Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Scalar effective potentials in de Sitter spacetime

Lucas Vicente García-Consuegra*

Arttu Rajantie†

  • Theoretical Physics Department, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland and Abdus Salam Centre for Theoretical Physics, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom

  • *Contact author: lucas.vicente_garcia-consuegra@kcl.ac.uk
  • †Contact author: a.rajantie@imperial.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. D 113, 125016 – Published 12 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/tkw7-dkq6

Abstract

We investigate two different definitions of a scalar field effective potential in quantum field theory in de Sitter spacetime: the standard textbook definition, and the constraint effective potential proposed by O’Raifeartaigh et al. in 1986. While these definitions are equivalent in Minkowski spacetime, they differ significantly in de Sitter spacetime. We demonstrate this by computing them both explicitly at one-loop order in perturbation theory. It is well known that the perturbative expansion of the standard effective potential fails to converge for light fields. In contrast, the constraint effective potential does not suffer from this infrared problem, and it can therefore be computed using perturbation theory. We discuss the physical interpretation of the two effective potentials. In particular, we provide evidence supporting an earlier conjecture that the constraint effective potential is the correct one to use in the stochastic Starobinsky-Yokoyama theory.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (49)

  1. S. R. Coleman and E. J. Weinberg, Radiative corrections as the origin of spontaneous symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 7, 1888 (1973).
  2. J. Goldstone, A. Salam, and S. Weinberg, Broken symmetries, Phys. Rev. 127, 965 (1962).
  3. B. S. DeWitt, Dynamical theory of groups and fields, Conf. Proc. C 630701, 585 (1964).
  4. G. Jona-Lasinio, Relativistic field theories with symmetry breaking solutions, Nuovo Cimento 34, 1790 (1964).
  5. R. Jackiw, Functional evaluation of the effective potential, Phys. Rev. D 9, 1686 (1974).
  6. G. M. Shore, Radiatively induced spontaneous symmetry breaking and phase transitions in curved space-time, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 128, 376 (1980).
  7. B. Allen, Phase transitions in de Sitter space, Nucl. Phys. B226, 228 (1983).
  8. P. Athron, C. Balázs, A. Fowlie, L. Morris, and L. Wu, Cosmological phase transitions: From perturbative particle physics to gravitational waves, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 135, 104094 (2024).
  9. T. Markkanen, A. Rajantie, and S. Stopyra, Cosmological aspects of Higgs vacuum metastability, Front. Astron. Space Sci. 5, 40 (2018).
  10. A. H. Guth and S. Y. Pi, Fluctuations in the new inflationary universe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1110 (1982).
  11. S. W. Hawking and I. G. Moss, Fluctuations in the inflationary universe, Nucl. Phys. B224, 180 (1983).
  12. J. M. Bardeen, P. J. Steinhardt, and M. S. Turner, Spontaneous creation of almost scale—free density perturbations in an inflationary universe, Phys. Rev. D 28, 679 (1983).
  13. A. A. Starobinsky, Stochastic de Sitter (inflationary) stage in the early universe, Lect. Notes Phys. 246, 107 (1986).
  14. A. A. Starobinsky and J. Yokoyama, Equilibrium state of a selfinteracting scalar field in the de Sitter background, Phys. Rev. D 50, 6357 (1994).
  15. B. Allen, Vacuum states in de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D 32, 3136 (1985).
  16. B. Allen and A. Folacci, The massless minimally coupled scalar field in de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D 35, 3771 (1987).
  17. A. Folacci, BRST quantization of the massless minimally coupled scalar field in de Sitter space: Zero modes, euclideanization and quantization, Phys. Rev. D 46, 2553 (1992).
  18. A. Riotto and M. S. Sloth, On resumming inflationary perturbations beyond one-loop, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2008) 030.
  19. A. Rajaraman, On the proper treatment of massless fields in euclidean de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D 82, 123522 (2010).
  20. J. Serreau, Effective potential for quantum scalar fields on a de Sitter geometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 191103 (2011).
  21. T. Prokopec, Symmetry breaking and the Goldstone theorem in de Sitter space, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2011) 023.
  22. T. Arai, Nonperturbative infrared effects for light scalar fields in de Sitter space, Classical Quantum Gravity 29, 215014 (2012).
  23. M. Beneke and P. Moch, On “dynamical mass” generation in Euclidean de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D 87, 064018 (2013).
  24. A. Youssef and D. Kreimer, Resummation of infrared logarithms in de Sitter space via Dyson-Schwinger equations: The ladder-rainbow approximation, Phys. Rev. D 89, 124021 (2014).
  25. T. Arai, Effective potential and Goldstone bosons in de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D 88, 064029 (2013).
  26. D. L. Lopez Nacir, F. D. Mazzitelli, and L. G. Trombetta, Hartree approximation in curved spacetimes revisited: The effective potential in de Sitter spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 89, 024006 (2014).
  27. B. Garbrecht, F. Gautier, G. Rigopoulos, and Y. Zhu, Feynman diagrams for stochastic inflation and quantum field theory in de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D 91, 063520 (2015).
  28. M. Guilleux and J. Serreau, Quantum scalar fields in de Sitter space from the nonperturbative renormalization group, Phys. Rev. D 92, 084010 (2015).
  29. I. Moss and G. Rigopoulos, Effective long wavelength scalar dynamics in de Sitter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2017) 009.
  30. T. Markkanen, S. Nurmi, A. Rajantie, and S. Stopyra, The 1-loop effective potential for the standard model in curved spacetime, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2018) 040,
  31. G. Moreau and J. Serreau, Backreaction of superhorizon scalar field fluctuations on a de Sitter geometry: A renormalization group perspective, Phys. Rev. D 99, 025011 (2019).
  32. S. Céspedes, A.-C. Davis, and D.-G. Wang, On the IR divergences in de Sitter space: Loops, resummation and the semi-classical wavefunction, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2024) 004,
  33. L. Di Pietro, V. Gorbenko, and S. Komatsu, Cosmological correlators at finite coupling, arXiv:2312.17195.
  34. J. Huenupi, E. Hughes, G. A. Palma, and S. Sypsas, Regularizing infrared divergences in de Sitter spacetime: Loops, dimensional regularization, and cutoffs, Phys. Rev. D 110, 123536 (2024).
  35. V. Nath, K. Roy, and S. Bhattacharya, Spontaneous symmetry breaking induced by curvature: Analysis via the nonperturbative 2PI Hartree approximation, Phys. Rev. D 112, 025017 (2025).
  36. J. E. Camargo-Molina, M. Carrillo González, and A. Rajantie, Phase transitions in de Sitter spacetimes: Quantum corrections, Phys. Rev. D 107, 063533 (2023).
  37. L. O’Raifeartaigh, A. Wipf, and H. Yoneyama, The constraint effective potential, Nucl. Phys. B271, 653 (1986).
  38. N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1982).
  39. L. E. Parker and D. Toms, Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime: Quantized Field and Gravity, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2009).
  40. G. Gibbons, S. Hawking, and M. Perry, Path integrals and the indefiniteness of the gravitational action, Nucl. Phys. B138, 141 (1978).
  41. V. S. Adamchik, Polygamma functions of negative order, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 100, 191 (1998).
  42. S. W. Hawking and I. G. Moss, Supercooled phase transitions in the very early universe, Phys. Lett. 110B, 35 (1982).
  43. T. S. Bunch and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum field theory in de Sitter space: Renormalization by point splitting, Proc. R. Soc. A 360, 117 (1978).
  44. T. Markkanen, A. Rajantie, S. Stopyra, and T. Tenkanen, Scalar correlation functions in de Sitter space from the stochastic spectral expansion, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2019) 001.
  45. A. Cable and A. Rajantie, Free scalar correlators in de Sitter space via the stochastic approach beyond the slow-roll approximation, Phys. Rev. D 104, 103511 (2021).
  46. A. Cable and A. Rajantie, Second-order stochastic theory for self-interacting scalar fields in de Sitter spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 106, 123522 (2022).
  47. A. Cable and A. Rajantie, Stochastic parameters for scalar fields in de Sitter spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 109, 045017 (2024).
  48. R. C. Brower, M. Cheng, G. T. Fleming, A. D. Gasbarro, T. G. Raben, C.-I. Tan, and E. S. Weinberg, Lattice ϕ4 field theory on Riemann manifolds: Numerical tests for the 2-d Ising CFT on S2, Phys. Rev. D 98, 014502 (2018).
  49. R. C. Brower, G. T. Fleming, A. D. Gasbarro, D. Howarth, T. G. Raben, C.-I. Tan, and E. S. Weinberg, Radial lattice quantization of 3D ϕ4 field theory, Phys. Rev. D 104, 094502 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation