Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Constraining neutrino charges at beam experiments

Jack D. Shergold*

Martin Spinrath†

  • *Contact author: jack.d.shergold@ific.uv.es
  • †Contact author: spinrath@phys.nthu.edu.tw

Phys. Rev. D 112, 073006 – Published 17 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/rnd5-jfvh

Abstract

We propose a new method to constrain neutrino charges at neutrino beam experiments. Uncharged in the Standard Model, evidence for a neutrino electric charge would be a smoking gun for new physics, shedding light on the Dirac or Majorana nature of neutrinos, and giving insight into the origin of charge quantization. We find that using the most sensitive magnetometers available, existing beam experiments could constrain neutrino charges |qν|≲10−13, in units of the electron charge, while future upgrades could strengthen these bounds significantly. We also discuss electromagnetic dipole moments and show that our proposal is highly sensitive to new long-range forces.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (42)

  1. C. Giunti and A. Studenikin, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 531 (2015).
  2. K. S. Babu and R. N. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 938 (1989).
  3. K. S. Babu and R. N. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. D 41, 271 (1990).
  4. R. Foot, G. C. Joshi, H. Lew, and R. R. Volkas, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 5, 2721 (1990).
  5. R. Foot, H. Lew, and R. R. Volkas, J. Phys. G 19, 361 (1993); 19, 1067(E) (1993), https://inspirehep.net/literature/337955.
  6. C. Giunti, K. Kouzakov, Y.-F. Li, and A. Studenikin, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 75, 1 (2024).
  7. C. Caprini, S. Biller, and P. G. Ferreira, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2005) 006.
  8. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  9. A. I. Studenikin and I. Tokarev, Nucl. Phys. B884, 396 (2014).
  10. M. Atzori Corona, W. M. Bonivento, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, and F. Dordei, Phys. Rev. D 107, 053001 (2023).
  11. K. A. ShivaSankar, A. Majumdar, D. K. Papoulias, H. Prajapati, and R. Srivastava, Phys. Lett. B 839, 137742 (2023).
  12. C. Giunti and C. A. Ternes, Phys. Rev. D 108, 095044 (2023).
  13. J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (Wiley, New York, 1998).
  14. R. Acciarri et al. (DUNE Collaboration), arXiv:1512.06148.
  15. Accelerator technical design report for high-intensity proton accelerator facility project, J-PARC, Technical Reports No. JAERI-TECH-2003-044, No. KEK-2002-13 JAERI, KEK, 2003.
  16. D. F. Jackson Kimball, and G. Rybka, Springer Proc. Phys. 245, 105 (2020).
  17. I. K. Kominis, T. W. Kornack, J. C. Allred, and M. V. Romalis, Nature (London) 422, 596 (2003).
  18. S. Ganguly, K. Yonehara, C. M. Bhat, A. K. Triplett, R. Ainsworth, C. Hinds, and M. Abdelhamid, arXiv:2410.18256.
  19. J. Strait et al. (DUNE Collaboration), arXiv:1601.05823.
  20. E. Angelico, J. Eisch, A. Elagin, H. Frisch, S. Nagaitsev, and M. Wetstein, Phys. Rev. D 100, 032008 (2019).
  21. M. Friend, in Proc. 7th International Beam Instrumentation Conference (IBIC’18), Shanghai, China, 2018 (JACoW Publishing, Geneva, Switzerland, 2019), pp. 85–88.
  22. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (CCM Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 106, 012001 (2022).
  23. A. Alekou et al. (ESSnuSB Collaboration), Universe 9, 347 (2023).
  24. R. Garoby et al., Phys. Scr. 93, 014001 (2018).
  25. C. Ahdida et al., nuSTORM at CERN: Feasibility Study, Technical Report No. CERN-PBC-REPORT-2019-003, CERN, Geneva, 2020.
  26. A. Longhin and F. Terranova, NP06/ENUBET annual report for the CERN-SPSC, Technical Reports No. CERN-SPSC-2020-009; SPSC-SR-268, CERN, Geneva, 2020.
  27. F. Acerbi et al. (ENUBET Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 964 (2023).
  28. A. Facon, E.-K. Dietsche, D. Grosso, S. Haroche, J.-M. Raimond, M. Brune, and S. Gleyzes, Nature (London) 535, 262 (2016).
  29. M. Aprili, Nat. Nanotechnol. 1, 15 (2006).
  30. M. Bauer, P. Foldenauer, and J. Jaeckel, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 094.
  31. J. M. Cline, in 58th Rencontres de Moriond on Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories (2024), https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.08534.
  32. P. Foldenauer, Phenomenology of extra Abelian gauge symmetries, Ph.D. thesis, U. Heidelberg (main), 2019.
  33. M. B. Wise and Y. Zhang, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2018) 053.
  34. E. G. Adelberger, J. H. Gundlach, B. R. Heckel, S. Hoedl, and S. Schlamminger, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 62, 102 (2009).
  35. T. A. Wagner, S. Schlamminger, J. H. Gundlach, and E. G. Adelberger, Classical Quantum Gravity 29, 184002 (2012).
  36. J. Venzor, A. Pérez-Lorenzana, and J. De-Santiago, Phys. Rev. D 103, 043534 (2021).
  37. A. Caputo, H. Liu, S. Mishra-Sharma, and J. T. Ruderman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 221303 (2020).
  38. A. A. Garcia, K. Bondarenko, S. Ploeckinger, J. Pradler, and A. Sokolenko, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2020) 011.
  39. M. Betz, F. Caspers, M. Gasior, M. Thumm, and S. W. Rieger, Phys. Rev. D 88, 075014 (2013).
  40. J. Jaeckel and S. Roy, Phys. Rev. D 82, 125020 (2010).
  41. M. Fabbrichesi, E. Gabrielli, and G. Lanfranchi, The Physics of the Dark Photon: A Primer (Springer International Publishing, New York, 2021).
  42. S.-P. Li and X.-J. Xu, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2023) 009.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation