- Open Access
Dirac-Majorana confusion theorem in the presence of flavor-changing neutral currents: A -filter mechanism
Phys. Rev. D 113, 115020 – Published 9 June, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/vn1x-xbrx
Abstract
The “practical Dirac-Majorana confusion theorem” (PDMCT) asserts that phenomenological differences between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos are kinematically suppressed by in lepton-number-conserving processes. The PDMCT relies on standard left-handed neutrino interactions, as in the Standard Model, in which case Dirac and Majorana neutrinos are experimentally indistinguishable in lepton-number-conserving processes. Our scenario explicitly goes beyond these assumptions by introducing a neutral vector boson with -violating, flavor-changing neutral current (FCNC) couplings, which generate observable Dirac-Majorana differences while remaining fully consistent with the PDMCT. In strict accordance with the PDMCT, Fermi-Dirac statistics dictate that the flavor-diagonal vector current identically vanishes for Majorana neutrinos. For nondiagonal transitions, the Majorana condition strictly forbids the real (-conserving) component of the vector interaction, leaving only an imaginary coupling. As a consequence, the observable difference in inclusive scattering cross sections between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos is driven entirely by the FCNC -violating couplings. We apply these results to coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering, showing that for spin-zero targets, the distinguishability of the neutrino’s nature is determined by the structure of the new interaction.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (28)
- W. H. Furry, Phys. Rev. 56, 1184 (1939).
- J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Rev. D 25, 2951 (1982).
- W. Rodejohann, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 20, 1833 (2011).
- M. J. Dolinski, A. W. P. Poon, and W. Rodejohann, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69, 219 (2019).
- A. Gando et al. (KamLAND-Zen Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 051801 (2023).
- B. Kayser and R. E. Shrock, Phys. Lett. 112B, 137 (1982).
- B. Kayser, Phys. Rev. D 26, 1662 (1982).
- S. P. Rosen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 842 (1982).
- I. Bigaran, S. J. Parke, and P. Pasquini, Phys. Rev. D 112, 053008 (2025).
- J. M. Márquez, P. Roig, and M. Salinas, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 227.
- J. M. Márquez, D. Portillo-Sánchez, and P. Roig, Phys. Rev. D 109, 033005 (2024).
- E. Akhmedov and A. Trautner, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 156.
- M. Lindner, W. Rodejohann, and X.-J. Xu, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2017) 097.
- A. Błaut and W. Sobków, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 261 (2020).
- A. Denner, H. Eck, O. Hahn, and J. Küblbeck, Nucl. Phys. B87, 467 (1992).
- D. Z. Freedman, Phys. Rev. D 9, 1389 (1974).
- P. B. Denton et al., arXiv:2203.07361.
- T. W. Donnelly and R. D. Peccei, Phys. Rep. 50, 1 (1979).
- V. A. Bednyakov and D. V. Naumov, Phys. Rev. D 98, 053004 (2018).
- D. Aristizabal Sierra, J. Liao, and D. Marfatia, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2019) 141.
- J. D. Walecka, Theoretical Nuclear and Subnuclear Physics, 2nd ed. (Imperial College Press & World Scientic, London, Singapore, 2004).
- D. Akimov et al. (COHERENT Collaboration), arXiv:1509.08702.
- D. Akimov et al. (COHERENT Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 012002 (2021).
- D. Akimov et al. (COHERENT Collaboration), Science 357, 1123 (2017).
- K. Scholberg, Phys. Rev. D 73, 033005 (2006).
- B. Abi et al. (DUNE Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 322 (2021).
- A. Abed Abud et al. (DUNE Collaboration), Instruments 5, 31 (2021).
- V. De Romeri, K. J. Kelly, and P. A. N. Machado, Phys. Rev. D 100, 095010 (2019).