- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Measurement of single charged pion production in charged-current νμ-Ar interactions with the MicroBooNE detector

P. Abratenko38, D. Andrade Aldana14, L. Arellano22, J. Asaadi37, A. Ashkenazi36, S. Balasubramanian12, B. Baller12, A. Barnard29, G. Barr29 et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration*)

G. Barr29, D. Barrow29, J. Barrow26, V. Basque12, J. Bateman15,22, B. Behera34, O. Benevides Rodrigues14, S. Berkman25, A. Bhat7, M. Bhattacharya12, V. Bhelande20, M. Bishai3, A. Blake19, B. Bogart24, T. Bolton18, M. B. Brunetti17,40, L. Camilleri10, D. Caratelli4, F. Cavanna12, G. Cerati12, A. Chappell40, Y. Chen33, J. M. Conrad23, M. Convery33, L. Cooper-Troendle30, J. I. Crespo-Anadón6, R. Cross40, M. Del Tutto12, S. R. Dennis5, P. Detje5, A. Devitt19, R. Diurba2, Z. Djurcic1, K. Duffy29, S. Dytman30, B. Eberly35, P. Englezos32, A. Ereditato7,12, J. J. Evans22, C. Fang4, W. Foreman14,20, B. T. Fleming7, D. Franco7, A. P. Furmanski26, F. Gao4, D. Garcia-Gamez13, S. Gardiner12, G. Ge10, S. Gollapinni20, E. Gramellini22, P. Green29, H. Greenlee12, L. Gu19, W. Gu3, R. Guenette22, P. Guzowski22, L. Hagaman7, M. D. Handley5, O. Hen23, C. Hilgenberg26, G. A. Horton-Smith18, A. Hussain18, B. Irwin26, M. S. Ismail30, C. James12, X. Ji27, J. H. Jo3, R. A. Johnson8, D. Kalra10, G. Karagiorgi10, W. Ketchum12, M. Kirby3, T. Kobilarcik12, K. Kumar10, N. Lane15,22, J.-Y. Li11, Y. Li3, K. Lin32, B. R. Littlejohn14, L. Liu12, W. C. Louis20, X. Luo4, T. Mahmud19, N. Majeed18, C. Mariani39, J. Marshall40, N. Martinez18, D. A. Martinez Caicedo34, S. Martynenko3, A. Mastbaum32, I. Mawby19, N. McConkey31, L. Mellet25, J. Mendez21, J. Micallef23,38, A. Mogan9, T. Mohayai16, M. Mooney9, A. F. Moor5, C. D. Moore12, L. Mora Lepin22, M. M. Moudgalya22, S. Mulleriababu2, D. Naples30, A. Navrer-Agasson15, N. Nayak3, M. Nebot-Guinot11, C. Nguyen32, J. Nowak19, N. Oza10, O. Palamara12, N. Pallat26, V. Paolone30, A. Papadopoulou1, V. Papavassiliou28, H. B. Parkinson11, S. F. Pate28, N. Patel19, Z. Pavlovic12, E. Piasetzky36, K. Pletcher25, I. Pophale19, X. Qian3, J. L. Raaf12, V. Radeka3, A. Rafique1, M. Reggiani-Guzzo11, J. Rodriguez Rondon34, M. Rosenberg38, M. Ross-Lonergan20, I. Safa10, D. W. Schmitz7, A. Schukraft12, W. Seligman10, M. H. Shaevitz10, R. Sharankova12, J. Shi5, A. Smith5, E. L. Snider12, S. Söldner-Rembold15, J. Spitz24, M. Stancari12, J. St. John12, T. Strauss12, A. M. Szelc11, N. Taniuchi5, K. Terao33, C. Thorpe22, D. Torbunov3, D. Totani4, M. Toups12, A. Trettin22, Y.-T. Tsai33, J. Tyler18, M. A. Uchida5, T. Usher33, B. Viren3, J. Wang27, M. Weber2, H. Wei21, A. J. White7, S. Wolbers12, T. Wongjirad38, K. Wresilo5, W. Wu30, E. Yandel4,20, T. Yang12, L. E. Yates12, H. W. Yu3, G. P. Zeller12, J. Zennamo12, and C. Zhang3 (MicroBooNE Collaboration*)

  • 1Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Lemont, Illinois 60439, USA
  • 2Universität Bern, Bern CH-3012, Switzerland
  • 3Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, New York 11973, USA
  • 4University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA
  • 5University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0HE, United Kingdom
  • 6Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), Madrid E-28040, Spain
  • 7University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
  • 8University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA
  • 9Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA
  • 10Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA
  • 11University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FD, United Kingdom
  • 12Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL), Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
  • 13Universidad de Granada, Granada E-18071, Spain
  • 14Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT), Chicago, Illinois 60616, USA
  • 15Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
  • 16Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
  • 17The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA
  • 18Kansas State University (KSU), Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA
  • 19Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW, United Kingdom
  • 20Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
  • 21Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA
  • 22The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
  • 23Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
  • 24University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
  • 25Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
  • 26University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
  • 27Nankai University, Nankai District, Tianjin 300071, China
  • 28New Mexico State University (NMSU), Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003, USA
  • 29University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RH, United Kingdom
  • 30University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA
  • 31Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom
  • 32Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA
  • 33SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA
  • 34South Dakota School of Mines and Technology (SDSMT), Rapid City, South Dakota 57701, USA
  • 35University of Southern Maine, Portland, Maine 04104, USA
  • 36Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel, 69978
  • 37University of Texas, Arlington, Texas 76019, USA
  • 38Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA
  • 39Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
  • 40University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom

  • *Contact author: microboone_info@fnal.gov
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 113, 032007 – Published 10 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/t2cw-cdx2

Abstract

We present flux-integrated charged-current νμ cross-section measurements on argon for final states containing exactly one π± and no other hadrons except nucleons. The analysis uses data from the MicroBooNE experiment in the Booster Neutrino Beam, corresponding to 1.11×1021 protons on target. Total and single-differential cross-section measurements are provided within a phase space restricted to muon momenta above 150 MeV, pion momenta above 100 MeV, and muon-pion opening angles smaller than 2.65 rad. Differential cross sections are reported with respect to the scattering angles of the muon and pion relative to the beam direction, their momenta, and their combined opening angle. The differential cross section with respect to muon momentum is based on a subset of selected events with the muon track fully contained in the detector, whereas the cross section with respect to pion momentum is based on a subset of selected events rich in pions that have not hadronically scattered on the argon before coming to rest. The latter has not been measured on argon before. The total cross section is measured as (3.75±0.07(stat)±0.80(syst))×10−38  cm2/Ar at a mean energy of approximately 0.8 GeV. Comparisons of the measured cross sections with predictions from multiple neutrino-nucleus interaction generators show good overall agreement, except at very forward muon angles.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (81)

  1. K. Abe et al. (T2K Collaboration), Constraint on the matter–antimatter symmetry-violating phase in neutrino oscillations, Nature (London) 580, 339 (2020); 583, E16 (2020).
  2. M. A. Acero et al. (NOvA Collaboration), Improved measurement of neutrino oscillation parameters by the NOvA experiment, Phys. Rev. D 106, 032004 (2022).
  3. B. Abi et al. (DUNE Collaboration), Prospects for beyond the standard model physics searches at the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 322 (2021).
  4. L. Alvarez-Ruso et al. (NuSTEC Collaboration), NuSTEC White Paper: Status and challenges of neutrino–nucleus scattering, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 100, 1 (2018).
  5. A. M. Ankowski and C. Mariani, Systematic uncertainties in long-baseline neutrino-oscillation experiments, J. Phys. G 44, 054001 (2017).
  6. B. Abi et al. (DUNE Collaboration), Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE), Far detector technical design report, volume I introduction to DUNE, J. Instrum. 15, T08008 (2020).
  7. P. A. Machado, O. Palamara, and D. W. Schmitz, The short-baseline neutrino program at Fermilab, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69, 363 (2019).
  8. C. Adams et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), First measurement of νμ charged-current π0 production on argon with the MicroBooNE detector, Phys. Rev. D 99, 091102 (2019).
  9. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Measurement of neutral current single π0 production on argon with the MicroBooNE detector, Phys. Rev. D 107, 012004 (2023).
  10. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), First double-differential cross section measurement of neutral-current π0 production in neutrino-argon scattering in the MicroBooNE detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 161802 (2025).
  11. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Measurement of the differential cross section for neutral pion production in charged-current muon neutrino interactions on argon with the MicroBooNE detector, Phys. Rev. D 110, 092014 (2024).
  12. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), First Measurement of νe and ν¯e charged-current single charged-pion production differential cross sections on argon using the MicroBooNE detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 061802 (2025).
  13. K. Abe et al. (T2K Collaboration), First measurement of the muon neutrino charged current single pion production cross section on water with the T2K near detector, Phys. Rev. D 95, 012010 (2017).
  14. A. Bercellie et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Simultaneous measurement of muon neutrino νμ charged-current single π+ production in CH, C, H2O, Fe, and Pb targets in MINERvA, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 011801 (2023).
  15. A. Rodriguez et al. (K2K Collaboration), Measurement of single charged pion production in the charged-current interactions of neutrinos in a 1.3-GeV wide band beam, Phys. Rev. D 78, 032003 (2008).
  16. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE Collaboration), Measurement of neutrino-induced charged-current charged pion production cross sections on mineral oil at Eν∼1  GeV, Phys. Rev. D 83, 052007 (2011).
  17. K. Abe et al. (T2K Collaboration), First T2K measurement of transverse kinematic imbalance in the muon-neutrino charged-current single-π+ production channel containing at least one proton, Phys. Rev. D 103, 112009 (2021).
  18. K. Abe et al. (T2K Collaboration), Measurement of the muon neutrino charged-current single π+ production on hydrocarbon using the T2K off-axis near detector ND280, Phys. Rev. D 101, 012007 (2020).
  19. B. Eberly et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Charged pion production in νμ interactions on hydrocarbon at ⟨Eν⟩=4.0  GeV, Phys. Rev. D 92, 092008 (2015).
  20. C. L. McGivern et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Cross sections for νμ and ν¯μ induced pion production on hydrocarbon in the few-GeV region using MINERvA, Phys. Rev. D 94, 052005 (2016).
  21. T. Le et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Measurement of ν¯μ charged-current single π− production on hydrocarbon in the few-GeV region using MINERvA, Phys. Rev. D 100, 052008 (2019).
  22. L. Aliaga et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Design, calibration, and performance of the MINERvA detector, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 743, 130 (2014).
  23. R. Acciarri et al. (ArgoNeuT Collaboration), First measurement of the cross section for νμ and ν¯μ induced single charged pion production on argon using ArgoNeuT, Phys. Rev. D 98, 052002 (2018).
  24. P. Adamson et al., The NuMI neutrino beam, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 806, 279 (2016).
  25. R. Acciarri et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Design and construction of the MicroBooNE detector, J. Instrum. 12, P02017 (2016).
  26. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE Collaboration), The neutrino flux prediction at MiniBooNE, Phys. Rev. D 79, 072002 (2009).
  27. I. Stancu et al. (BooNE Collaboration), Technical Design Report for the 8 GeV Beam, Technical Report, Fermilab, 2001.
  28. S. Agostinelli et al. (GEANT4 Collaboration), geant4–a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 506, 250 (2003).
  29. J. Allison et al., geant4 developments and applications, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53, 270 (2006).
  30. J. Allison et al., Recent developments in geant4, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 835, 186 (2016).
  31. M. G. Catanesi et al. (HARP Collaboration), Measurement of the production cross-section of positive pions in the collision of 8.9-GeV/c protons on beryllium, Eur. Phys. J. C 52, 29 (2007).
  32. G. Cheng et al. (SciBooNE Collaboration), Measurement of K+ production cross section by 8 GeV protons using high energy neutrino interactions in the SciBooNE detector, Phys. Rev. D 84, 012009 (2011).
  33. C. Andreopoulos et al., The GENIE neutrino Monte Carlo generator, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 614, 87 (2010).
  34. L. Alvarez-Ruso et al. (GENIE Collaboration), Recent highlights from GENIE v3, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 230, 4449 (2021).
  35. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), New CC0π GENIE model tune for MicroBooNE, Phys. Rev. D 105, 072001 (2022).
  36. S. Dytman, GENIE final state interactions, AIP Conf. Proc. 1680, 020005 (2015).
  37. E. L. Snider and G. Petrillo, larsoft: Toolkit for simulation, reconstruction and analysis of liquid argon TPC neutrino detectors, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 898, 042057 (2017).
  38. C. Adams et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Ionization electron signal processing in single phase LArTPCs. Part I. Algorithm description and quantitative evaluation with MicroBooNE simulation, J. Instrum. 13, P07006 (2018).
  39. R. Acciarri et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Noise characterization and filtering in the MicroBooNE liquid argon TPC, J. Instrum. 12, P08003 (2017).
  40. C. Adams et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Ionization electron signal processing in single phase LArTPCs. Part II. Data/simulation comparison and performance in MicroBooNE, J. Instrum. 13, P07007 (2018).
  41. J. S. Marshall and M. A. Thomson, The Pandora Software development kit for pattern recognition, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 439 (2015).
  42. R. Acciarri et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), The Pandora multi-algorithm approach to automated pattern recognition of cosmic-ray muon and neutrino events in the MicroBooNE detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 82 (2018).
  43. C. Adams et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Calibration of the charge and energy loss per unit length of the MicroBooNE liquid argon time projection chamber using muons and protons, J. Instrum. 15, P03022 (2019).
  44. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Measurement of space charge effects in the MicroBooNE LArTPC using cosmic muons, J. Instrum. 15, P12037 (2020).
  45. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/t2cw-cdx2 for covariance, correlation, and regularization matrices; numerical cross-section results; all no-FSI generator comparisons; results from a fake-data study; distributions of the chi-squared metrics used in the preselection; plots of the excluded phase space; uncertainty distributions; and sideband checks for all kinematic variables.
  46. A. Hocker et al. (TMVA Collaboration), TMVA—toolkit for multivariate data analysis, Technical Report, CERN, Geneva, 2007.
  47. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Calorimetric classification of track-like signatures in liquid argon TPCs using MicroBooNE data, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2021) 153.
  48. C. Adams et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Calibration of the charge and energy loss per unit length of the MicroBooNE liquid argon time projection chamber using muons and protons, J. Instrum. 15, P03022 (2019).
  49. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), First measurement of inclusive muon neutrino charged current differential cross sections on argon at Eν∼0.8  GeV with the MicroBooNE detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 131801 (2019).
  50. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), First measurement of differential charged current quasielastic-like νμ-argon scattering cross sections with the MicroBooNE detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 201803 (2020).
  51. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Multidifferential cross section measurements of νμ-argon quasielasticlike reactions with the MicroBooNE detector, Phys. Rev. D 108, 053002 (2023).
  52. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Determination of muon momentum in the MicroBooNE LArTPC using an improved model of multiple Coulomb scattering, J. Instrum. 12, P10010 (2017).
  53. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Measurement of differential cross sections for νμ -Ar charged-current interactions with protons and no pions in the final state with the MicroBooNE detector, Phys. Rev. D 102, 112013 (2020).
  54. MicroBooNE, Booster neutrino flux prediction at MicroBooNE, Technical Report, Fermilab, 2018.
  55. J. Calcutt, C. Thorpe, K. Mahn, and L. Fields, geant4Reweight: A framework for evaluating and propagating hadronic interaction uncertainties in geant4, J. Instrum. 16, P08042 (2021).
  56. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Novel approach for evaluating detector-related uncertainties in a LArTPC using MicroBooNE data, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 454 (2022).
  57. W. Tang, X. Li, X. Qian, H. Wei, and C. Zhang, Data unfolding with Wiener-SVD method, J. Instrum. 12, P10002 (2017).
  58. S. Gardiner, Mathematical methods for neutrino cross-section extraction, arXiv:2401.04065.
  59. T. Golan, J. T. Sobczyk, and J. Zmuda, NuWro: The Wroclaw Monte Carlo generator of neutrino interactions, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 229–232, 499 (2012).
  60. P. Stowell et al., NUISANCE: A neutrino cross-section generator tuning and comparison framework, J. Instrum. 12, P01016 (2016).
  61. J. Nieves, J. E. Amaro, and M. Valverde, Inclusive quasi-elastic neutrino reactions, Phys. Rev. C 70, 055503 (2004); 72, 019902(E) (2005).
  62. J. Nieves, I. Ruiz Simo, and M. J. Vicente Vacas, The nucleon axial mass and the MiniBooNE quasielastic neutrino-nucleus scattering problem, Phys. Lett. B 707, 72 (2012).
  63. R. Gran, J. Nieves, F. Sanchez, and M. Vicente Vacas, Neutrino-nucleus quasi-elastic and 2p2h interactions up to 10 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 88, 113007 (2013).
  64. K. S. Kuzmin, V. V. Lyubushkin, and V. A. Naumov, Lepton polarization in neutrino nucleon interactions, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 19, 2815 (2004).
  65. K. M. Graczyk and J. T. Sobczyk, Form factors in the quark resonance model, Phys. Rev. D 77, 053001 (2008); 79, 079903(E) (2009).
  66. C. Berger and L. Sehgal, Lepton mass effects in single pion production by neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 76, 113004 (2007).
  67. J. A. Nowak (MiniBooNE Collaboration), Four momentum transfer discrepancy in the charged current π+ production in the MiniBooNE: Data vs. theory, AIP Conf. Proc. 1189, 243 (2009).
  68. C. Berger and L. Sehgal, PCAC and coherent pion production by low energy neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 79, 053003 (2009).
  69. A. Bodek and U. K. Yang, Higher twist, xi(omega) scaling, and effective LO PDFs for lepton scattering in the few GeV region, J. Phys. G 29, 1899 (2003).
  70. T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, pythia 6.4 physics and manual, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2006) 026.
  71. J. E. Amaro, M. B. Barbaro, J. A. Caballero, R. González-Jiménez, G. D. Megias, and I. Ruiz Simo, Electron- versus neutrino-nucleus scattering, J. Phys. G 47, 124001 (2020).
  72. K. M. Graczyk, D. Kielczewska, P. Przewlocki, and J. T. Sobczyk, C5A axial form factor from bubble chamber experiments, Phys. Rev. D 80, 093001 (2009).
  73. C. H. Llewellyn Smith, Neutrino reactions at accelerator energies, Phys. Rep. 3, 261 (1972).
  74. Y. Hayato, NEUT, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 112, 171 (2002).
  75. O. Buss, T. Gaitanos, K. Gallmeister, H. van Hees, M. Kaskulov, O. Lalakulich, A. B. Larionov, T. Leitner, J. Weil, and U. Mosel, Transport-theoretical description of nuclear reactions, Phys. Rep. 512, 1 (2012).
  76. U. Mosel, Neutrino event generators: Foundation, status and future, J. Phys. G 46, 113001 (2019).
  77. P. E. Bosted and M. E. Christy, Empirical fit to inelastic electron-deuteron and electron-neutron resonance region transverse cross-sections, Phys. Rev. C 77, 065206 (2008).
  78. B. Bogart, K. Gallmeister, and U. Mosel, In-medium changes of nucleon cross sections tested in neutrino-induced reactions, Phys. Rev. C 110, 044001 (2024).
  79. P. Adamson et al. (MINOS Collaboration), Study of quasielastic scattering using charged-current νμ -iron interactions in the MINOS near detector, Phys. Rev. D 91, 012005 (2015).
  80. P. Stowell et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Tuning the GENIE pion production model with MINERνA data, Phys. Rev. D 100, 072005 (2019).
  81. A. Abed Abud et al. (DUNE Collaboration), The track-length extension fitting algorithm for energy measurement of interacting particles in liquid argon TPCs and its performance with ProtoDUNE-SP data, J. Instrum. 20, P02021 (2024).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 113, 032007– Published 10 February, 2026
  • Received 5 September 2025
  • Accepted 2 January 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation