Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Holography for QCD with fermionic matter in the adjoint and fundamental representations

Anja Alfano, Nick Evans, and Wanxiang Fan

Phys. Rev. D 112, 126003 – Published 2 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/t5kl-tspc

Abstract

We discuss confinement and chiral symmetry breaking in SU(Nc) gauge theories with fermions in the adjoint representation. There has been considerable work on studying these theories compactified on a small circle (with compactification scale 1/L large relative to the strong coupling scale of the theory). The weakly coupled IR theory of photons exhibits confinement through a density of magnetically charged instanton configurations. As the compactification scale 1/L approaches the strong coupling scale, the IR theory becomes strongly coupled. In this regime we propose a holographic description of the IR degrees of freedom. The instanton condensation scale can be associated with a scale at which the Brietenlohner-Freedman (BF) bound is violated in the model and the glueball spectrum is computed. We can also introduce the adjoint fermions which holographically display a BF bound violation associated with their running anomalous dimension. Very naively extending the perturbative results to the nonperturbative regime suggests that chiral symmetry breaking might occur ahead of confinement, but equally they may be joined phenomena. If the two phenomena are separate, then it would be useful to be able to enlarge the gap in scales. We propose adding fermions in the fundamental representation as well, which in a holographic model (that favors this separation) can greatly enlarge the gap to an order of magnitude. These results challenge the lattice community to seek such scale gaps (or their absence) to further understand the confining and chiral symmetry breaking dynamics.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (39)

  1. V. A. Miransky, Nuovo Cimento A 90, 149 (1985).
  2. T. W. Appelquist, D. Karabali, and L. C. R. Wijewardhana, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 957 (1986).
  3. A. G. Cohen and H. Georgi, Nucl. Phys. B314, 7 (1989).
  4. T. Appelquist, J. Terning, and L. C. R. Wijewardhana, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1214 (1996).
  5. T. A. Ryttov and F. Sannino, Phys. Rev. D 78, 065001 (2008).
  6. F. Sannino, Phys. Rev. D 79, 096007 (2009).
  7. W. J. Marciano, Phys. Rev. D 21, 2425 (1980).
  8. N. Evans and K. S. Rigatos, Phys. Rev. D 103, 094022 (2021).
  9. M. Jarvinen and E. Kiritsis, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2012) 002.
  10. D. Kutasov, J. Lin, and A. Parnachev, Nucl. Phys. B858, 155 (2012).
  11. R. Alvares, N. Evans, and K. Y. Kim, Phys. Rev. D 86, 026008 (2012).
  12. A. Hasenfratz, E. T. Neil, Y. Shamir, B. Svetitsky, and O. Witzel, Phys. Rev. D 108, L071503 (2023).
  13. T. Appelquist et al. (LSD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 90, 114502 (2014).
  14. N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B426, 19 (1994); B430, 485(E) (1994).
  15. M. Unsal, Phys. Rev. D 80, 065001 (2009).
  16. M. Unsal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 032005 (2008).
  17. E. Poppitz, Symmetry 14, 180 (2022).
  18. E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 253 (1998).
  19. P. Breitenlohner and D. Z. Freedman, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 144, 249 (1982).
  20. J. Babington, J. Erdmenger, N. J. Evans, Z. Guralnik, and I. Kirsch, Phys. Rev. D 69, 066007 (2004).
  21. T. Albash, V. G. Filev, C. V. Johnson, and A. Kundu, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2008) 080.
  22. J. Rantaharju, Phys. Rev. D 93, 094516 (2016).
  23. A. Athenodorou, E. Bennett, G. Bergner, P. Butti, J. Lenz, and B. Lucini, arXiv:2408.00171.
  24. E. Bennett, A. Athenodorou, G. Bergner, P. Butti, and B. Lucini, Proc. Sci., LATTICE2024 (2025) 432 [arXiv:2410.19484].
  25. G. Veneziano and S. Yankielowicz, Phys. Lett. 113B, 231 (1982).
  26. A. Alfano and N. Evans, Phys. Rev. D 111, 026001 (2025).
  27. K. Demmouche, F. Farchioni, A. Ferling, I. Montvay, G. Munster, E. E. Scholz, and J. Wuilloud, Eur. Phys. J. C 69, 147 (2010).
  28. S. Ali, G. Bergner, H. Gerber, P. Giudice, I. Montvay, G. Münster, S. Piemonte, and P. Scior, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 113.
  29. S. Ali, G. Bergner, H. Gerber, I. Montvay, G. Münster, S. Piemonte, and P. Scior, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 221601 (2019).
  30. M. Steinhauser, A. Sternbeck, B. Wellegehausen, and A. Wipf, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 154.
  31. G. Bergner and S. Piemonte, Phys. Rev. D 103, 014503 (2021); 107, 019902(E) (2023).
  32. K. M. Lee and P. Yi, Phys. Rev. D 56, 3711 (1997).
  33. T. C. Kraan and P. van Baal, Nucl. Phys. B533, 627 (1998).
  34. J. Erlich, E. Katz, D. T. Son, and M. A. Stephanov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 261602 (2005).
  35. A. Karch and E. Katz, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2002) 043.
  36. M. Kruczenski, D. Mateos, R. C. Myers, and D. J. Winters, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2003) 049.
  37. J. Erdmenger, N. Evans, I. Kirsch, and E. Threlfall, Eur. Phys. J. A 35, 81 (2008).
  38. T. Alho, N. Evans, and K. Tuominen, Phys. Rev. D 88, 105016 (2013).
  39. Data files for the paper: A. Alfano, N. Evans, and W. Fan (2025), https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/506555.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation