- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Triplet fermion WIMP dark matter in the general supersymmetric Georgi-Machacek model

Liangliang Shang1, Yuanping Wang1,2, Xiaokang Du1,2,*, Bingfang Yang1, and Stefano Moretti3,4

  • *Contact author: xkdu@hnas.ac.cn
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 111, 115006 – Published 9 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/vsz9-gwvs

Abstract

The supersymmetric custodial triplet model (SCTM), which is a fully supersymmetric generalization of the Georgi-Machacek (GM) model, is constructed by extending the Higgs sector of the minimal supersymmetric standard model by three triplet chiral superfields with hypercharge Y=0,±1, in order to maintain the holomorphy of the superpotential and satisfy the requirements of anomaly cancellation. The global SU(2)L⊗SU(2)R symmetry has to be respected for the superpotential and soft supersymmetry breaking sector, where the former will only be broken by the Yukawa couplings and the latter one will be broken spontaneously to the custodial SU(2)V symmetry after electroweak symmetry breaking similar to the GM model. The ensuing complicated spectrum not only gives rich collider phenomenology but also provides more available weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP) dark matter (DM) candidates. In this paper, we explore the viability of WIMP solutions for DM in the SCTM, by considering the increasingly stringent constraints from direct detection DM experiments. Our numerical simulations show that a significant portion of the SCTM parameter space remains viable despite these constraints and will be fully tested in future experiments.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (131)

  1. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Combined search for the Standard Model Higgs boson using up to 4.9  fb−1 of pp collision data at s=7  TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 710, 49 (2012).
  2. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Combined results of searches for the Standard Model Higgs boson in pp collisions at s=7  TeV, Phys. Lett. B 710, 26 (2012).
  3. H. Georgi and M. Machacek, Doubly charged Higgs bosons, Nucl. Phys. B262, 463 (1985).
  4. M. S. Chanowitz and M. Golden, Higgs boson triplets with M(W)=M(Z) cosθω, Phys. Lett. 165B, 105 (1985).
  5. J. F. Gunion, R. Vega, and J. Wudka, Higgs triplets in the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 42, 1673 (1990).
  6. J. F. Gunion, R. Vega, and J. Wudka, Naturalness problems for ρ=1 and other large one loop effects for a standard model Higgs sector containing triplet fields, Phys. Rev. D 43, 2322 (1991).
  7. J. F. Gunion, H. E. Haber, G. L. Kane, and S. Dawson, The Higgs Hunter’s Guide, Front. Phys. 80, 1 (2000).
  8. H. E. Haber and H. E. Logan, Radiative corrections to the Zb b¯ vertex and constraints on extended Higgs sectors, Phys. Rev. D 62, 015011 (2000).
  9. S. Godfrey and K. Moats, Exploring Higgs triplet models via vector boson scattering at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 81, 075026 (2010).
  10. I. Low, J. Lykken, and G. Shaughnessy, Have we observed the Higgs (imposter)?, Phys. Rev. D 86, 093012 (2012).
  11. H. E. Logan and M. A. Roy, Higgs couplings in a model with triplets, Phys. Rev. D 82, 115011 (2010).
  12. R. Killick, K. Kumar, and H. E. Logan, Learning what the Higgs boson is mixed with, Phys. Rev. D 88, 033015 (2013).
  13. A. Efrati and Y. Nir, What if λhhh≠3mh2/v, arXiv:1401.0935.
  14. C. Degrande, K. Hartling, H. E. Logan, A. D. Peterson, and M. Zaro, Automatic predictions in the Georgi-Machacek model at next-to-leading order accuracy, Phys. Rev. D 93, 035004 (2016).
  15. C. H. de Lima and H. E. Logan, Unavoidable Higgs coupling deviations in the Z2-symmetric Georgi-Machacek model, Phys. Rev. D 106, 115020 (2022).
  16. A. Ahriche, Constraining the Georgi-Machacek model with a light Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D 107, 015006 (2023).
  17. S. L. Chen, A. Dutta Banik, and Z. K. Liu, Common origin of radiative neutrino mass, dark matter and leptogenesis in scotogenic Georgi-Machacek model, Nucl. Phys. B966, 115394 (2021).
  18. A. Falkowski, S. Rychkov, and A. Urbano, What if the Higgs couplings to W and Z bosons re larger than in the Standard Model?, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2012) 073.
  19. S. Chang, C. A. Newby, N. Raj, and C. Wanotayaroj, Revisiting theories with enhanced Higgs couplings to weak gauge bosons, Phys. Rev. D 86, 095015 (2012).
  20. C. W. Chiang, A. L. Kuo, and K. Yagyu, Enhancements of weak gauge boson scattering processes at the CERN LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2013) 072.
  21. Y. Yu, Y. P. Bi, and J. F. Shen, Associated production of the doubly-charged scalar pair with the Higgs boson in the Georgi–Machacek model at the ILC, Phys. Lett. B 759, 513 (2016).
  22. J. Cao and Y. B. Liu, Search for doubly-charged Higgs bosons through the diboson decay channel at the ILC, Mod. Phys. Lett. 31A, 1650182 (2016).
  23. H. Sun, X. Luo, W. Wei, and T. Liu, Searching for the doubly-charged Higgs bosons in the Georgi-Machacek model at the electron-proton colliders, Phys. Rev. D 96, 095003 (2017).
  24. J. Cao, Y. Q. Li, and Y. B. Liu, Searching for the doubly charged scalars in the Georgi–Machacek model via γγ collisions at the ILC, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33, 1841003 (2018).
  25. Q. Yang, R. Y. Zhang, W. G. Ma, Y. Jiang, X. Z. Li, and H. Sun, H5±±h0 production via vector-boson fusion in the Georgi-Machacek model at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 98, 055034 (2018).
  26. C. W. Chiang and K. Yagyu, Testing the custodial symmetry in the Higgs sector of the Georgi-Machacek model, J. High Endergy Phys. 01 (2013) 026.
  27. S. Kanemura, M. Kikuchi, and K. Yagyu, Probing exotic Higgs sectors from the precise measurement of Higgs boson couplings, Phys. Rev. D 88, 015020 (2013).
  28. C. Englert, E. Re, and M. Spannowsky, Triplet Higgs boson collider phenomenology after the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 87, 095014 (2013).
  29. C. Englert, E. Re, and M. Spannowsky, Pinning down Higgs triplets at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 88, 035024 (2013).
  30. S. I. Godunov, M. I. Vysotsky, and E. V. Zhemchugov, Double Higgs production at LHC, see-saw type II and Georgi-Machacek model, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 120, 369 (2015).
  31. C. W. Chiang and K. Tsumura, Properties and searches of the exotic neutral Higgs bosons in the Georgi-Machacek model, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2015) 113.
  32. C. W. Chiang, A. L. Kuo, and T. Yamada, Searches of exotic Higgs bosons in general mass spectra of the Georgi-Machacek model at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2016) 120.
  33. J. Chang, C. R. Chen, and C. W. Chiang, Higgs boson pair productions in the Georgi-Machacek model at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2017) 137.
  34. B. Li, Z. L. Han, and Y. Liao, Higgs production at future e+e− colliders in the Georgi-Machacek model, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2018) 007.
  35. N. Ghosh, S. Ghosh, and I. Saha, Charged Higgs boson searches in the Georgi-Machacek model at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 101, 015029 (2020).
  36. A. Ismail, H. E. Logan, and Y. Wu, Updated constraints on the Georgi-Machacek model from LHC Run 2, arXiv:2003.02272.
  37. C. Wang, J. Q. Tao, M. A. Shahzad, G. M. Chen, and S. Gascon-Shotkin, Search for a lighter neutral custodial fiveplet scalar in the Georgi-Machacek model *, Chin. Phys. C 46, 083107 (2022).
  38. S. Ghosh, Fermionic decay of charged Higgs boson in low mass region in Georgi Machacek model, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 39, 2450139 (2024).
  39. M. Chakraborti, D. Das, N. Ghosh, S. Mukherjee, and I. Saha, New physics implications of vector boson fusion searches exemplified through the Georgi-Machacek model, Phys. Rev. D 109, 015016 (2024).
  40. S. Ghosh, Charged Higgs decay to W± and heavy neutral Higgs decaying into τ+τ− in Georgi Machacek Model at LHC, arXiv:2311.15405.
  41. Y. Zhang, H. Sun, X. Luo, and W. Zhang, Searching for the heavy charged custodial fiveplet Higgs boson in the Georgi-Machacek model at the International Linear Collider, Phys. Rev. D 95, 115022 (2017).
  42. G. Azuelos, H. Sun, and K. Wang, Search for singly charged Higgs bosons in vector-boson scattering at ep colliders, Phys. Rev. D 97, 116005 (2018).
  43. J. W. Zhu, R. Y. Zhang, W. G. Ma, Q. Yang, M. M. Long, and Y. Jiang, Search for SU(2)V singlet Higgs boson in the Georgi–Machacek model at the LHC, J. Phys. G 47, 125005 (2020).
  44. A. Ahriche, The 95 GeV excess in the Georgi-Machacek model: Single or twin peak resonance, Phys. Rev. D 110, 035010 (2024).
  45. T. K. Chen, C. W. Chiang, S. Heinemeyer, and G. Weiglein, 95 GeV Higgs boson in the Georgi-Machacek model, Phys. Rev. D 109, 075043 (2024).
  46. S. Blasi, S. De Curtis, and K. Yagyu, Effects of custodial symmetry breaking in the Georgi-Machacek model at high energies, Phys. Rev. D 96, 015001 (2017).
  47. B. Keeshan, H. E. Logan, and T. Pilkington, Custodial symmetry violation in the Georgi-Machacek model, Phys. Rev. D 102, 015001 (2020).
  48. H. Song, X. Wan, and J. H. Yu, Custodial symmetry violation in scalar extensions of the standard model*, Chin. Phys. C 47, 103103 (2023).
  49. R. Ghosh and B. Mukhopadhyaya, Some new observations for the Georgi-Machacek scenario with triplet Higgs scalars, Phys. Rev. D 107, 035031 (2023).
  50. X. K. Du, Z. Li, F. Wang, and Y. K. Zhang, Explaining the CDF-II W-boson mass anomaly in the Georgi–Machacek extension models, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 139 (2023).
  51. P. Mondal, Enhancement of the W boson mass in the Georgi-Machacek model, Phys. Lett. B 833, 137357 (2022).
  52. T. K. Chen, C. W. Chiang, and K. Yagyu, Explanation of the W mass shift at CDF II in the extended Georgi-Machacek model, Phys. Rev. D 106, 055035 (2022).
  53. R. Ghosh, B. Mukhopadhyaya, and U. Sarkar, The ρ parameter and the CDF-IIW-mass anomaly: Observations on the role of scalar triplets, J. Phys. G 50, 075003 (2023).
  54. C. W. Chiang and T. Yamada, Electroweak phase transition in Georgi–Machacek model, Phys. Lett. B 735, 295 (2014).
  55. T. K. Chen, C. W. Chiang, C. T. Huang, and B. Q. Lu, Updated constraints on the Georgi-Machacek model and its electroweak phase transition and associated gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 106, 055019 (2022).
  56. R. Zhou, W. Cheng, X. Deng, L. Bian, and Y. Wu, Electroweak phase transition and Higgs phenomenology in the Georgi-Machacek model, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2019) 216.
  57. L. Bian, H. K. Guo, Y. Wu, and R. Zhou, Gravitational wave and collider searches for electroweak symmetry breaking patterns, Phys. Rev. D 101, 035011 (2020).
  58. K. Hartling, K. Kumar, and H. E. Logan, Indirect constraints on the Georgi-Machacek model and implications for Higgs boson couplings, Phys. Rev. D 91, 015013 (2015).
  59. M. Aoki and S. Kanemura, Unitarity bounds in the Higgs model including triplet fields with custodial symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 77, 095009 (2008); 89, 059902(E) (2014).
  60. K. Hartling, K. Kumar, and H. E. Logan, The decoupling limit in the Georgi-Machacek model, Phys. Rev. D 90, 015007 (2014).
  61. C. W. Chiang, G. Cottin, and O. Eberhardt, Global fits in the Georgi-Machacek model, Phys. Rev. D 99, 015001 (2019).
  62. D. Azevedo, P. Ferreira, H. E. Logan, and R. Santos, Vacuum structure of the Z2 symmetric Georgi-Machacek model, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 221.
  63. Z. Bairi and A. Ahriche, More constraints on the Georgi-Machacek model, Phys. Rev. D 108, 055028 (2023).
  64. J. F. Gunion, R. Vega, and J. Wudka, Naturalness problems for ρ=1 and other large one loop effects for a standard model Higgs sector containing triplet fields, Phys. Rev. D 43, 2322 (1991).
  65. S. Ghosh, Charged Higgs decay to W± and heavy neutral Higgs decaying into τ+τ− in Georgi Machacek Model at LHC, Lett. High Energy Phys. 2024, 518 (2024).
  66. S. Bhattacharya, R. Ghosh, and B. Mukhopadhyaya, Diphoton signals for the Georgi-Machacek scenario at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. D 111, 053012 (2025).
  67. D. Chowdhury, P. Mondal, and S. Samanta, Next-to-leading order unitarity fits in the extended Georgi-Machacek model, arXiv:2404.18996.
  68. C. T. Lu, X. Wang, X. Wei, and Y. Wu, Probing long-lived doubly charged scalar in the Georgi-Machacek model at the LHC and in far detectors, arXiv:2410.19561.
  69. G. Moultaka and M. C. Peyranère, Vacuum stability conditions for Higgs potentials with SU(2)L triplets, Phys. Rev. D 103, 115006 (2021).
  70. S. Ghosh, Updated constraints on triplet vev in the Georgi Machacek model, arXiv:2501.17462.
  71. A. Giarnetti, J. Herrero-Garcia, S. Marciano, D. Meloni, and D. Vatsyayan, Neutrino masses from new Weinberg-like operators: Phenomenology of TeV scalar multiplets, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 055.
  72. A. Giarnetti, J. Herrero-García, S. Marciano, D. Meloni, and D. Vatsyayan, Neutrino masses from new seesaw models: low-scale variants and phenomenological implications, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 803 (2024).
  73. X. K. Du and F. Wang, Positive definiteness constraints of effective scalar potential in Georgi-Machacek model, arXiv:2409.20198.
  74. S. Ghosh, Light Higgs in the Georgi Machacek Model: Neutral or charged?, arXiv:2501.17457.
  75. X. Du, H. Liu, and Q. Chang, Interpretation of 95 GeV excess within the Georgi-Machacek model in light of positive definiteness constraints, arXiv:2502.06444.
  76. Y. A. Golfand and E. P. Likhtman, Extension of the algebra of Poincare group generators and violation of p invariance, JETP Lett. 13, 323 (1971).
  77. J. L. Gervais and B. Sakita, Field theory interpretation of supergauges in dual models, Nucl. Phys. B34, 632 (1971).
  78. D. V. Volkov and V. P. Akulov, Is the neutrino a goldstone particle?, Phys. Lett. 46B, 109 (1973).
  79. J. Wess and B. Zumino, Supergauge transformations in four-dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B70, 39 (1974).
  80. L. Cort, M. Garcia, and M. Quiros, Supersymmetric custodial triplets, Phys. Rev. D 88, 075010 (2013).
  81. M. Garcia-Pepin, S. Gori, M. Quiros, R. Vega, R. Vega-Morales, and T. T. Yu, Supersymmetric custodial Higgs triplets and the breaking of universality, Phys. Rev. D 91, 015016 (2015).
  82. A. Delgado, M. Garcia-Pepin, B. Ostdiek, and M. Quiros, Dark matter from the supersymmetric custodial triplet model, Phys. Rev. D 92, 015011 (2015).
  83. A. Delgado, M. Garcia-Pepin, and M. Quiros, GMSB with light stops, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2015) 159.
  84. M. Quiros, M. Garcia-Pepin, and A. Delgado, Gauge mediation with light stops, Proc. Sci. PLANCK2015 (2015) 109 [arXiv:1511.03254].
  85. M. Garcia-Pepin and M. Quiros, Strong electroweak phase transition from supersymmetric custodial triplets, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2016) 177.
  86. M. García Pepin, Supersymmetry with custodial triplets, Ph.D. thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 2016.
  87. R. Vega, R. Vega-Morales, and K. Xie, The supersymmetric Georgi-Machacek model, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 168.
  88. R. Vega, R. Vega-Morales, and K. Xie, Light (and darkness) from a light hidden Higgs, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2018) 137.
  89. K. Xie, Massive elementary particles in the Standard Model and its supersymmetric triplet Higgs extension, Ph.D. thesis, Southern Methodist University, 2019.
  90. Y. Xu, Global fits in the supersymmetric Georgi-Machacek model, arXiv:2408.04489.
  91. J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), Dark matter search results from 4.2 tonne-years of exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, arXiv:2410.17036.
  92. Y. Meng et al. (PandaX-4T Collaboration), Dark matter search results from the PandaX-4T commissioning run, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 261802 (2021).
  93. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), First dark matter search with nuclear recoils from the XENONnT experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041003 (2023).
  94. N. Seiberg, Naturalness versus supersymmetric nonrenormalization theorems, Phys. Lett. B 318, 469 (1993).
  95. W. Porod, SPheno, a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, SUSY particle decays and SUSY particle production at e+ e− colliders, Comput. Phys. Commun. 153, 275 (2003).
  96. W. Porod and F. Staub, SPheno 3.1: Extensions including flavour, CP-phases and models beyond the MSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 2458 (2012).
  97. F. Staub, sarah 4: A tool for (not only SUSY) model builders, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 1773 (2014).
  98. F. Staub, sarah 3.2: Dirac Gauginos, UFO output, and more, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 1792 (2013).
  99. F. Staub, Automatic calculation of supersymmetric renormalization group equations and self energies, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182, 808 (2011).
  100. F. Staub, From superpotential to model files for FeynArts and CalcHep/CompHep, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181, 1077 (2010).
  101. F. Staub, sarah, arXiv:0806.0538.
  102. P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, G. Weiglein, and K. E. Williams, higgsbounds: Confronting arbitrary Higgs sectors with exclusion bounds from LEP and the Tevatron, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181, 138 (2010).
  103. P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, G. Weiglein, and K. E. Williams, higgsbounds 2.0.0: Confronting neutral and charged Higgs sector predictions with exclusion bounds from LEP and the tevatron, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182, 2605 (2011).
  104. P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stal, T. Stefaniak, G. Weiglein, and K. E. Williams, HiggsBounds-4: Improved tests of extended Higgs sectors against exclusion bounds from LEP, the Tevatron and the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2693 (2014).
  105. P. Bechtle, D. Dercks, S. Heinemeyer, T. Klingl, T. Stefaniak, G. Weiglein, and J. Wittbrodt, higgsbounds-5: Testing Higgs sectors in the LHC 13 TeV era, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1211 (2020).
  106. H. Bahl, T. Biekötter, S. Heinemeyer, C. Li, S. Paasch, G. Weiglein, and J. Wittbrodt, HiggsTools: BSM scalar phenomenology with new versions of higgsbounds and higgssignals, Comput. Phys. Commun. 291, 108803 (2023).
  107. P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stal, T. Stefaniak, and G. Weiglein, HiggsSignals: Confronting arbitrary Higgs sectors with measurements at the Tevatron and the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2711 (2014).
  108. P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stal, T. Stefaniak, and G. Weiglein, Probing the Standard Model with Higgs signal rates from the tevatron, the LHC and a future ILC, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2014) 039.
  109. P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, T. Klingl, T. Stefaniak, G. Weiglein, and J. Wittbrodt, higgssignals-2: Probing new physics with precision Higgs measurements in the LHC 13 TeV era, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 145 (2021).
  110. G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, and A. Semenov, micromegas3.1: A program for calculating dark matter observables, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 960 (2014).
  111. G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, and A. Semenov, micromegas: A tool for dark matter studies, Nuovo Cimento C 033N2, 111 (2010).
  112. G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, and A. Semenov, Dark matter direct detection rate in a generic model with micromegas_2.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 747 (2009).
  113. G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, and A. Semenov, micromegas 2.0 2.0: A program to calculate the relic density of dark matter in a generic model, Comput. Phys. Commun. 176, 367 (2007).
  114. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for supersymmetry in final states with missing transverse momentum and three or more b-jets in 139  fb−1 of proton–proton collisions at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 561 (2023).
  115. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for supersymmetry in pp collisions at s=13  TeV with 137  fb−1 in final states with a single lepton using the sum of masses of large-radius jets, Phys. Rev. D 101, 052010 (2020).
  116. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for new phenomena in final states with b-jets and missing transverse momentum in s=13  TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 093.
  117. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for a scalar partner of the top quark in the all-hadronic tt¯ plus missing transverse momentum final state at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 737 (2020).
  118. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for top squarks in events with a Higgs or Z boson using 139  fb−1 of pp collision data at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1080 (2020).
  119. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for electroweak production of supersymmetric particles in final states with two τ-leptons in s=13  TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 150.
  120. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for electroweak production of charginos and sleptons decaying into final states with two leptons and missing transverse momentum in s=13  TeV pp collisions using the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 123 (2020).
  121. P. A. R. Ade et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 571, A16 (2014).
  122. S. Schael et al. (ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group, and SLD Heavy Flavour Group), Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance, Phys. Rep. 427, 257 (2006).
  123. M. Mahdi Altakach, S. Kraml, A. Lessa, S. Narasimha, T. Pascal, and W. Waltenberger, smodels v2.3: Enabling global likelihood analyses, SciPost Phys. 15, 185 (2023).
  124. S. Kraml, S. Kulkarni, U. Laa, A. Lessa, W. Magerl, D. Proschofsky-Spindler, and W. Waltenberger, smodels: A tool for interpreting simplified-model results from the LHC and its application to supersymmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2868 (2014).
  125. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, and T. Stelzer, madgraph 5: Going beyond, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2011) 128.
  126. I. Zurbano Fernandez, M. Zobov, A. Zlobin, F. Zimmermann, M. Zerlauth, C. Zanoni, C. Zannini, O. Zagorodnova, I. Zacharov and M. Yu et al., High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC): Technical Design Report (CERN, Geneva, 2020), ISBN [Amazon][WorldCat], [Amazon][WorldCat].
  127. CEPC Study Group, CEPC Conceptual Design Report: Volume 1—Accelerator, arXiv:1809.00285.
  128. A. Abada et al. (FCC Collaboration), FCC-hh: The Hadron Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 3, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 228, 755 (2019).
  129. A. Delgado, M. Garcia-Pepin, M. Quiros, J. Santiago, and R. Vega-Morales, Diphoton and diboson probes of fermiophobic Higgs bosons at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2016) 042.
  130. V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for a Higgs boson in the mass range from 145 to 1000 GeV decaying to a pair of W or Z bosons, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2015) 144.
  131. S. Moretti and S. Khalil, Supersymmetry Beyond Minimality: From Theory to Experiment (CRC Press, London, UK, 2019), ISBN [Amazon][WorldCat].

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 111, 115006– Published 9 June, 2025
  • Received 5 March 2025
  • Accepted 13 May 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation