- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Characterizing heavy neutral leptons: Measuring parameters, discriminating Majorana versus Dirac, and using FASER2 as a trigger for ATLAS

Jonathan L. Feng*, Alec Hewitt†, Daniel La Rocco‡, and Daniel Whiteson§

  • *Contact author: jlf@uci.edu
  • †Contact author: ahewitt1@uci.edu
  • ‡Contact author: laroccod@uci.edu
  • §Contact author: daniel@uci.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 113, 035006 – Published 4 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/vbbq-fb1t

Abstract

This work explores the potential of the proposed FASER2 experiment at the LHC to determine the properties of a discovered heavy neutral lepton (HNL), including its mass, couplings, and whether it is a Majorana or Dirac fermion. We first consider a Majorana HNL with mass mN=1.84  GeV that is primarily produced through decays D→μN at the ATLAS interaction point. Such HNLs may travel macroscopic distances in the far-forward direction and then decay, yielding approximately 8600 N→μπ decays in FASER2 at the High-Luminosity LHC. With FASER2 measurements alone, the HNL’s mass and couplings can be measured to fractional uncertainties of approximately 0.1% and 3% at 95% confidence level (CL), respectively, and the Dirac fermion hypothesis can be rejected at 99.8% CL. We then consider a second, more difficult, case of a Majorana HNL with mass mN=2.00  GeV, yielding only 80 N→μπ decays in FASER2. With FASER2 alone, measurements of HNL properties are still possible, but somewhat less precise. However, by using FASER2 as a trigger for ATLAS and measuring the charge of the muon produced in association with the HNL at ATLAS to search for lepton number violation, one can precisely measure the HNL’s properties and reject the Dirac fermion hypothesis at 99.7% CL. These results show that FASER2, sometimes in coordination with ATLAS, can precisely determine HNL properties, with far-reaching implications for our understanding of neutrino masses, baryogenesis, and the fundamental symmetries of nature.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (65)

  1. S. Weinberg, Baryon and lepton nonconserving processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1566 (1979).
  2. M.-C. Chen and J. Huang, TeV scale models of neutrino masses and their phenomenology, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 26, 1147 (2011).
  3. S. F. King, Models of neutrino mass, mixing and CP violation, J. Phys. G 42, 123001 (2015).
  4. A. de Gouvêa, Neutrino mass models, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 66, 197 (2016).
  5. M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, Baryogenesis without grand unification, Phys. Lett. B 174, 45 (1986).
  6. S. Davidson, E. Nardi, and Y. Nir, Leptogenesis, Phys. Rep. 466, 105 (2008).
  7. J. E. Gunn, B. W. Lee, I. Lerche, D. N. Schramm, and G. Steigman, Some astrophysical consequences of the existence of a heavy stable neutral lepton, Astrophys. J. 223, 1015 (1978).
  8. S. Dodelson and L. M. Widrow, Sterile-neutrinos as dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 17 (1994).
  9. K. N. Abazajian, Sterile neutrinos in cosmology, Phys. Rep. 711–712, 1 (2017).
  10. A. Boyarsky, M. Drewes, T. Lasserre, S. Mertens, and O. Ruchayskiy, Sterile neutrino dark matter, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 104, 1 (2019).
  11. J. D. Bjorken and C. H. Llewellyn Smith, Spontaneously broken gauge theories of weak interactions and heavy leptons, Phys. Rev. D 7, 887 (1973).
  12. R. Shrock, Decay L0→νlγ in gauge theories of weak and electromagnetic interactions, Phys. Rev. D 9, 743 (1974).
  13. R. E. Shrock, New tests for, and bounds on, neutrino masses and lepton mixing, Phys. Lett. 96B, 159 (1980).
  14. R. E. Shrock, General theory of weak leptonic and semileptonic decays. 1. Leptonic pseudoscalar meson decays, with associated tests for, and bounds on, neutrino masses and lepton mixing, Phys. Rev. D 24, 1232 (1981).
  15. R. E. Shrock, General theory of weak processes involving neutrinos. 2. Pure leptonic decays, Phys. Rev. D 24, 1275 (1981).
  16. S. Böser, C. Buck, C. Giunti, J. Lesgourgues, L. Ludhova, S. Mertens, A. Schukraft, and M. Wurm, Status of light sterile neutrino searches, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 111, 103736 (2020).
  17. E. Fernández-Martínez, M. González-López, J. Hernández-García, M. Hostert, and J. López-Pavón, Effective portals to heavy neutral leptons, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2023) 001.
  18. J. L. Feng, I. Galon, F. Kling, and S. Trojanowski, ForwArd search ExpeRiment at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 97, 035001 (2018).
  19. H. Abreu et al. (FASER Collaboration), The FASER detector, J. Instrum. 19, P05066 (2024).
  20. O. Salin, A. Barr, J. McFayden, J. Boyd, M. Vranjes Milosavljevic, N. Vranjes, M. D’Onofrio, C. Gwilliam, J. K. Anders, S. Jakobsen, H. Otono, M. Queitsch-Maitland, B. J. Wilson, K. Lohwasser, M. V. Diwan, M. Vicenzi, and W. Wu, FASER2: Detector design and performance, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2927003.
  21. J. L. Feng et al., The forward physics facility at the High-Luminosity LHC, J. Phys. G 50, 030501 (2023).
  22. J. Adhikary et al., Scientific program for the forward physics facility, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 430 (2025).
  23. L. A. Anchordoqui et al. (FPF Collaboration), The forward physics facility at the large hadron collider, arXiv:2503.19010.
  24. F. Kling and S. Trojanowski, Heavy neutral leptons at FASER, Phys. Rev. D 97, 095016 (2018).
  25. J. C. Helo, M. Hirsch, and Z. S. Wang, Heavy neutral fermions at the high-luminosity LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 056.
  26. A. Ariga et al. (FASER Collaboration), FASER’s physics reach for long-lived particles, Phys. Rev. D 99, 095011 (2019).
  27. G. Cottin, J. C. Helo, M. Hirsch, A. Titov, and Z. S. Wang, Heavy neutral leptons in effective field theory and the high-luminosity LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2021) 039.
  28. Y.-n. Mao, K. Wang, and Z. S. Wang, Can we discover lepton number violation with the LHC far detectors?, Phys. Rev. D 108, 095025 (2023).
  29. H. K. Dreiner, D. Köhler, S. Nangia, M. Schürmann, and Z. S. Wang, Recasting bounds on long-lived heavy neutral leptons in terms of a light supersymmetric R-parity violating neutralino, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2023) 058.
  30. J. L. Feng, A. Hewitt, F. Kling, and D. La Rocco, Simulating heavy neutral leptons with general couplings at collider and fixed target experiments, Phys. Rev. D 110, 035029 (2024).
  31. Z. S. Wang, Y. Zhang, and W. Liu, Searching for heavy neutral leptons coupled to axion-like particles at the LHC far detectors and SHiP, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2025) 070.
  32. N. Bernal, K. Deka, and M. Losada, Heavy neutral leptons without prejudice, Phys. Rev. D 111, 075031 (2025).
  33. S. K. A, S. Das, A. Das, and S. Mandal, Right handed neutrino production from Z′ interactions in forward search experiments, Phys. Rev. D 112, 115045 (2025).
  34. F. Kling, T. Mäkelä, and S. Trojanowski, Investigating the fluxes and physics potential of LHC neutrino experiments, Phys. Rev. D 108, 095020 (2023).
  35. J.-L. Tastet and I. Timiryasov, Dirac vs Majorana HNLs (and their oscillations) at SHiP, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2020) 005.
  36. O. Mikulenko and M. Marinichenko, Measuring lepton number violation in heavy neutral lepton decays at the future muon collider, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2024) 032.
  37. P. D. Bolton, F. F. Deppisch, M. Rai, and Z. Zhang, Probing the nature of heavy neutral leptons in direct searches and neutrinoless double beta decay, Nucl. Phys. B1010, 116785 (2025).
  38. M. Drewes, Distinguishing Dirac and Majorana heavy neutrinos at lepton colliders, Proc. Sci. ICHEP2022 (2022) 608 [arXiv:2210.17110].
  39. D. Abbaneo et al. (SND@LHC Collaboration), Input from the SND@LHC Collaboration to the 2026 update to the European strategy for particle physics, arXiv:2503.24233.
  40. S. K. A., A. Datta, and D. Marfatia, Distinguishing between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos at FASER, arXiv:2508.00170.
  41. B. Pontecorvo, Tagging direct neutrinos. A first step to neutrino tagging, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 25, 257 (1979).
  42. E. Cortina Gil et al. (NA62 Collaboration), First detection of a tagged neutrino in the NA62 experiment, Phys. Lett. B 863, 139345 (2025).
  43. A. Barr and I. Vivarelli (private communication).
  44. F. Kling and S. Trojanowski, Forward experiment sensitivity estimator for the LHC and future hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 104, 035012 (2021).
  45. S. Ostapchenko, Monte Carlo treatment of hadronic interactions in enhanced Pomeron scheme: I. qgsjet-II model, Phys. Rev. D 83, 014018 (2011).
  46. F. Riehn, R. Engel, A. Fedynitch, T. K. Gaisser, and T. Stanev, Hadronic interaction model Sibyll 2.3d and extensive air showers, Phys. Rev. D 102, 063002 (2020).
  47. C. Bierlich et al., A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3, SciPost Phys. Codebases 2022, 8 (2022).
  48. L. Buonocore, F. Kling, L. Rottoli, and J. Sominka, Predictions for neutrinos and new physics from forward heavy hadron production at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 363 (2024).
  49. J. L. Feng, A. Hewitt, F. Kling, and D. La Rocco, hnlcalc: Github repository, https://github.com/laroccod/HNLCalc (2024).
  50. G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1554 (2011).
  51. R. Mammen Abraham et al. (FASER Collaboration), First measurement of the muon neutrino interaction cross section and flux as a function of energy at the LHC with FASER, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 211801 (2025).
  52. G. Apollinari, O. Brüning, T. Nakamoto, and L. Rossi, High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC): Preliminary Design Report, Technical Report FERMILAB-DESIGN-2015-02, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, 2015. https://lss.fnal.gov/archive/design/fermilab-design-2015-02.pdf.
  53. I. Zurbano Fernandez et al., High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC), CERN Technical Design Report No. CERN-2020-010, https://e-publishing.cern.ch/index.php/CYRM/issue/view/127.
  54. ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS Phase-II Upgrade Scoping Document, Technical report, CERN, Geneva, 2015, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2055248.
  55. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Expected performance of the ATLAS experiment—detector, trigger and physics, arXiv:0901.0512.
  56. A. Henriques, The ATLAS tile calorimeter, Technical Report ATL-TILECAL-PROC-2015-002, CERN, 2015, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2004868/files/ATL-TILECAL-PROC-2015-002.pdf.
  57. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Operation and performance of the ATLAS tile calorimeter in LHC run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1313 (2024).
  58. ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the ATLAS hadronic endcap calorimeter in beam tests: Selected results, Technical Report ATL-LARG-PUB-2022-001, CERN, 2022, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2811731/files/ATL-LARG-PUB-2022-001.pdf.
  59. D. M. Gingrich et al., Construction assembly and testing of the ATLAS hadronic end-cap calorimeter, J. Instrum. 2, P05005 (2007).
  60. A. Henriques (ATLAS Collaboration), The ATLAS Tile Calorimeter, Technical Report ATL-TILECAL-PROC-2015-002, CERN, 2015, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2004868/files/ATL-TILECAL-PROC-2015-002.pdf.
  61. F. Pastore (ATLAS Collaboration), ATLAS TDAQ upgrades for Phase-2, Technical Report ATL-DAQ-PROC-2024-008, CERN, 2024, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2907275/files/ATL-DAQ-PROC-2024-008.pdf.
  62. ATLAS Collaboration, Technical design report for the Phase-II upgrade of the ATLAS TDAQ system, Report No. CERN-LHCC-2017-020, ATLAS-TDR-029, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2285584/files/ATLAS-TDR-029.pdf.
  63. ATLAS Collaboration, Technical design report for the Phase-II upgrade of the ATLAS muon spectrometer, Report No. CERN-LHCC-2017-017, ATLAS-TDR-026, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2285580/files/ATLAS-TDR-026.pdf.
  64. M. Drewes, J. Klarić, and J. López-Pavón, New benchmark models for heavy neutral lepton searches, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 1176 (2022).
  65. J. Feng, A. Hewitt, D. LaRocco, and D. Whiteson, Characterizing HNL Data (2026), 10.5281/zenodo.18176599.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 113, 035006– Published 4 February, 2026
  • Received 30 October 2025
  • Accepted 12 January 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation