Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Absence of Majorana-Weyl fermions in d=4 and the theory of Majorana fermions

Phys. Rev. D 113, 013001 – Published 9 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/qrrm-97qk

Abstract

It is customary to identify ψ+=νR+CνR¯T with a Majorana fermion on the basis of chirality changing charge conjugation C˜:νR→CνR¯T and parity P˜:νR→iγ4νR. The theorem on the absence of a Majorana-Weyl fermion in d=4 states C˜γ5C˜−1=−γ5 with C˜=Cγ4T, and, thus, the charge conjugation of the equivalent Majorana ψ+=(1+γ52)νR+(1−γ52)CνR¯T vanishes without subsidiary γ5→−γ5, namely, not defined in field theory. To be consistent with the theorem, it is common to use a doublet representation of chirality preserving charge conjugation C^:νR,L→CνL,R¯T and parity P^:νR,L→iγ4νL,R in theory containing both νR,L. In the type I seesaw model, the latter formulation is applicable but ψ+=νR+CνR¯T is not a Majorana fermion. An analog of the Bogoliubov transformation converts ψ±=νR,L±CνR,L¯T, which are obtained by a precise diagonalization of the seesaw model, to Majorana fermions ψM1,2=(ψ±Cψ¯T)/2 with a Dirac-type fermion ψ, as originally defined by Majorana. A chiral projection [(1+γ5)/2]ψM1 of a Majorana fermion is not a chiral fermion, which ensures the presence of the neutrinoless double beta decay.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (14)

  1. E. Majorana, Teoria symmetrica dell’elettrone e del positrone, Nuovo Cimento 14, 171 (1937) [An English translation by L. Maiani, A symmetric theory of electrons and positrons, Soryusiron Kenkyu 63, 149 (1981)].
  2. K. Fujikawa and A. Tureanu, Majorana neutrino as Bogoliubov quasiparticle, Phys. Lett. B 774, 273 (2017).
  3. K. Fujikawa and A. Tureanu, Seesaw mechanism and pseudo C-symmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 752 (2019).
  4. As for the representation with γ5 diagonal, we follow J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle, Neutrino masses in SU(2)×U(1) theories, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2227 (1980).
  5. P. Minkowski, μ→eγ at a rate of one out of 109 muon decays?, Phys. Lett. 67B, 421 (1977); T. Yanagida, in Proceedings of Workshop on Unified Theory and Baryon Number in the Universe, edited by O. Sawada and A. Sugamoto (1979), p. 95, KEK Report No. 79-18; M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, in Supergravity, edited by P. van Nieuwenhuizen and D. Z. Freedman (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979), p. 315; R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Neutrino masses and mixings in gauge models with spontaneous parity violation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 912 (1980).
  6. The BCS theory apparently violates the gauge symmetry, but it becomes manifestly gauge invariant after the Bogoliubov canonical transformation. Similarly, the type I seesaw model is not invariant under the C symmetry, but after an analog of the Bogoliubov canonical transformation, it becomes manifestly C invariant. This analogy was briefly mentioned in K. Fujikawa, BCS, Nambu-Jona-Lasinio, and Han-Nambu: A sketch of Nambu’s works in 1960–1965, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2016, 06A101 (2016).
  7. L. Autonne, Sur les matrices hypohermitiennes et sur les matrices unitaires, Ann. Univ. Lyon 38, 1 (1915); T. Takagi, On an algebraic problem related to an analytic theorem of Carathéodory and Fejér and on an allied theorem of Landau, Jpn. J. Math. 1, 83 (1925).
  8. Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Dynamical model of elementary particles based on an analogy with superconductivity. I, Phys. Rev. 122, 345 (1961).
  9. K. Fujikawa and A. Tureanu, Two classes of Majorana neutrinos in the seesaw model, Phys. Lett. B 858, 139064 (2024).
  10. S. M. Bilenky, J. Hošek, and S. T. Petcov, On oscillations of neutrinos with Dirac and Majorana masses, Phys. Lett. 94B, 495 (1980); M. Doi, T. Kotani, H. Nishiura, K. Okuda, and E. Takasugi, CP violation in Majorana neutrinos, 102B, 323 (1981).
  11. This theorem is well known. See, for example, N. Ohta, Superstrings, Branes and M-Theory (in Japanese), Modern Theoretical Physics Series No. 1 (Springer Verlag, Tokyo, 2002), p. 52. The difference between d=2, where the Majorana-Weyl fermion exists, and d=4, where the Majorana-Weyl fermion does not exist, is also understood by using the so-called Majorana representation of γ matrices for which the charge conjugation is given by the complex conjugation; γ5 is Hermitian and real and [(1+γ52)ψ]⋆=(1+γ52)ψ⋆ in d=2, while γ5 is Hermitian and pure imaginary and [(1+γ52)ψ]⋆=(1−γ52)ψ⋆ in d=4.
  12. K. Fujikawa, Generalized Pauli-Gursey transformation and Majorana neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B 789, 76 (2019). See also W. Pauli, On the conservation of the lepton charge, Nuovo Cimento 6, 204 (1957); F. Gürsey, Relation of charge independence and baryon conservation to Pauli’s transformation, 7, 411 (1958).
  13. K. Fujikawa, Operatorial characterization of Majorana neutrinos, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 285 (2020).
  14. M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, Baryogenesis without grand unification, Phys. Lett. B 174, 45 (1986).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation