Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

R2-Higgs inflation: R3 contribution and preheating after ACT and SPT data

Tanmoy Modak

Phys. Rev. D 112, 115006 – Published 1 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/srpt-jd6s

Abstract

The R2-Higgs inflation is one of the simplest yet best-fit models consistent with Planck data. The higher spectral index ns recently reported by the combined cosmic microwave background (CMB) data from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT), South Pole Telescope (SPT), and Planck, along with baryonic acoustic oscillation data from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), disfavors the single-field-like regime of R2-Higgs inflation at approximately 2σ. Following a doubly covariant formalism, we show that the R2-Higgs inflation, when modified by a dimension-six R3 term, can account for the high ns reported by CMB+BAO. In this regard, we find that preheating may play a pivotal role. We also show that if the nonminimal coupling between the Ricci scalar R and the Higgs field is O(10), then preheating via the production of Higgs quanta may help explain the reported observations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (85)

  1. A. A. Starobinsky, A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity, Phys. Lett. B 91, 99 (1980).
  2. K. Sato, First order phase transition of a vacuum and expansion of the universe, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 195, 467 (1981).
  3. A. H. Guth, The inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems, Phys. Rev. D 23, 347 (1981).
  4. G. Hinshaw et al. (WMAP Collaboration), Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological parameter results, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 208, 19 (2013).
  5. Y. Akrami et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A10 (2020).
  6. P. A. R. Ade et al. (BICEP, Keck Collaborations), Improved constraints on primordial gravitational waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck observations through the 2018 observing season, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 151301 (2021).
  7. P. Ade et al. (Simons Observatory Collaboration), The Simons Observatory: Science goals and forecasts, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2018) 056.
  8. E. Allys et al. (LiteBIRD Collaboration), Probing cosmic inflation with the LiteBIRD cosmic microwave background polarization survey, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2023, 042F01 (2023).
  9. A. A. Starobinsky, The perturbation spectrum evolving from a nonsingular initially de-Sitter cosmology and the microwave background anisotropy, Sov. Astron. Lett. 9, 302 (1983).
  10. A. Vilenkin, Classical and quantum cosmology of the Starobinsky inflationary model, Phys. Rev. D 32, 2511 (1985).
  11. M. B. Mijic, M. S. Morris, and W.-M. Suen, The R2 cosmology: Inflation without a phase transition, Phys. Rev. D 34, 2934 (1986).
  12. K.-i. Maeda, Inflation as a transient attractor in R2 cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 37, 858 (1988).
  13. T. Louis et al. (ACT Collaboration), The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 power spectra, likelihoods and ΛCDM parameters, arXiv:2503.14452.
  14. E. Camphuis et al. (SPT-3G Collaboration), SPT-3G D1: CMB temperature and polarization power spectra and cosmology from 2019 and 2020 observations of the SPT-3G main field, arXiv:2506.20707.
  15. M. Abdul Karim et al. (DESI Collaboration), DESI DR2 results II: Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints, Phys. Rev. D 112, 083515 (2025).
  16. A. Salvio and A. Mazumdar, Classical and quantum initial conditions for Higgs inflation, Phys. Lett. B 750, 194 (2015).
  17. Y. Ema, Higgs scalaron mixed inflation, Phys. Lett. B 770, 403 (2017).
  18. S. Pi, Y.-l. Zhang, Q.-G. Huang, and M. Sasaki, Scalaron from R2-gravity as a heavy field, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2017) 042.
  19. D. Gorbunov and A. Tokareva, Scalaron the healer: Removing the strong-coupling in the Higgs- and Higgs-dilaton inflations, Phys. Lett. B 788, 37 (2019).
  20. A. Gundhi and C. F. Steinwachs, Scalaron-Higgs inflation, Nucl. Phys. B954, 114989 (2020).
  21. M. He, R. Jinno, K. Kamada, S. C. Park, A. A. Starobinsky, and J. Yokoyama, On the violent preheating in the mixed Higgs-R2 inflationary model, Phys. Lett. B 791, 36 (2019).
  22. M. He, A. A. Starobinsky, and J. Yokoyama, Inflation in the mixed Higgs-R2 model, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2018) 064.
  23. D. Y. Cheong, S. M. Lee, and S. C. Park, Primordial black holes in Higgs-R2 inflation as the whole of dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2019) 032.
  24. D. D. Canko, I. D. Gialamas, and G. P. Kodaxis, A simple F(R,ϕ) deformation of Starobinsky inflationary model, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 458 (2020).
  25. M. He, R. Jinno, K. Kamada, A. A. Starobinsky, and J. Yokoyama, Occurrence of tachyonic preheating in the mixed Higgs−R2 model, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2020) 066.
  26. M. He, Perturbative reheating in the mixed Higgs-R2 model, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2020) 021.
  27. F. Pineda and L. O. Pimentel, Non-perturbative approach for scalar particle production in Higgs-R2 inflation, arXiv:2409.09999.
  28. E. J. Copeland, C. Rahmede, and I. D. Saltas, Asymptotically safe Starobinsky inflation, Phys. Rev. D 91, 103530 (2015).
  29. I. D. Saltas, Higgs inflation and quantum gravity: An exact renormalisation group approach, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2015) 048.
  30. A. de la Cruz-Dombriz, E. Elizalde, S. D. Odintsov, and D. Sáez-Gómez, Spotting deviations from R2 inflation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2016) 060.
  31. S. D. Odintsov, V. K. Oikonomou, and F. P. Fronimos, Canonical scalar field inflation with string and R2 -corrections, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 424, 168359 (2021).
  32. I. D. Gialamas, A. Karam, A. Racioppi, and M. Raidal, Has ACT measured radiative corrections to the tree-level Higgs-like inflation?, arXiv:2504.06002.
  33. M. Drees and Y. Xu, Refined predictions for Starobinsky inflation and post-inflationary constraints in light of ACT, Phys. Lett. B 867, 139612 (2025).
  34. D. S. Zharov, O. O. Sobol, and S. I. Vilchinskii, Reheating acts on Starobinsky and Higgs inflation, arXiv:2505.01129.
  35. L. Liu, Z. Yi, and Y. Gong, Reconciling Higgs inflation with ACT observations through reheating, arXiv:2505.02407.
  36. M. R. Haque, S. Pal, and D. Paul, Improved predictions on Higgs-Starobinsky inflation and reheating with ACT DR6 and primordial gravitational waves, Phys. Lett. B 869, 139852 (2025).
  37. Yogesh, A. Mohammadi, Q. Wu, and T. Zhu, Starobinsky like inflation and EGB gravity in the light of ACT, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2025) 010.
  38. A. Addazi, Y. Aldabergenov, and S. V. Ketov, Curvature corrections to Starobinsky inflation can explain the ACT results, Phys. Lett. B 869, 139883 (2025).
  39. R. Kallosh and A. Linde, On the present status of inflationary cosmology, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 57, 135 (2025).
  40. I. D. Gialamas, T. Katsoulas, and K. Tamvakis, Keeping the relation between the Starobinsky model and no-scale supergravity active, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2025) 060.
  41. S. Saini and A. Nautiyal, Power law α-Starobinsky inflation, arXiv:2505.16853.
  42. W. J. Wolf, Inflationary attractors and radiative corrections in light of ACT data, arXiv:2506.12436.
  43. X. Wang, K. Kohri, and T. T. Yanagida, Primordial black holes save R2 inflation, arXiv:2506.06797.
  44. M. Piva, Classification of f(R) theories of inflation and the uniqueness of Starobinsky model, arXiv:2507.02637.
  45. N. Sidik Risdianto, R. H. S. Budhi, N. Shobcha, and A. Salim Adam, The preheating stage on the Starobinsky inflation after ACT, arXiv:2507.12868.
  46. D. S. Zharov, O. O. Sobol, and S. I. Vilchinskii, ACT observations, reheating, and Starobinsky and Higgs inflation, Phys. Rev. D 112, 023544 (2025).
  47. E. G. M. Ferreira, E. McDonough, L. Balkenhol, R. Kallosh, L. Knox, and A. Linde, The BAO-CMB tension and implications for inflation, arXiv:2507.12459.
  48. J. Ellis, M. A. G. Garcia, N. Nagata, D. V. Nanopoulos, and K. A. Olive, Deformations of Starobinsky inflation in no-scale SU(5) and SO(10) GUTs, arXiv:2508.13279.
  49. V. K. Oikonomou, Strong gravity effects on R2-corrected single scalar field inflation and compatibility with the ACT data, Phys. Lett. B 871, 139972 (2025).
  50. T. Modak, L. Röver, B. M. Schäfer, B. Schosser, and T. Plehn, Cornering extended Starobinsky inflation with CMB and SKA, SciPost Phys. 15, 047 (2023).
  51. S. M. Lee, T. Modak, K.-y. Oda, and T. Takahashi, Ultraviolet sensitivity in Higgs-Starobinsky inflation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2023) 045.
  52. T. Saidov and A. Zhuk, Bouncing inflation in nonlinear R2+R4 gravitational model, Phys. Rev. D 81, 124002 (2010).
  53. Q.-G. Huang, A polynomial f(R) inflation model, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2013) 035.
  54. H. Motohashi, Consistency relation for Rp inflation, Phys. Rev. D 91, 064016 (2015).
  55. T. Asaka, S. Iso, H. Kawai, K. Kohri, T. Noumi, and T. Terada, Reinterpretation of the Starobinsky model, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2016, 123E01 (2016).
  56. K. Bamba and S. D. Odintsov, Inflationary cosmology in modified gravity theories, Symmetry 7, 220 (2015).
  57. T. Miranda, J. C. Fabris, and O. F. Piattella, Reconstructing a f(R) theory from the α-attractors, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2017) 041.
  58. D. Y. Cheong, H. M. Lee, and S. C. Park, Beyond the Starobinsky model for inflation, Phys. Lett. B 805, 135453 (2020).
  59. G. Rodrigues-da Silva, J. Bezerra-Sobrinho, and L. G. Medeiros, Higher-order extension of Starobinsky inflation: Initial conditions, slow-roll regime, and reheating phase, Phys. Rev. D 105, 063504 (2022).
  60. V. R. Ivanov, S. V. Ketov, E. O. Pozdeeva, and S. Y. Vernov, Analytic extensions of Starobinsky model of inflation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2021) 058.
  61. A. S. Koshelev, K. S. Kumar, and A. A. Starobinsky, Generalized non-local R2-like inflation, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2022) 146.
  62. Y. Shtanov, V. Sahni, and S. S. Mishra, Tabletop potentials for inflation from f(R) gravity, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2022) 023.
  63. Q.-Y. Wang, Y. Tang, and Y.-L. Wu, Inflation in Weyl scaling invariant gravity with R3 extensions, Phys. Rev. D 107, 083511 (2023).
  64. J. Kim, X. Wang, Y.-l. Zhang, and Z. Ren, Enhancement of primordial curvature perturbations in R3-corrected Starobinsky-Higgs inflation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2025) 011.
  65. L. Sebastiani, G. Cognola, R. Myrzakulov, S. D. Odintsov, and S. Zerbini, Nearly Starobinsky inflation from modified gravity, Phys. Rev. D 89, 023518 (2014).
  66. S. D. Odintsov, V. K. Oikonomou, and L. Sebastiani, Unification of constant-roll inflation and dark energy with logarithmic R2-corrected and exponential F(R) gravity, Nucl. Phys. B923, 608 (2017).
  67. S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and V. K. Oikonomou, Modified gravity theories on a nutshell: Inflation, bounce and late-time evolution, Phys. Rep. 692, 1 (2017).
  68. Y. Cado, C. Englert, T. Modak, and M. Quirós, Implication of preheating on gravity assisted baryogenesis in R2-Higgs inflation, Phys. Rev. D 111, 023042 (2025).
  69. J.-O. Gong and T. Tanaka, A covariant approach to general field space metric in multi-field inflation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2011) 015; 02 (2012) E01.
  70. E. I. Sfakianakis and J. van de Vis, Preheating after Higgs inflation: Self-resonance and gauge boson production, Phys. Rev. D 99, 083519 (2019).
  71. D. I. Kaiser, E. A. Mazenc, and E. I. Sfakianakis, Primordial bispectrum from multifield inflation with nonminimal couplings, Phys. Rev. D 87, 064004 (2013).
  72. H. Kodama and M. Sasaki, Cosmological perturbation theory, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 78, 1 (1984).
  73. V. F. Mukhanov, H. A. Feldman, and R. H. Brandenberger, Theory of cosmological perturbations. Part 1. Classical perturbations. Part 2. Quantum theory of perturbations. Part 3. Extensions, Phys. Rep. 215, 203 (1992).
  74. K. A. Malik and D. Wands, Cosmological perturbations, Phys. Rep. 475, 1 (2009).
  75. J. Elliston, D. Seery, and R. Tavakol, The inflationary bispectrum with curved field-space, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2012) 060.
  76. M. Sasaki, Large scale quantum fluctuations in the inflationary universe, Prog. Theor. Phys. 76, 1036 (1986).
  77. V. F. Mukhanov, Theory of cosmological perturbations. Part 1. Classical perturbations. Part 2. Quantum theory of perturbations. Part 3. Extensions, Phys. Rept. 215, 203 (1992).
  78. B. A. Bassett, S. Tsujikawa, and D. Wands, Inflation dynamics and reheating, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 537 (2006).
  79. S. Antusch, D. Nolde, and S. Orani, Hill crossing during preheating after Hilltop inflation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2015) 009.
  80. M. P. DeCross, D. I. Kaiser, A. Prabhu, C. Prescod-Weinstein, and E. I. Sfakianakis, Preheating after multifield inflation with nonminimal couplings, I: Covariant formalism and attractor behavior, Phys. Rev. D 97, 023526 (2018).
  81. M. P. DeCross, D. I. Kaiser, A. Prabhu, C. Prescod-Weinstein, and E. I. Sfakianakis, Preheating after multifield inflation with nonminimal couplings, III: Dynamical spacetime results, Phys. Rev. D 97, 023528 (2018).
  82. Y. Cado, C. Englert, T. Modak, and M. Quirós, Baryogenesis in R2-Higgs inflation: The gravitational connection, Phys. Rev. D 109, 043026 (2024).
  83. M. Abitbol et al. (Simons Observatory Collaboration), The Simons Observatory: Science goals and forecasts for the enhanced large aperture telescope, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2025) 034.
  84. T. M. C. Abbott et al. (DES Collaboration), Dark Energy Survey: A 2.1% measurement of the angular baryonic acoustic oscillation scale at redshift zeff=0.85 from the final dataset, Phys. Rev. D 110, 063515 (2024).
  85. V. Duret et al. (Euclid Collaboration), Euclid preparation. BAO analysis of photometric galaxy clustering in configuration space, arXiv:2503.11621.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation