Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Large CP asymmetries from final-state interactions in charmful baryonic decays of B0→Ξc+Ξ¯c− and Bs0→Λc+Λ¯c−

Chao-Qiang Geng1, Xiang-Nan Jin1,*, and Chia-Wei Liu1,2

  • 1School of Fundamental Physics and Mathematical Sciences, Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, UCAS, Hangzhou 310024, China
  • 2Tsung-Dao Lee Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

  • *Contact author: xnjin@ucas.ac.cn

Phys. Rev. D 112, 013001 – Published 7 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/rgyz-jvgk

Abstract

We study the direct CP asymmetries in the decays of B0→Ξc+Ξ¯c− and Bs0→Λc+Λ¯c−, emphasizing the critical role of final-state interactions (FSIs). In these channels, the small energy release and annihilation topology suppress short-distance contributions while enhancing long-distance effects. By separating the decay amplitudes into S and P waves, we show that the P-wave component, carrying only a single weak phase, contributes negligibly to CP asymmetries. In contrast, the S-wave amplitude—strongly modified by FSIs—acquires a substantial strong phase that enables interference among multiple weak phases, producing large CP-violating effects. Numerically, we find sizable asymmetries of aCPdir=0.88±0.05±0.10 for B0→Ξc+Ξ¯c− and aCPdir=−0.106±0.019±0.010 for Bs0→Λc+Λ¯c−, where the first and second uncertainties stem from the poorly known hadron couplings and the omission of the B0→K+K−→Ξc+Ξ¯c− rescattering process. For practical feasibility, we restrict our analysis to intermediate states involving pseudoscalar mesons, which yield tractable loop integrals. Excited intermediate states, such as D(*)D¯(*), are omitted because their inclusion would require handling nonrenormalizable interactions, introducing substantial ambiguity. These results, combined with the relatively large branching fractions, make these modes prime targets for experimental searches at LHCb and Belle II, potentially offering new insights into strong dynamics and nonperturbative QCD in heavy-hadron decays.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (24)

  1. M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49, 652 (1973).
  2. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2515 (2001); K. Abe et al. (Belle Collaboration), 87, 091802 (2001).
  3. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  4. A. D. Sakharov, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 5, 32 (1967).
  5. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), arXiv:2503.16954.
  6. C. W. Liu and C. Q. Geng, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2022) 128.
  7. J. J. Han, J. X. Yu, Y. Li, H. n. Li, J. P. Wang, Z. J. Xiao, and F. S. Yu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 221801 (2025).
  8. X. N. Jin, C. W. Liu, and C. Q. Geng, Phys. Rev. D 105, 053005 (2022).
  9. C. Q. Geng, X. N. Jin, and C. W. Liu, Phys. Lett. B 846, 138240 (2023).
  10. C. K. Chua, Phys. Rev. D 106, 036015 (2022).
  11. S. Fajfer, A. Prapotnik, P. Singer, and J. Zupan, Phys. Rev. D 68, 094012 (2003).
  12. H. Y. Cheng and C. W. Chiang, Phys. Rev. D 109, 073008 (2024).
  13. C. P. Jia, H. Y. Jiang, J. P. Wang, and F. S. Yu, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2024) 072.
  14. A. A. Petrov, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 233, 439 (2024).
  15. X. Y. Pham, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1663 (1980).
  16. I. Bediaga and E. Predazzi, Phys. Lett. B 275, 161 (1992).
  17. C. H. Chen, H. Y. Cheng, and Y. K. Hsiao, Phys. Lett. B 663, 326 (2008).
  18. Y. K. Hsiao and C. Q. Geng, Phys. Rev. D 91, 077501 (2015).
  19. C. Q. Geng, X. N. Jin, C. W. Liu, and X. Yu, Phys. Rev. D 110, 113008 (2024).
  20. Z. Rui, Z. T. Zou, and Y. Li, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 159.
  21. G. Buchalla, A. J. Buras, and M. E. Lautenbacher, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 1125 (1996).
  22. A. Khodjamirian, C. Klein, T. Mannel, and Y. M. Wang, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2011) 106.
  23. T. M. Yan, H. Y. Cheng, C. Y. Cheung, G. L. Lin, Y. C. Lin, and H. L. Yu, Phys. Rev. D 46, 1148 (1992); 55, 5851(E) (1997).
  24. H. Y. Cheng, C. W. Liu, and F. Xu, Phys. Rev. D 106, 093005 (2022).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation