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1095 (2020).
  17. U. Egede, M. Patel, and K. A. Petridis, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2015) 084.
  18. A. Beck, M. Atzeni, and E. Smith, arXiv:2503.22549.
  19. B. Grinstein, R. P. Springer, and M. B. Wise, Phys. Lett. B 202, 138 (1988).
  20. G. Buchalla, A. J. Buras, and M. E. Lautenbacher, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 1125 (1996).
  21. E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, and P. Stoffer, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 016.
  22. P. Gambino, M. Gorbahn, and U. Haisch, Nucl. Phys. B673, 238 (2003).
  23. C. Bobeth, P. Gambino, M. Gorbahn, and U. Haisch, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2004) 071.
  24. M. Misiak and M. Steinhauser, Nucl. Phys. B764, 62 (2007).
  25. T. Huber, E. Lunghi, M. Misiak, and D. Wyler, Nucl. Phys. B740, 105 (2006).
  26. T. Huber, T. Hurth, and E. Lunghi, Nucl. Phys. B802, 40 (2008).
  27. M. Algueró, A. Biswas, B. Capdevila, S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias, and M. Novoa-Brunet, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 648 (2023).
  28. N. Gubernari, A. Kokulu, and D. van Dyk, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2019) 150.
  29. A. Bharucha, D. M. Straub, and R. Zwicky, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 098.
  30. J. Charles, A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pene, and J. C. Raynal, Phys. Rev. D 60, 014001 (1999).
  31. M. Beneke and T. Feldmann, Nucl. Phys. B592, 3 (2001).
  32. S. Descotes-Genon, L. Hofer, J. Matias, and J. Virto, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2014) 125.
  33. B. Capdevila, S. Descotes-Genon, L. Hofer, and J. Matias, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2017) 016.
  34. S. Jäger and J. Martin Camalich, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2013) 043.
  35. A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel, A. A. Pivovarov, and Y. M. Wang, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2010) 089.
  36. R. R. Horgan, Z. Liu, S. Meinel, and M. Wingate, Phys. Rev. D 89, 094501 (2014).
  37. C. Bourrely, I. Caprini, and L. Lellouch, Phys. Rev. D 79, 013008 (2009); 82, 099902(E) (2010).
  38. A. J. Buras, M. Misiak, M. Munz, and S. Pokorski, Nucl. Phys. B424, 374 (1994).
  39. S. Descotes-Genon, L. Hofer, J. Matias, and J. Virto, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2016) 092.
  40. M. Bordone, G. isidori, S. Mächler, and A. Tinari, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 547 (2024).
  41. M. A. Shifman, in 8th International Symposium on Heavy Flavor Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 2000), Vol. 3, pp. 1447–1494.
  42. B. Grinstein and D. Pirjol, Phys. Rev. D 70, 114005 (2004).
  43. M. Beylich, G. Buchalla, and T. Feldmann, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1635 (2011).
  44. J. Lyon and R. Zwicky, arXiv:1406.0566.
  45. B. Capdevila and A. Scaffidi (to be published).
  46. M. Algueró, P. A. Cartelle, A. M. Marshall, P. Masjuan, J. Matias, M. A. McCann, M. Patel, K. A. Petridis, and M. Smith, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2021) 085.
  47. U. Egede, T. Hurth, J. Matias, M. Ramon, and W. Reece, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2010) 056.
  48. This is an approximation as lattice information is fitted together with the experimental data.

  49. F. Beaujean, M. Chrząszcz, N. Serra, and D. van Dyk, Phys. Rev. D 91, 114012 (2015).
  50. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2016) 104.
  51. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2016) 065.
  52. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 109, 052009 (2024).
  53. T. Cover and P. Hart, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 13, 21 (1967).
  54. F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg et al., J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825 (2011), http://jmlr.org/papers/v12/pedregosa11a.html.
  55. A. Savitzky and M. J. E. Golay, Anal. Chem. 36, 1627 (1964).
  56. M. R. Hestenes and E. Stiefel, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 49, 409 (1952).
  57. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. Instrum. 19, P05065 (2024).
  58. J. Matias and N. Serra, Phys. Rev. D 90, 034002 (2014).
  59. J. Matias, F. Mescia, M. Ramon, and J. Virto, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2012) 104.
  60. T. Hurth, F. Mahmoudi, and S. Neshatpour, Phys. Rev. D 108, 115037 (2023).
  61. F. Beaujean, C. Bobeth, and S. Jahn, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 456 (2015).
  62. C. Bobeth, G. Hiller, and D. van Dyk, Phys. Rev. D 87, 034016 (2013).
  63. A. Ali, G. F. Giudice, and T. Mannel, Z. Phys. C 67, 417 (1995).
  64. G. Kumar and N. Mahajan, Phys. Rev. D 93, 054041 (2016).
  65. B. Capdevila, J. Matias, M. Novoa-Brunet, M. Patel, and M. Smith (to be published).
  66. D. Aston et al., Nucl. Phys. B296, 493 (1988).
  67. Z. Rui and W.-F. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 97, 033006 (2018).
  68. W. Altmannshofer, P. Ball, A. Bharucha, A. J. Buras, D. M. Straub, and M. Wick, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2009) 019.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation