- Open Access
Machine learning assisted unfolding for neutrino cross-section measurements with the OmniFold technique
Phys. Rev. D 112, 012008 – Published 9 July, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/sp1f-n9k2
Abstract
The choice of unfolding method for a cross-section measurement is tightly coupled to the model dependence of the efficiency correction and the overall impact of cross-section modeling uncertainties in the analysis. A key issue is the dimensionality used in unfolding, as the kinematics of all outgoing particles in an event typically affect the reconstruction performance in a neutrino detector. OmniFold is an unfolding method that iteratively reweights a simulated dataset, using machine learning to utilize arbitrarily high-dimensional information, that has previously been applied to proton-proton and proton-electron datasets. This paper demonstrates OmniFold’s application to a neutrino cross-section measurement for the first time using a public T2K near detector simulated dataset, comparing its performance with traditional approaches using a mock data study.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (70)
- G. Cowan, Conf. Proc. C 0203181, 248 (2002), https://www.ippp.dur.ac.uk/Workshops/02/statistics/proceedings//cowan.pdf.
- Proceedings, PHYSTAT 2011 Workshop on Statistical Issues Related to Discovery Claims in Search Experiments and Unfolding, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland 17-20 January 2011, edited by H. B. Prosper and L. Lyons (CERN, Geneva, 2011).
- S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
- K. Mahn, C. Marshall, and C. Wilkinson, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 68, 105 (2018).
- W. Tang, X. Li, X. Qian, H. Wei, and C. Zhang, J. Instrum. 12, P10002 (2017).
- K. Abe et al. (The T2K Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 98, 032003 (2018).
- S. Gardiner, arXiv:2401.04065.
- M. B. Avanzini et al., Phys. Rev. D 105, 092004 (2022).
- G. D’Agostini, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 362, 487 (1995).
- G. D’Agostini, in Proceedings of the Alliance Workshop on Unfolding and Data Correction (2010), arXiv:1010.0632.
- M. Kuusela, Statistical issues in unfolding methods for high energy physics, Master’s thesis, Aalto University, 2012.
- Y. Vardi, L. A. Shepp, and L. Kaufman, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 80, 8 (1985).
- H. N. Multhei and B. Schorr, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 257, 371 (1987).
- W. H. Richardson, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 62, 55 (1972).
- L. B. Lucy, Astron. J. 79, 745 (1974).
- L. Koch, J. Instrum. 14, P09013 (2019).
- R. D. Cousins, S. J. May, and Y. Sun, arXiv:1607.07038.
- M. Arratia et al., J. Instrum. 17, P01024 (2022).
- S. Badger et al., SciPost Phys. 14, 079 (2023).
- N. Huetsch et al., SciPost Phys. 18, 070 (2025).
- A. Andreassen, P. T. Komiske, E. M. Metodiev, B. Nachman, and J. Thaler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 182001 (2020).
- A. Andreassen, P. T. Komiske, E. M. Metodiev, B. Nachman, A. Suresh, and J. Thaler, in Procceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Representations (2021), arXiv:2105.04448.
- C.-C. Pan, X. Dong, Y.-C. Sun, A.-Y. Cheng, A.-B. Wang, Y.-X. Hu, and H. Cai, arXiv:2406.01635.
- K. Datta, D. Kar, and D. Roy, arXiv:1806.00433.
- J. N. Howard, S. Mandt, D. Whiteson, and Y. Yang, Sci. Rep. 12, 7567 (2022).
- S. Diefenbacher, G.-H. Liu, V. Mikuni, B. Nachman, and W. Nie, Phys. Rev. D 109, 076011 (2024).
- A. Butter, T. Jezo, M. Klasen, M. Kuschick, S. Palacios Schweitzer, and T. Plehn, SciPost Phys. Core 7, 064 (2024).
- M. Bellagente, A. Butter, G. Kasieczka, T. Plehn, and R. Winterhalder, SciPost Phys. 8, 070 (2020).
- Y. Alanazi et al., Phys. Rev. D 106, 096002 (2022).
- M. Bellagente, A. Butter, G. Kasieczka, T. Plehn, A. Rousselot, R. Winterhalder, L. Ardizzone, and U. Köthe, SciPost Phys. 9, 074 (2020).
- M. Vandegar, M. Kagan, A. Wehenkel, and G. Louppe, arXiv:2011.05836.
- M. Backes, A. Butter, M. Dunford, and B. Malaescu, SciPost Phys. Core 7, 007 (2024).
- M. Leigh, J. A. Raine, K. Zoch, and T. Golling, SciPost Phys. 14, 159 (2023).
- J. Ackerschott, R. K. Barman, D. Gonçalves, T. Heimel, and T. Plehn, SciPost Phys. 17, 001 (2024).
- A. Shmakov, K. Greif, M. Fenton, A. Ghosh, P. Baldi, and D. Whiteson, arXiv:2305.10399.
- A. Shmakov, K. Greif, M. J. Fenton, A. Ghosh, P. Baldi, and D. Whiteson, SciPost Phys. 18, 117 (2025).
- V. Andreev et al. (H1 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 132002 (2022); H1 Collaboration, Report No. H1prelim-22-031, 2022.
- V. Andreev et al. (H1 Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 844, 138101 (2023).
- V. Andreev et al. (H1 Collaboration), arXiv:2412.14092.
- R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 108, L031103 (2023).
- G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 261803 (2024).
- G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), arXiv:2502.02062.
- Y. Song (STAR Collaboration), arXiv:2307.07718.
- T. Pani (STAR Collaboration), EPJ Web Conf. 296, 11003 (2024).
- P. T. Komiske, S. Kryhin, and J. Thaler, Phys. Rev. D 106, 094021 (2022).
- CMS Collaboration, Measurement of event shapes in minimum bias events from pp collisions at 13 TeV, Report No. CMS-PAS-SMP-23-008, CERN, Geneva, 2024, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2899591.
- T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman, The Elements of Statistical Learning, Springer Series in Statistics (Springer New York Inc., New York, NY, USA, 2001).
- M. Sugiyama, T. Suzuki, and T. Kanamori, Density Ratio Estimation in Machine Learning (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2012).
- K. Cranmer, J. Pavez, and G. Louppe, Approximating likelihood ratios with calibrated discriminative classifiers, arXiv:1506.02169.
- T2K Collaboration, Data release for simulated muon neutrino charged-current interactions on hydrocarbon without pions in the final state using multiple detectors with correlated energy spectra at T2K, 10.5281/zenodo.15183090 (2025).
- K. Abe et al. (T2K Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 108, 112009 (2023).
- K. Abe et al. (T2K Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 101, 112001 (2020).
- K. Abe et al. (T2K Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 101, 112004 (2020).
- Y. Hayato, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 112, 171 (2002).
- Y. Hayato, Acta Phys. Pol. B 40, 2477 (2009), https://www.actaphys.uj.edu.pl/R/40/9/2477.
- Y. Hayato and L. Pickering, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 230, 4469 (2021).
- S. Agostinelli et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 506, 250 (2003).
- J. Nieves, R. Gran, I. Ruiz Simo, F. Sánchez, and M. Vicente Vacas, Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc. 273–275, 1830 (2016).
- K. Abe et al. (T2K Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 103, 112008 (2021).
- https://github.com/rhuang1/OmnifoldT2K
- X.-G. Lu, L. Pickering, S. Dolan, G. Barr, D. Coplowe, Y. Uchida, D. Wark, M. O. Wascko, A. Weber, and T. Yuan, Phys. Rev. C 94, 015503 (2016).
- L. Pickering, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. Conf. Proc. 12, 010032 (2016).
- F. Chollet et al., keras, https://keras.io (2015).
- M. Abadi et al., arXiv:1605.08695.
- D. Kingma and J. Ba, arXiv:1412.6980.
- R. Milton, V. Mikuni, T. Lee, T. Wamorkar, and B. Nachman, J. Instrum. 20, P05034 (2025).
- F. Topsoe, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 46, 1602 (2000).
- V. Mikuni and B. Nachman, Phys. Rev. D 111, 054015 (2025).
- V. Mikuni and B. Nachman, Phys. Rev. D 111, L051504 (2025).
- P. Komiske, E. Metodiev, and J. Thaler, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2019) 121.