Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Testing thermal-relic dark matter with a dark-photon mediator

Gordan Krnjaic

  • Theory Division, Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA and Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Phys. Rev. D 113, 115057 – Published 22 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/sd6p-8y9p

Abstract

In light of recent DAMIC-M results, we present the status of thermal-relic dark matter χ coupled to a kinetically mixed dark photon A′. In the predictive “direct annihilation” regime, mA′>mχ, the relic abundance depends on the kinetic mixing parameter, and there is a minimum value compatible with thermal freeze-out. Using only electron- and nuclear-recoil direct-detection results, we find that, for complex scalar dark matter, the direct annihilation regime is now excluded for nearly all values of mχ; the only exception is the resonant annihilation regime where mA′≈2mχ. Direct annihilation relic targets for other representative models, including Majorana and pseudo-Dirac candidates, remain viable across a wide range of model parameters but will be tested with a combination of dedicated accelerator searches in the near future. In the opposite “secluded annihilation” regime, where mχ>mA′, this scenario is excluded by cosmic microwave background measurements for all mχ≲30  GeV. Similar conclusions in both the direct and secluded regimes hold for all anomaly-free vector mediators that couple to the first generation of electrically charged Standard Model particles.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (79)

  1. M. Cirelli, A. Strumia, and J. Zupan, arXiv:2406.01705.
  2. G. Bertone and D. Hooper, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 045002 (2018).
  3. A. Berlin and N. Blinov, Phys. Rev. D 99, 095030 (2019).
  4. A. Berlin, N. Blinov, and S. W. Li, Phys. Rev. D 100, 015038 (2019).
  5. A. Berlin, D. Hooper, and G. Krnjaic, Phys. Rev. D 94, 095019 (2016).
  6. A. Berlin, D. Hooper, and G. Krnjaic, Phys. Lett. B 760, 106 (2016).
  7. B. W. Lee and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 165 (1977).
  8. M. Fabbrichesi, E. Gabrielli, and G. Lanfranchi, 10.1007/978-3-030-62519-1 (2020).
  9. G. Krnjaic, Phys. Rev. D 94, 073009 (2016).
  10. B. Batell, T. Han, D. McKeen, and B. Shams Es Haghi, Phys. Rev. D 97, 075016 (2018).
  11. N. F. Bell, M. J. Dolan, A. Ghosh, and M. Virgato, Phys. Rev. D 111, 055020 (2025).
  12. K. Aggarwal et al. (DAMIC-M Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 071002 (2025).
  13. S. Balan et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2025) 053.
  14. P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini, Nucl. Phys. B360, 145 (1991).
  15. G. Steigman, B. Dasgupta, and J. F. Beacom, Phys. Rev. D 86, 023506 (2012).
  16. E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner, The Early Universe (Taylor and Francis, London, 2019), Vol. 69, 10.1201/9780429492860.
  17. E. Izaguirre, G. Krnjaic, P. Schuster, and N. Toro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 251301 (2015).
  18. M. Carrillo González and N. Toro, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2022) 060.
  19. V. V. Ezhela, S. B. Lugovsky, and O. V. Zenin, arXiv:hep-ph/0312114.
  20. D. P. Finkbeiner, S. Galli, T. Lin, and T. R. Slatyer, Phys. Rev. D 85, 043522 (2012).
  21. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
  22. T. R. Slatyer, Phys. Rev. D 93, 023527 (2016).
  23. R. Essig, J. Mardon, and T. Volansky, Phys. Rev. D 85, 076007 (2012).
  24. O. Abramoff et al. (SENSEI Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 161801 (2019).
  25. N. Castelló-Mor (DAMIC-M Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 958, 162933 (2020).
  26. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (Oscura Collaboration), arXiv:2202.10518.
  27. B. Carew, A. R. Caddell, T. N. Maity, and C. A. J. O’Hare, Phys. Rev. D 109, 083016 (2024).
  28. A. Berlin, N. Blinov, G. Krnjaic, P. Schuster, and N. Toro, Phys. Rev. D 99, 075001 (2019).
  29. A. Berlin and F. Kling, Phys. Rev. D 99, 015021 (2019).
  30. R. Essig, J. Mardon, M. Papucci, T. Volansky, and Y.-M. Zhong, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2013) 167.
  31. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE DM Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 98, 112004 (2018).
  32. Y. M. Andreev et al. (NA64 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 211803 (2024).
  33. M. Battaglieri et al. (BDX Collaboration), arXiv:1607.01390.
  34. B. Dutta, W.-C. Huang, and J. L. Newstead, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 111801 (2023).
  35. E. Izaguirre, G. Krnjaic, P. Schuster, and N. Toro, Phys. Rev. D 88, 114015 (2013).
  36. T. Åkesson et al. (LDMX Collaboration), arXiv:1808.05219.
  37. J. L. Feng and J. Smolinsky, Phys. Rev. D 96, 095022 (2017).
  38. Y. Kahn, G. Krnjaic, and B. Mandava, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 081804 (2021).
  39. T. Lin, H.-B. Yu, and K. M. Zurek, Phys. Rev. D 85, 063503 (2012).
  40. M. Pospelov, A. Ritz, and M. B. Voloshin, Phys. Lett. B 662, 53 (2008).
  41. S. Li et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 261001 (2023).
  42. P. Agnes et al. (DarkSide Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 101002 (2023).
  43. H. An, H. Nie, M. Pospelov, J. Pradler, and A. Ritz, Phys. Rev. D 104, 103026 (2021).
  44. A. H. Abdelhameed et al. (CRESST Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 100, 102002 (2019).
  45. G. Angloher et al. (CRESST Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 110, 083038 (2024).
  46. A. Migdal, Sov. Phys. JETP 9, 1163 (1939).
  47. M. Ibe, W. Nakano, Y. Shoji, and K. Suzuki, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 194.
  48. M. J. Dolan, F. Kahlhoefer, and C. McCabe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 101801 (2018).
  49. N. F. Bell, J. B. Dent, J. L. Newstead, S. Sabharwale, and T. J. Weiler, Phys. Rev. D 101, 015012 (2020).
  50. D. Baxter, Y. Kahn, and G. Krnjaic, Phys. Rev. D 101, 076014 (2020).
  51. S. Knapen, J. Kozaczuk, and T. Lin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 081805 (2021).
  52. J. Xu, D. Adams, B. G. Lenardo, T. Pershing, R. L. Mannino, E. Bernard, J. Kingston, E. Mizrachi, J. Lin, R. Essig, V. Mozin, P. Kerr, A. Bernstein, and M. Tripathi, Phys. Rev. D 109, L051101 (2024).
  53. P. Agnes et al. (DarkSide Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 101001 (2023).
  54. D. Huang et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 191002 (2023).
  55. P. Adari et al. (SENSEI Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 011804 (2025).
  56. M. F. Albakry et al. (SuperCDMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 107, 112013 (2023).
  57. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 241803 (2019).
  58. H. M. Araújo et al. (MIGDAL Collaboration), Astropart. Phys. 151, 102853 (2023).
  59. D. Adams, D. Baxter, H. Day, R. Essig, and Y. Kahn, Phys. Rev. D 107, L041303 (2023).
  60. K. Schutz and K. M. Zurek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 121302 (2016).
  61. T. Trickle, Z. Zhang, and K. M. Zurek, Phys. Rev. D 105, 015001 (2022).
  62. K. M. Nollett and G. Steigman, Phys. Rev. D 89, 083508 (2014).
  63. C. Boehm, M. J. Dolan, and C. McCabe, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2013) 041.
  64. G. Krnjaic and S. D. McDermott, Phys. Rev. D 101, 123022 (2020).
  65. N. Sabti, J. Alvey, M. Escudero, M. Fairbairn, and D. Blas, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2020) 004.
  66. P. deNiverville, M. Pospelov, and A. Ritz, Phys. Rev. D 84, 075020 (2011).
  67. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo (MiniBooNE DM Collaboration), J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1342, 012055 (2020).
  68. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 221803 (2017).
  69. V. De Romeri, K. J. Kelly, and P. A. N. Machado, Phys. Rev. D 100, 095010 (2019).
  70. C. Ahdida et al. (SHiP Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 199.
  71. B. Batell, R. Essig, and Z. Surujon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 171802 (2014).
  72. M. Battaglieri et al., Phys. Rev. D 106, 072011 (2022).
  73. Y. M. Andreev et al. (NA64 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 161801 (2023).
  74. E. Izaguirre, G. Krnjaic, P. Schuster, and N. Toro, Phys. Rev. D 91, 094026 (2015).
  75. T. Åkesson et al., arXiv:2203.08192.
  76. A. Berlin, G. Krnjaic, and E. Pinetti, Phys. Rev. D 110, 035015 (2024).
  77. P. Ilten, Y. Soreq, M. Williams, and W. Xue, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2018) 004.
  78. M. Bauer, P. Foldenauer, and J. Jaeckel, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 094.
  79. Y. Kahn, G. Krnjaic, N. Tran, and A. Whitbeck, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2018) 153.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation