Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

X-rays emission: A novel tool to detect extensive air showers

Rodrigo Alberto Torres Saavedra*, Caterina Trimarelli, and Roberto Aloisio

John F. Krizmanic

Johannes Eser

Austin Cummings

  • *Contact author: rodrigo.torressaavedra@gssi.it

Phys. Rev. D 113, 123067 – Published 29 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/qnlg-4vnd

Abstract

We investigate the feasibility of detecting extensive air showers via their geo-synchrotron x-ray emission from high-altitude platforms. Starting from first principles, we derive a differential expression for the number of emitted photons per unit grammage and photon energy for an ensemble of gyrating shower electrons. The calculation uses noted parametrizations of the electron state variable distributions in the shower to establish a scale for the photon footprint and, further, takes into account the propagation of emitted photons in the atmosphere. The computed fluxes at the position of the detector are used to estimate the detector acceptance and event rate using a bootstrap Monte-Carlo procedure. For a 1 m-radius, 70° half-aperture circular detector at an altitude between 20 km to 30 km viewing the Earth’s limb, we find acceptances at the O(1  m2 sr) level and integral event rates of O(10) per month. These results indicate that x-ray geo-synchrotron emission is a promising, complimentary channel for high-altitude indirect cosmic ray detection in the PeV regime.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (51)

  1. Multiple Messengers and Challenges in Astroparticle Physics, edited by R. Aloisio, E. Coccia, and F. Vissani (Springer, Cham, 2018).
  2. M. Ackermann et al., High-energy and ultra-high-energy neutrinos: A snowmass white paper, J. High Energy Astrophys. 36, 55 (2022).
  3. R. Aloisio, Acceleration and propagation of ultra high energy cosmic rays, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2017, 12A102 (2017).
  4. A. Coleman et al., Ultra high energy cosmic rays The intersection of the cosmic and energy frontiers, Astropart. Phys. 149, 102819 (2023).
  5. R. Aloisio, P. Blasi, I. De Mitri, and S. Petrera, Selected topics in cosmic ray physics, in Multiple Messengers and Challenges in Astroparticle Physics, edited by R. Aloisio, E. Coccia, and F. Vissani (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 2018), pp. 1–95.
  6. C. Guépin, R. Aloisio, L. A. Anchordoqui, A. Cummings, J. F. Krizmanic, A. V. Olinto, M. H. Reno, and T. M. Venters, Indirect dark matter searches at ultrahigh energy neutrino detectors, Phys. Rev. D 104, 083002 (2021).
  7. R. Aloisio, A. Ambrosone, and C. Evoli, Constraining super-heavy dark matter with the KM3-230213A neutrino event, Phys. Rev. D 113, 043024 (2026).
  8. R. Aloisio and F. Tortorici, Super heavy dark matter and UHECR anisotropy at low energy, Astropart. Phys. 29, 307 (2008).
  9. M. G. Aartsen et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Cosmic ray spectrum from 250 TeV to 10 PeV using IceTop, Phys. Rev. D 102, 122001 (2020).
  10. F. Varsi, Cosmic ray energy and composition measurements with GRAPES-3 and other experiments, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 234, 5021 (2025).
  11. R. U. Abbasi et al. (Telescope Array Collaboration), The cosmic-ray composition between 2 PeV and 2 EeV observed with the TALE detector in monocular mode, Astrophys. J. 909, 178 (2021).
  12. Z. Cao et al. (LHAASO Collaboration), Measurements of all-particle energy spectrum and mean logarithmic mass of cosmic rays from 0.3 to 30 PeV with LHAASO-KM2A, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 131002 (2024).
  13. A. A. Halim et al. (Pierre Auger Collaboration), Constraining models for the origin of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays with a novel combined analysis of arrival directions, spectrum, and composition data measured at the Pierre Auger Observatory, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2024) 022.
  14. F. Salamida (Pierre Auger Collaboration), Highlights from the Pierre Auger Observatory, Proc. Sci., ICRC2023 (2023) 016 [arXiv:2312.14673].
  15. T. Abu-Zayyad et al. (Telescope Array Collaboration), The surface detector array of the telescope array experiment, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 689, 87 (2013).
  16. W. D. Apel et al., KASCADE-Grande measurements of energy spectra for elemental groups of cosmic rays, Astropart. Phys. 47, 54 (2013).
  17. M. G. Aartsen et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Cosmic ray spectrum and composition from PeV to EeV using 3 years of data from IceTop and IceCube, Phys. Rev. D 100, 082002 (2019).
  18. P. Lipari and S. Vernetto, The shape of the cosmic ray proton spectrum, Astropart. Phys. 120, 102441 (2020).
  19. D. R. Bergman et al. (Pierre Auger and Telescope Array Collaborations), Updated comparison of the UHECR energy spectra measured by the Pierre Auger Observatory and the telescope array, Proc. Sci. ICRC2025 (2025) 381 [arXiv:2509.05530].
  20. A. Abdul Halim et al. (Pierre Auger, Telescope Array Collaboration), Depth of maximum of air-shower profiles: Testing the compatibility of the measurements at the Pierre Auger Observatory and the telescope array, Proc. Sci. ICRC2023 (2023) 249.
  21. J. Eser, A. V. Olinto, and L. Wiencke (JEM-EUSO Collaboration), Overview and first results of EUSO-SPB2, Proc. Sci. ICRC2023 (2023) 397 [arXiv:2308.15693].
  22. Q. Abarr et al. (PUEO Collaboration), The payload for ultrahigh energy observations (PUEO): A white paper, J. Instrum. 16, P08035 (2021).
  23. J. B. Heibges (JEM-EUSO Collaboration), POEMMA-balloon with radio: Mission overview, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 3053, 012012 (2025).
  24. P. Colin, A. Chukanov, V. Grebenyuk, D. Naumov, P. Nedelec, Y. Nefedov, A. Onofre, S. Porokhovoi, B. Sabirov, and L. Tkatchev, Measurement of air and nitrogen fluorescence light yields induced by electron beam for UHECR experiments, Astropart. Phys. 27, 317 (2007).
  25. A. Cummings, R. Aloisio, J. Eser, and J. Krizmanic, Modeling the optical Cherenkov signals by cosmic ray extensive air showers directly observed from suborbital and orbital altitudes, Phys. Rev. D 104, 063029 (2021).
  26. A. L. Cummings, R. Aloisio, and J. F. Krizmanic, Modeling of the tau and muon neutrino-induced optical Cherenkov signals from upward-moving extensive air showers, Phys. Rev. D 103, 043017 (2021).
  27. M. Tueros, S. Cabana-Freire, and J. Álvarez-Muñiz, Radio emission from atmosphere-skimming cosmic ray showers in high-altitude balloon-borne experiments, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2025) 112.
  28. M. J. Tueros, Simulation of radiopulses from atmosphere-skimming extensive air showers with ZHAireS-RASPASS, Proc. Sci. ARENA2022 (2023) 056.
  29. J. F. Krizmanic, A. L. Cummings, F. A. B. Garcia, and J. W. Mitchell, Extensive Air Shower (EAS) development in the upper atmosphere: A unique environment to measure the EAS properties, Proc. Sci., ICRC2023 (2023) 524.
  30. G. B. Rybicki and A. P. Lightman, Radiative Processes in Astrophysics (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2024).
  31. K. C. Westfold, The polarization of synchrotron radiation, Astrophys. J. 130, 241 (1959).
  32. R. Aloisio and P. Blasi, Theory of synchrotron radiation. 1. Coherent emission from ensembles of particles, Astropart. Phys. 18, 183 (2002).
  33. U. S. Atmosphere, US Standard Atmosphere (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington DC, USA, 1976).
  34. J.-M. Alameddine et al. (CORSIKA Collaboration), Overview of the CORSIKA 8 astroparticle simulation framework, Proc. Sci., ICRC2025 (2025) 371.
  35. P. Lipari, The concepts of ‘age’ and ‘universality’ in cosmic ray showers, Phys. Rev. D 79, 063001 (2009).
  36. D. Heck, J. Knapp, J. N. Capdevielle, G. Schatz, and T. Thouw, CORSIKA: A Monte Carlo code to simulate extensive air showers, Technical Report No. FZKA 6019, 1998.
  37. J. Alvarez-Muñiz, W. R. Carvalho, A. L. Cummings, K. Payet, A. Romero-Wolf, H. Schoorlemmer, and E. Zas, Comprehensive approach to tau-lepton production by high-energy tau neutrinos propagating through the Earth, Phys. Rev. D 97, 023021 (2018); 99, 069902(E) (2019).
  38. F. Nerling, J. Bluemer, R. Engel, and M. Risse, Universality of electron distributions in high-energy air showers: Description of Cherenkov light production, Astropart. Phys. 24, 421 (2006).
  39. A. M. Hillas, Angular and energy distributions of charged particles in electron-photon cascades in air, J. Phys. G 8, 1461 (1982).
  40. M. Giller, G. Wieczorek, A. Kacperczyk, H. Stojek, and W. Tkaczyk, Energy spectra of electrons in the extensive air showers of ultra-high energy, J. Phys. G 30, 97 (2004).
  41. M. Berger, J. Hubbell, S. Seltzer, J. Coursey, and D. Zucker, Xcom: Photon cross section database (version 1.5) (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 1999), http://physics.nist.gov/xcom.
  42. M. Kalos and J. Blatt, The angular distribution of high energy electrons in air showers. I. Landau approximation, Aust. J. Phys. 7, 543 (1954).
  43. S. Lafebre, R. Engel, H. Falcke, J. Horandel, T. Huege, J. Kuijpers, and R. Ulrich, Universality of electron-positron distributions in extensive air showers, Astropart. Phys. 31, 243 (2009).
  44. D. Bergman, An efficient technique for the reconstruction of extensive air showers using nonimaging Cherenkov measurements, in 33rd International Cosmic Ray Conference (Sociedade Brasileira de Fisica (SBF), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2013), p. 0983.
  45. K. Kamata and J. Nishimura, The lateral and the angular structure functions of electron showers, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 6, 93 (1958).
  46. K. Greisen, Cosmic ray showers, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 10, 63 (1960).
  47. J. Sullivan, Geometric factor and directional response of single and multi-element particle telescopes, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 95, 5 (1971).
  48. C. J. Crannell and J. F. Ormes, Geometrical-factor determination using a Monte Carlo approach, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 94, 179 (1971).
  49. J. C. Ling, A semiempirical model for atmospheric γ rays from 0.3 to 10 MeV at λ=40°, J. Geophys. Res. (1896–1977) 80, 3241 (1975).
  50. M. Schubnell et al., The cosmic ray electron synchrotron telescope (CREST) experiment, in 30th International Cosmic Ray Conference (Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City, Mexico, 2007), Vol. 2, pp. 305–308.
  51. S. Coutu et al., Searching for TeV cosmic electrons with the CREST experiment, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 215, 250 (2011).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation