Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Light-front mass operator with dressed quarks

J. A. O. Marinho1,2,*, J. P. B. C. de Melo3,†, T. Frederico4,‡, and W. de Paula4,§

  • *Contact author: adnei@ufra.edu.br
  • †Contact author: joao.mello@cruzeirodosul.edu.br
  • ‡Contact author: tobias@ita.br
  • §Contact author: wayne@ita.br

Phys. Rev. D 113, 096014 – Published 18 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/vv85-p6kd

Abstract

We construct an effective light-front mass-squared operator for quark-antiquark systems that incorporates quark dressing effects through a running quark mass. Starting from a Minkowski-space quark propagator constrained by lattice-QCD–inspired parametrization, we derive the disconnected light-front resolvent for a light quark-antiquark system using a generalized spectral representation of an individual quark propagator separating out the instantaneous contributions. By projecting the resolvent onto a constituent-quark helicity basis, we obtain an effective dressed mass-squared operator suitable for light-front Hamiltonian approaches. We introduce an effective light-front quark self-energy and analyze its momentum dependence. As an application, we study pion structure using representative light-front wave-function models and compute unpolarized transverse-momentum–dependent distributions, unpolarized parton distribution functions, and distribution amplitudes. Our results show that quark dressing induces sizable infrared modifications while preserving controlled ultraviolet behavior, providing a framework to incorporate nonperturbative QCD dynamics into light-front descriptions of hadrons.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (54)

  1. G. Eichmann, H. Sanchis-Alepuz, R. Williams, R. Alkofer, and C. S. Fischer, Baryons as relativistic three-quark bound states, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 91, 1 (2016).
  2. W. de Paula and T. Frederico, Minkowski space dynamics and light-front projection, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 235, 1619 (2026).
  3. O. Oliveira, T. Frederico, W. de Paula, and J. P. B. C. de Melo, Exploring the quark-gluon vertex with Slavnov-Taylor identities and lattice simulations, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 553 (2018).
  4. O. Oliveira, W. de Paula, T. Frederico, and J. de Melo, The quark-gluon vertex and the QCD infrared dynamics, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 116 (2019).
  5. O. Oliveira, T. Frederico, and W. de Paula, The soft-gluon limit and the infrared enhancement of the quark-gluon vertex, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 484 (2020).
  6. A. C. Aguilar, M. N. Ferreira, B. M. Oliveira, J. Papavassiliou, and G. T. Linhares, Infrared properties of the quark-gluon vertex in general kinematics, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1231 (2024).
  7. Z.-N. Xu, Z.-Q. Yao, S.-X. Qin, Z.-F. Cui, and C. D. Roberts, Bethe–Salpeter kernel and properties of strange-quark mesons, Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 39 (2023).
  8. V. Sauli, J. Adam, Jr., and P. Bicudo, Dynamical chiral symmetry breaking with integral Minkowski representations, Phys. Rev. D 75, 087701 (2007).
  9. C. Mezrag and G. Salmè, Fermion and photon gap-equations in Minkowski space within the Nakanishi integral representation method, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 34 (2021).
  10. D. C. Duarte, T. Frederico, W. de Paula, and E. Ydrefors, Dynamical mass generation in Minkowski space at QCD scale, Phys. Rev. D 105, 114055 (2022).
  11. W. de Paula, E. Ydrefors, J. H. Alvarenga Nogueira, T. Frederico, and G. Salmè, Observing the Minkowskian dynamics of the pion on the null-plane, Phys. Rev. D 103, 014002 (2021).
  12. E. Ydrefors, W. de Paula, J. H. A. Nogueira, T. Frederico, and G. Salmé, Pion electromagnetic form factor with Minkowskian dynamics, Phys. Lett. B 820, 136494 (2021).
  13. W. de Paula, E. Ydrefors, J. H. Nogueira Alvarenga, T. Frederico, and G. Salmè, Parton distribution function in a pion with Minkowskian dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 105, L071505 (2022).
  14. W. de Paula, T. Frederico, and G. Salmè, Unpolarized transverse-momentum dependent distribution functions of a quark in a pion with Minkowskian dynamics, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 985 (2023).
  15. E. Ydrefors and T. Frederico, Proton quark distributions from a light-front Faddeev-Bethe-Salpeter approach, Phys. Lett. B 838, 137732 (2023).
  16. O. Oliveira, P. J. Silva, J.-I. Skullerud, and A. Sternbeck, Quark propagator with two flavors of O(a)-improved Wilson fermions, Phys. Rev. D 99, 094506 (2019).
  17. S. W. Li, P. Lowdon, O. Oliveira, and P. J. Silva, The generalised infrared structure of the gluon propagator, Phys. Lett. B 803, 135329 (2020).
  18. A. C. Aguilar, M. N. Ferreira, B. M. Oliveira, and J. Papavassiliou, Schwinger–Dyson truncations in the all-soft limit: A case study, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 1068 (2022).
  19. D. Dudal, O. Oliveira, and N. Vandersickel, Indirect lattice evidence for the refined Gribov-Zwanziger formalism and the gluon condensate ⟨A2⟩ in the Landau gauge, Phys. Rev. D 81, 074505 (2010).
  20. A. Cucchieri, D. Dudal, T. Mendes, and N. Vandersickel, Modeling the gluon propagator in Landau gauge: Lattice estimates of pole masses and dimension-two condensates, Phys. Rev. D 85, 094513 (2012).
  21. C. D. Roberts, D. G. Richards, T. Horn, and L. Chang, Insights into the emergence of mass from studies of pion and kaon structure, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 120, 103883 (2021).
  22. A. Accardi et al., Strong interaction physics at the luminosity frontier with 22 GeV electrons at Jefferson Lab, Eur. Phys. J. A 60, 173 (2024).
  23. J. Arrington, C. A. Gayoso, P. C. Barry, V. Berdnikov, D. Binosi, L. Chang, M. Diefenthaler, M. Ding, R. Ent, T. Frederico et al., Revealing the structure of light pseudoscalar mesons at the electron–ion collider, J. Phys. G 48, 075106 (2021).
  24. J. Lan, C. Mondal, S. Jia, X. Zhao, and J. P. Vary, Parton distribution functions from a light front Hamiltonian and QCD evolution for light mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 172001 (2019).
  25. B. L. G. Bakker et al., Light-front quantum chromodynamics: A framework for the analysis of hadron physics, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 251–252, 165 (2014).
  26. R. Haag, On quantum field theories, Mat. Fys. Medd. 29, 1 (1955).
  27. R. F. Streater and A. S. Wightman, PCT, Spin and Statistics, and All That (Princeton University Press, New York, 1989).
  28. W. Polyzou, Relation between instant and light-front formulations of quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. D 103, 105017 (2021).
  29. C. Itzykson and J.-B. Zuber, Quantum Field Theory (Courier Corporation, New York, 2012).
  30. T. Frederico and G. Salmè, Projecting the Bethe-Salpeter equation onto the light-front and back: A short review, Few Body Syst. 49, 163 (2011).
  31. J. P. Vary, H. Honkanen, J. Li, P. Maris, S. J. Brodsky, A. Harindranath, G. F. de Teramond, P. Sternberg, E. G. Ng, and C. Yang, Hamiltonian light-front field theory in a basis function approach, Phys. Rev. C 81, 035205 (2010).
  32. J. P. Vary et al., Trends and progress in nuclear and hadron physics: A straight or winding road, Few Body Syst. 58, 56 (2017).
  33. J. Horak, J. M. Pawlowski, and N. Wink, On the quark spectral function in QCD, SciPost Phys. 15, 149 (2023).
  34. T.-M. Yan, Quantum field theories in the infinite momentum frame. II. Scattering matrices of vector and Dirac fields, Phys. Rev. D 7, 1760 (1973).
  35. J. P. B. C. de Melo, J. H. O. Sales, T. Frederico, and P. U. Sauer, Pairs in the light front and covariance, Nucl. Phys. A631, 574C (1998).
  36. D. Bhamre and J. P. B. C. de Melo, Ward-Takahashi identity in the light-front formalism for a bound state of fermions, Phys. Rev. D 113, 036015 (2026).
  37. H. W. L. Naus, J. P. B. C. de Melo, and T. Frederico, Ward-Takahashi identity on the light front, Few Body Syst. 24, 99 (1998).
  38. J. P. C. B. de Melo, H. W. L. Naus, and T. Frederico, Pion electromagnetic current in the light cone formalism, Phys. Rev. C 59, 2278 (1999).
  39. J. P. B. C. de Melo and T. Frederico, Covariant and light front approaches to the rho meson electromagnetic form-factors, Phys. Rev. C 55, 2043 (1997).
  40. J. P. B. C. de Melo, Covariant form factors for spin-1 particles, Phys. Rev. D 113, 014039 (2026).
  41. W. de Paula, T. Frederico, G. Salmè, and M. Viviani, Advances in solving the two-fermion homogeneous Bethe-Salpeter equation in Minkowski space, Phys. Rev. D 94, 071901 (2016).
  42. W. de Paula, T. Frederico, G. Salmè, M. Viviani, and R. Pimentel, Fermionic bound states in Minkowski-space: Light-cone singularities and structure, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 764 (2017).
  43. J. H. O. Sales, T. Frederico, B. V. Carlson, and P. U. Sauer, Light-front Green’s function approach to the bound state problem, Phys. Rev. C 63, 064003 (2001).
  44. J. A. O. Marinho, T. Frederico, E. Pace, G. Salmè, and P. Sauer, Light-front Ward-Takahashi identity for two-fermion systems, Phys. Rev. D 77, 116010 (2008).
  45. J. P. Vary, L. Adhikari, G. Chen, Y. Li, P. Maris, and X. Zhao, Basis light-front quantization: Recent progress and future prospects, Few Body Syst. 57, 695 (2016).
  46. C. S. Mello, J. P. B. C. de Melo, and T. Frederico, Minkowski space pion model inspired by lattice QCD running quark mass, Phys. Lett. B 766, 86 (2017).
  47. A. Castro, W. de Paula, T. Frederico, and G. Salmè, Exploring the 0− bound state with dressed quarks in Minkowski space, Phys. Lett. B 845, 138159 (2023).
  48. O. Oliveira, P. J. Silva, J.-I. Skullerud, and A. Sternbeck, Quark propagator with two flavors of O(a)-improved Wilson fermions, Phys. Rev. D 99, 094506 (2019).
  49. O. Oliveira, T. Frederico, and W. de Paula, On the momentum space structure of the quark propagator, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 280 (2025).
  50. S. J. Brodsky, H.-C. Pauli, and S. S. Pinsky, Quantum chromodynamics and other field theories on the light cone, Phys. Rep. 301, 299 (1998).
  51. T. Huang, B.-Q. Ma, and Q.-X. Shen, Analysis of the pion wave function in light cone formalism, Phys. Rev. D 49, 1490 (1994).
  52. C. Fanelli, E. Pace, G. Romanelli, G. Salme, and M. Salmistraro, Pion generalized parton distributions within a fully covariant constituent quark model, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 253 (2016).
  53. T. Frederico and G. A. Miller, Null-plane phenomenology for the pion decay constant and radius, Phys. Rev. D 45, 4207 (1992).
  54. R. A. Briere, J. L. Rosner, S. L. Stone, and R. Van de Water (Particle Data Group), Leptonic decays of charged pseudoscalar mesons, in Review of Particle Physics, edited by S. Navas et al. (2024), Vol. 110, p. 030001, https://pdg.lbl.gov/2024/reviews/rpp2024-rev-pseudoscalar-meson-decay-cons.pdf.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation