- Open Access
Measurement of the time-integrated asymmetry in decays at Belle II
Phys. Rev. D 112, 012006 – Published 8 July, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/vg9c-xvdc
Abstract
We measure the time-integrated asymmetry, , in decays reconstructed in events collected by Belle II during 2019–2022. The data corresponds to an integrated luminosity of . The decays are required to originate from the flavor-conserving decay to determine the charm flavor at production time. Control samples of decays, with or without an associated pion from a decay, are used to correct for detection asymmetries. The result, , where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic, is consistent with symmetry.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (48)
- M. Golden and B. Grinstein, Enhanced violations in hadronic charm decays, Phys. Lett. B 222, 501 (1989).
- F. Buccella, M. Lusignoli, G. Miele, A. Pugliese, and P. Santorelli, Nonleptonic weak decays of charmed mesons, Phys. Rev. D 51, 3478 (1995).
- S. Bianco, F. L. Fabbri, D. Benson, and I. Bigi, A cicerone for the physics of charm, Riv. Nuovo Cimento 26, 1 (2003).
- Y. Grossman, A. L. Kagan, and Y. Nir, New physics and violation in singly Cabibbo suppressed decays, Phys. Rev. D 75, 036008 (2007).
- M. Artuso, B. Meadows, and A. A. Petrov, Charm meson decays, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 58, 249 (2008).
- R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of violation in charm decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 211803 (2019).
- R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of the time-integrated asymmetry in decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 091802 (2023).
- M. Chala, A. Lenz, A. V. Rusov, and J. Scholtz, within the Standard Model and beyond, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2019) 161.
- A. Dery and Y. Nir, Implications of the LHCb discovery of violation in charm decays, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2019) 104.
- L. Calibbi, T. Li, Y. Li, and B. Zhu, Simple model for large violation in charm decays, -physics anomalies, muon and dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2020) 070.
- Y. Grossman and S. Schacht, The emergence of the rule in charm physics, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2019) 020.
- H.-Y. Cheng and C.-W. Chiang, Revisiting violation in and decays, Phys. Rev. D 100, 093002 (2019).
- A. J. Buras, P. Colangelo, F. De Fazio, and F. Loparco, The charm of 331, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2021) 021.
- S. Schacht and A. Soni, Enhancement of charm violation due to nearby resonances, Phys. Lett. B 825, 136855 (2022).
- I. Bediaga, T. Frederico, and P. C. Magalhães, Enhanced charm asymmetries from final state interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 051802 (2023).
- A. Pich, E. Solomonidi, and L. Vale Silva, Final-state interactions in the asymmetries of charm-meson two-body decays, Phys. Rev. D 108, 036026 (2023).
- M. Gavrilova, Y. Grossman, and S. Schacht, Determination of the ratio of penguin over tree diagrams, Phys. Rev. D 109, 033011 (2024).
- A. Lenz, M. L. Piscopo, and A. V. Rusov, Two body non-leptonic decays from LCSR and implications for , J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2024) 151.
- S. Schacht, A U-spin anomaly in charm violation, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2023) 205.
- Y. Grossman, A. L. Kagan, and J. Zupan, Testing for new physics in singly Cabibbo suppressed D decays, Phys. Rev. D 85, 114036 (2012).
- A. J. Bevan and B. T. Meadows, Bounding hadronic uncertainties in decays, Phys. Rev. D 90, 094028 (2014).
- D. Wang, Evidence of implies observable violation in the decay, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 279 (2023).
- Y. S. Amhis et al. (HFLAV Group), Averages of -hadron, -hadron, and -lepton properties as of 2021, Phys. Rev. D 107, 052008 (2023), updated results and plots available at https://hflav.web.cern.ch/.
- N. K. Nisar et al. (Belle Collaboration), Search for violation in decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 211601 (2014).
- R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Search for time-dependent violation in and decays, Phys. Rev. D 104, 072010 (2021).
- T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF Collaboration), Measurement of -violating asymmetries in and decays at CDF, Phys. Rev. D 85, 012009 (2012).
- F. A. Berends, K. J. F. Gaemers, and R. Gastmans, contribution to the angular asymmetry in , Nucl. Phys. B63, 381 (1973).
- R. W. Brown, K. O. Mikaelian, V. K. Cung, and E. A. Paschos, Electromagnetic background in the search for neutral weak currents via , Phys. Lett. 43B, 403 (1973).
- R. J. Cashmore, C. M. Hawkes, B. W. Lynn, and R. G. Stuart, The forward-backward asymmetry in comparisons between the theoretical calculations at the one loop level in the Standard Model and with the experimental measurements, Z. Phys. C 30, 125 (1986).
- T. Abe et al. (Belle II Collaboration), Belle II technical design report, arXiv:1011.0352.
- W. Altmannshofer et al., The Belle II physics book, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 123C01 (2019); (2020) 029201(E).
- K. Akai, K. Furukawa, and H. Koiso, SuperKEKB collider, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 907, 188 (2018).
- D. J. Lange, The evtgen particle decay simulation package, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 462, 152 (2001).
- S. Jadach, B. F. L. Ward, and Z. Wąs, The precision Monte Carlo event generator KK for two-fermion final states in collisions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 130, 260 (2000).
- T. Sjöstrand, S. Ask, J. R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten, S. Mrenna, S. Prestel, C. O. Rasmussen, and P. Z. Skands, An introduction to pythia 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191, 159 (2015).
- E. Barberio, B. van Eijk, and Z. Wąs, photos: A universal Monte Carlo for QED radiative corrections in decays, Comput. Phys. Commun. 66, 115 (1991).
- E. Barberio and Z. Wąs, photos: A universal Monte Carlo for QED radiative corrections. Version 2.0, Comput. Phys. Commun. 79, 291 (1994).
- S. Agostinelli et al. (geant4 Collaboration), geant4: A simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 506, 250 (2003).
- T. Kuhr et al. (Belle II Framework Software Group), The Belle II core software, Comput. Software Big Sci. 3, 1 (2019).
- Belle II Collaboration, Belle II analysis software framework (basf2), Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.5574115.
- S. Longo et al., CsI(Tl) pulse shape discrimination with the Belle II electromagnetic calorimeter as a novel method to improve particle identification at electron-positron colliders, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 982, 164562 (2020).
- J.-F. Krohn et al. (Belle II Analysis Software Group), Global decay chain vertex fitting at Belle II, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 976, 164269 (2020).
- F. Pedregosa et al., scikit-learn: Machine learning in python, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825 (2011), https://jmlr.csail.mit.edu/papers/v12/pedregosa11a.html.
- I. Adachi et al. (Belle II Collaboration), Charged-hadron identification at Belle II, arXiv:2506.04355.
- A. Rogozhnikov, Reweighting with boosted decision trees, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 762, 012036 (2016).
- M. Pivk and F. R. Le Diberder, sPlot: A statistical tool to unfold data distributions, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 555, 356 (2005).
- N. L. Johnson, Systems of frequency curves generated by methods of translation, Biometrika 36, 149 (1949).
- S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).