Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Kaon radiative leptonic decay rates from lattice QCD simulations at the physical point

R. Di Palma1, R. Frezzotti2, G. Gagliardi1, V. Lubicz1, G. Martinelli3, C. T. Sachrajda4, F. Sanfilippo5, S. Simula5, and N. Tantalo2

Phys. Rev. D 111, 114523 – Published 30 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/r55k-cnqg

Abstract

We present a lattice quantum chromodynamics (QCD) calculation of the radiative leptonic decay rates of the kaon, improving upon our previous work in Desiderio et al. [First lattice calculation of radiative leptonic decay rates of pseudoscalar mesons, Phys. Rev. D 103, 014502 (2021)]. Our analysis uses gauge ensembles generated by the Extended Twisted Mass Collaboration (ETMC) with Nf=2+1+1 flavors of Wilson-clover twisted mass fermions. For the first time, we go beyond the electroquenched approximation by including quark-disconnected contributions. Several key improvements have been implemented: (i) the simulations are now performed directly at physical light- and strange-quark masses, (ii) finite-size effects are carefully investigated using lattices with spatial extents ranging from L≃3.8  fm to L≃7.7  fm, and (iii) the continuum extrapolation is based on three lattice spacings in the range a∈[0.08,0.058]  fm. As a result of the high-precision determination of the relevant correlation functions, we reduce the uncertainties on both the axial and vector form factors by nearly a factor of two compared to our previous analysis. When compared to experimental measurements in the electron channel (K−→e−ν¯eγ), our results show a tension—at the level of 2.6 standard deviations—with respect to KLOE data. On the other hand, they are compatible with measurements from the E36 Collaboration at J-PARC. In the muonic decay channel (K−→μ−ν¯μγ), we confirm the tensions, already observed in our previous study, between lattice QCD predictions and ISTRA+ and OKA data, which are both primarily sensitive to the value of the negative-helicity form factor F−.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (51)

  1. J. Bijnens, G. Ecker, and J. Gasser, Radiative semileptonic kaon decays, Nucl. Phys. B396, 81 (1993).
  2. C. H. Chen, C. Q. Geng, and C. C. Lih, Decay spectrum of K+→e+νeγ, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 23, 3204 (2008).
  3. R. Frezzotti, N. Tantalo, G. Gagliardi, F. Sanfilippo, S. Simula, V. Lubicz, F. Mazzetti, G. Martinelli, and C. T. Sachrajda, Lattice calculation of the Ds meson radiative form factors over the full kinematical range, Phys. Rev. D 108, 074505 (2023).
  4. A. Desiderio et al., First lattice calculation of radiative leptonic decay rates of pseudoscalar mesons, Phys. Rev. D 103, 014502 (2021).
  5. R. Frezzotti, M. Garofalo, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, C. T. Sachrajda, F. Sanfilippo, S. Simula, and N. Tantalo, Comparison of lattice QCD+QED predictions for radiative leptonic decays of light mesons with experimental data, Phys. Rev. D 103, 053005 (2021).
  6. KLOE Collaboration, Precise measurement of Γ(K→eν(γ))/Γ(K→μν(γ)) and study of K→eνγ, Eur. Phys. J. C 64, 627 (2009).
  7. J-PARC E36 Collaboration, Measurement of structure dependent radiative K+→e+νeγ decays using stopped positive kaons, Phys. Lett. B 826, 136913 (2022).
  8. J-PARC E36 Collaboration, New determination of the branching ratio of the structure dependent radiative K+→e+νeγ, Phys. Lett. B 843, 138020 (2023).
  9. D. Giusti, C. F. Kane, C. Lehner, S. Meinel, and A. Soni, Methods for high-precision determinations of radiative-leptonic decay form factors using lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 107, 074507 (2023).
  10. X.-Y. Tuo, X. Feng, L.-C. Jin, and T. Wang, Lattice QCD calculation of K→ℓνℓℓ’+ℓ’- decay width, Phys. Rev. D 105, 054518 (2022).
  11. G. Gagliardi, F. Sanfilippo, S. Simula, V. Lubicz, F. Mazzetti, G. Martinelli, G. Martinelli, C. T. Sachrajda, and N. Tantalo, Virtual photon emission in leptonic decays of charged pseudoscalar mesons, Phys. Rev. D 105, 114507 (2022).
  12. R. Frezzotti, N. Tantalo, G. Gagliardi, F. Sanfilippo, S. Simula, and V. Lubicz, Spectral-function determination of complex electroweak amplitudes with lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 108, 074510 (2023).
  13. G. M. de Divitiis, R. Petronzio, and N. Tantalo, On the extraction of zero momentum form factors on the lattice, Phys. Lett. B 718, 589 (2012).
  14. Alpha Collaboration, Lattice QCD with a chirally twisted mass term, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2001) 058.
  15. R. Frezzotti and G. C. Rossi, Twisted mass lattice QCD with mass nondegenerate quarks, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 128, 193 (2004).
  16. R. Frezzotti and G. C. Rossi, Chirally improving Wilson fermions. 1. O(a) improvement, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2004) 007.
  17. R. Frezzotti and G. C. Rossi, Chirally improving Wilson fermions. II. Four-quark operators, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2004) 070.
  18. Extended Twisted Mass Collaboration (ETMC), Strange and charm quark contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment in lattice QCD with twisted-mass fermions, Phys. Rev. D 111, 054502 (2025).
  19. B. Sheikholeslami and R. Wohlert, Improved continuum limit lattice action for QCD with Wilson fermions, Nucl. Phys. B259, 572 (1985).
  20. Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG, FLAG review 2024, arXiv:2411.04268.
  21. D. Becirevic and F. Sanfilippo, Lattice QCD study of the radiative decays J/ψ→ηcγ and hc→ηcγ, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2013) 028.
  22. R. Di Palma, G. Gagliardi, and F. Sanfilippo, Investigation of optimal smearing for mesons, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2023 (2024) 152.
  23. C. T. Sachrajda and G. Villadoro, Twisted boundary conditions in lattice simulations, Phys. Lett. B 609, 73 (2005).
  24. G. M. de Divitiis, R. Petronzio, and N. Tantalo, On the discretization of physical momenta in lattice QCD, Phys. Lett. B 595, 408 (2004).
  25. ETM Collaboration, Dynamical twisted mass fermions with light quarks: Simulation and analysis details, Comput. Phys. Commun. 179, 695 (2008).
  26. ETM Collaboration, Sigma terms and strangeness content of the nucleon with Nf=2+1+1 twisted mass fermions, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2012) 037.
  27. L. Giusti, T. Harris, A. Nada, and S. Schaefer, Frequency-splitting estimators of single-propagator traces, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 586 (2019).
  28. E. T. Neil and J. W. Sitison, Improved information criteria for Bayesian model averaging in lattice field theory, Phys. Rev. D 109, 014510 (2024).
  29. J. Bijnens and G. Ecker, Mesonic low-energy constants, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 64, 149 (2014).
  30. F. Bloch and A. Nordsieck, Note on the radiation field of the electron, Phys. Rev. 52, 54 (1937).
  31. E787 Collaboration, Measurement of structure dependent K+→μ+νμγ decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2256 (2000).
  32. ISTRA+ Collaboration, Extraction of kaon formfactors from K−→μ−νμγ decay at ISTRA+ setup, Phys. Lett. B 695, 59 (2011).
  33. OKA Collaboration, Measurement of the K+→μ+νμγ decay form factors in the OKA experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 635 (2019).
  34. Particle Data Group, Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  35. M. Hansen, A. Lupo, and N. Tantalo, Extraction of spectral densities from lattice correlators, Phys. Rev. D 99, 094508 (2019).
  36. R. Frezzotti, N. Tantalo, G. Gagliardi, F. Sanfilippo, S. Simula, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, and C. T. Sachrajda, Bs→μ+μ−γ decay rate at large q2 from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 109, 114506 (2024).
  37. K. Jansen and C. Urbach, tmlqcd: A program suite to simulate Wilson twisted mass lattice QCD, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 2717 (2009).
  38. A. Abdel-Rehim, F. Burger, A. Deuzeman, K. Jansen, B. Kostrzewa, L. Scorzato et al., Recent developments in the tmlqcd software suite, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2013 (2014) 414 [arXiv:1311.5495].
  39. A. Deuzeman, K. Jansen, B. Kostrzewa, and C. Urbach, Experiences with openmp in tmlqcd, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2013 (2014) 416 [arXiv:1311.4521].
  40. ETM Collaboration, Twisted mass ensemble generation on GPU machines, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2022 (2023) 340 [arXiv:2212.06635].
  41. ETM Collaboration, lemon: An MPI parallel I/O library for data encapsulation using LIME, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 1321 (2012).
  42. A. Frommer, K. Kahl, S. Krieg, B. Leder, and M. Rottmann, Adaptive aggregation-based domain decomposition multigrid for the lattice Wilson–Dirac operator, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 36, A1581 (2014)
  43. C. Alexandrou, S. Bacchio, J. Finkenrath, A. Frommer, K. Kahl, and M. Rottmann, Adaptive aggregation-based domain decomposition multigrid for twisted mass fermions, Phys. Rev. D 94, 114509 (2016).
  44. S. Bacchio, C. Alexandrou, and J. Finkerath, Multigrid accelerated simulations for twisted mass fermions, EPJ Web Conf. 175, 02002 (2018).
  45. C. Alexandrou, S. Bacchio, and J. Finkenrath, Multigrid approach in shifted linear systems for the non-degenerated twisted mass operator, Comput. Phys. Commun. 236, 51 (2019).
  46. B. Joó, D. D. Kalamkar, T. Kurth, K. Vaidyanathan, and A. Walden, Optimizing Wilson-Dirac operator and linear solvers for Intel® KNL, in High Performance Computing, edited by M. Taufer, B. Mohr, and J. M. Kunkel (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016), pp. 415–427.
  47. M. Schröck, S. Simula, and A. Strelchenko, Accelerating twisted mass LQCD with qphix, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2015 (2016) 030 [arXiv:1510.08879].
  48. M. A. Clark, R. Babich, K. Barros, R. C. Brower, and C. Rebbi, Solving lattice QCD systems of equations using mixed precision solvers on GPUs, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181, 1517 (2010).
  49. R. Babich, M. A. Clark, B. Joo, G. Shi, R. C. Brower, and S. Gottlieb, Scaling lattice QCD beyond 100 GPUs, in SC11 International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis Seattle, Washington, 2011 (2011), arXiv:1109.2935.
  50. M. A. Clark, B. Joó, A. Strelchenko, M. Cheng, A. Gambhir, and R. C. Brower, Accelerating lattice QCD multigrid on GPUs using fine-grained parallelization, in SC ’16: Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (2016), pp. 795–806, arXiv:1612.07873.
  51. www.gauss-centre.eu

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation