- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Exploring leptogenesis, WIMP dark matter, and gravitational waves in an extended scalar framework

Subhaditya Bhattacharya*, Niloy Mondal†, and Arunansu Sil‡

  • *Contact author: subhab@iitg.ac.in
  • †Contact author: niloy18@iitg.ac.in
  • ‡Contact author: asil@iitg.ac.in
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 114, 055053 – Published 29 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/syzm-ws8c

Abstract

We explore an extension of the type-I seesaw framework in which a scalar mediator Φ connects the Standard Model (SM) to a dark sector consisting of right-handed neutrinos or RHNs (Ni) and a complex scalar S. The interactions are governed by a phenomenologically viable Z4×CP symmetry, allowing a dimension-five effective operator involving the SM lepton doublet, Higgs, RHNs, and Φ. Once Φ acquires a vacuum expectation value, its couplings to the SM and RHNs affect the standard leptogenesis through Ni decay, while electroweak symmetry breaking subsequently induces neutrino masses through the same structure. Furthermore, a Φ-portal interaction induces a vacuum expectation value for real (imaginary) component of S opening additional annihilation channels for its imaginary (real) component, identified as dark matter (DM) in the GeV-TeV mass range (excluded in the simplest scalar singlet DM scenario). The spontaneous breaking of the associated discrete symmetry can lead to domain wall formation, whose required early annihilation may generate observable gravitational-wave signals, providing a way to ideate the symmetry-breaking scale and its connection to neutrino mass, baryogenesis, and dark matter.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (131)

  1. W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavor conservation, Nucl. Phys. B268, 621 (1986).
  2. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak, and J. Rosiek, Dimension-six terms in the standard model Lagrangian, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2010) 085.
  3. E. Masso, An effective guide to beyond the standard model physics, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2014) 128.
  4. C. Englert and M. Spannowsky, Effective theories and measurements at colliders, Phys. Lett. B 740, 8 (2015).
  5. L. Calibbi and G. Signorelli, Charged lepton flavour violation: An experimental and theoretical introduction, Riv. Nuovo Cimento 41, 71 (2018).
  6. J. Aebischer, W. Dekens, E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, D. Sengupta, and P. Stoffer, Effective field theory interpretation of lepton magnetic and electric dipole moments, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 107.
  7. A. Azatov, R. Contino, C. S. Machado, and F. Riva, Helicity selection rules and noninterference for BSM amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D 95, 065014 (2017).
  8. J. A. A. Saavedra et al., Interpreting top-quark lhc measurements in the standard-model effective field theory, arXiv:1802.07237.
  9. T. C. Collaboration et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for new physics in top quark production with additional leptons in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV using effective field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 095.
  10. C. Degrande, N. Greiner, W. Kilian, O. Mattelaer, H. Mebane, T. Stelzer, S. Willenbrock, and C. Zhang, Effective field theory: A modern approach to anomalous couplings, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 335, 21 (2013).
  11. L. Coito, C. Faubel, J. Herrero-García, A. Santamaria, and A. Titov, Sterile neutrino portals to Majorana dark matter: Effective operators and UV completions, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 085.
  12. A. B. Beneito, I, J. Gargalionis, J. Herrero-Garcia, A. Santamaria, and M. A. Schmidt, An EFT approach to baryon number violation: Lower limits on the new physics scale and correlations between nucleon decay modes, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 004.
  13. P. Amaro-Seoane et al., Laser interferometer space antenna, arXiv:1702.00786.
  14. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), LIGO: The Laser Interferometer gravitational-wave observatory, Rep. Prog. Phys. 72, 076901 (2009).
  15. J. Crowder and N. J. Cornish, Beyond LISA: Exploring future gravitational wave missions, Phys. Rev. D 72, 083005 (2005).
  16. S. Bhattacharya, I. de Medeiros Varzielas, B. Karmakar, S. F. King, and A. Sil, Dark side of the Seesaw, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2018) 007.
  17. T. Asaka, S. Blanchet, and M. Shaposhnikov, The nuMSM, dark matter and neutrino masses, Phys. Lett. B 631, 151 (2005).
  18. A. Datta, R. Roshan, and A. Sil, Imprint of the Seesaw mechanism on feebly interacting dark matter and the baryon asymmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 231801 (2021).
  19. S. Bhattacharya, R. Roshan, A. Sil, and D. Vatsyayan, Symmetry origin of baryon asymmetry, dark matter, and neutrino mass, Phys. Rev. D 106, 075005 (2022).
  20. J. Herrero-Garcia, G. Landini, and D. Vatsyayan, Asymmetries in extended dark sectors: A cogenesis scenario, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 049.
  21. A. Falkowski, J. T. Ruderman, and T. Volansky, Asymmetric dark matter from leptogenesis, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2011) 106.
  22. A. Dutta Banik, R. Roshan, and A. Sil, Neutrino mass and asymmetric dark matter: Study with inert Higgs doublet and high scale validity, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2020) 037.
  23. H. An, S.-L. Chen, R. N. Mohapatra, and Y. Zhang, Leptogenesis as a common origin for matter and dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2009) 124.
  24. N. Cosme, L. Lopez Honorez, and M. H. G. Tytgat, Leptogenesis and dark matter related?, Phys. Rev. D 72, 043505 (2005).
  25. E. J. Chun, Minimal dark matter and leptogenesis, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2011) 098.
  26. B. Barman, D. Borah, and R. Roshan, Nonthermal leptogenesis and UV freeze-in of dark matter: Impact of inflationary reheating, Phys. Rev. D 104, 035022 (2021).
  27. E. Ma, Common origin of neutrino mass, dark matter, and baryogenesis, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 21, 1777 (2006).
  28. T. Hambye, K. Kannike, E. Ma, and M. Raidal, Emanations of dark matter: Muon anomalous magnetic moment, radiative neutrino mass, and novel leptogenesis at the TeV scale, Phys. Rev. D 75, 095003 (2007).
  29. P.-H. Gu and U. Sarkar, Radiative neutrino mass, dark matter and leptogenesis, Phys. Rev. D 77, 105031 (2008).
  30. P.-H. Gu, M. Hirsch, U. Sarkar, and J. W. F. Valle, Neutrino masses, leptogenesis and dark matter in hybrid seesaw, Phys. Rev. D 79, 033010 (2009).
  31. M. Aoki, S. Kanemura, and O. Seto, Neutrino mass, dark matter and baryon asymmetry via TeV-scale physics without fine-tuning, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 051805 (2009).
  32. M. Aoki, S. Kanemura, and O. Seto, A model of TeV scale physics for neutrino mass, dark matter and baryon asymmetry and its phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D 80, 033007 (2009).
  33. F.-X. Josse-Michaux and E. Molinaro, A common framework for dark matter, leptogenesis and neutrino masses, Phys. Rev. D 84, 125021 (2011).
  34. J. Herrero-Garcia, G. Landini, and T. T. Yanagida, Dark matter in the high-scale seesaw leptogenesis paradigm, Phys. Rev. D 111, 075033 (2025).
  35. D. K. Ghosh, P. Ghosh, K. Mukherjee, and N. Narendra, A singlet scalar assisted n2 leptogenesis and pseudo-scalar dark matter, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1217 (2025).
  36. T. Brune, Leptogenesis in a Majoron plus triplet model, Phys. Rev. D 111, 115001 (2025).
  37. A. Datta, S. K. Manna, and A. Sil, Spontaneous leptogenesis with sub-GeV axionlike particles, Phys. Rev. D 110, 095035 (2024).
  38. K. Kasai, M. Kawasaki, and K. Murai, Affleck-Dine leptogenesis scenario for resonant production of sterile neutrino dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2024) 008.
  39. D. Borah, A. Dasgupta, M. Knauss, and I. Saha, Baryon asymmetry from dark matter decay in the vicinity of a phase transition, Phys. Rev. D 108, L091701 (2023).
  40. S. Bhattacharya, N. Mondal, R. Roshan, and D. Vatsyayan, Leptogenesis, dark matter and gravitational waves from discrete symmetry breaking, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2023) 029.
  41. M. Aker et al. (KATRIN Collaboration), Direct neutrino-mass measurement based on 259 days of KATRIN data, Science 388, adq9592 (2025).
  42. P. Minkowski, μ→eγ at a rate of one out of 109 muon decays?, Phys. Lett. 67B, 421 (1977).
  43. M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, Complex spinors and unified theories, Conf. Proc. C 790927, 315 (1979).
  44. R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Neutrino mass and spontaneous parity nonconservation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 912 (1980).
  45. J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle, Neutrino masses in SU(2)×U(1) theories, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2227 (1980).
  46. J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle, Neutrinoless Double beta Decay in SU(2)×U(1) Theories, Phys. Rev. D 25, 2951 (1982).
  47. M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, Baryogenesis without grand unification, Phys. Lett. B 174, 45 (1986).
  48. E. K. Akhmedov, V. A. Rubakov, and A. Y. Smirnov, Baryogenesis via neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1359 (1998).
  49. X.-D. Shi and G. M. Fuller, A new dark matter candidate: Nonthermal sterile neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2832 (1999).
  50. L. Canetti, M. Drewes, and M. Shaposhnikov, Sterile neutrinos as the origin of dark and baryonic matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 061801 (2013).
  51. D. Gorbunov, D. Kalashnikov, and G. Krugan, Playing with lepton asymmetry at the resonant production of sterile neutrino dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 868, 139750 (2025).
  52. K. Akita, K. Hamaguchi, and M. Ovchynnikov, Maximal parameter space of sterile neutrino dark matter with lepton asymmetries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 111001 (2026).
  53. E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner, The Early Universe (Taylor and Francis, London, 2019) Vol. 69.
  54. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group Collaboration), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  55. A. Vilenkin and E. P. S. Shellard, Cosmic Strings and Other Topological Defects (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2000).
  56. Y. B. Zeldovich, I. Y. Kobzarev, and L. B. Okun, Cosmological consequences of the spontaneous breakdown of discrete symmetry, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 67, 3 (1974).
  57. S. Centelles Chuliá, E. Ma, R. Srivastava, and J. W. F. Valle, Dirac neutrinos and dark matter stability from lepton quarticity, Phys. Lett. B 767, 209 (2017).
  58. J. Kim, S.-S. Kim, H. M. Lee, and R. Padhan, Small neutrino masses from a decoupled singlet scalar field, Phys. Lett. B 861, 139243 (2025).
  59. A. Beniwal, J. Herrero-García, N. Leerdam, M. White, and A. G. Williams, The ScotoSinglet model: A scalar singlet extension of the scotogenic model, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2020) 136.
  60. P. Athron et al. (GAMBIT Collaboration), Global analyses of Higgs portal singlet dark matter models using GAMBIT, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 38 (2019).
  61. J. M. Cline, K. Kainulainen, P. Scott, and C. Weniger, Update on scalar singlet dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 88, 055025 (2013); 92, 039906(E) (2015).
  62. C. P. Burgess, M. Pospelov, and T. ter Veldhuis, The minimal model of nonbaryonic dark matter: A singlet scalar, Nucl. Phys. B619, 709 (2001).
  63. M. Escudero Abenza and T. Hambye, The simplest dark matter model at the edge of perturbativity, Phys. Lett. B 868, 139696 (2025).
  64. T. Binder, T. Bringmann, M. Gustafsson, and A. Hryczuk, Early kinetic decoupling of dark matter: When the standard way of calculating the thermal relic density fails, Phys. Rev. D 96, 115010 (2017); 101, 099901(E) (2020).
  65. M. Di Mauro, C. Arina, N. Fornengo, J. Heisig, and D. Massaro, Dark matter in the Higgs resonance region, Phys. Rev. D 108, 095008 (2023).
  66. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716, 1 (2012).
  67. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716, 30 (2012).
  68. A. Abada, S. Davidson, F.-X. Josse-Michaux, M. Losada, and A. Riotto, Flavor issues in leptogenesis, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2006) 004.
  69. E. Nardi, Y. Nir, E. Roulet, and J. Racker, The importance of flavor in leptogenesis, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2006) 164.
  70. S. Blanchet and P. Di Bari, Flavor effects on leptogenesis predictions, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2006) 018.
  71. P. S. B. Dev, P. Di Bari, B. Garbrecht, S. Lavignac, P. Millington, and D. Teresi, Flavor effects in leptogenesis, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33, 1842001 (2018).
  72. A. Datta, R. Roshan, and A. Sil, Scalar triplet flavor leptogenesis with dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 105, 095032 (2022).
  73. A. Datta, R. Roshan, and A. Sil, Effects of reheating on charged lepton Yukawa equilibration and leptogenesis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 061802 (2024).
  74. A. Datta, R. Roshan, and A. Sil, Flavor leptogenesis during the reheating era, Phys. Rev. D 108, 035029 (2023).
  75. R. Roshan and S. Show, Delayed charged lepton yukawa equilibration and thermal leptogenesis, arXiv:2510.23712.
  76. L. Covi, E. Roulet, and F. Vissani, CP violating decays in leptogenesis scenarios, Phys. Lett. B 384, 169 (1996).
  77. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Dark matter search results from a one ton-year exposure of XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 111302 (2018).
  78. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), First dark matter search with nuclear recoils from the XENONnT experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041003 (2023).
  79. J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), First dark matter search results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041002 (2023).
  80. L. Baudis, DARWIN/XLZD: A future xenon observatory for dark matter and other rare interactions, Nucl. Phys. B1003, 116473 (2024).
  81. A. Abdukerim et al. (PANDA-X, PandaX Collaborations), PandaX-xT—A deep underground multi-ten-tonne liquid xenon observatory, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 68, 221011 (2025).
  82. G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski, and K. Griest, Supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rep. 267, 195 (1996).
  83. G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rep. 405, 279 (2005).
  84. P. Ghosh, A. K. Saha, and A. Sil, Study of electroweak vacuum stability from extended Higgs portal of dark matter and neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 97, 075034 (2018).
  85. M. Hoferichter, P. Klos, J. Menéndez, and A. Schwenk, Improved limits for Higgs-portal dark matter from LHC searches, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 181803 (2017).
  86. T. W. B. Kibble, Topology of cosmic domains and strings, J. Phys. A 9, 1387 (1976).
  87. Y. Gouttenoire, S. F. King, R. Roshan, X. Wang, G. White, and M. Yamazaki, Cosmological consequences of domain walls biased by quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 112, 075007 (2025).
  88. R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde, D. A. Linde, and L. Susskind, Gravity and global symmetries, Phys. Rev. D 52, 912 (1995).
  89. L. F. Abbott and M. B. Wise, Wormholes and global symmetries, Nucl. Phys. B325, 687 (1989).
  90. T. Hiramatsu, M. Kawasaki, and K. Saikawa, On the estimation of gravitational wave spectrum from cosmic domain walls, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2013) 031.
  91. T. Hiramatsu, M. Kawasaki, and K. Saikawa, Gravitational waves from collapsing domain walls, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2010) 032.
  92. Z. A. Borboruah, D. Borah, L. Malhotra, and U. Patel, Minimal Dirac seesaw dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 112, 015022 (2025).
  93. Z. A. Borboruah and U. A. Yajnik, Left-right symmetry breaking and gravitational waves: A tale of two phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D 110, 043016 (2024).
  94. M. Kawasaki, K. Saikawa, and T. Sekiguchi, Axion dark matter from topological defects, Phys. Rev. D 91, 065014 (2015).
  95. C. Caprini, K. Hamaguchi, and K. Nakayama, Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: An update, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2019) 024.
  96. A. Afzal et al. (NANOGrav Collaboration), The NANOGrav 15 yr data set: Search for signals from new physics, Astrophys. J. Lett. 951, L11 (2023).
  97. A. Weltman et al., Fundamental physics with the square kilometre array, Pub. Astron. Soc. Aust. 37, e002 (2020).
  98. J. Garcia-Bellido, H. Murayama, and G. White, Exploring the early Universe with Gaia and Theia, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2021) 023.
  99. C. J. Moore, S. R. Taylor, and J. R. Gair, Estimating the sensitivity of pulsar timing arrays, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 055004 (2015).
  100. A. Sesana et al., Unveiling the gravitational Universe at μ-Hz frequencies, Exp. Astron. 51, 1333 (2021).
  101. N. Seto, S. Kawamura, and T. Nakamura, Possibility of direct measurement of the acceleration of the Universe using 0.1-Hz band laser interferometer gravitational wave antenna in space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 221103 (2001).
  102. S. Kawamura et al., The Japanese Space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO, Classical Quantum Gravity 23, S125 (2006).
  103. K. Yagi and N. Seto, Detector configuration of DECIGO/BBO and identification of cosmological neutron-star binaries, Phys. Rev. D 83, 044011 (2011); 95, 109901(E) (2017).
  104. V. Corbin and N. J. Cornish, Detecting the cosmic gravitational wave background with the big bang observer, Classical Quantum Gravity 23, 2435 (2006).
  105. G. M. Harry, P. Fritschel, D. A. Shaddock, W. Folkner, and E. S. Phinney, Laser interferometry for the big bang observer, Classical Quantum Gravity 23, 4887 (2006); 23, 7361(E) (2006).
  106. M. Punturo et al., The Einstein telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 194002 (2010).
  107. S. Hild et al., Sensitivity studies for third-generation gravitational wave observatories, Classical Quantum Gravity 28, 094013 (2011).
  108. B. Sathyaprakash et al., Scientific objectives of Einstein telescope, Classical Quantum Gravity 29, 124013 (2012); 30, 079501(E) (2013).
  109. M. Maggiore et al., Science case for the Einstein telescope, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2019) 050.
  110. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Exploring the sensitivity of next generation gravitational wave detectors, Classical Quantum Gravity 34, 044001 (2017).
  111. D. Reitze et al., Cosmic explorer: The U.S. Contribution to gravitational-wave astronomy beyond LIGO, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51, 035 (2019).
  112. J. Aasi et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Characterization of the LIGO detectors during their sixth science run, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 115012 (2015).
  113. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Upper limits on the stochastic gravitational-wave background from Advanced LIGO’s first observing run, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 121101 (2017); 119, 029901(E) (2017).
  114. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
  115. R. H. Cyburt, B. D. Fields, K. A. Olive, and T.-H. Yeh, Big bang nucleosynthesis: 2015, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 015004 (2016).
  116. K. Abazajian et al., CMB-s4 science case, reference design, and project plan, arXiv:1907.04473.
  117. C. Caprini and D. G. Figueroa, Cosmological backgrounds of gravitational waves, Classical Quantum Gravity 35, 163001 (2018).
  118. M. Maggiore, Gravitational wave experiments and early Universe cosmology, Phys. Rep. 331, 283 (2000).
  119. B. Allen and J. D. Romano, Detecting a stochastic background of gravitational radiation: Signal processing strategies and sensitivities, Phys. Rev. D 59, 102001 (1999).
  120. J. Elias-Miro, J. R. Espinosa, G. F. Giudice, H. M. Lee, and A. Strumia, Stabilization of the electroweak vacuum by a scalar threshold effect, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2012) 031.
  121. K. Kannike, Vacuum stability of a general scalar potential of a few fields, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 324 (2016); 78, 355(E) (2018).
  122. J. Chakrabortty, P. Konar, and T. Mondal, Copositive criteria and boundedness of the scalar potential, Phys. Rev. D 89, 095008 (2014).
  123. S. Bhattacharya, S. Chakraborti, and D. Pradhan, Electroweak symmetry breaking and WIMP-FIMP dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 091.
  124. S. Bhattacharya, P. Ghosh, A. K. Saha, and A. Sil, Two component dark matter with inert Higgs doublet: Neutrino mass, high scale validity and collider searches, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2019) 090.
  125. G. Bhattacharyya and D. Das, Scalar sector of two-Higgs-doublet models: A minireview, Pramana 87, 40 (2016).
  126. J. Horejsi and M. Kladiva, Tree-unitarity bounds for THDM Higgs masses revisited, Eur. Phys. J. C 46, 81 (2006).
  127. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the discovery, Nature (London) 607, 52 (2022); 612, E24 (2022).
  128. A. Tumasyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery, Nature (London) 607, 60 (2022); 623, E4 (2023).
  129. S. D. Lane, I. M. Lewis, and M. Sullivan, Resonant multiscalar production in the generic complex singlet model in the multi-TeV region, Phys. Rev. D 110, 055017 (2024).
  130. M. Plumacher, Baryogenesis and lepton number violation, Z. Phys. C 74, 549 (1997).
  131. A. Pilaftsis, CP violation and baryogenesis due to heavy Majorana neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 56, 5431 (1997).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 114, 055053– Published 29 September, 2026
  • Received 6 April 2026
  • Revised 24 August 2026
  • Accepted 26 August 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation