Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Probing the isospin structure and low-lying resonances in Λc+→nK¯0π+ decays

Meng-Yuan Li1, Guan-Ying Wang2,*, Neng-Chang Wei3,†, De-Min Li1,‡, and En Wang1,§

  • *Contact author: wangguanying@henu.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: weinengchang@htu.edu.cn
  • ‡Contact author: lidm@zzu.edu.cn
  • §Contact author: wangen@zzu.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 113, 094013 – Published 7 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/s3bp-h492

Abstract

The Cabibbo-favored decay Λc+→nK¯0π+ offers a unique window to explore unresolved puzzles in the low-energy baryon spectroscopy and the isospin dynamics of the K¯N system. Recent experimental results present a, for now, contradiction: LHCb and Belle analyses of Λc+→pK−π+ suggest the pK− (I=0) component dominates, while the Beijing Spectrometer III (BESIII) hints at significant contributions from both isospin 0 and 1 in the nK¯0 system of Λc+→nKS0π+. Furthermore, the measured branching fraction of Λc+→nKS0π+ exceeds SU(3) symmetry predictions by a factor of 3–4, signaling strong contributions from low-lying resonances. In this work, we provide a theoretical analysis of Λc+→nK¯0π+ within the coupled-channel chiral unitary approach, where the N(1535) and Λ(1670) can be dynamically generated. Our calculations show a narrow peak from N(1535) in the π+n invariant mass spectrum and a distinct dip from Λ(1670) in the K¯0n spectrum. The dip structure is qualitatively consistent with the Λ(1670) manifestation in K¯N→K¯N scattering, supporting its molecular interpretation. This study not only connects the experimental observations but also highlights Λc+→nK¯0π+ as a crucial process to disentangle the nature of N(1535) and Λ(1670). Future precise measurements of this decay channel by the BESIII, Belle II, LHCb, and the proposed Super Tau-Charm Facility are strongly encouraged.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (62)

  1. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 112, 032006 (2025).
  2. I. Adachi et al. (Belle and Belle-II Collaborations), Phys. Rev. D 112, 012013 (2025).
  3. E. Wang, L. S. Geng, J. J. Wu, J. J. Xie, and B. S. Zou, Chin. Phys. Lett. 41, 101401 (2024).
  4. X. C. Feng, L. L. Wei, M. Y. Duan, E. Wang, and D. M. Li, Phys. Lett. B 846, 138185 (2023).
  5. C. H. Zeng, J. X. Lu, E. Wang, J. J. Xie, and L. S. Geng, Phys. Rev. D 102, 076009 (2020).
  6. Z. Wang, Y. Y. Wang, E. Wang, D. M. Li, and J. J. Xie, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 842 (2020).
  7. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 112001 (2017).
  8. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 109, 072010 (2024).
  9. C. Q. Geng, Y. K. Hsiao, C. W. Liu, and T. H. Tsai, Phys. Rev. D 99, 073003 (2019).
  10. J. Y. Cen, C. Q. Geng, C. W. Liu, and T. H. Tsai, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 946 (2019).
  11. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 108, 012023 (2023).
  12. S. B. Yang et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 108, L031104 (2023).
  13. S. C. Zhang, M. Y. Duan, W. T. Lyu, G. Y. Wang, J. Y. Zhu, and E. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1253 (2024).
  14. M. Y. Duan, M. Bayar, and E. Oset, Phys. Lett. B 857, 139003 (2024).
  15. C. D. Lü, W. Wang, and F. S. Yu, Phys. Rev. D 93, 056008 (2016).
  16. B. C. Liu and B. S. Zou, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 042002 (2006).
  17. L. S. Geng, E. Oset, B. S. Zou, and M. Doring, Phys. Rev. C 79, 025203 (2009).
  18. L. Hannelius and D. O. Riska, Phys. Rev. C 62, 045204 (2000).
  19. C. Helminen and D. O. Riska, Nucl. Phys. A699, 624 (2002).
  20. A. Zhang, Y. R. Liu, P. Z. Huang, W. Z. Deng, X. L. Chen, and S. L. Zhu, High Energy Phys. Nucl. Phys. 29, 250 (2005).
  21. B. S. Zou, Eur. Phys. J. A 35, 325 (2008).
  22. E. Oset and A. Ramos, Nucl. Phys. A635, 99 (1998).
  23. D. Jido, J. A. Oller, E. Oset, A. Ramos, and U. G. Meissner, Nucl. Phys. A725, 181 (2003).
  24. N. Kaiser, T. Waas, and W. Weise, Nucl. Phys. A612, 297 (1997).
  25. J. Nieves and E. Ruiz Arriola, Phys. Rev. D 64, 116008 (2001).
  26. T. Inoue, E. Oset, and M. J. Vicente Vacas, Phys. Rev. C 65, 035204 (2002).
  27. M. Doring, E. Oset, and B. S. Zou, Phys. Rev. C 78, 025207 (2008).
  28. E. Wang, H. X. Chen, L. S. Geng, D. M. Li, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 93, 094001 (2016).
  29. J. X. Lu, E. Wang, J. J. Xie, L. S. Geng, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 93, 094009 (2016).
  30. J. J. Xie and L. S. Geng, Phys. Rev. D 96, 054009 (2017).
  31. R. Pavao, S. Sakai, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. C 98, 015201 (2018).
  32. W. T. Lyu, Y. H. Lyu, M. Y. Duan, G. Y. Wang, D. Y. Chen, and E. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 123 (2025).
  33. Y. Li, S. W. Liu, E. Wang, D. M. Li, L. S. Geng, and J. J. Xie, Phys. Rev. D 110, 074010 (2024).
  34. M. Y. Li, W. T. Lyu, L. J. Liu, and E. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 111, 034046 (2025).
  35. J. Song, M. Bayar, Y. Y. Li, and E. Oset, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1114 (2025).
  36. Y. Li, E. Wang, L. S. Geng, and J. J. Xie, Phys. Rev. D 113, 054039 (2026).
  37. Z. W. Liu, W. Kamleh, D. B. Leinweber, F. M. Stokes, A. W. Thomas, and J. J. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 082004 (2016).
  38. D. Guo and Z. W. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 105, 114039 (2022).
  39. C. D. Abell, D. B. Leinweber, Z. W. Liu, A. W. Thomas, and J. J. Wu, Phys. Rev. D 108, 094519 (2023).
  40. R. Molina, C. W. Xiao, W. H. Liang, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 109, 054002 (2024).
  41. H. P. Li, J. Song, W. H. Liang, R. Molina, and E. Oset, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 656 (2024).
  42. J. Y. Lee et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 103, 052005 (2021).
  43. G. P. Gopal et al. (Rutherford-London Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. B119, 362 (1977).
  44. E. Oset, A. Ramos, and C. Bennhold, Phys. Lett. B 527, 99 (2002); 530, 260(E) (2002).
  45. A. Starostin et al. (Crystal Ball Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 64, 055205 (2001).
  46. X. H. Zhong and Q. Zhao, Phys. Rev. C 79, 045202 (2009).
  47. J. J. Liu, Z. W. Liu, K. Chen, D. Guo, D. B. Leinweber, X. Liu, and A. W. Thomas, Phys. Rev. D 109, 054025 (2024).
  48. J. J. Xie and L. S. Geng, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 496 (2016).
  49. G. Y. Wang, N. C. Wei, H. M. Yang, E. Wang, L. S. Geng, and J. J. Xie, Phys. Rev. D 106, 056001 (2022).
  50. K. Miyahara, T. Hyodo, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. C 92, 055204 (2015).
  51. M. Y. Duan, W. T. Lyu, C. W. Xiao, E. Wang, J. J. Xie, D. Y. Chen, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 111, 016004 (2025).
  52. W. T. Lyu, S. C. Zhang, G. Y. Wang, J. J. Wu, E. Wang, L. S. Geng, and J. J. Xie, Phys. Rev. D 110, 054020 (2024).
  53. Z. Y. Wang, S. Q. Luo, Z. F. Sun, C. W. Xiao, and X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 106, 096026 (2022).
  54. Y. Li, W. T. Lyu, G. Y. Wang, L. Li, W. C. Yan, and E. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 111, 054011 (2025).
  55. S. C. Zhang, W. T. Lyu, G. Y. Wang, B. Q. Ma, and E. Wang, Chin. Phys. Lett. 43, 050203 (2026).
  56. K. Miyahara, T. Hyodo, M. Oka, J. Nieves, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. C 95, 035212 (2017).
  57. R. P. Pavao, W. H. Liang, J. Nieves, and E. Oset, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 265 (2017).
  58. A. Bramon, A. Grau, and G. Pancheri, Phys. Lett. B 283, 416 (1992).
  59. E. Oset, W. H. Liang, M. Bayar, J. J. Xie, L. R. Dai, M. Albaladejo, M. Nielsen, T. Sekihara, F. Navarra, L. Roca et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 25, 1630001 (2016).
  60. M. Doring, E. Oset, and D. Strottman, Phys. Rev. C 73, 045209 (2006).
  61. T. Hyodo, D. Jido, and A. Hosaka, Phys. Rev. C 78, 025203 (2008).
  62. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation