Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Probing mixed-state dark matter and flavor observables in a scalar-assisted baryonic gauge theory

Taramati1,*, Manas Kumar Mohapatra2,†, Utkarsh Patel3,‡, Rukmani Mohanta2,§, and Sudhanwa Patra1,4,∥

  • *Contact author: taramati@iitbhilai.ac.in
  • †Contact author: manasmohapatra12@gmail.com
  • ‡Contact author: utkarsh.patel@saha.ac.in
  • §Contact author: rmsp@uohyd.ac.in
  • ∥Contact author: sudhanwa@iitbhilai.ac.in

Phys. Rev. D 114, 015017 – Published 10 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/rmwj-8bzc

Abstract

We explore a standard model extension based on a local U(1)B symmetry, where a baryon-charged scalar mediates interactions between a fermionic dark matter candidate and standard model quarks. In this setup, the dark matter relic abundance is shaped not only by standard annihilation channels but also by additional coannihilation processes induced by a new scalar. The presence of this mediator provides a unified link between dark sector and flavor physics, yielding distinctive phenomenological consequences. We conduct a detailed study of dark matter phenomenology, emphasizing the role of the mass splitting between the dark matter particles and the scalar mediator in determining the efficiency of coannihilation. The parameter space is examined in light of existing constraints from cosmological observations, direct and indirect detection experiments, as well as the collider searches at the LHC. Our analysis shows that the extended scalar sector opens up viable regions of parameter space beyond those accessible in minimal U(1)B realizations, many of which are expected to be tested by forthcoming searches at XENONnT and the Cherenkov Telescope Array. Moreover, the model induces correlated signatures from flavor observables associated with the b→s transitions as well, serving as complementary tests of the underlying framework.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (106)

  1. M. Cirelli, A. Strumia, and J. Zupan, arXiv:2406.01705.
  2. D. Abercrombie et al., Phys. Dark Universe 27, 100371 (2020).
  3. P. Fileviez Pérez, E. Golias, R.-H. Li, C. Murgui, and A. D. Plascencia, Phys. Rev. D 100, 015017 (2019).
  4. C. Murgui Galvez, Phenomenological and cosmological aspects of electroweak models beyond the standard model, Ph.D. thesis, Valencia University, 2020.
  5. Taramati, R. Sahu, U. Patel, K. Ghosh, and S. Patra, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2025) 159.
  6. Taramati, L. Malhotra, Z. A. Borboruah, and S. Patra, arXiv:2508.17476.
  7. G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, Phys. Rep. 405, 279 (2005).
  8. G. Bertone and D. Hooper, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 045002 (2018).
  9. R. Foot, G. C. Joshi, and H. Lew, Phys. Rev. D 40, 2487 (1989).
  10. A. Das, S. Gola, S. Mandal, and N. Sinha, Phys. Lett. B 829, 137117 (2022).
  11. S. Patra, W. Rodejohann, and C. E. Yaguna, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2016) 076.
  12. U. Patel, Avnish, S. Patra, and K. Ghosh, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2025) 079.
  13. A. Das, S. Goswami, K. N. Vishnudath, and T. Nomura, Phys. Rev. D 101, 055026 (2020).
  14. A. Alves, A. Berlin, S. Profumo, and F. S. Queiroz, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2015) 076.
  15. N. Okada, S. Okada, and Q. Shafi, Phys. Lett. B 810, 135845 (2020).
  16. M. J. Neves, N. Okada, and S. Okada, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2021) 038.
  17. J. Lao, C. Cai, Z.-H. Yu, Y.-P. Zeng, and H.-H. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 101, 095031 (2020).
  18. A. Biswas, S. Ganguly, and S. Roy, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2020) 043.
  19. A. Das, S. K. Gola, S. Mandal, and N. Sinha, Phys. Lett. B 829, 137117 (2022).
  20. B. L. Sánchez-Vega and E. R. Schmitz, Phys. Rev. D 92, 053007 (2015).
  21. S. Mishra, M. K. Behera, R. Mohanta, S. Patra, and S. Singirala, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 420 (2020).
  22. E. Ma, P. K. Paul, and N. Sahu, arXiv:2601.05926.
  23. S. Mahapatra, P. K. Paul, N. Sahu, and P. Shukla, Eur. Phys. J. C 86, 67 (2026).
  24. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (CCM Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 021801 (2022).
  25. C. D. Carone and H. Murayama, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3122 (1995).
  26. C. D. Carone and H. Murayama, Phys. Rev. D 52, 484 (1995).
  27. D. Bailey and S. Davidson, Phys. Lett. B 348, 185 (1995).
  28. P. Fileviez Perez and M. B. Wise, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2011) 068.
  29. E. Ma, Phys. Lett. B 813, 136066 (2021).
  30. L. Michaels and F. Yu, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 120.
  31. J. Boos, C. D. Carone, N. L. Donald, and M. R. Musser, Phys. Rev. D 107, 035018 (2023).
  32. P. Fileviez Pérez, E. Golias, R.-H. Li, and C. Murgui, Phys. Rev. D 99, 035009 (2019).
  33. J. Butterworth, H. Debnath, P. Fileviez Perez, and Y. Yeh, Phys. Rev. D 110, 075001 (2024).
  34. J. Butterworth, H. Debnath, J. Egan, and P. Fileviez Perez, Phys. Rev. D 112, 015012 (2025).
  35. C. Macolino (DARWIN Collaboration), J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1468, 012068 (2020).
  36. C. E. Aalseth et al. (DarkSide-20k Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133, 131 (2018).
  37. F. Bernlochner et al. (Belle-II Collaboration), arXiv:2503.24155.
  38. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. Instrum. 19, P05065 (2024).
  39. S. Singirala, S. Sahoo, and R. Mohanta, Phys. Rev. D 99, 035042 (2019).
  40. S. Singirala, S. Sahoo, and R. Mohanta, Phys. Rev. D 105, 015033 (2022).
  41. M. K. Mohapatra, S. Singirala, D. Panda, and R. Mohanta, Phys. Dark Universe 52, 102338 (2026).
  42. W. Chao, H. Wang, L. Wang, and Y. Zhang, Chin. Phys. C 45, 083105 (2021).
  43. P. Ko, T. Nomura, and H. Okada, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2022) 098.
  44. S. Sahoo, S. Singirala, and R. Mohanta, arXiv:2112.04382.
  45. M. Bordone, G. Isidori, and A. Pattori, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 440 (2016).
  46. G. Hiller and F. Kruger, Phys. Rev. D 69, 074020 (2004).
  47. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 108, 032002 (2023).
  48. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 191802 (2022).
  49. D. M. Straub, arXiv:1810.08132.
  50. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 121803 (2025).
  51. S. Descotes-Genon, T. Hurth, J. Matias, and J. Virto, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2013) 137.
  52. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 011802 (2020).
  53. S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias, M. Ramon, and J. Virto, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2013) 048.
  54. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 781, 517 (2018).
  55. S. Descotes-Genon, L. Hofer, J. Matias, and J. Virto, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2014) 125.
  56. A. Abdesselam et al. (Belle Collaboration), in LHC Ski 2016: A First Discussion of 13 TeV Results (2016), arXiv:1604.04042.
  57. A. Bharucha, D. M. Straub, and R. Zwicky, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 098.
  58. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2016) 047; 04 (2017) 142(E).
  59. J. Aebischer, J. Kumar, P. Stangl, and D. M. Straub, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 509 (2019).
  60. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 151801 (2021).
  61. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2013) 084.
  62. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2015) 179.
  63. C. Bobeth, M. Gorbahn, T. Hermann, M. Misiak, E. Stamou, and M. Steinhauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 101801 (2014).
  64. M. Beneke, C. Bobeth, and R. Szafron, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 232; 11 (2022) 099(E).
  65. A. Greljo, J. Salko, A. Smolkovič, and P. Stangl, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 087.
  66. A. Hook, E. Izaguirre, and J. G. Wacker, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2011, 859762 (2011).
  67. T. Gherghetta, J. Kersten, K. Olive, and M. Pospelov, Phys. Rev. D 100, 095001 (2019).
  68. M. Napsuciale, S. Rodríguez, and H. Hernández-Arellano, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 093E01 (2022).
  69. F. Staub, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 1773 (2014).
  70. W. Porod and F. Staub, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 2458 (2012).
  71. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Goudelis, A. Pukhov, and B. Zaldivar, Comput. Phys. Commun. 231, 173 (2018).
  72. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  73. C. Cai, Z.-H. Yu, and H.-H. Zhang, Nucl. Phys. B924, 128 (2017).
  74. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
  75. J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 011802 (2025).
  76. A. Abdukerim et al. (PANDA-X and PandaX Collaborations), Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 68, 221011 (2025).
  77. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 221003 (2025).
  78. A. W. Strong, R. Diehl, H. Halloin, V. Schoenfelder, L. Bouchet, P. Mandrou, F. Lebrun, and R. Terrier, Astron. Astrophys. 444, 495 (2005).
  79. G. Maier (VERITAS Collaboration), AIP Conf. Proc. 1085, 187 (2009).
  80. D. J. Thompson, Rep. Prog. Phys. 71, 116901 (2008).
  81. M. Ackermann et al. (Fermi-LAT Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 241302 (2011).
  82. F. Acero et al. (Fermi-LAT Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 218, 23 (2015).
  83. F. Aharonian et al. (H.E.S.S. Collaboration), Nature (London) 439, 695 (2006).
  84. A. Abramowski et al. (H.E.S.S. Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 041301 (2013).
  85. B. S. Acharya et al. (CTA Consortium Collaboration), Science with the Cherenkov Telescope Array (World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 2018).
  86. S. Abe et al. (CTAO Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2024) 047.
  87. A. Ali, P. Ball, L. T. Handoko, and G. Hiller, Phys. Rev. D 61, 074024 (2000).
  88. W. Altmannshofer, P. Ball, A. Bharucha, A. J. Buras, D. M. Straub, and M. Wick, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2009) 019.
  89. S. Sahoo and R. Mohanta, Phys. Rev. D 93, 034018 (2016).
  90. C. Bouchard, G. P. Lepage, C. Monahan, H. Na, and J. Shigemitsu (HPQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 88, 054509 (2013); 88, 079901(E) (2013).
  91. S. Descotes-Genon, L. Hofer, J. Matias, and J. Virto, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2016) 092.
  92. B. Capdevila, S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias, and J. Virto, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2016) 075.
  93. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 105, 012010 (2022).
  94. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2019) 098.
  95. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2020) 188.
  96. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 191801 (2017).
  97. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2014) 133.
  98. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2016) 104.
  99. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 161802 (2021).
  100. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2021) 043.
  101. S. Wehle et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 111801 (2017).
  102. M. Misiak et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 221801 (2015).
  103. M. Misiak and M. Steinhauser, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 201 (2017).
  104. J. Albrecht, F. Bernlochner, A. Lenz, and A. Rusov, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 233, 359 (2024).
  105. S. Banerjee et al. (Heavy Flavor Averaging Group (HFLAV) Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 113, 012008 (2026).
  106. D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov, and V. O. Galkin, Phys. Rev. D 82, 034032 (2010).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation