- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Entanglement and correlations between local observables in de Sitter spacetime

Patricia Ribes-Metidieri1,2,*, Ivan Agullo3,†, and Béatrice Bonga2,4,‡

  • *Contact author: patricia.ribesmetidieri@york.ac.uk
  • †Contact author: agullo@lsu.edu
  • ‡Contact author: bbonga@science.ru.nl
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 113, 065001 – Published 2 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/qqjv-rv8t

Abstract

Studies of quantum field entanglement in de Sitter space based on the von Neumann entropy of local patches have concluded that curvature enhances entanglement between regions and their complements. Similar conclusions about entanglement enhancement have been reached in analyses of Fourier modes in the cosmological patch of de Sitter space. We challenge this interpretation by adopting a fully local approach: examining entanglement between pairs of field modes compactly supported within de Sitter’s cosmological patch. Our approach is formulated in terms of the properties of a metric tensor and an associated complex structure induced by the Bunch-Davies vacuum on the classical phase space. We find that increasing curvature increases correlations between local modes but, somewhat counterintuitively, decreases their entanglement. Our methods allow us to characterize how entanglement is spatially distributed, revealing that a cosmological constant, even if tiny, qualitatively alters the vacuum’s entanglement structure. We show our results are compatible with previous entropy-based studies when properly interpreted. Our findings have implications for entanglement between observables generated during cosmic inflation.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (98)

  1. E. Witten, APS medal for exceptional achievement in research: Invited article on entanglement properties of quantum field theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 045003 (2018).
  2. S. Hollands and K. Sanders, Entanglement Measures and Their Properties in Quantum Field Theory (Springer, Cham, 2018).
  3. S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2023).
  4. A. Ashtekar, B. Bonga, and A. Kesavan, Asymptotics with a positive cosmological constant: I. Basic framework, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 025004 (2015).
  5. T. S. Bunch and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum field theory in de Sitter space: Renormalization by point splitting, Proc. R. Soc. A 360, 117 (1978).
  6. H. Reeh and S. Schlieder, Bemerkungen zur Unitaaraquivalenz von Lorentzinvarienten Feldern, Nuovo Cimento 22, 1051 (1961).
  7. L. P. Grishchuk and Y. V. Sidorov, Squeezed quantum states of relic gravitons and primordial density fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D 42, 3413 (1990).
  8. A. Albrecht, P. Ferreira, M. Joyce, and T. Prokopec, Inflation and squeezed quantum states, Phys. Rev. D 50, 4807 (1994).
  9. J. Lesgourgues, D. Polarski, and A. A. Starobinsky, Quantum to classical transition of cosmological perturbations for nonvacuum initial states, Nucl. Phys. B497, 479 (1997).
  10. C. Kiefer, J. Lesgourgues, D. Polarski, and A. A. Starobinsky, The coherence of primordial fluctuations produced during inflation, Classical Quantum Gravity 15, L67 (1998).
  11. C. Kiefer, D. Polarski, and A. A. Starobinsky, Quantum to classical transition for fluctuations in the early universe, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 07, 455 (1998).
  12. C. Kiefer and D. Polarski, Why do cosmological perturbations look classical to us?, Adv. Sci. Lett. 2, 164 (2009).
  13. D. Polarski and A. A. Starobinsky, Semiclassicality and decoherence of cosmological perturbations, Classical Quantum Gravity 13, 377 (1996).
  14. J. Martin and V. Vennin, Quantum discord of cosmic inflation: Can we show that CMB anisotropies are of quantum-mechanical origin?, Phys. Rev. D 93, 023505 (2016).
  15. A. Ashtekar, A. Corichi, and A. Kesavan, Emergence of classical behavior in the early universe, Phys. Rev. D 102, 023512 (2020).
  16. A. Micheli and P. Peter, Quantum cosmological gravitational waves?, in Handbook of Quantum Gravity (Springer, Singapore, 2023).
  17. S. Brahma and A. N. Seenivasan, Probing the curvature of the cosmos from quantum entanglement due to gravity, Phys. Lett. B 862, 139309 (2025).
  18. S. Brahma and A. N. Seenivasan, Gravity-induced entanglement as a probe of spacetime curvature, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 32, 2342020 (2023).
  19. S. Brahma, J. Calderón-Figueroa, M. Hassan, and X. Mi, Momentum-space entanglement entropy in de Sitter spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 108, 043522 (2023).
  20. S. Brahma, J. Calderón-Figueroa, and X. Luo, Time-convolutionless cosmological master equations: Late-time resummations and decoherence for non-local kernels, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2025) 019.
  21. A. Bhattacharyya, S. Brahma, S. S. Haque, J. S. Lund, and A. Paul, The early universe as an open quantum system: Complexity and decoherence, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 058.
  22. J. Martin, A. Micheli, and V. Vennin, Discord and decoherence, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2022) 051.
  23. E. Calzetta and B. L. Hu, Quantum fluctuations, decoherence of the mean field, and structure formation in the early universe, Phys. Rev. D 52, 6770–6788 (1995).
  24. J. Maldacena and G. L. Pimentel, Entanglement entropy in de Sitter space, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2013) 038.
  25. J. Maldacena, A model with cosmological Bell inequalities, Fortschr. Phys. 64, 10 (2016).
  26. E. Nelson, Quantum decoherence during inflation from gravitational nonlinearities, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2016) 022.
  27. J. Martin and V. Vennin, Non Gaussianities from quantum decoherence during inflation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2018) 037.
  28. J. Grain and V. Vennin, Canonical transformations and squeezing formalism in cosmology, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2019) 022.
  29. S. Brahma, O. Alaryani, and R. Brandenberger, Entanglement entropy of cosmological perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 102, 043529 (2020).
  30. S. Brahma, A. Berera, and J. Calderón-Figueroa, Universal signature of quantum entanglement across cosmological distances, Classical Quantum Gravity 39, 245002 (2022).
  31. J. Martin and V. Vennin, Real-space entanglement in the cosmic microwave background, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2021) 036.
  32. I. Agullo, B. Bonga, and P. Ribes-Metidieri, Does inflation squeeze cosmological perturbations?, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2022) 032.
  33. L. Espinosa-Portalés and V. Vennin, Real-space Bell inequalities in de Sitter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2022) 037.
  34. A. Bhardwaj, I. Agullo, D. Kranas, J. H. Wilson, and D. E. Sheehy, Entanglement in an expanding toroidal Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A 109, 013305 (2024).
  35. J. Martin and V. Vennin, Real-space entanglement of quantum fields, Phys. Rev. D 104, 085012 (2021).
  36. H. K, S. Barman, and D. Kothawala, Universal role of curvature in vacuum entanglement, Phys. Rev. D 109, 065017 (2024).
  37. Y. Nambu, Entanglement of quantum fluctuations in the inflationary universe, Phys. Rev. D 78, 044023 (2008).
  38. Y. Nambu and Y. Ohsumi, Entanglement of a coarse grained quantum field in the expanding universe, Phys. Rev. D 80, 124031 (2009).
  39. Y. Nambu and K. Yamaguchi, Entanglement partners and monogamy in de Sitter universes, Phys. Rev. D 108, 045002 (2023).
  40. A. Belfiglio, O. Luongo, and S. Mancini, Quantum entanglement in cosmology, Phys. Rep. 1146, 1 (2025).
  41. A. Valentini, Non-local correlations in quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Lett. A 153, 321 (1991).
  42. B. Reznik, A. Retzker, and J. Silman, Violating Bell’s inequalities in vacuum, Phys. Rev. A 71, 042104 (2005).
  43. J. Silman and B. Reznik, Long-range entanglement in the Dirac vacuum, Phys. Rev. A 75, 052307 (2007).
  44. A. Pozas-Kerstjens and E. Martín-Martínez, Harvesting correlations from the quantum vacuum, Phys. Rev. D 92, 064042 (2015).
  45. A. Pozas-Kerstjens and E. Martín-Martínez, Entanglement harvesting from the electromagnetic vacuum with hydrogenlike atoms, Phys. Rev. D 94, 064074 (2016).
  46. G. Salton, R. B. Mann, and N. C. Menicucci, Acceleration-assisted entanglement harvesting and rangefinding, New J. Phys. 17, 035001 (2015).
  47. K. K. Ng, L. Hodgkinson, J. Louko, R. B. Mann, and E. Martín-Martínez, Unruh-DeWitt detector response along static and circular-geodesic trajectories for Schwarzschild–anti-de Sitter black holes, Phys. Rev. D 90, 064003 (2014).
  48. K. Bueley, L. Huang, K. Gallock-Yoshimura, and R. B. Mann, Harvesting mutual information from BTZ black hole spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 106, 025010 (2022).
  49. K. Gallock-Yoshimura, E. Tjoa, and R. B. Mann, Harvesting entanglement with detectors freely falling into a black hole, Phys. Rev. D 104, 025001 (2021).
  50. J. Foo, R. B. Mann, and M. Zych, Entanglement amplification between superposed detectors in flat and curved spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 103, 065013 (2021).
  51. L. J. Henderson, R. A. Hennigar, R. B. Mann, A. R. H. Smith, and J. Zhang, Entangling detectors in anti-de Sitter space, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2019) 178.
  52. L. J. Henderson and N. C. Menicucci, Bandlimited entanglement harvesting, Phys. Rev. D 102, 125026 (2020).
  53. M. P. G. Robbins, L. J. Henderson, and R. B. Mann, Entanglement amplification from rotating black holes, Classical Quantum Gravity 39, 02LT01 (2021).
  54. T. R. Perche, C. Lima, and E. Martín-Martínez, Harvesting entanglement from complex scalar and fermionic fields with linearly coupled particle detectors, Phys. Rev. D 105, 065016 (2022).
  55. T. R. Perche, B. Ragula, and E. Martín-Martínez, Harvesting entanglement from the gravitational vacuum, Phys. Rev. D 108, 085025 (2023).
  56. E. Tjoa and E. Martín-Martínez, When entanglement harvesting is not really harvesting, Phys. Rev. D 104, 125005 (2021).
  57. D. Mendez-Avalos, L. J. Henderson, K. Gallock-Yoshimura, and R. B. Mann, Entanglement harvesting of three Unruh-DeWitt detectors, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 54, 87 (2022).
  58. L. J. Henderson, S. Y. Ding, and R. B. Mann, Entanglement harvesting with a twist, AVS Quantum Sci. 4, 014402 (2022).
  59. C. Gooding, A. Sachs, R. B. Mann, and S. Weinfurtner, Vacuum entanglement probes for ultra-cold atom systems, New J. Phys. 26, 105001 (2024).
  60. J. G. A. Caribé, R. H. Jonsson, M. Casals, A. Kempf, and E. Martín-Martínez, Lensing of vacuum entanglement near Schwarzschild black holes, Phys. Rev. D 108, 025016 (2023).
  61. G. V. Steeg and N. C. Menicucci, Entangling power of an expanding universe, Phys. Rev. D 79, 044027 (2009).
  62. E. Bianchi and A. Satz, Entropy of a subalgebra of observables and the geometric entanglement entropy, Phys. Rev. D 99, 085001 (2019).
  63. I. Agullo, B. Bonga, P. Ribes-Metidieri, D. Kranas, and S. Nadal-Gisbert, How ubiquitous is entanglement in quantum field theory?, Phys. Rev. D 108, 085005 (2023).
  64. A. Serafini, Quantum Continuous Variables: A Primer of Theoretical Methods (CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, 2017).
  65. C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. García-Patrón, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Lloyd, Gaussian quantum information, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 621 (2012).
  66. Y. Akrami, F. Arroja et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 results—IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A9 (2020).
  67. M. Hotta, R. Schützhold, and W. Unruh, On the partner particles for moving mirror radiation and black hole evaporation, Phys. Rev. D 91, 124060 (2015).
  68. J. Trevison, K. Yamaguchi, and M. Hotta, Spatially overlapped partners in quantum field theory, J. Phys. A 52, 125402 (2019).
  69. L. Hackl and R. H. Jonsson, Minimal energy cost of entanglement extraction, Quantum 3, 165 (2019).
  70. I. Agullo, E. Martin-Martinez, S. Nadal-Gisbert, P. Ribes-Metidieri, and K. Yamaguchi, Correlation and entanglement partners in Gaussian systems, arXiv:2512.11055.
  71. P. Ribes-Metidieri, I. Agullo, and B. Bonga, Inflation does not create entanglement in local observables, Classical Quantum Gravity 43, 01LT01 (2026).
  72. R. M. Wald, Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time and Black Hole Thermodynamics, Chicago Lectures in Physics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1995).
  73. A. Ashtekar and A. Magnon, Quantum fields in curved space-times, Proc. R. Soc. A 346, 375 (1975).
  74. L. Hackl and E. Bianchi, Bosonic and fermionic Gaussian states from Kähler structures, SciPost Phys. Core 4, 025 (2021).
  75. A. Much and R. Oeckl, Complex structures for Klein–Gordon theory on globally hyperbolic spacetimes, Classical Quantum Gravity 39, 025015 (2022).
  76. R. Haag and D. Kastler, An algebraic approach to quantum field theory, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 5, 848 (1964).
  77. A. Peres, Separability criterion for density matrices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413 (1996).
  78. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, On the necessary and sufficient conditions for separability of mixed quantum states, Phys. Lett. A 223, 1 (1996).
  79. R. Simon, Peres-Horodecki separability criterion for continuous variable systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2726 (2000).
  80. N. A. Chernikov and E. A. Tagirov, Quantum theory of scalar fields in de Sitter space-time, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare Phys. Theor. A 9, 109 (1968).
  81. E. A. Tagirov, Consequences of field quantization in de Sitter type cosmological models, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 76, 561 (1973).
  82. A. R. Liddle and S. M. Leach, How long before the end of inflation were observable perturbations produced?, Phys. Rev. D 68, 103503 (2003).
  83. H. Bahouri, J.-Y. Chemin, and R. Danchin, Fourier Analysis and Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations (Springer Science & Business Media, New York, 2011).
  84. C. Bender and S. Orszag, Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers I: Asymptotic Methods and Perturbation Theory, Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers (Springer, New York, 1999).
  85. J. Martin and V. Vennin, Real-space entanglement of quantum fields, Phys. Rev. D 104, 085012 (2021).
  86. N. Shiba, Entanglement entropy of two spheres, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2012) 100.
  87. G. Jing, C. Marissa, A. Iserles, B. Gilvey, and J. Trevelyan, Quadrature methods for highly oscillatory singular integrals, J. Comput. Math. 39, 227 (2021).
  88. A. S. Fokas and S. A. Smitheman, The Fourier transforms of the Chebyshev and legendre polynomials, arXiv:1211.4943.
  89. J.-T. Hsiang and B.-L. Hu, No intrinsic decoherence of inflationary cosmological perturbations, Universe 8, 27 (2022).
  90. A. Ashtekar, B. Bonga, and A. Kesavan, Gravitational waves from isolated systems: Surprising consequences of a positive cosmological constant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 051101 (2016).
  91. Y. Akrami et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A9 (2020).
  92. J. J. Halliwell, Decoherence in quantum cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 39, 2912 (1989).
  93. P. Martineau, On the decoherence of primordial fluctuations during inflation, Classical Quantum Gravity 24, 5817 (2007).
  94. C. P. Burgess, R. Holman, and D. Hoover, Decoherence of inflationary primordial fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D 77, 063534 (2008).
  95. T. Colas, J. Grain, and V. Vennin, Quantum recoherence in the early universe, Europhys. Lett. 142, 69002 (2023).
  96. F. Treves, Topological Vector Spaces, Distributions and Kernels, Pure and Applied Mathematics (Academic Press, New York, 1967).
  97. R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson, Matrix Analysis, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2012).
  98. P. Freitas, Sharp bounds for the modulus and phase of Hankel functions with applications to Jaeger integrals, Math. Comput. 87, 289 (2018).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 113, 065001– Published 2 March, 2026
  • Received 5 December 2025
  • Accepted 15 January 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation