- Open Access
Quantitative performance analysis of two different interferometric alignment sensing schemes for gravitational wave detectors
Phys. Rev. D 113, 083002 – Published 1 April, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/rg8d-6vdv
Abstract
Precise laser alignment in optical cavities is essential for high-precision laser interferometry. We report on a table-top optical experiment featuring two alignment sensing schemes: the conventional wavefront sensing (WFS) scheme which uses quadrant photodetectors (QPDs) to recover optical alignment, and the newly developed radio frequency jitter alignment sensing (RFJAS) scheme, which uses an electro-optic beam deflector (EOBD) to apply fast angular modulation. This work evaluates the performance of RFJAS through a direct, side-by-side comparison with WFS. We present a detailed noise budget for both techniques, with particular emphasis on limitations at low frequencies, below 30 Hz. Our results show that WFS performance is constrained by technical noise arising from beam spot motion (BSM), mainly due to beam miscentering on QPDs. In contrast, RFJAS is primarily limited by residual RF amplitude modulation. A blended scheme that combines both sensing methods may offer the most practical approach for use in gravitational wave detectors such as Advanced LIGO.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (18)
- J. Aasi et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Advanced LIGO, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 074001 (2015).
- F. Acernese et al. (VIRGO Collaboration), Advanced Virgo: A second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 024001 (2015).
- T. Akutsu et al., Overview of Kagra: Detector design and construction history, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2021, 05A101 (2020).
- D. R. Euan Morrison, Brian J. Meers, and H. Ward, Automatic alignment of optical interferometers, Appl. Opt. 33, 5041 (1994).
- E. Morrison, B. J. Meers, D. I. Robertson, and H. Ward, Experimental demonstration of an automatic alignment system for optical interferometers, Appl. Opt. 33, 5037 (1994).
- E. Black, An introduction to Pound-Drever-Hall laser frequency stabilization, Am. J. Phys. 69, 79 (2001).
- A. Buikema and C. et al., Sensitivity and performance of the Advanced LIGO detectors in the third observing run, Phys. Rev. D 102, 062003 (2020).
- E. Capote, W. Jia et al., Advanced LIGO detector performance in the fourth observing run, Phys. Rev. D 111, 062002 (2025).
- P. Fulda, D. Voss, C. Mueller, L. Ortega, G. Ciani, G. Mueller, and D. Tanner, Alignment sensing for optical cavities using radio-frequency jitter modulation, Appl. Opt. 56, 3879 (2017).
- L. Tao, P. Fulda, and A. C. Green, Misalignment and mode mismatch error signals for higher-order hermite-gauss modes from two sensing schemes, Phys. Rev. D 108, 062001 (2023).
- D. D. Brown, A. Freise, H. T. Cao, A. Ciobanu, J. Gobeil, A. Green, P. Hapke, P. Jones, M. van der Kolk, K. Kuns et al., Finesse (2025), 10.5281/zenodo.12662017.
- C. M. Caves, Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer, Phys. Rev. D 23, 1693 (1981).
- Finesse 3 development page (2023), https://finesse.docs.ligo.org/finesse-ligo/.
- D. Z. Anderson, Alignment of resonant optical cavities, Appl. Opt. 23, 2944 (1984).
- G. Mueller, Beam jitter coupling in Advanced LIGO, Opt. Express 13, 7118 (2005).
- X. Shi, J. Zhang, X. Zeng, X. Lü, K. Liu, J. Xi, Y. Ye, and Z. Lu, Suppression of residual amplitude modulation effects in Pound–Drever–Hall locking, Appl. Phys. B 124, 153 (2018).
- E. Capote et al., Advanced LIGO detector performance in the fourth observing run, Phys. Rev. D 111, 062002 (2025).
- E. Capote, Overcoming Controls and Noise Challenges for High Power Interferometric Gravitational-Wave Detectors, Ph.D. dissertation, Syracuse University, 2024.
