Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Constraints on new physics from decays of polarized Λb0 baryons at the FCC-ee

Anja Beck1,*, Mero Elmarassy1, Asher Sabbagh1, Michal Kreps2, and Eluned Smith1

  • 1Department of Physics and Laboratory for Nuclear Science, MIT, Cambridge, 02139, Massachusetts, USA
  • 2Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, West Midlands, United Kingdom

  • *Contact author: anbeck@mit.edu

Phys. Rev. D 113, 055005 – Published 3 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/tx1d-vyqk

Abstract

The Z0 bosons produced in electron-positron collisions at the potential Future Circular Collider (FCC-ee) provide unique opportunities for flavor physics. The nonzero polarization of Λb0 baryons produced in Z0 decays enables access to a much larger set of observables than at the LHC, where the Λb0 baryons are produced unpolarized. This paper presents a toy angular analysis of Λb0→Λ(→pπ−)μ+μ− decays using simulation samples of collisions at the FCC-ee reconstructed using the IDEA detector concept and assuming a dataset of 6×1012 Z0 bosons. While the statistical sensitivity achieved for individual angular observables is not expected to significantly exceed that from the LHCb Upgrade II experiment, the addition of the polarized observables leads to a significant improvement of the knowledge on the Wilson coefficients C9(′) and C10(′).

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (42)

  1. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Angular analysis of the B0→K*(892)0μ+μ− decay in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, Phys. Lett. B 864, 139406 (2025).
  2. S. Wehle et al. (Belle Collaboration), Lepton-flavor-dependent angular analysis of B→K*ℓ+ℓ−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 111801 (2017).
  3. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Angular analysis of Bd0→K*μ+μ− decays in pp collisions at s=8  TeV with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 047.
  4. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of CP-averaged observables in the B0→K*0μ+μ− decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 011802 (2020).
  5. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Differential branching fraction and angular analysis of the decay Bs0→ϕμ+μ−, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2013) 084.
  6. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Angular analysis and differential branching fraction of the decay Bs0→ϕμ+μ−, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2015) 179.
  7. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Branching fraction measurements of the rare Bs0→ϕμ+μ− and Bs0→f2′(1525)μ+μ− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 151801 (2021).
  8. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Differential branching fractions and isospin asymmetries of B0→K(*)μ+μ− decays, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2014) 133.
  9. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Angular analysis of the B+→K*+μ+μ− decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 161802 (2021).
  10. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Amplitude analysis of the B0→K*0μ+μ− decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 131801 (2024).
  11. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Comprehensive analysis of local and nonlocal amplitudes in the B0→K*0μ+μ− decay, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 026.
  12. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Test of lepton flavor universality in B±→K±μ+μ− and B±→K±e+e− decays in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, Rep. Prog. Phys. 87, 077802 (2024).
  13. J. P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration, Measurement of branching fractions and rate asymmetries in the rare decays B→K(*)ℓ+ℓ−, Phys. Rev. D 86, 032012 (2012).
  14. S. Choudhury et al. (Belle Collaboration), Test of lepton flavor universality and search for lepton flavor violation in B→Kℓℓ decays, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 105.
  15. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Test of lepton universality using B+→K+ℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 151601 (2014).
  16. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Test of lepton universality with B0→K*0ℓ+ℓ− decays, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2017) 055.
  17. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Test of lepton universality using Λb0→pK−ℓ+ℓ− decays, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2020) 040.
  18. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Test of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays, Nat. Phys. 18, 277 (2022).
  19. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Tests of lepton universality using B0→KS0ℓ+ℓ− and B+→K*+ℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 191802 (2022).
  20. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of lepton universality parameters in B+→K+ℓ+ℓ− and B0→K*0ℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. D 108, 032002 (2023).
  21. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Test of lepton universality in b→sℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 051803 (2023).
  22. W. Detmold, C. J. D. Lin, S. Meinel, and M. Wingate, Λb→Λℓ+ℓ− form factors and differential branching fraction from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 87, 074502 (2013).
  23. D. Abbaneo et al. (ALEPH, CDF, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD Collaborations), Combined results on b hadron production rates and decay properties, arXiv:hep-ex/0112028.
  24. M. Benedikt, Future circular collider feasibility study report volume 1: Physics and experiments (2025), 10.17181/CERN.9DKX.TDH9.
  25. T. Blake and M. Kreps, Angular distribution of polarised Λb baryons decaying to Λℓ+ℓ−, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2017) 138.
  26. T. Sjöstrand, S. Ask, J. R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten, S. Mrenna, S. Prestel, C. O. Rasmussen, and P. Z. Skands, An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191, 159 (2015).
  27. D. J. Lange, The EvtGen particle decay simulation package, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 462, 152 (2001).
  28. A. J. Buras, M. Misiak, M. Munz, and S. Pokorski, Theoretical uncertainties and phenomenological aspects of B→X(s)γ decay, Nucl. Phys. B 424, 374 (1994).
  29. A. J. Buras and M. Munz, Effective Hamiltonian for B→X(s)e+e− beyond leading logarithms in the NDR and HV schemes, Phys. Rev. D 52, 186 (1995).
  30. C. Bobeth, G. Hiller, D. van Dyk, and C. Wacker, The decay B→Kℓ+ℓ− at low hadronic recoil and model-independent ΔB=1 constraints, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2012) 107.
  31. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Angular analysis of charged and neutral B0→Kμ+μ− decays, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2014) 082.
  32. M. Abbrescia et al. (IDEA Study Group Collaboration), The IDEA detector concept for FCC-ee, arXiv:2502.21223.
  33. J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaître, A. Mertens, and M. Selvaggi (DELPHES 3 Collaboration), DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2014) 057.
  34. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group Collaboration), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  35. G. Abbiendi et al. (OPAL Collaboration), Production rates of bb¯ quark pairs from gluons and bb¯bb¯ events in hadronic Z0 decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 18, 447 (2001).
  36. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Strong constraints on the b→sγ photon polarisation from B0→K*0e+e− decays, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2020) 081.
  37. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Constraints on the photon polarisation in b→sγ transitions using Bs0→ϕe+e− decays, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2025) 047.
  38. Y. S. Amhis et al. (HFLAV Collaboration), Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ-lepton properties as of 2018, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 226 (2021).
  39. H.-Y. Jiang and F.-S. Yu, Fragmentation-fraction ratio fΞb/fΛb in b- and c-baryon decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 224 (2018).
  40. M. Benedikt et al. (FCC Collaboration), Future circular collider feasibility study report: Volume 2, accelerators, technical infrastructure and safety, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 234, 5713 (2025).
  41. T. Chen and C. Guestrin, xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system, in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD ’16 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 2016), pp. 785–794, 10.1145/2939672.2939785.
  42. D. M. Straub, flavio: A python package for flavour and precision phenomenology in the standard model and beyond, arXiv:1810.08132.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation